Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Original investigation
  • Open Access

The role of obesity in carotid plaque instability: interaction with age, gender, and cardiovascular risk factors

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 3, 4, 5,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 6,
  • 7,
  • 1,
  • 6 and
  • 2Email author
Contributed equally
Cardiovascular Diabetology201817:46

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-018-0685-0

  • Received: 9 January 2018
  • Accepted: 10 March 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

In the last decade, several studies have reported an unexpected and seemingly paradoxical inverse correlation between BMI and incidence of cardiovascular diseases. This so called “obesity paradox effect” has been mainly investigated through imaging methods instead of histologic evaluation, which is still the best method to study the instability of carotid plaque. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to evaluate by histology the role of obesity in destabilization of carotid plaques and the interaction with age, gender and other major cerebrovascular risk factors.

Methods

A total of 390 carotid plaques from symptomatic and asymptomatic patients submitted to endarterectomy, for whom complete clinical and laboratory assessment of major cardiovascular risk factors was available, were studied by histology. Patients with a BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2 were considered as obese. Data were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression and for each variable in the equation the estimated odds ratio (OR) was calculated.

Results

Unstable carotid plaque OR for obese patients with age < 70 years was 5.91 (95% CI 1.17–29.80), thus being the highest OR compared to that of other risk factors. Unstable carotid plaque OR decreased to 4.61 (95% CI 0.54–39.19) in males ≥ 70 years, being only 0.93 (95% CI 0.25–3.52) among women. When obesity featured among metabolic syndrome risk factors, the OR for plaque destabilization was 3.97 (95% CI 1.81–6.22), a significantly higher value compared to OR in non-obese individuals with metabolic syndrome (OR = 1.48; 95% CI 0.86–2.31). Similar results were obtained when assessing the occurrence of acute cerebrovascular symptoms.

Conclusions

Results from our study appear to do not confirm any paradoxical effect of obesity on the carotid artery district. Conversely, obesity is confirmed to be an independent risk factor for carotid plaque destabilization, particularly in males aged < 70 years, significantly increasing such risk among patients with metabolic syndrome.

Keywords

  • Obesity
  • Stroke
  • Carotid
  • Histology
  • Metabolic syndrome
  • Age
  • Gender

Introduction

Obesity is often accompanied by other comorbidities increasing the risk of atherosclerosis, particularly hypertension, dyslipidemia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus, the combination of which is observed in the metabolic syndrome [1, 2]. Despite this mechanistic evidence, the role of obesity as a significant risk factor for development of clinically manifest cardiovascular disease [24] is still controversial with both positive and neutral studies [5, 6]. More recently, several studies underlined the so-called “obesity survival paradox” in patients suffering from acute myocardial infarction [2, 79]. An analogous paradoxical influence of obesity was also demonstrated in an autopsy study on the aortic district [10].

The influence of obesity on atherosclerotic disease in the carotid district is still unclear. While obesity is regarded as a well-established risk factor for stroke [1114], some studies reported significantly lower mortality rates in stroke patients with higher body mass index (BMI) values [1517]. Such conflicting evidence may be due to the fact that, in the carotid district, the atherosclerotic disease has been mainly investigated through imaging methods, instead of histologic evaluation. Nevertheless, histology is regarded as the gold standard for assessing the degree of atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability as well as the presence of cap rupture and acute luminal thrombosis, which is the major source of emboli in the cerebral circulation [1820]. Furthermore, it remains still unknown whether the pro- or anti-atherosclerotic effect of obesity may be affected by age, gender and other major cerebrovascular risk factors.

The main target for preventing ischemic cerebrovascular events is the identification of vulnerable plaques, prior to the onset of acute clinical symptoms. Thus, the evaluation of any correlation between obesity and plaque histologic features may be of significant clinical relevance. Here we show results from a clinicopathological evaluation of the role of obesity in the destabilization of carotid plaques and development of cerebrovascular events.

Materials and methods

Case selection

A total of 390 carotid specimens from the Interinstitutional Carotid Tissue Bank (ICTB) [18] were studied; carotid samples were collected from 265 symptomatic patients (major stroke or transient ischemic attack; 67.9%) and 125 asymptomatic patients (32.1%) underwent to surgical carotid endarterectomy (CEA) at the University of Rome Tor Vergata (Italy).

Among symptomatic patients, only those diagnosed with thrombo-embolism due to carotid atherosclerosis were included, whereas patients referred to any other cause of thrombo-embolism assessed by clinical examination and imaging were excluded. Specifically, cerebral CT scan study and angiographic examination of extra and intracranial carotid arteries and their branches were performed as routine pre-operative evaluation in all patients. Exclusion factors from the study were: (1) a possible cardiac source of embolization (rhythm disorders, recent myocardial infarction, stenosis, prolapse or calcification of mitral valve, left ventricular thrombus, mechanical cardiac valves, atrial myxoma, endocarditis, dilated cardiomyopathy, a patent foramen ovale), (2) stenosis greater than 50% of Willis circle.

All asymptomatic patients showed a carotid stenosis of at least 60%. For each patient, one carotid sample was collected. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects enrolled in this study. Study protocol adhered to ethical guidelines of the 2000 Declaration of Helsinki and was granted an a priori approval by the IRBs of our Institution.

Risk factors

Patients with a BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2 were considered as obese, as defined by the American Heart Association (AHA) criteria [13]. Additional cardiovascular risk factors were defined as follows: (a) hypertension: systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg and/or a diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg corresponding to stage 1 of JNC7 [21] and stage 2 of 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines [22]. Any patient under previous treatment with antihypertensive drugs was considered as being included under the diagnosis of hypertension; (b) diabetes mellitus: fasting blood glucose > 126 mg/dL and/or oral glucose-lowering treatment and/or insulin therapy; (c) smoke: patients with tobacco dependence as well as those who had stopped smoking for < 5 years; (d) metabolic syndrome, as defined in the AHA scientific statement [1]. In order to evaluate the dyslipidemia [23] low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was calculated by the Friedewald equation [24]: LDL-C = cholesterol – [HDL-C + (triglycerides/5)]. A value of LDL-C of > 100 mg/dL was utilized as cut-off between high and low levels. Treatment with statins was also used as a criterion for inclusion in this category.

Histology

Sampling and histological methods have been previously reported [18, 25, 26]. Intraoperatively, carotid plaques were removed in block, immediately fixed in 10% buffered formalin, transversely cut every 5 mm, paraffin-embedded, and stained with hematoxylin–eosin and Movat stain. The entire plaque was evaluated by histology.

Plaques were classified into two categories according to the modified AHA atherosclerosis classification [27]: stable plaques and unstable plaques. Unstable plaques included those with cap rupture associated with acute thrombosis or with organized thrombi as well as vulnerable plaques or thin-cap fibroatheromas (TCFAs), the latter being characterized by the presence of a fibrous cap < 165 µm-thick and a marked infiltration by CD68 positive macrophages (at least 25/hpf), with no plaque rupture. Stable plaques included fibroatheromatous plaques with thick fibrous caps (> 165 µm) associated with the presence of calcification and a variable necrotic core [28], as well as healed plaques, defined as those showing multilayers of fibrous tissue.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill) software. Continuous variables were expressed as the mean ± SD. The normal distribution of the data was assessed by the Shapiro–Wilk test. Continuous variables were compared using the independent Student t-test or the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Categorical data were analysed using the Chi square test or the Fisher exact test.

Multivariate analysis using stepwise logistic regression (using the “enter” method for variable selection) was utilized to identify independent risk factors which significantly correlate with the presence of cerebrovascular symptoms (symptomatics vs. asymptomatics) or with an unstable carotid plaque. Multivariate analysis was performed in two models. One model was adjusted for the following parameters: age, gender and all the risk factors associated to metabolic syndrome (hypertension, diabetes, smoking habit, dyslipidemia (LDL-C), obesity. A second model was adjusted for age, gender, smoking habit, high cholesterol levels and metabolic syndrome, with or without obesity.

For each of the independent variables in the model, logistic regression was also used to estimate the coefficient (B), the estimated odds ratio (OR) [exp(B)] and the 95% confidence interval for exp(B) The statistical analyses were performed considering (a) all patients, (b) the male and female subgroups, (c) two cohorts of male patients divided according to the value of the median of age, i.e. 70 years.

A 2-tailed p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline data

As shown in Table 1, the mean age of the study population at the time of CEA was 69.8 ± 7.2 years; 273 (70.0%) were male and 117 female (30.0%); 265 patients (67.9%) suffered ipsilateral major stroke or TIA (31.9%), while 125 (32.1%) were asymptomatic individuals who underwent CEA for high grade carotid stenosis.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients

 

All cases

Symptomatic patients

Asymptomatic, patients

Symptomatics vs. asymptomatics

N = 390

N = 265

N = 125

p

Age, mean (SD)

69.80 (7.21)

70.11 (7.39)

69.17 (6.80)

0.23

Gender

 M

273 (70.0%)

117 (30.0%)

194 (73.2%)

0.04

 F

71 (26.8%)

79 (63.2%)

46 (36.8%)

 

Obesity

43 (11.0%)

37 (14.0%)

6 (4.8%)

0.007

Hypertension

271 (69.5%)

198 (74.7%)

73 (58.4%)

0.001

Diabetes

94 (24.1%)

65 (24.5%)

29 (23.2%)

0.77

Smoking habit

227 (58.2%)

152 (57.4%)

75 (60.0%)

0.62

Dyslipidemia (high LDL-C)

257 (65.9%)

185 (69.8%)

72 (57.6%)

0.02

Metabolic syndrome

123 (31.6%)

93 (35.2%)

30 (24.0%)

0.03

Drugs

 Statins

147 (37.7%)

101 (38.1%)

46 (36.8%)

0.80

 Diuretics

223 (57.2%)

158 (59.6%)

65 (52.0%)

0.16

Previous myocardial infarction/unstable angina

52 (13.3%)

37 (14.0%)

15 (12.0%)

0.59

Histological type of carotid plaque

 Stable plaques

137 (35.1%)

51 (19.2%)

86 (68.8%)

0.001

 Unstable plaques

253 (64.9%)

214 (80.8%)

39 (31.2%)

 

  Ruptured/thrombotic

123 (45.5%)

123 (45.5%)

0

 

  TCFA

72 (18.5%)

33 (12.5%)

39 (31.2%)

 

  Thrombus in organization

58 (14.9%)

58 (14.9%)

0

 

All patients had at least one risk factor. Hypertension (in 69.5% of cases) and dyslipidemia (in 65.9% of patients) were the risk factors most frequently observed. In particular, 43 patients (11.0%) showed a BMI > 30 kg/m2 (obesity). Metabolic syndrome was observed in 123 cases (31.5%) and in 39 of these obesity constituted one of its components. Treatment with statins and diuretics was administered to 37.7 and 57.2% of patients, respectively. All patients in the post-operative and follow-up periods were treated with aspirin (100 md/die).

The histological examination showed in 253 patients (64.9%) the presence of unstable plaque (with acute thrombosis and/or TCFA), whereas in 137 (35.1%) the presence of the stable one (Fig. 1). Unstable plaques were significantly associated with the presence of symptoms (p = 0.001) (Table 1). The only unstable plaques observed in the asymptomatic group were represented by TCFAs.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Carotid plaque histology. a A stable fibroatheromatous plaque constituted by a large lipidic-necrotic core covered by a thick fibrous cap consisting principally of smooth muscle cells with few macrophages and T lymphocytes (Movat stain, 2×). b A stable plaque consisting mainly of fibrous tissue associated to the presence of calcifications (Movat stain, 2×). c An unstable ulcerated plaque characterized by a large disruption of the fibrous cap whereby the overlying acute thrombosis is in continuity with the underlying necrotic core (Movat stain, 1.5×). d An unstable plaque with an acute thrombus in organization (Movat stain, 4×). Cap fibrous cap, Ath atheroma or lipid necrotic core, Cal calcification, Th acute thrombus

Correlation among risk factors, symptoms and type of plaque

Univariate analysis reported in Table 2 demonstrated that obesity (p = 0.006), gender (p = 0.03), hypertension (p = 0.001) and dyslipidemia (p = 0.01) were the risk factors significantly correlated with the presence of unstable carotid plaques characterized by a high degree of inflammation, thinning and rupture of the cap associated with an acute thrombosis. In addition a significant correlation was also observed between the presence of the risk factors mentioned above and the presence of symptoms (Table 1).
Table 2

Correlation between risk factors and type of carotid plaques in all cases

 

Unstable plaques

Stable plaques

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

N = 253

N = 137

p

p

OR (95% CI)

1st model

 Age, mean (SD)

70.0 (7.3)

69.4 (7.0)

0.90

0.20

0.98 (0.95–1.01)

 Gender

  M

187 (73.9%)

86 (62.8%)

0.03

0.007

1.96 (1.20–3.18)

  F

66 (26.1%)

51 (37.2%)

   

 Hypertension

200 (79.1.5%)

71 (51.8%)

0.001

0.001

0.29 (0.18–0.47)

 Diabetes

63 (24.9%)

31 (22.6%)

0.71

0.97

1.01 (0.59–1.72)

 Smoking habit

145 (57.3%)

82 (59.9%)

0.67

0.19

1.37 (0.85–2.20)

 Dyslipidemia (high LDL-C)

178 (70.4%)

79 (57.7%)

0.01

0.05

0.63 (0.39–1.01)

 Obesity

36 (14.2%)

7 (5.1%)

0.006

0.03

2.58 (1.08–6.19)

2nd model

 Metabolic syndrome

96 (38.1%)

27 (19.7%)

0.001

0.001

2.55 (1.61–4.90)

 Metabolic syndrome without obesity

62 (24.5%)

21 (15.3%)

0.006

0.006

1.48 (0.86–2.31)

 Metabolic syndrome with obesity

33 (13.0%)

6 (4.4%)

0.001

0.003

3.97 (1.81–6.22)

Multivariate analysis confirmed these results and showed an OR (increased risk of having an unstable plaque) of 2.58 (95% CI 1.08–6.19) for obesity. When the presence of metabolic syndrome was considered in the multivariate analysis, the latter had a highly significant independent effect (p = 0.001) with an OR of 2.55 (95% CI 1.61–4.90). If we considered patients with metabolic syndrome and obesity, the value of OR increased to 3.97 (95% CI 1.81–6.22) compared to the value of 1.48 (95% CI 0.86–2.31) when obesity was not included in the metabolic syndrome (Table 2).

Similar results were obtained when the presence of cerebrovascular clinical symptoms, and not the histological finding of unstable plaques, was considered as the dependent variable in the uni- and multivariate analysis (Table 3). Patients with BMI > 30 and metabolic syndrome were those at highest risk, with an OR of 3.15 (95% CI 1.85–5.10) (Table 3).
Table 3

Correlation between risk factors and cerebrovascular symptoms

 

Asymptomatic patients

Symptomatic patients

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

N = 125

N = 265

p

p

OR (95% CI)

1st model

 Age, mean (SD)

70.0 (7.3)

69.4 (7.0)

0.90

0.11

1.03 (0.99–1.06)

 Gender

  M

79 (63.2%)

194 (73.2%)

0.06

0.02

0.57 (0.35–0.92)

  F

46 (36.8%)

71 (28.8%)

   

 Hypertension

73 (58.4%)

198 (74.7%)

0.001

0.004

1.98 (1.24–3.17)

 Diabetes

29 (23.2%)

65 (24.5%)

0.80

0.86

0.96 (0.56–1.62)

 Smoking habit

75 (60.0%)

152 (57.4%)

0.66

0.31

0.78 (0.49–1.25)

 Dyslipidemia (high LDL-C)

72 (57.6%)

185 (69.8%)

0.02

0.04

1.64 (1.03–2.61)

 Obesity

6 (4.8%)

37 (14.0%)

0.006

0.02

0.34 (0.14–0.86)

2nd model

 Metabolic syndrome

30 (24.0%)

93 (35.2%)

0.03

0.04

1.71 (1.05–3.04)

 Metabolic syndrome without obesity

24 (20.2%)

61 (26.3%)

0.24

0.26

1.17 (0.71–1.88)

 Metabolic syndrome with obesity

6 (5.9%)

33 (16.2%)

0.01

0.01

3.15 (1.85–5.10)

Correlation among risk factors, gender and type of plaque

A separate analysis was performed in male and female patients, as reported in Table 4.
Table 4

Correlation between risk factors and type of carotid plaques in male and female patients

 

Male patients

Female patients

Unstable plaques

Stable plaques

Multivariate analysis

Unstable plaques

Stable plaques

Multivariate analysis

N = 187

N = 86

p

OR (95% CI)

N = 66

N = 51

p

OR (95% CI)

Age, mean (SD)

70.4 (7.2)

68.8 (6.9)

0.03

0.96 (0.92–1.00)

70.5 (7.31)

69.7 (7.44)

0.42

1.02 (0.97–1.08)

Hypertension

146 (78.1%)

43 (50.0%)

0.001

0.27 (0.15–0.49)

54 (81.8%)

28 (54.9%)

0.005

0.29 (0.12–0.69)

Diabetes

45 (24.1%)

20 (23.3%)

0.68

1.15 (0.59–2.23)

18 (27.3%)

11 (21.6%)

0.65

0.81 (0.32–2.04)

Smoking habit

117 (62.6%)

58 (67.4%)

0.19

1.50 (0.82–2.75)

28 (42.9%)

24 (47.1%)

0.54

1.20 (0.58–2.85)

Dyslipidemia (high LDL-C)

128 (68.4%)

46 (53.5%)

0.06

0.58 (0.32–1.07)

50 (75.8%)

33 (64.7%)

0.43

0.71 (0.30–1.66)

Obesity

28 (15.0%)

3 (3.5%)

0.01

5.06 (1.42–18.11)

8 (12.1%)

4 (7.8%)

0.92

0.93 (0.25–3.52)

For male patients the risk factors significantly associated with the presence of unstable carotid plaques were: age (p = 0.03), hypertension (p = 0.001) and obesity (p = 0.01). However, obesity showed the higher OR (= 5.06, 95% CI 1.42–18.11) as compared to those of other risk factors.

In the female patients obesity was not significantly associated to the presence of unstable plaques (p = 0.92). In this subgroup of patients only hypertension was predictive of carotid plaque instability (p = 0.005).

Since in male patients age was an independent risk factor for carotid plaque instability, a different analysis was performed considering (a) male patients with < 70 years and (b) those with ≥ 70 years, value corresponding to the median value of age (Table 5). In patients aged < 70 years obesity showed the highest value of OR observed in all the analyses performed, with a value of 5.91 (95% CI 1.17–29.80). In aged patients (≥ 70 years) the value of OR decreased to 4.61 (95% CI 0.54–39.19).
Table 5

Effect of age in the correlation between risk factors, gender and type of plaques

 

Male patients < 70 years

Male patients ≥ 70 years

Unstable plaques

Stable plaques

Multivariate analysis

Unstable plaques

Stable plaques

Multivariate analysis

N = 84

N = 48

p

OR (95% CI)

N = 103

N = 38

p

OR (95% CI)

Hypertension

67 (79.8%)

25 (52.1%)

0.02

0.27 (0.12–0.63)

79 (76.7%)

18 (47.4%)

0.002

0.27 (0.12–0.62)

Diabetes

24 (28.6%)

14 (29.2%)

0.52

1.34 (0.55–3.30)

21 (20.4%)

6 (15.8%)

0.90

0.93 (0.32–2.71)

Smoking habit

63 (75.0%)

34 (70.8%)

0.88

1.07 (0.44–2.59)

54 (52.4%)

24 (63.2%)

0.12

1.97 (0.84–4.58)

Dyslipidemia (high LDL-C)

65 (77.4%)

26 (54.2%)

0.04

0.42 (0.18–0.95)

63 (61.2%)

20 (52.6%)

0.86

4.57 (0.38–1.97)

Obesity

16 (19.0%)

2 (4.2%)

0.03

5.91 (1.17–29.80)

12 (11.7%)

1 (2.6%)

0.16

4.61 (0.54–39.19)

Discussion

Results reported in this study support the role of obesity as an independent risk factor for carotid plaque destabilization among male patients < 70 years-old, while in older patients and women the effect of obesity appears to be less consistent. Indeed, among patients with BMI > 30 g/m2 and age < 70 years, OR for unstable carotid was 5.91 (95% CI 1.17–29.80), the highest OR compared to that of other risk factors. OR for unstable carotid plaque decreased to 4.61 (95% CI 0.54–39.19) in males ≥ 70 years (Table 5), whereas it resulted 0.93 (95% CI 0.25–3.52) in the women group (Table 4).

Various clinical studies reported a significant association between obesity and risk of stroke, independently from the presence of other known cardiovascular risk factors [1114]. Indeed, patients with a BMI in the 25–50 kg/m2 range were shown in the Prospective Studies Collaboration (involving 900,000 patients) to have a 40% increased mortality from stroke [29]. Accordingly, the AHA recommends weight reduction in overweight (BMI = 25–29 kg/m2) and obese (BMI > 30 kg/m2) individuals, in order to reduce the risk of stroke [13].

The present study not only assessed the correlation between obesity and the occurrence of cerebrovascular symptoms, but also evaluated any association of obesity with the degree of atherosclerotic changes within carotids through histologic analysis of carotid plaques. Importantly, one of the targets of stroke prevention is the identification of plaques at high risk for rupture and thrombosis, i.e. so-called “vulnerable or unstable plaques” [18, 27]. Anatomic and clinical studies have demonstrated that acute cerebrovascular events are pathogenetically related to thrombosis and rupture of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques, rather than to severity of stenosis [18, 27, 30]. To this end, many efforts have been recently made using non-invasive techniques aimed at identifying high risk plaques prone to rupture and thrombosis [3134].

Results from our study support the negative impact of obesity in influencing other known risk factors for cardiovascular disease, increasing the risk of cerebrovascular disease and carotid plaque instability among patients with metabolic syndrome. As shown in Table 2, when obesity featured among metabolic syndrome risk factors, OR for plaque destabilization was 3.97 (95% CI 1.81–6.22), a significantly higher value compared to OR in non-obese individuals with metabolic syndrome (= 1.48, 95% CI 0.86–2.31). Similar results were obtained when assessing the occurrence of acute cerebrovascular symptoms (Table 3).

The observation that obesity represents an independent risk factor of plaque vulnerability only in male patients as supported by histological analysis corroborates data from both a recent large meta-analysis [35] and a duplex ultrasound study performed on 1686 patients with cerebrovascular disease [36]. Additionally, in another previous histological study performed on 457 CEA specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, our group had already observed that women had a significant lower prevalence of thrombotic plaques, as well as smaller necrotic core and hemorrhage extension [37]. Gender-related differences in cardio- and cerebrovascular disease have been extensively demonstrated [36, 3840]. Sex hormones seem to favor plaque stabilization, through their influence on endothelial function, lipid homeostasis, and inflammation. Several authors have hypothesized an age-dependent effect of estrogens, with a significant reduction of plaque inflammation being observed only in younger patients [38, 41]. Notwithstanding, results of this as well as previous studies from our group [37] appear to show that also among post-menopausal women estrogens seem to have a stabilizing and protective effect on carotid arteries, as demonstrated by a significant lower number of inflammatory cells including macrophagic foam cells within the plaque cap of females as compared to men.

Obesity and incidence of cardio and cerebrovascular diseases

In the last decade, several studies have reported an unexpected and seemingly paradoxical inverse correlation between BMI and incidence of cardiovascular disease. Extensive clinical data from patients with congestive heart failure and ischemic heart disease seem to support the hypothesis that overweight and obese individuals benefit from a more favorable short- and long-term prognosis [2, 79]. These results have been corroborated by autopsy-related and histologic data revealing a lower incidence of coronary atherosclerosis in obese decedents [42, 43]. According to Brodsky et al. [10] morbid obesity seems to exert a protective effect also against developing severe aortic atherosclerosis, even if the pathogenetic mechanisms for such observation are yet to be explained.

On the contrary, other clinical studies failed to show the protective effects of obesity. The LEADER trial demonstrated a prevalence and cardiometabolic impact of obesity in cardiovascular high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [44]. In addition, the Partners registry has demonstrated that compared to normal BMI there was an increased burden of CAD for BMI > 25 kg/m2 [45]. According to these data, the results of our study do not seem to confirm such paradoxical effect of obesity on the cerebral circulation, especially in the cohort of male patients with an age < 70 years; additionally, a neutral influence seems to exist among female patients (Table 4).

The discrepancy between our results and those obtained with a similar methodology in other vascular districts could be due to the fact that our study did not include the general population, but was rather limited to patients undergoing CEA due to symptomatic disease or presence of a carotid stenosis > 60%. Accordingly, our study did not evaluate the absolute incidence of atherosclerotic disease, but rather was focused on the unstable atherosclerotic plaque since it represents the target for prevention studies.

Obesity and aging

Another significant clinical result from our study is the observation that risk of carotid plaque destabilization in obese patients is linked to age. Indeed, OR was highest in male patients aged < 70 years. It was not possible to evaluate whether the risk increased in even younger patients as in our cases only 38 individuals were younger than 60 years. Despite this limitation, our results confirm data from other clinical studies reporting an inverse age-dependent association of BMI with all-cause mortality risk, including stroke mortality [14, 46]. In this context, the Global BMI Mortality Collaboration study recently reported a detailed analysis about the correlation between BMI and all-cause mortality, including atherosclerotic disease, showing that BMI was greater in younger than older people and in men than women [47]. Furthermore, prevention of hypertension, obesity, and diabetes in patients aged 44–56 years may substantially prolong heart failure-free survival and decrease heart failure-related morbidity [48, 49].

Study limitations

Another possible limitation of our study is the criterion used to define obesity, since BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, or waist circumference have been employed to evaluate the presence of obesity in different studies. Data in the literature in this regard are conflicting. According to some authors, abdominal body fat might represent a stronger predictor of stroke risk than BMI [50]. Other studies reported that only BMI was significantly associated with stroke in male patients, whereas for female individuals the ideal criterion to define obesity appeared to be waist-to-hip ratio [51]. In our study the AHA definition of obesity was used [13], as we believe that BMI appears to be the most frequent anthropometric index employed to measure the obesity in the available literature [52, 53].

Moreover, mixing the whole patient population (symptomatic and asymptomatic) may have determined a bias in the results, since patients who already had a stroke also presented a different risk factor profile overall. It was not possible to perform separately the multivariate statistical analysis in the group of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients as the latter was only constituted of 125 cases with only 6 obese, 4 with TCFA and 2 with stable plaques. To overcome this limitation we evaluated the possible correlation of obesity with the instability of the carotid plaque which represents the true target for stroke prevention.

Conclusions

In sum, the results from our study appear to do not confirm any paradoxical effect of obesity on the carotid artery district. Conversely, obesity is confirmed to be an independent risk factor for carotid plaque destabilization, particularly in males aged < 70 years, significantly increasing such risk among patients with metabolic syndrome.

Further studies are required to assess the clinical implications of our data. We may speculate, however, that gender, along with age and type of atherosclerotic lesions (as assessed by imaging techniques) should be taken into account for a precise risk-stratification of obese patients.

Notes

Abbreviations

BMI: 

body mass index

CEA: 

carotid endarterectomy

AHA: 

American Heart Association

OR: 

estimated odds ratio

95% CI: 

95% confidence interval

TCFA: 

thin-cap fibroatheroma

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

VR, LA, NDD, MF and AM: study conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data; MC. MS, AS, GS, EB, MM, IML, AI: acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not relevant.

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Study protocol adhered to ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and was granted an a priori approval by the IRBs of our Institution.

Funding

Not relevant.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Hypertension and Nephrology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
(2)
Anatomic Pathology, Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy
(3)
Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy
(4)
IRCCS San Raffaele, Via di Val Cannuta 247, 00166 Rome, Italy
(5)
OrchideaLab S.r.l, Via del Grecale 6, Morlupo, Rome, RM, Italy
(6)
Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
(7)
Vascular Surgery, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy

References

  1. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, Gordon DJ, Krauss RM, Savage PJ, Smith SC Jr, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation. 2005;112(17):2735–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lavie CJ, Milani RV, Ventura HO. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: risk factor, paradox, and impact of weight loss. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(21):1925–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ortega FB, Lavie CJ, Blair SN. Obesity and cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 2016;118(11):1752–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Pischon T, Boeing H, Hoffmann K, Bergmann M, Schulze MB, Overvad K, van der Schouw YT, Spencer E, Moons KG, Tjonneland A, et al. General and abdominal adiposity and risk of death in Europe. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(20):2105–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Wessel TR, Arant CB, Olson MB, Johnson BD, Reis SE, Sharaf BL, Shaw LJ, Handberg E, Sopko G, Kelsey SF, et al. Relationship of physical fitness vs body mass index with coronary artery disease and cardiovascular events in women. JAMA. 2004;292(10):1179–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Bautista L, Franzosi MG, Commerford P, Lang CC, Rumboldt Z, Onen CL, Lisheng L, et al. Obesity and the risk of myocardial infarction in 27,000 participants from 52 countries: a case–control study. Lancet. 2005;366(9497):1640–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Romero-Corral A, Montori VM, Somers VK, Korinek J, Thomas RJ, Allison TG, Mookadam F, Lopez-Jimenez F. Association of bodyweight with total mortality and with cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease: a systematic review of cohort studies. Lancet. 2006;368(9536):666–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Angeras O, Albertsson P, Karason K, Ramunddal T, Matejka G, James S, Lagerqvist B, Rosengren A, Omerovic E. Evidence for obesity paradox in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(5):345–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Oreopoulos A, Padwal R, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Fonarow GC, Norris CM, McAlister FA. Body mass index and mortality in heart failure: a meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2008;156(1):13–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Brodsky SV, Barth RF, Mo X, Yildiz V, Allenby P, Ivanov I, Moore S, Hitchcock CL, Smith S, Sachak T, et al. An obesity paradox: an inverse correlation between body mass index and atherosclerosis of the aorta. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2016;25(6):515–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kurth T, Gaziano JM, Rexrode KM, Kase CS, Cook NR, Manson JE, Buring JE. Prospective study of body mass index and risk of stroke in apparently healthy women. Circulation. 2005;111(15):1992–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Strazzullo P, D’Elia L, Cairella G, Garbagnati F, Cappuccio FP, Scalfi L. Excess body weight and incidence of stroke: meta-analysis of prospective studies with 2 million participants. Stroke. 2010;41(5):e418–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Meschia JF, Bushnell C, Boden-Albala B, Braun LT, Bravata DM, Chaturvedi S, Creager MA, Eckel RH, Elkind MS, Fornage M, et al. Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45(12):3754–832.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Mitchell AB, Cole JW, McArdle PF, Cheng YC, Ryan KA, Sparks MJ, Mitchell BD, Kittner SJ. Obesity increases risk of ischemic stroke in young adults. Stroke. 2015;46(6):1690–2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Ovbiagele B, Bath PM, Cotton D, Vinisko R, Diener HC. Obesity and recurrent vascular risk after a recent ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2011;42(12):3397–402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Vemmos K, Ntaios G, Spengos K, Savvari P, Vemmou A, Pappa T, Manios E, Georgiopoulos G, Alevizaki M. Association between obesity and mortality after acute first-ever stroke: the obesity–stroke paradox. Stroke. 2011;42(1):30–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Barba R, Marco J, Ruiz J, Canora J, Hinojosa J, Plaza S, Zapatero-Gaviria A. The obesity paradox in stroke: impact on mortality and short-term readmission. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(4):766–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Spagnoli LG, Mauriello A, Sangiorgi G, Fratoni S, Bonanno E, Schwartz RS, Piepgras DG, Pistolese R, Ippoliti A, Holmes DR Jr. Extracranial thrombotically active carotid plaque as a risk factor for ischemic stroke. JAMA. 2004;292(15):1845–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Golledge J, Greenhalgh RM, Davies AH. The symptomatic carotid plaque. Stroke. 2000;31(3):774–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mauriello A, Sangiorgi GM, Virmani R, Trimarchi S, Holmes DR Jr, Kolodgie FD, Piepgras DG, Piperno G, Liotti D, Narula J, et al. A pathobiologic link between risk factors profile and morphological markers of carotid instability. Atherosclerosis. 2010;208(2):572–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT Jr, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42(6):1206–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE Jr, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, DePalma SM, Gidding S, Jamerson KA, Jones DW, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006.Google Scholar
  23. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, Goldberg AC, Gordon D, Levy D, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129(25 Suppl 2):S1–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18(6):499–502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mauriello A, Servadei F, Sangiorgi G, Anemona L, Giacobbi E, Liotti D, Spagnoli LG. Asymptomatic carotid plaque rupture with unexpected thrombosis over a non-canonical vulnerable lesion. Atherosclerosis. 2011;218(2):356–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bischetti S, Scimeca M, Bonanno E, Federici M, Anemona L, Menghini R, Casella S, Cardellini M, Ippoliti A, Mauriello A. Carotid plaque instability is not related to quantity but to elemental composition of calcification. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;27(9):768–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Schwartz SM. Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20(5):1262–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mauriello A, Sangiorgi G, Virmani R, Servadei F, Trimarchi S, Holmes DR Jr, Kolodgie F, Biondi Zoccai G, Leuzzi C, Spagnoli LG. Evidence of a topographical link between unstable carotid plaques and luminal stenosis: can we better stratify asymptomatic patients with significant plaque burden? Int J Cardiol. 2012;155(2):309–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Whitlock G, Lewington S, Sherliker P, Clarke R, Emberson J, Halsey J, Qizilbash N, Collins R, Peto R. Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900,000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies. Lancet. 2009;373(9669):1083–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Redgrave JN, Lovett JK, Gallagher PJ, Rothwell PM. Histological assessment of 526 symptomatic carotid plaques in relation to the nature and timing of ischemic symptoms: the Oxford plaque study. Circulation. 2006;113(19):2320–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gupta A, Baradaran H, Schweitzer AD, Kamel H, Pandya A, Delgado D, Dunning A, Mushlin AI, Sanelli PC. Carotid plaque MRI and stroke risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2013;44(11):3071–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Huibers A, de Borst GJ, Wan S, Kennedy F, Giannopoulos A, Moll FL, Richards T. Non-invasive carotid artery imaging to identify the vulnerable plaque: current status and future goals. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;50(5):563–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Brinjikji W, Rabinstein AA, Lanzino G, Murad MH, Williamson EE, DeMarco JK, Huston J 3rd. ultrasound characteristics of symptomatic carotid plaques: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;40(3–4):165–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Fabiano S, Mancino S, Stefanini M, Chiocchi M, Mauriello A, Spagnoli LG, Simonetti G. High-resolution multicontrast-weighted MR imaging from human carotid endarterectomy specimens to assess carotid plaque components. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(12):2912–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Stoberock K, Debus ES, Atlihan G, Daum G, Larena-Avellaneda A, Eifert S, Wipper S. Gender differences in patients with carotid stenosis. Vasa. 2016;45(1):11–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Iemolo F, Martiniuk A, Steinman DA, Spence JD. Sex differences in carotid plaque and stenosis. Stroke. 2004;35(2):477–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sangiorgi G, Roversi S, Biondi Zoccai G, Modena MG, Servadei F, Ippoliti A, Mauriello A. Sex-related differences in carotid plaque features and inflammation. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(2):338–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Manson JE, Hsia J, Johnson KC, Rossouw JE, Assaf AR, Lasser NL, Trevisan M, Black HR, Heckbert SR, Detrano R, et al. Estrogen plus progestin and the risk of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(6):523–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Maric-Bilkan C, Arnold AP, Taylor DA, Dwinell M, Howlett SE, Wenger N, Reckelhoff JF, Sandberg K, Churchill G, Levin E, et al. Report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group on Sex Differences Research in Cardiovascular Disease: scientific questions and challenges. Hypertension. 2016;67(5):802–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Arnold AP, Cassis LA, Eghbali M, Reue K, Sandberg K. Sex hormones and sex chromosomes cause sex differences in the development of cardiovascular diseases. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017;37(5):746–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Xing D, Nozell S, Chen YF, Hage F, Oparil S. Estrogen and mechanisms of vascular protection. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29(3):289–95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Kortelainen ML. Myocardial infarction and coronary pathology in severely obese people examined at autopsy. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002;26(1):73–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Rastogi P, Pinto DS, Pai MR, Kanchan T. An autopsy study of coronary atherosclerosis and its relation to anthropometric measurements/indices of overweight and obesity in men. J Forensic Leg Med. 2012;19(1):12–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Masmiquel L, Leiter LA, Vidal J, Bain S, Petrie J, Franek E, Raz I, Comlekci A, Jacob S, van Gaal L, et al. LEADER 5: prevalence and cardiometabolic impact of obesity in cardiovascular high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: baseline global data from the LEADER trial. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15:29.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Hulten EA, Bittencourt MS, Preston R, Singh A, Romagnolli C, Ghoshhajra B, Shah R, Abbasi S, Abbara S, Nasir K, et al. Obesity, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular prognosis: from the Partners coronary computed tomography angiography registry. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017;16(1):14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Kernan WN, Dearborn JL. Obesity increases stroke risk in young adults: opportunity for prevention. Stroke. 2015;46(6):1435–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Global BMIMC, Di Angelantonio E, Bhupathiraju SN, Wormser D, Gao P, Kaptoge S, BerringtondeGonzalez A, Cairns BJ, Huxley R, Jackson CL, et al. Body-mass index and all-cause mortality: individual-participant-data meta-analysis of 239 prospective studies in four continents. Lancet. 2016;388(10046):776–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Ahmad FS, Ning H, Rich JD, Yancy CW, Lloyd-Jones DM, Wilkins JT. Hypertension, obesity, diabetes, and heart failure-free survival: the cardiovascular disease lifetime risk pooling project. JACC Heart Fail. 2016;4(12):911–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Kumar S, Sharma V. Hypertension, obesity, diabetes, and heart failure-free survival: the cardiovascular disease lifetime risk pooling project in New Delhi, India. Atherosclerosis. 2017;263:e159.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Suk SH, Sacco RL, Boden-Albala B, Cheun JF, Pittman JG, Elkind MS, Paik MC. Abdominal obesity and risk of ischemic stroke: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke. 2003;34(7):1586–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Kizer JR, Biggs ML, Ix JH, Mukamal KJ, Zieman SJ, de Boer IH, Mozaffarian D, Barzilay JI, Strotmeyer ES, Luchsinger JA, et al. Measures of adiposity and future risk of ischemic stroke and coronary heart disease in older men and women. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(1):10–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Lu Y, Hajifathalian K, Ezzati M, Woodward M, Rimm EB, Danaei G. Metabolic mediators of the effects of body-mass index, overweight, and obesity on coronary heart disease and stroke: a pooled analysis of 97 prospective cohorts with 1.8 million participants. Lancet. 2014;383(9921):970–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Forouzanfar MH, Alexander L, Anderson HR, Bachman VF, Biryukov S, Brauer M, Burnett R, Casey D, Coates MM, Cohen A, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;386(10010):2287–323.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement