Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Gender disparity in LDL-induced cardiovascular damage and the protective role of estrogens against electronegative LDL

Cardiovascular Diabetology volume 13, Article number: 64 (2014) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Increased levels of the most electronegative type of LDL, L5, have been observed in the plasma of patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS) and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and can induce endothelial dysfunction. Because men have a higher predisposition to developing coronary artery disease than do premenopausal women, we hypothesized that LDL electronegativity is increased in men and promotes endothelial damage.

Methods

L5 levels were compared between middle-aged men and age-matched, premenopausal women with or without MetS. We further studied the effects of gender-influenced LDL electronegativity on aortic cellular senescence and DNA damage in leptin receptor–deficient (db/db) mice by using senescence-associated–β-galactosidase and γH2AX staining, respectively. We also studied the protective effects of 17β-estradiol and genistein against electronegative LDL–induced senescence in cultured bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAECs).

Results

L5 levels were higher in MetS patients than in healthy subjects (P < 0.001), particularly in men (P = 0.001). LDL isolated from male db/db mice was more electronegative than that from male or female wild-type mice. In addition, LDL from male db/db mice contained abundantly more apolipoprotein CIII and induced more BAEC senescence than did female db/db or wild-type LDL. In the aortas of db/db mice but not wild-type mice, we observed cellular senescence and DNA damage, and the effect was more significant in male than in female db/db mice. Pretreatment with 17β-estradiol or genistein inhibited BAEC senescence induced by male or female db/db LDL and downregulated the expression of lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor-1 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha protein.

Conclusion

The gender dichotomy of LDL-induced cardiovascular damage may underlie the increased propensity to coronary artery disease in men.

Background

The accelerated development of atherosclerosis and premature aging of the cardiovascular system have been recognized in patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS) [1]; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Vascular aging is a feature of MetS that may represent the prodromal stage of atherosclerotic disease, favored by co-existing harmful stimuli such as dyslipidemia [2].

The potential role of electronegative low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in cardiovascular diseases is gaining a global recognition [3–9]. Increased proportions of electronegative LDL have been described in many conditions that define metabolic syndrome, such as hypertriglyceridemia [10], diabetes [4, 11], insulin resistance [12], obesity [13], and hypertension [14]. Previously, we separated plasma LDL according to charge into 5 subfractions, L1-L5, by using anion-exchange chromatography and showed that plasma levels of L5—the most electronegative subfraction of LDL—are higher in patients with MetS and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) than in healthy individuals [15]. L5 has a chemical composition unique from that of other LDL subfractions and has been shown to induce atherogenic processes [16, 17], including endothelial cell apoptosis and mitochondrial dysfunction [18–20]. Although L5 has a role in promoting atherogenesis, it is not known whether L5 induces endothelial cell senescence, a pro-inflammatory and prothrombotic phenotype associated with arterial stiffness [21], endothelial dysfunction [22], and atherosclerosis [23]. Understanding whether L5 contributes to endothelial cell senescence may help to explain the accelerated development of atherosclerosis and the premature aging observed in MetS patients.

The risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) is greater in men than in premenopausal women [24], but the mechanisms are not completely understood. In addition, the frequency of cardiovascular disease rises in post-menopausal and in estrogen-deficient women [25]. Because LDL becomes more toxic as its electronegativity increases [16], we hypothesized that LDL electronegativity is higher in male patients with MetS than in female patients with MetS and may underlie the increased propensity to CAD observed in men. In addition, using mice with a proclivity to developing diabetes and atherosclerosis, we compared the effects of male and female LDL on cellular senescence and determined whether estrogen confers protection against the harmful effects of highly electronegative LDL.

Materials and methods

Human L5 study

LDL was isolated from the plasma of asymptomatic, middle-aged men and age-matched, premenopausal women who did (MetS patients, n = 30; 15 men and 15 women) or did not (control subjects, n = 26; 11 men and 15 women) meet 3 of the criteria for MetS according to the National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines [26]. Patients who were taking medications that may affect the electronegativity of LDL such as statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers were excluded [27]. All participants gave informed consent for the use of their plasma, and the study was conducted according to the principles in the Declaration of Helsinki. Patient characteristics, including waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and levels of glucose, triglyceride, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) were determined according to standard operating procedures. LDL samples were further resolved into subfractions L1-L5 by using fast protein liquid chromatography (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA) with an anion-exchange UnoQ12 column (BioRad, Hercules, CA).

Biochemical analysis of mouse blood plasma

All animal experiments were approved by the China Medical University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85–23, revised 1996). Whole blood was drawn from mice by means of intubation via the common carotid artery, and plasma was obtained by using centrifugation. Using an automated Biochemical Analyzer (SP-4430, Spotchem EZ, Arkray), we examined plasma levels of glucose, total cholesterol, total triglyceride, HDL-C, and LDL-C. LDL (d = 1.030-1.063 g/mL) was isolated by using sequential ultracentrifugation as previously described [19]. Protein concentrations were determined by using the Lowry method [16]. The charge of LDL was analyzed by subjecting LDL samples to gel electrophoresis in 0.7% agarose, and the composition of delipidated LDL was analyzed by subjecting samples to SDS-PAGE. Relative mobility (Rf) was quantified as a measure of the distance migrated by a band divided by the distance migrated by the dye front. For Western blot analysis, proteins were transferred to PVDF membrane and probed by using antibodies against apolipoprotein CIII (ApoCIII) and ApoB100 (Academy Biomedical Company, Inc., Houston, TX). Images were acquired and analyzed by using the G-box imaging system (Syngene, Frederick, MD). To quantify the protein expression of ApoCIII, we normalized the band intensity with that of ApoB100 (internal control).

Analysis of cellular senescence and DNA damage in mouse aortas

Male and female homozygous leptin receptor knock-out mice (db/db) and wild-type C57B6/J littermates (controls) were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and were maintained on a 12-hour light/dark cycle with free access to food and water. After 6 months on a normal chow diet, all animals were anesthetized by means of 2% isoflurane inhalation, and the aorta of each mouse was removed for histologic examination.

For the detection of cellular senescence in the aortic endothelium, aortas were fixed for 10 minutes at room temperature in 2% formaldehyde/0.2% glutaraldehyde solution and were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours with fresh senescence-associated–β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal) staining solution (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA). Using images acquired with a Nikon D300s digital camera, we identified senescent cells marked by a blue color produced by the enzymatic reaction.

For the detection of DNA damage in the aortic endothelium, thoracic descending aortas were paraffin-embedded, and serial cross-sections were obtained from each sample. Slides were immunostained with anti–phospho-histone H2AX (anti-γH2AX) antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) and analyzed by using an Olympus IX70 inverted microscope (Japan) with OPTRONICS digital microscope cameras (Goleta, CA).

To examine telomerase enzyme activity, aortas or subconfluent bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAECs) were homogenized in 3-[3-(cholamidopropyl) diethylammonio]-1-propane sulfonate (CHAPS) buffer. Homogenized tissues were then used to perform telomerase activity assays by using a modified telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAPeze RT Telomerase Detection Kit; Chemicon, Billerica, MA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time PCR amplification and detection was performed with StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR Systems (Applied Biosystems, Grand Island, NY). Threshold cycle (Ct) measurements were obtained for determining telomerase activity. Values for Ct, which are inversely related to telomerase activity, were then adjusted with the standard curve by using the commercial TSR8 template.

Analysis of cellular senescence in cultured BAECs

Subconfluent BAECs were incubated with a subapoptotic concentration (30 μg/mL) of LDL from male or female db/db or wild-type mice for 5 consecutive days. Cells were then either lysed in radio-immunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO) containing protease inhibitor cocktail and 0.1% Triton X-100 for Western blot analysis or were stained with SA-β-gal for the detection of senescent cells. A total of 500 cells were scored in 10 randomly selected fields to determine the percentage of SA-β-gal–positive cells.

To investigate the protective effects of estrogen against cell senescence induced by LDL from db/db mice, BAECs were pretreated with 17β-estradiol (10 nM; Biorbyt Ltd., UK) or its isoflavone analogue genistein (100 nM; LC Laboratories, MA), followed by exposure with 30 μg/mL LDL from male or female db/db or wild-type mice. For the detection of cell senescence, cells were stained with SA-β-gal as described above.

Western blot analysis of lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor-1 (LOX-1) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)

Using Western blot analysis, we examined the protein expression of LOX-1 (antibody from R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and TNF-α (antibody from GeneTex Inc., Irvine, CA) in BAECs treated with 30 μg/mL LDL from male db/db mice or PBS in the presence or absence of pretreatment with 17β-estradiol (10 nM) or genistein (100 nM), as described previously [19].

Results

The increased percent of L5 in total LDL (L5%) in MetS patients is more pronounced in men than in women

We examined the L5% in MetS patients and healthy control subjects (Table 1 and Figure 1) and confirmed that L5% is significantly higher in MetS patients than in healthy subjects (P < 0.001). Although no significant difference was observed between men in total LDL-C, men with MetS had significantly higher L5% than did healthy men (P = 0.001). Furthermore, men with MetS had higher L5% than did premenopausal women with MetS, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.33). Waist circumference was significantly different between control men and control women (Table 1; P < 0.05). No other significant differences were observed in characteristics between control men and control women or between MetS women and MetS men.

Table 1 Gender-stratified characteristics of MetS patients and healthy control subjects
Full size table
Figure 1
figure 1

Percent L5 in total LDL (L5%) among healthy control subjects and MetS patients, grouped by gender. L5% was significantly higher in MetS patients than in healthy subjects. In addition, men with MetS had slightly higher L5% than did women with MetS. Values for L5% were determined by using fast protein liquid chromatography. The solid line indicates the mean value for each group.

Full size image

Male db/db mice show increased DNA damage and aortic senescence

The db/db mouse is a well-established animal model for analyzing diabetic dyslipidemia and MetS, which precipitates obesity, insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, and leptin resistance [28]. We found that male and female db/db mice had higher body weights and plasma levels of fasting plasma glucose, total cholesterol, HDL-C, and LDL-C than did their gender-matched wild-type littermates after 6 months on a normal chow diet (Table 2). However, no significant differences were observed in these parameters between male and female db/db mice or between male and female wild-type mice.

Table 2 Gender-stratified characteristics of leptin receptor–deficient ( db/db ) mice and wild-type (C57B6/J) littermates
Full size table

To compare the electronegativity of LDL among male and female db/db and wild-type mice, we analyzed LDL samples using agarose gel electrophoresis. In native agarose gel, LDL from male db/db mice migrated toward the anode faster than did LDL from male or female wild-type mice (Figure 2A), indicating that LDL from male db/db mice was more electronegative than LDL from wild-type mice. LDL from female db/db mice was only slightly more electronegative than LDL from male or female wild-type mice. No significant differences were observed in LDL electronegativity between males and females in either wild-type or db/db mice. When we examined the protein composition of LDL among male and female db/db and wild-type mice using SDS-PAGE, we observed a higher content of ApoCIII in db/db mice than in gender-matched wild-type mice (Figure 2B). These findings were confirmed by the results of Western blot analysis for ApoCIII (P < 0.01) (Figure 2C). In LDL from male db/db mice, ApoCIII levels were significantly higher than those in LDL from female db/db mice (P < 0.01) (Figure 2B and C).

Figure 2
figure 2

Comparison of LDL electronegativity and protein composition between db/db and wild-type mice. A, Representative results of agarose gel electrophoresis showing the relative electronegativity of LDL isolated from male and female db/db (KO) and wild-type (WT) mice. Relative mobility (Rf) was compared among groups. B, Representative results of SDS-PAGE showing the relative concentration of ApoCIII in LDL isolated from male and female db/db (KO) and wild-type (WT) mice. C, Western blot analysis of ApoCIII and ApoB100 protein levels in LDL isolated from male and female db/db (KO) and wild-type (WT) mice. The ratio of ApoCIII to ApoB100 was compared among groups. n = 5 for each group.

Full size image

To compare the extent of vascular senescence in male and female db/db and wild-type mice in vivo, aortas from these mice were fixed and stained with SA-β-gal. SA-β-gal activity, indicated by blue color, was strong in aortas of male db/db mice, weak in aortas of female db/db mice, and absent in aortas of male or female wild-type mice (Figure 3A). When we examined telomerase activity in aortas from these mice, we observed significantly lower telomerase activity in the aortas of db/db mice than in those of wild-type mice, for both genders (P < 0.01). Furthermore, the telomerase activity in the aortas of male db/db mice was significantly lower than that in the aortas of female db/db mice (P < 0.01) (Figure 3B). In addition, aortic cross-sections stained with anti-γH2AX, indicated by green color, showed marked DNA damage in the vascular cell nuclei of male db/db mice that was not observed in male or female wild-type mice (Figure 3C). Aortic cross-sections of female db/db mice also showed several positively stained nuclei, but the percentage was significantly lower than that in male db/db mice (Figure 3D).

Figure 3
figure 3

Analysis of cellular senescence and DNA damage in the aortas of db/db and wild-type mice. A, Representative SA-β-galactosidase staining of senescent cells (blue) in descending thoracic aortas from male and female db/db and wild-type mice. B, Telomerase activity in aortas from male and female db/db and wild-type mice. C, Representative γH2AX immunostaining (green) of aortic cross-sections from male and female db/db and wild-type mice. L, lumen. Arrows indicate positive staining. D, The percentage of γH2AX-positive nuclei was compared among groups (n = 8 per group).

Full size image

LDL from male db/db mice causes endothelial cell senescence that can be blocked by estrogens

To test our hypothesis that LDL with increased electronegativity induces vascular senescence, we exposed BAECs to LDL from male or female db/db or wild-type mice and analyzed SA-β-gal staining and telomerase activity in the treated cells. BAECs treated with LDL from male db/db mice had a significantly higher percentage of SA-β-gal–positive stained cells (P < 0.01) and a significantly lower amount of telomerase activity (P < 0.01) than did BAECs treated with LDL from male wild-type mice (Figure 4). In addition, BAECs treated with LDL from female db/db mice had a significantly higher percentage of SA-β-gal–positive stained cells (P < 0.01) and a significantly lower amount of telomerase activity (P < 0.01) than did BAECs treated with LDL from female wild-type mice, although the effects of LDL from female db/db mice were not as strong as those of LDL from male db/db mice (Figure 4). Furthermore, when we examined whether estrogens confer protection against LDL from db/db mice, we found that pretreatment of BAECs with 17β-estradiol (10 nM) or genistein (100 nM) significantly attenuated the percentage of SA-β-gal–stained cells and blocked the effects on telomerase activity induced by LDL from male or female db/db mice (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05) (Figure 4).

Figure 4
figure 4

Effect of LDL electronegativity and estrogens on bovine aortic endothelial cell (BAEC) senescence. A, Representative images of SA-β-gal staining of senescent BAECs (blue) 5 days after incubation with 30 μg/mL LDL isolated from male or female db/db or wild-type mice in the presence or absence of pretreatment with 17β-estradiol (10 nM) or genistein (100 nM). B, The percentage of senescent cells and (C) telomerase activity in BAECs treated with LDL from male or female db/db or wild-type mice in the presence or absence of 17β-estradiol or genistein. n = 4 for each group. *P < 0.01 vs. gender-matched wild-type LDL, #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01 vs. gender-matched db/db LDL.

Full size image

Toxicity induced by LDL from male db/db mice is mediated by increased TNF-α and LOX-1 expression in endothelial cells

To study the specific mechanisms underlying the effects of LDL and estrogen on vascular senescence, we examined LOX-1 and TNF-α expression in BAECs treated with LDL from male db/db mice in the presence or absence of pretreatment with 17β-estradiol or genistein (Figure 5A and B). In BAECs treated with LDL from male db/db mice, LOX-1 and TNF-α protein levels were significantly upregulated when compared with those in PBS-treated cells (P < 0.05). In addition, pretreatment with 17β-estradiol or genistein decreased LOX-1 and TNF-α protein expression induced by LDL from male db/db mice (P < 0.05 vs. LDL-treated cells; Figure 5A and B).

Figure 5
figure 5

LOX-1 and TNF-α expression in bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAECs) treated with LDL and/or estrogens. A, Representative Western blot showing LOX-1 and TNF-α protein expression in BAECs treated with LDL from male db/db mice (mdbLDL) in the presence or absence of pretreatment with 100 nM genistein (Gen) or 10 nM 17β-estradiol (E2). B, Quantification of protein expression shown in (A), expressed as a percent ratio to the expression of β-actin (internal loading control) (n = 4). *P < 0.05 vs control-treated BAECs, #P < 0.05 vs. mdbLDL-treated BAECs.

Full size image

Discussion

Significance of increased LDL electronegativity in men with MetS compared to women with MetS

Cardiovascular disease differs between men and women. Among men and women aged 20 to 44, the prevalence of cardiovascular disease is one-third higher in men than in women (34% versus 24%, respectively) [29]. In a middle-aged group of MetS subjects, we found that increased plasma L5 levels in these subjects are more pronounced in men than in women, which may explain why men are at higher cardiovascular risk than are women and require early medical treatment, such as statin administration. In addition, in male mice with MetS, we observed increased LDL electronegativity compared to wild-type mice. We found in mice with MetS and in cultured BAECs that gender corresponded with the extent of vascular senescence. Interestingly, we observed a protective effect of 17β-estradiol or genistein against electronegative LDL–induced senescence. Our findings collectively suggest that gender disparities in LDL electronegativity may underlie the increased propensity to CAD in men.

Potential contribution of increased ApoCIII content to the harmful effects of electronegative LDL

When fed a Western diet, db/db mice have an atherogenic lipoprotein profile characterized by increased levels of VLDL cholesterol and LDL-C [30]. Consistent with the findings of a previous study, we found that male and female db/db mice fed for 6 months with a standard chow diet showed evidence of weight gain, hyperglycemia, and hypercholesterolemia [31]. However, these traits did not differ between our male and female db/db mice and, thus, cannot explain the differences observed in vascular senescence in these animals.

We previously showed that plasma levels of L5 are higher in patients with diabetes mellitus than in healthy subjects [18] and that levels of the most electronegative subfraction of very-low-density lipoprotein, called V5, are higher in patients with MetS than in healthy subjects [32]. Recently, a clinical study, Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE), of South Africans showed that some dietary fatty acids affect blood lipid profiles more unfavorably in men than in women [33]. To further characterize gender-influenced lipid abnormalities that occur in diabetes and MetS, we compared the electronegativity of LDL and the content of ApoCIII between male and female db/db mice and isogenic wild-type mice. LDL from male db/db mice was more electronegative than LDL from wild-type mice and contained more ApoCIII than did LDL from female db/db mice or wild-type mice. In addition, in each group of mice, ApoCIII content was greater in the LDL that induced more significant vascular senescence, indicating that ApoCIII may be one of the components of highly electronegative LDL responsible for its harmful effects. It has been well-established that ApoCIII is atherogenic and contributes to vascular senescence and coronary heart disease [34]. ApoCIII plays a pivotal role in regulating lipoprotein metabolism by inhibiting receptor-mediated uptake by the liver, which leads to the accumulation of triglycerides in ApoCIII-containing lipoproteins [35]. Other toxic components of LDL previously associated with MetS include oxidized LDL, small dense LDL, and other modified forms of LDL [36, 37]. However, copper-oxidized LDL is artificially derived, and, although small dense LDL is a plausible concept, neither has yet to be isolated from the plasma for mechanistic scrutiny. ApoB has also been reported to be associated with MetS [38], [39]. In a previous study, we found that L5 contains fragmented ApoB100, which is most likely a consequence of longer LDL residence times in the circulation [40].

Protective role of female hormones against the harmful effects of electronegative LDL

Among women, the cardiovascular death rates are 3 times higher after menopause than before menopause [41], indicating a protective role for female hormones that decline with age. In addition, the presence of type 2 diabetes aggravates cardiometabolic risk in postmenopausal women, as demonstrated by more atherogenic lipid and proinflammatory profiles [42]. In patients with type 1 diabetes, gender-related differences in cardiometabolic risk (ie., obesity and dyslipidemia) have also been observed, which may result from different outcomes after treatment between male and female patients [43]. In our in vivo and in vitro experiments, we found that female db/db aortas exhibited less cellular senescence than did male db/db aortas, and LDL isolated from female db/db mice caused less BAEC senescence than did LDL from male db/db mice. Furthermore, 17β-estradiol or genistein reduced db/db LDL–induced senescence. The differences observed between male and female db/db mice, combined with our evidence for a protective role of estrogens, indicate that female hormones may protect the arterial endothelium against senescence in vivo, either by altering the electronegativity of LDL or by inhibiting electronegative LDL receptor–mediated signaling pathways, such as the LOX-1 signaling pathway. In support of our findings, observational studies have shown that estrogen therapy may significantly decrease the risk of CAD by counteracting oxidized LDL–induced endothelial dysfunction [44] and by inhibiting endothelial progenitor cell senescence [45]. Other research has indicated that estrogen does not confer protection by affecting vascular relaxation [46] and that its protective effects may be independent of lipid levels [47]. Brunelli and colleagues [48, 49] have shown that 17β-estradiol could bind to a single specific and saturable binding site of ApoB100 and prevent the misfolding of its structure on electronegative LDL without changing the electronegativity and phospholipase activity of LDL. Therefore, the modification of ApoB100 may play an important role in the underlying mechanisms by which estrogen provides protection, although this possibility needs further investigation.

Regulation of TNF-α and LOX-1 expression by electronegative LDL and estrogen

Recently, genetic analyses performed in various animal models have shown that phosphoinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt, TNF-α, and other metabolic pathways are crucial for cellular senescence [1]. Thus, it is possible that highly electronegative LDL promotes endothelial senescence by inhibiting the PI3K/Akt pathway and by increasing TNF-α via LOX-1 [19]. In the present study, we found that LDL isolated from db/db mice enhanced both LOX-1 and TNF-α expression and that pretreatment of BAECs with 17β-estradiol and genistein significantly diminished these effects. Our findings correspond to those previously reported showing that estrogen decreases TNF-α expression and oxidized LDL–induced endothelial cell dysfunction [50].

Conclusion

In conclusion, our data have suggested that, compared with wild-type mice, the more prominent DNA damage and endothelial senescence observed in male db/db mice may be partly attributed to more electronegative and, thus, more toxic LDL. Furthermore, estrogens may provide systemic hormonal protection against the harmful effects of electronegative LDL. Our findings indicate that gender disparities in LDL-induced cardiovascular damage may impact the development of CAD.

Abbreviations

MetS:

Metabolic syndrome

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

HDL-C:

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

LDL-C:

low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

ApoCIII:

Apolipoprotein CIII

db/db:

Homozygous leptin receptor deficient

SA-β-gal:

Senescence-associated–β-galactosidase

Anti-γH2AX:

Anti–phospho-histone H2AX

BAEC:

Bovine aortic endothelial cell

LOX-1:

Lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor-1

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor-α

PI3K:

Phosphoinositol-3-kinase.

References

  1. Minamino T, Komuro I: Vascular cell senescence: contribution to atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2007, 100 (1): 15-26. 10.1161/01.RES.0000256837.40544.4a.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoang KC, Ghandehari H, Lopez VA, Barboza MG, Wong ND: Global coronary heart disease risk assessment of individuals with the metabolic syndrome in the U.S. Diabetes Care. 2008, 31 (7): 1405-1409. 10.2337/dc07-2087.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Avogaro P, Cazzolato G, Bittolo-Bon G: Some questions concerning a small, more electronegative LDL circulating in human plasma. Atherosclerosis. 1991, 91 (1–2): 163-171.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanchez-Quesada JL, Vinagre I, de Juan-Franco E, Sanchez-Hernandez J, Bonet-Marques R, Blanco-Vaca F, Ordonez-Llanos J, Perez A: Impact of the LDL subfraction phenotype on Lp-PLA2 distribution, LDL modification and HDL composition in type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013, 12: 112-10.1186/1475-2840-12-112.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sevanian A, Bittolo-Bon G, Cazzolato G, Hodis H, Hwang J, Zamburlini A, Maiorino M, Ursini F: LDL- is a lipid hydroperoxide-enriched circulating lipoprotein. J Lipid Res. 1997, 38 (3): 419-428.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Demuth K, Myara I, Chappey B, Vedie B, Pech-Amsellem MA, Haberland ME, Moatti N: A cytotoxic electronegative LDL subfraction is present in human plasma. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996, 16 (6): 773-783. 10.1161/01.ATV.16.6.773.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Damasceno NR, Sevanian A, Apolinario E, Oliveira JM, Fernandes I, Abdalla DS: Detection of electronegative low density lipoprotein (LDL-) in plasma and atherosclerotic lesions by monoclonal antibody-based immunoassays. Clin Biochem. 2006, 39 (1): 28-38. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2005.09.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang B, Kawachi E, Matsunaga A, Imaizumi S, Noda K, Uehara Y, Miura S, Yoshinaga K, Kuroki M, Saku K: Reactivity of direct assays for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol toward charge-modified LDL in hypercholesterolemia. Circ J. 2012, 76 (9): 2241-2248. 10.1253/circj.CJ-12-0381.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Parasassi T, Bittolo-Bon G, Brunelli R, Cazzolato G, Krasnowska EK, Mei G, Sevanian A, Ursini F: Loss of apoB-100 secondary structure and conformation in hydroperoxide rich, electronegative LDL(−). Free Radic Biol Med. 2001, 31 (1): 82-89. 10.1016/S0891-5849(01)00555-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sanchez-Quesada JL, Benitez S, Otal C, Franco M, Blanco-Vaca F, Ordonez-Llanos J: Density distribution of electronegative LDL in normolipemic and hyperlipemic subjects. J Lipid Res. 2002, 43 (5): 699-705.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sanchez-Quesada JL, Perez A, Caixas A, Ordonmez-Llanos J, Carreras G, Payes A, Gonzalez-Sastre F, de Leiva A: Electronegative low density lipoprotein subform is increased in patients with short-duration IDDM and is closely related to glycaemic control. Diabetologia. 1996, 39 (12): 1469-1476. 10.1007/s001250050600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakano K, Hasegawa G, Fukui M, Yamasaki M, Ishihara K, Takashima T, Kitagawa Y, Fujinami A, Ohta M, Hara H, Adachi T, Ogata M, Obayashi H, Nakamura N: Effect of pioglitazone on various parameters of insulin resistance including lipoprotein subclass according to particle size by a gel-permeation high-performance liquid chromatography in newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes. Endocr J. 2010, 57 (5): 423-430. 10.1507/endocrj.K10E-006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Silva IT, Mello AP, Sanches LB, Abdalla DS, Damasceno NR: Is plasma alpha-tocopherol associated with electronegative LDL in obese adolescents?. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2013, 59 (2): 100-107. 10.3177/jnsv.59.100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Urata J, Ikeda S, Koga S, Nakata T, Yasunaga T, Sonoda K, Koide Y, Ashizawa N, Kohno S, Maemura K: Negatively charged low-density lipoprotein is associated with atherogenic risk in hypertensive patients. Heart Vessels. 2012, 27 (3): 235-242. 10.1007/s00380-011-0139-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chan HC, Ke LY, Chu CS, Lee AS, Shen MY, Cruz MA, Hsu JF, Cheng KH, Chan HC, Lu J, Lai WT, Sawamura T, Sheu SH, Yen JH, Chen CH: Highly electronegative LDL from patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction triggers platelet activation and aggregation. Blood. 2013, 122 (22): 3632-3641. 10.1182/blood-2013-05-504639.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen CH, Jiang T, Yang JH, Jiang W, Lu J, Marathe GK, Pownall HJ, Ballantyne CM, McIntyre TM, Henry PD, Yang CY: Low-density lipoprotein in hypercholesterolemic human plasma induces vascular endothelial cell apoptosis by inhibiting fibroblast growth factor 2 transcription. Circulation. 2003, 107 (16): 2102-2108. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000065220.70220.F7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee AS, Wang GJ, Chan HC, Chen FY, Chang CM, Yang CY, Lee YT, Chang KC, Chen CH: Electronegative low-density lipoprotein induces cardiomyocyte apoptosis indirectly through endothelial cell-released chemokines. Apoptosis. 2012, 17 (9): 1009-1018. 10.1007/s10495-012-0726-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lu J, Jiang W, Yang JH, Chang PY, Walterscheid JP, Chen HH, Marcelli M, Tang D, Lee YT, Liao WSL, Yang CY, Chen CH: Electronegative LDL impairs vascular endothelial cell integrity in diabetes by disrupting fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) Autoregulation. Diabetes. 2007, 57 (1): 158-166. 10.2337/db07-1287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lu J, Yang JH, Burns AR, Chen HH, Tang D, Walterscheid JP, Suzuki S, Yang CY, Sawamura T, Chen CH: Mediation of electronegative Low-density lipoprotein signaling by LOX-1: a possible mechanism of endothelial apoptosis. Circ Res. 2009, 104 (5): 619-627. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.190116.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang G-J, Chang C-T, Yang C-Y, Chen C-H: Negatively charged L5 as a naturally occurring atherogenic low-density lipoprotein. Biomedicine. 2012, 2 (4): 147-154. 10.1016/j.biomed.2012.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lakatta EG, Levy D: Arterial and cardiac aging: major shareholders in cardiovascular disease enterprises: Part I: aging arteries: a “set up” for vascular disease. Circulation. 2003, 107 (1): 139-146. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000048892.83521.58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Spiegelhalter DJ, Georgakopoulos D, Robinson J, Deanfield JE: Aging is associated with endothelial dysfunction in healthy men years before the age-related decline in women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994, 24 (2): 471-476. 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90305-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Minamino T, Miyauchi H, Yoshida T, Ishida Y, Yoshida H, Komuro I: Endothelial cell senescence in human atherosclerosis: role of telomere in endothelial dysfunction. Circulation. 2002, 105 (13): 1541-1544. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000013836.85741.17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bassuk SS, Manson JE: Gender-specific Aspects of Selected Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factors: A Summary of the Epidemiologic Evidence. Principles of Gender-Specific Medicine,. 2010, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Inc., 2

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ho JE, Mosca L: Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy and atherosclerosis. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2002, 4 (5): 387-395. 10.1007/s11883-002-0077-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Expert Panel on Detection E, Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in A: Executive summary of the third report of the national cholesterol education program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III). JAMA. 2001, 285 (19): 2486-2497. 10.1001/jama.285.19.2486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chu CS, Wang YC, Lu LS, Walton B, Yilmaz HR, Huang RY, Sawamura T, Dixon RA, Lai WT, Chen CH, Lu J: Electronegative low-density lipoprotein increases C-reactive protein expression in vascular endothelial cells through the LOX-1 receptor. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (8): e70533-10.1371/journal.pone.0070533.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nishina PM, Lowe S, Wang J, Paigen B: Characterization of plasma lipids in genetically obese mice: the mutants obese, diabetes, fat, tubby, and lethal yellow. Metabolism. 1994, 43 (5): 549-553. 10.1016/0026-0495(94)90194-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, Howard VJ, Rumsfeld J, Manolio T, Zheng ZJ, Flegal K, O’Donnell C, Kittner S, Lloyd-Jones D, Goff DC, Hong Y, Adams R, Friday G, Furie K, Gorelick P, Kissela B, Marler J, Meigs J, Roger V, Sidney S, Sorlie P, Steinberger J, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Wilson M, Wolf P, American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee: Heart disease and stroke statistics–2006 update: a report from the American heart association statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee. Circulation. 2006, 113 (6): e85-e151. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.171600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. MacLean PS, Bower JF, Vadlamudi S, Osborne JN, Bradfield JF, Burden HW, Bensch WH, Kauffman RF, Barakat HA: Cholesteryl ester transfer protein expression prevents diet-induced atherosclerotic lesions in male db/db mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003, 23 (8): 1412-1415. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000080687.94313.67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kobayashi K, Forte TM, Taniguchi S, Ishida BY, Oka K, Chan L: The db/db mouse, a model for diabetic dyslipidemia: molecular characterization and effects of Western diet feeding. Metabolism. 2000, 49 (1): 22-31. 10.1016/S0026-0495(00)90588-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen CH, Lu J, Chen SH, Huang RY, Yilmaz HR, Dong J, Elayda MA, Dixon RA, Yang CY: Effects of electronegative VLDL on endothelium damage in metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2012, 35 (3): 648-653. 10.2337/dc11-1623.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Richter M, Baumgartner J, Wentzel-Viljoen E, Smuts CM: Different dietary fatty acids are associated with blood lipids in healthy South African men and women: The PURE study. Int J Cardiol. 2014, 172 (2): 368-374. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.01.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sacks FM, Alaupovic P, Moye LA, Cole TG, Sussex B, Stampfer MJ, Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E: VLDL, apolipoproteins B, CIII, and E, and risk of recurrent coronary events in the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) trial. Circulation. 2000, 102 (16): 1886-1892. 10.1161/01.CIR.102.16.1886.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Aalto-Setala K, Fisher EA, Chen X, Chajek-Shaul T, Hayek T, Zechner R, Walsh A, Ramakrishnan R, Ginsberg HN, Breslow JL: Mechanism of hypertriglyceridemia in human apolipoprotein (apo) CIII transgenic mice. Diminished very low density lipoprotein fractional catabolic rate associated with increased apo CIII and reduced apo E on the particles. J Clin Invest. 1992, 90 (5): 1889-1900. 10.1172/JCI116066.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Holvoet P, Kritchevsky SB, Tracy RP, Mertens A, Rubin SM, Butler J, Goodpaster B, Harris TB: The metabolic syndrome, circulating oxidized LDL, and risk of myocardial infarction in well-functioning elderly people in the health, aging, and body composition cohort. Diabetes. 2004, 53 (4): 1068-1073. 10.2337/diabetes.53.4.1068.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nozue T, Michishita I, Ishibashi Y, Ito S, Iwaki T, Mizuguchi I, Miura M, Ito Y, Hirano T: Small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is a useful marker of metabolic syndrome in patients with coronary artery disease. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2007, 14 (4): 202-207. 10.5551/jat.E507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bloomgarden ZT: Dyslipidemia and the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2004, 27 (12): 3009-3016. 10.2337/diacare.27.12.3009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sniderman AD: The apoB/apoA-I ratio and insulin resistance: sorting out the metabolic syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2007, 28 (21): 2563-2564. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm434.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cy Y: Isolation, characterization, and functional assessment of oxidatively modified subfractions of circulating Low-density lipoproteins. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003, 23 (6): 1083-1090. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000071350.78872.C4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Colditz GA, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH: Menopause and the risk of coronary heart disease in women. N Engl J Med. 1987, 316 (18): 1105-1110. 10.1056/NEJM198704303161801.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mascarenhas-Melo F, Marado D, Palavra F, Sereno J, Coelho A, Pinto R, Teixeira-Lemos E, Teixeira F, Reis F: Diabetes abrogates sex differences and aggravates cardiometabolic risk in postmenopausal women. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013, 12: 61-10.1186/1475-2840-12-61.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kautzky-Willer A, Stich K, Hintersteiner J, Kautzky A, Kamyar MR, Saukel J, Johnson J, Lemmens-Gruber R: Sex-specific-differences in cardiometabolic risk in type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013, 12: 78-10.1186/1475-2840-12-78.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Monsalve E, Oviedo PJ, Garcia-Perez MA, Tarin JJ, Cano A, Hermenegildo C: Estradiol counteracts oxidized LDL-induced asymmetric dimethylarginine production by cultured human endothelial cells. Cardiovasc Res. 2007, 73 (1): 66-72. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.09.020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Imanishi T, Hano T, Nishio I: Estrogen reduces endothelial progenitor cell senescence through augmentation of telomerase activity. J Hypertens. 2005, 23 (9): 1699-1706. 10.1097/01.hjh.0000176788.12376.20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Packer CS, Pelaez NJ, Kramer JA: Estrogen protects against hypertension in the spontaneously hypertensive rat, but its protective mechanism is unrelated to impaired arterial muscle relaxation. J Gend Specif Med. 2001, 4 (1): 20-27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Saltiki K, Papageorgiou G, Voidonikola P, Mantzou E, Xiromeritis K, Papamichael C, Alevizaki M, Stamatelopoulos K: Endogenous estrogen levels are associated with endothelial function in males independently of lipid levels. Endocrine. 2010, 37 (2): 329-335. 10.1007/s12020-010-9307-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Brunelli R, Balogh G, Costa G, de Spirito M, Greco G, Mei G, Nicolai E, Vigh L, Ursini F, Parasassi T: Estradiol binding prevents ApoB-100 misfolding in electronegative LDL(−). Biochemistry. 2010, 49 (34): 7297-7302. 10.1021/bi100715f.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Brunelli R, Greco G, Barteri M, Krasnowska EK, Mei G, Natella F, Pala A, Rotella S, Ursini F, Zichella L, Parasassi T: One site on the apoB-100 specifically binds 17-beta-estradiol and regulates the overall structure of LDL. FASEB J. 2003, 17 (14): 2127-2129.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Florian M, Magder S: Estrogen decreases TNF-alpha and oxidized LDL induced apoptosis in endothelial cells. Steroids. 2008, 73 (1): 47-58. 10.1016/j.steroids.2007.08.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Nicole Stancel, PhD, ELS, of the Texas Heart Institute in Houston, Texas, for editorial assistance. This work was supported by grants from the American Diabetes Association (1-04-RA-13), the National Institutes of Health (HL-63364), National Science Council of Taiwan (NSC 100-2314-B-039-040-MY3, NSC 102-2320-B-039-058), China Medical University Hospital (DMR-100-008, DMR-101-007, DMR-102-108, CMU-102-N-02), National Health Research Institutes of Taiwan (NHRI-EX103-10305SI), Taiwan Department of Health Clinical Trial and Research Center of Excellence (DOH102-TD-B-111-004), and Academia Sinica of Taiwan (BM103010096).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei, Taiwan

    An-Sheng Lee

  2. Division of Cardiology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan

    An-Sheng Lee & Kuan-Cheng Chang

  3. Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

    An-Sheng Lee, Ming-Yi Shen, Kuan-Cheng Chang & Chu-Huang Chen

  4. L5 Research Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

    An-Sheng Lee, Wei-Yu Chen, Hua-Chen Chan, Jing-Fang Hsu, Ming-Yi Shen, Chia-Ming Chang & Chu-Huang Chen

  5. George R. Brown School of Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA

    Henry Bair

  6. Graduate Institute of Pharmacology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Ming-Jai Su

  7. Center for Lipid Biosciences and Department of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

    Hua-Chen Chan & Chu-Huang Chen

  8. Vascular and Medicinal Research, Texas Heart Institute, 6770 Bertner Avenue, MC 2-255, Houston, TX, 77030, USA

    Chu-Huang Chen

  9. Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA

    Chu-Huang Chen

Authors
  1. An-Sheng Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wei-Yu Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hua-Chen Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jing-Fang Hsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ming-Yi Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chia-Ming Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Henry Bair
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ming-Jai Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Kuan-Cheng Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Chu-Huang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kuan-Cheng Chang or Chu-Huang Chen.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

LAS performed experiments, literature reading, manuscript writing, and problem solving and supervised the clinical and bench portions of the study. CWY performed experiments and literature reading. CHC performed experiments and literature reading. HJF performed statistical analysis and acted as a consultant. SMY performed experiments and literature reading. CCM performed experiments. HB participated in the writing of the manuscript. SMJ performed literature reading and problem solving. CKC performed literature reading, problem solving, and study design and co-mentored the first authors. CCH directed the study and performed literature reading, manuscript writing and revising, and problem solving. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, AS., Chen, WY., Chan, HC. et al. Gender disparity in LDL-induced cardiovascular damage and the protective role of estrogens against electronegative LDL. Cardiovasc Diabetol 13, 64 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-13-64

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-13-64

Keywords

Cardiovascular Diabetology

ISSN: 1475-2840