Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub
  • Original investigation
  • Open access
  • Published:

Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on in-hospital-mortality after major cardiovascular events in Spain (2002–2014)

Cardiovascular Diabetology volume 16, Article number: 126 (2017) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Diabetes mellitus has long been associated with cardiovascular events. Nevertheless, the higher burden of traditional cardiovascular risk factors reported in high-income countries is offset by a more widespread use of preventive measures and revascularization or other invasive procedures. The aim of this investigation is to describe trends in number of cases and outcomes, in-hospital mortality (IHM) and length of hospital stay (LHS), of hospital admissions for major cardiovascular events between type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and matched non-diabetes patients.

Methods

Retrospective study using National Hospital Discharge Database, analyzed in 4 years 2002, 2006, 2010, 2014, in Spain. We included patients (≥ 40 years old) with a primary diagnosis of myocardial infarction, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, aortic aneurysm and dissection and acute lower limb ischemia in people with T2DM. Cases were matched with controls (without T2DM) by ICD-9-CM codes, sex, age, province of residence and year.

Results

We selected 130,011 matched couples (50,427 with myocardial infarction, 60,236 with stroke, 2599 with aortic aneurysm and dissection and 16,749 with acute lower limb ischemia. Among T2DM patients we found increasing numbers of admissions overtime for stroke (10,794 in 2002 vs 17,559 in 2014), aortic aneurysm and dissection (390 vs 841) and acute lower limb ischemia (3854 vs. 4548). People were progressively older (except for myocardial infarction), had more comorbidities (especially T2DM patients), and were more frequently coded overtime for cardiovascular risk factors (smoking, obesity, hypertension, lipid disorders) and renal diseases. LHS and IHM declined overtime, though IHM only did it significantly in T2DM patients. Multivariable adjustment showed that T2DM patients had a significantly 15% higher mortality rate during admission for myocardial infarction, a 6% higher mortality for stroke, and a 6% higher mortality rate for “all cardiovascular events combined”, than non-diabetic matched controls.

Conclusions

The number of hospital admissions for stroke, aortic aneurysm and dissection and acute lower limb ischemia increased overtime, but remained stable for myocardial infarction. T2DM is associated to higher IHM after major cardiovascular events. Further research is needed to help us understand the reasons for an apparently increased mortality in T2DM patients when admitted to hospital for some major cardiovascular events.

Background

Diabetes mellitus is a prevalent chronic condition [1] and has long been associated with cardiovascular events. Nevertheless, the higher burden of traditional cardiovascular risk factors reported in high-income countries is offset by a more widespread use of preventive measures and revascularization or other invasive procedures [2, 3]. This may underlie the fact that in the United States the adjusted incidence rates of hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction or fatal coronary artery disease have decreased in recent years [4]. We have previously reported increasing incidence rates overtime of acute myocardial infarction [5], ischemic stroke [6] and admissions for abdominal aortic aneurysm [7], but declining rates of major lower extremity amputations due to peripheral artery disease for the overall population [8]. Moreover, incidence rates of major cardiovascular events are higher in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) than among people without diabetes in our Mediterranean population. However, our previous research is based on administrative data used to compare outcomes and procedures between people with or without T2DM who were not matched for baseline characteristics; therefore, some degree of residual confounding cannot be ruled out.

Here we aim to describe trends in number of cases and outcomes, namely in-hospital mortality (IHM) and length of hospital stay (LHS), of hospital admissions for major cardiovascular events (acute myocardial infarction, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, aortic aneurysm and dissection and acute lower limb ischemia), analyzed in prespecified moments in time (years 2002, 2006, 2010, 2014), in people with or without T2DM matched for International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes (up to the fourth digit), sex, age, province of residence and year, using national discharge hospital data.

Methods

We performed a retrospective, observational study using the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database (SNHDD), which is managed by the Spanish Ministry of Health, Social Services and Equality (MHSSE). The SNHDD includes patient variables (sex and date of birth), admission and discharge dates, up to 14 diagnoses at discharge and up to 20 procedures performed during the hospital stay. The ICD-9-CM is used for coding in the SNHDD.

This study was conducted using the nationwide SNHDD that compiles all public and private hospital data, which covers more than 98% of hospital admissions [9]. The study populations were created as follows.

  1. (1)

    From the entire databases of patients hospitalized in Spain in years 2002, 2006, 2010 and 2014 (data collected between January 1 and December 31) we selected those patients aged 40 years or over who had an ICD9 code for T2DM (codes 250.x0, 250.x2) in any diagnostic position. Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus were excluded (ICD-9-CM codes 250.x1, 250.x3).

  2. (2)

    Once we had the database with T2DM patients we created five databases for each year including those patients who had in the primary diagnosis of (i) myocardial infarction (codes: 410.xx), (ii) ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke (codes: 431; 432.9; 433.x1; 434.01; 434.11; 434.91), (iii) aortic aneurysm and dissection (codes: 441.xx), (iv) acute lower limb ischemia (codes: 440.21–440.24; 440.4; 444.22; 444.81; 445.02) and (v) any of these four cardiovascular conditions. Therefore we created a total of 20 different study populations of T2DM patients that is, five populations for each year (2002, 2006, 2010 and 2014).

  3. (3)

    Once we had these 20 populations of T2DM patients we matched each T2DM patient with a non-diabetic control using as matching variables ICD-9-CM codes for the four cardiovascular events studied (up to the fourth digit), sex, age, province of residence and year; if more than one control was available for a case, the selection was conducted randomly. The databases used to find the controls were those that included non T2DM patients for years 2002, 2006, 2010 and 2014.

  4. (4)

    So finally we analyzed data from 20 different study populations of T2DM and matched non-diabetic patients. We selected 27,255 matched couples in 2002 with any of the CV events analyzed (12,217 with myocardial infarction, 10,794 with stroke, 390 with aortic aneurysm and dissection, 3854 with acute lower limb ischemia), 32,252 with any of the CV events analyzed in 2006 (13,013 with myocardial infarction, 14,600 with stroke, 615 with aortic aneurysm and dissection and 4024 with acute lower limb ischemia), 35,098 with any of the CV events analyzed in 2010 (12,739 with myocardial infarction, 17,283 with stroke, 753 with aortic aneurysm and dissection and 4323 with acute lower limb ischemia), and 35,406 with any of the CV events analyzed in 2014 (12,458 with myocardial infarction, 17,559 with stroke, 841 with aortic aneurysm and dissection and 4548 with acute lower limb ischemia). We were able to match 80.8% of T2DM cases overall, therefore we analyzed this proportion of all the type 2 diabetic patients that suffered these conditions in Spain in the 4 years studied.

Clinical characteristics included data on overall comorbidities at the time of diagnosis, which were assessed by calculating the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) [10].

We retrieved data about specific comorbidities, risk factors and therapeutic and diagnostic procedures during the admissions for myocardial infarction, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, aortic aneurysm and dissection and acute lower limb ischemia. The conditions and procedures studied and the codes used to identify them according to the ICD-9-CM are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Comorbidities, risk factors and procedures with corresponding ICD-9-CM codes
Full size table

Hospital outcome variables included LHS and IHM, which was defined as the proportion of patients who died during the admission.

Statistical analysis

A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Variables were expressed as proportions and means with standard deviations. We constructed bivariate conditional logistic regression models to compare study variables between T2DM patients and controls for each cardiovascular event and for all cardiovascular events combined in the 4 years analyzed.

The changes from year 2002 to 2014 in the means and proportions of study variables were analyzed using ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis tests for means and logistic regression or a Chi square test for proportions.

To assess the effect of diabetes on the IHM we performed five conditional logistic regression analyses, one for each cardiovascular event and one for “all cardiovascular events combined”. To do so we used diabetes “yes/no” as the dependent variable, and as the independent variables those with significant results in the bivariate analysis and those considered relevant in other studies.

Estimates for variables were expressed as the odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Cases were matched with controls and all statistical analyses were performed using Stata version 10.1 (Stata, College Station, Texas, USA). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 (2-tailed).

Ethical aspects

Data confidentiality was maintained at all times in accordance with Spanish legislation. Given the anonymous and mandatory nature of the dataset, it was not deemed necessary to obtain informed consent or approval by an ethics committee.

Results

Myocardial infarction admissions

The total number of hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of myocardial infarction analyzed was 100,854. The distribution according to study variables for those with and without T2DM is shown in Table 2. The proportion of men rose from 63.49% in 2002 to 70.79% in 2014 (p < 0.05), and the mean age decreased from 71.01 to 70.23 years (p < 0.05).

Table 2 Characteristics, risk factors, and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for myocardial infarction admissions in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) versus non-diabetic patients, according to year of study (2002, 2006, 2010, and 2014)
Full size table

For all the years analyzed, the mean CCI was higher for T2DM patients when compared with non-diabetic patients.

People with T2DM had higher prevalence of obesity, hypertension and lipid metabolism disorders than non-diabetic people in the 4 years studied, whereas smoking was more frequent among people without diabetes. Overtime the prevalence of these four cardiovascular risk factors increased significantly in both groups.

The proportion of diabetic patients hospitalized with a myocardial infarction who suffered concomitant renal disease or congestive heart failure was higher than for non-diabetic patients.

Regarding the use of therapeutic procedures, among T2DM patients percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was recorded in 16.68% in year 2002 and in 53.32% in year 2014 (p < 0.05). However, the use of PCI was lower among diabetic than among matched non-diabetic controls in all the years analyzed. The proportion of patients undergoing coronary artery by-pass grafting (CABG) was similar in both groups and remained stable overtime.

The LHS was longer among T2DM patients than among non-diabetic patients, and decreased significantly from 2002 to 2014.

The IHM for the diabetic sample was 13.67% in 2002 and 7.95% in 2014 (p < 0.05). Equivalent figures for non-diabetic patients were significantly lower, 11.61 and 7.22% respectively.

Stroke admissions

Table 3 shows the characteristics, risk factors, and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for stroke admissions in T2DM versus non-diabetic patients, according to the year of study (2002, 2006, 2010, and 2014). The number of T2DM patients and matched controls rose from 10,794 in 2002 to 17,559 in 2014.

Table 3 Characteristics, risk factors, and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for stroke admissions in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) versus non-diabetic patients, according to year of study (2002, 2006, 2010, and 2014)
Full size table

Men represented around 52–54% of the study sample and the mean age increased from 73.17 years in 2002 to 75.35 years in 2014.

As can be seen in Table 3 the differences in the prevalences between those with and without diabetes, and in the time trends observed for cardiovascular risk factors and concomitant chronic conditions were very similar to those found for myocardial infarction (Table 2).

T2DM patients less frequently received mechanical ventilation and fibrinolysis than matched controls, yet the use of these therapeutic procedures increased overtime.

The LHS and the IHM did not differ significantly between both groups of patients in any year analyzed. However the LHS decreased significantly from around 12 to 10 days from 2002 to 2014. The reduction in the IHM was from 14.97% in year 2002 to 14.27% in year 2014 among T2DM patients (p < 0.05).

Aortic aneurysm and dissection admissions

As can be seen in Table 4 the number of T2DM patients hospitalized with aortic aneurysm and dissection increased from 390 in 2002 to 841 in 2014. Most of these patients were male (> 93%) and with a mean age ranging from 69 to 72 years.

Table 4 Characteristics, risk factors, and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for aortic aneurysm and dissection admissions in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) versus non-diabetic patients, according to year of study (2002, 2006, 2010, and 2014)
Full size table

The prevalence of obesity, hypertension and lipid metabolism disorders were higher among T2DM patients in the 4 years analyzed and increased significantly overtime in both groups.

No differences were found in the use of open or endovascular procedures to treat thoracic or abdominal aortic aneurysms between T2DM and non-diabetic patients. However a relevant and significant increment was observed for the use of endovascular procedures, especially for abdominal aneurysm, which increased from 4.87 to 37.1% over the study period among T2DM patients.

LHS and IHM were similar in both groups. The LHS decreased significantly from around 16–13 days from 2002 to 2014 in the T2DM group, but it increased slightly yet significantly in the non-T2DM group. Overtime IHM decreased significantly only in the T2DM group (14.36% in 2002 vs. 8.09% in 2014).

Acute lower limb ischemia admissions

The number of T2DM patients hospitalized with an acute lower limb ischemia increased from 3854 in 2002 to 4548 in 2014, as can been seen in Table 5. Males represented around 73% and the mean age was close to 74 years.

Table 5 Characteristics, risk factors, and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for acute lower limb ischemia admissions in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) versus non-diabetic patients, according to year of study (2002, 2006, 2010, and 2014)
Full size table

When we compared the mean CCI between those with and without T2DM we found higher values among T2DM patients for all the years analyzed.

The prevalence of risk factors such as obesity, hypertension and lipid metabolism disorders were higher among diabetic patients in the 4 years analyzed and increased significantly overtime in both groups. Furthermore, the proportion of T2DM patients hospitalized with an acute lower limb ischemia who suffered concomitant renal disease was higher than for non-diabetic patients and increased significantly overtime (9.24% in 2002 vs. 19.13% in 2014).

Regarding the use of therapeutic procedures no differences were found in the rate of major amputations between T2DM and non-diabetic patients. However a relevant and significant increment was observed in the rate of minor amputation in the T2DM group.

As can been seen in Table 5, major amputations and the use of lower extremity revascularization procedures decreased significantly over time in both groups. We found an increased rate of lower extremity angioplasty over the study period in both groups.

LHS was longer among T2DM than among non-diabetic patients, except in 2014, and decreased significantly from 2002 to 2014 in both groups.

The IHM was significantly lower in T2DM patients than in those without diabetes. In people with T2DM IHM did not change significantly over time, with figures around 5–6%.

All cardiovascular events combined admissions

Table 6 shows the characteristics, risk factors, and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for “all cardiovascular events combined” admissions in T2DM versus non-diabetic patients, according to the year of study. The number of T2DM patients and matched controls rose from 27,255 in 2002 to 35,406 in 2014. The proportion of men rose from 61.19% in 2002 to 63.71% in 2014 (p < 0.05) and the mean age increased from 72.03 to 73.19 years (p < 0.05).

Table 6 Characteristics, risk factors, and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for all cardiovascular events combined (acute coronary syndrome, stroke, aortic aneurysm and dissection or acute lower limb ischemia) admissions in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) versus non-diabetic patients, according to year of study (2002, 2006, 2010, and 2014)
Full size table

For all the years analyzed, higher values of hemodyalisis and peritoneal dialysis were found in T2DM patients for “all cardiovascular events combined” admission and increased significantly in both group overtime.

LHS decreased significantly over time both for T2DM and non-diabetic people. The IHM for the T2DM population was 13.04% in 2002 and 10.77% in 2014 (p < 0.05). Equivalent figures for the non-diabetic population were significantly lower, 12.71 and 10.53% respectively.

Figure 1 shows the results of the conditional logistic regression analysis to assess the effect of T2DM on the IHM in patients with acute cardiovascular events admissions. After adjusting for possible confounders T2DM patients had significantly higher mortality rates during admission for myocardial infarction (OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.09–1.21) and stroke (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.03–1.10). However these patients had a significantly lower mortality when admitted for acute lower limb ischemia (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.74–0.90).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Conditional logistic regression analysis to assess the effect of T2DM on the IHM in patients with acute cardiovascular events admissions. Odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs)

Full size image

Finally, we found that T2DM patients had a 6% higher probability (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.04–1.09) of dying during the hospitalization for “all cardiovascular events combined” than non-diabetic matched controls.

Discussion

In the Spanish population, we found increasing numbers of admissions overtime for stroke, aortic aneurysm and dissection and acute lower limb ischemia, but not for myocardial infarction, which remained stable. Previous reports had highlighted declining incidence rates for myocardial infarction in western societies, perhaps as a consequence of the preventive measures implemented to lower cardiovascular risk [4]. Notwithstanding the previous statement, people admitted to hospitals in our country for major cardiovascular events were progressively older (except for myocardial infarction), had more comorbidities (especially people with T2DM), and were more frequently coded overtime for classical cardiovascular risk factors (smoking, obesity, hypertension, lipid disorders) and renal diseases. This particularity was seen in people both with and without T2DM, albeit these factors were more prevalent in the T2DM population, except for smoking. However, a better quality coding in recent years could not be ruled out as a potential confounder [11]. Also, despite the lowering incidence rates of stroke previously reported by others [12], more recent research [13], including our own previous reports [6] support increasing numbers of admissions for this condition.

Atrial fibrillation was more often coded in the non-diabetic population and was increasingly coded overtime in people with and without T2DM. Contrarily, congestive heart failure was more often coded in people with T2DM, and remained stable overtime in both populations. This stability had been underscored in recent research [14], and some authors claim that new drugs with course-modifying properties may be playing a role to avoid readmissions [15]. In follow up studies it has been found, that among patients with heart failure both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were higher in diabetic patients [16]. However, in Spain a study showed that in hospital mortality in patients admitted because of acute heart failure did not differ between those with and without type 2 diabetes [17].

PCI increased overtime and was more frequently done in people without diabetes, at the expense of lowering rates of fibrinolysis during admission for myocardial infarction. Updated guidelines support prompt PCI where available, with a performance goal of ≤ 90 min from the first medical contact for ST elevation myocardial infarction within the previous 12 h [18].

The use of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft among diabetic patients remained stable overtime in our investigation. A recent meta-analysis concluded that CABG was associated with a significantly lower overall mortality rate and with less cerebrovascular and major adverse cardiovascular events than PCI among insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus patients [19].

As opposed to myocardial infarction, fibrinolysis was more frequently performed overtime during admission for an ischemic stroke, with predominance in people without diabetes. We had previously reported a higher mortality rate in T2DM people admitted for ischemic stroke undergoing systemic fibrinolysis [6], which might be due to a higher risk of bleeding in T2DM patients after systemic fibrinolytic therapy [20]. We do not know whether the perception of this risk could be influencing the decision to withhold fibrinolysis in the T2DM population; alternatively, particular characteristics of ischemic stroke in people with diabetes might make physicians less prone to indicate this treatment.

Major lower limb amputations declined overtime, with a more widespread use of lower limb angioplasty. A combined approach of improving regional blood flow plus conservative minor amputations is probably driving the declining rate of major amputations, as pointed out too by previous research [21]. This is relevant because lower-extremity amputations and the history of peripheral revascularization have been associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality and major macrovascular events [22].

LHS was lower in people without diabetes overall, but it declined in both populations overtime. For myocardial infarction our result agree with Loudon et al., who described for acute coronary syndromes a mean LHS of 7.8 days for T2DM patients compared with 7 days for the entire cohort (Adjusted OR 1.003; 95% CI 1.001–1.004) [23].

IHM declined overtime, though this trend was not significant for people without diabetes in the last 2 years analyzed. Other authors had described progressively lower mortality rates for cardiovascular mortality in Europe during the last three decades [24], yet with some heterogeneity within its borders [25, 26]. Patients’ awareness of classical cardiovascular risk factors, global preventive measures, free access to all levels of health care and prompt invasive management of acute conditions have probably acted synergistically to improved outcomes of cardiovascular disease [27].

In the multivariate analyses, T2DM patients had a significantly 15% higher mortality rate during admission for myocardial infarction, a 6% higher mortality for stroke and a 6% higher mortality for “all cardiovascular events combined”, than non-diabetic matched controls. Myocardial infarction has long been associated with a higher short and long-term mortality in people with T2DM [28,29,30,31]. Lettino et al. using 10 contemporary registries in Europe compared outcomes for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) between patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Their results showed a 1.66 (95% CI 1.42–1.94) higher risk of in-hospital all-cause death among diabetic patients [30]. Using the National Inpatient Sample, Ahmed et al., obtained an adjusted OR of 1.069, (95% CI 1.051–1.087) for DM on in-hospital mortality in patients with an acute myocardial infarction [31]. It is reassuring that in previous research from our group, without proceeding with case–control matching and evaluating a different period of time (2001–2010), the IHM that we reported was 14% higher in people with T2DM compared with no-diabetes in people admitted for a myocardial infarction [5], which is very similar to current data. Also, we had formerly reported a 7% significantly higher mortality for women with T2DM admitted for ischemic stroke versus non-diabetic women, yet no statistical differences for men [6], or for any gender when comparing T2DM and non-diabetic patients admitted for hemorrhagic stroke [32]. The differences in survival after a stroke between people with and without T2DM seem to persist in the long-term: Eriksson et al. showed that during a follow-up time after a stroke of 86,086 patient-years, 75.7% of the diabetic patients and 58.5% of the non-diabetic patients had died (p < 0.001), with median survivals of 60 months (95% CI 57–64) for the former and 117 months (95% CI 113–120) for the latter [33].

The prevention of cardiovascular events is of great importance for long-term survival of T2DM patients. Necessary strategies include intensive glycemic and risk factors control, an appropriate selection of glucose-lowering medications and screening strategies for the early detection of cardiovascular complications [34,35,36,37]. The benefit of aggressive coronary screening must be considered [37].

The robustness of our findings is supported by the large sample size, the 12-year follow-up period virtually covering all the Spanish population and the standardized methodology, which has been previously used for research in diabetes and its complications [38]. We were able to select matched controls for the T2DM cases to lower the possibility of confounding due to different baseline characteristics between the two subpopulations. Nevertheless, our work has some limitations: Our data source was the CMBD, an administrative database that contains discharge data for hospitalizations in Spain and depends on the quality of the information that physicians report.

The prevalence of obesity, hypertension and smoking (including prior smoking) found in our investigation are lower than those reported in other studies conducted among people with diabetes in Spain [39,40,41].

The under-coding of obesity is relevant since, previous investigations have suggested that among diabetic patients obesity may have a protective effect on cardiac and all-cause mortality after adjusting for confounding factors [42].

Previous studies have found that under reporting of risk factors including obesity is common among discharge diagnoses [43, 44].

The main reason for this is that according to the SNHDD methodology the primary/main diagnosis is defined as the condition which, after proper investigation, is considered the reason why the patient was admitted to the hospital [9]. The secondary diagnosis includes those diseases or risk factors that coexists with the primary diagnosis at the time of admission or were detected during the hospitalization and that, in the opinion of the treating physician, may have affected the patient’s progress or treatment plan. Other possible reasons include that people who codify may not record risk factors owing to time constraints when performing data abstraction or that when time for coding is limited, coders tend to include severe conditions but not risk factors [43, 44].

Another limitation is that coding of diagnoses and guidelines of reporting may have substantially changed over the study period. However, in Spain the SNHDD has maintained the same methodology over the last years and the codes for the cardiovascular conditions studied and diabetes have not been modified overtime. In any case these changes in coding would not affect the main results of our investigation because we compare always T2DM patients with matched non diabetic patients who were hospitalized the same year, so it is expected that the changes in reporting would affect equally cases and controls. However, these changes in diagnostic criteria, coding practices and reporting could affect time trend analysis. Beside these limitations studies conducted in other countries have assessed the time trends in hospitalizations for cardiovascular diseases using hospital discharge data [45, 46].

Unfortunately in Spain a validation study to assess the rate of unreported diagnosis of diabetes in administrative databases has not yet been conducted, to our knowledge. However, Leong et al. reported that a commonly-used administrative database definition for diabetes had a sensitivity of 82.3% (95% CI 75.8, 87.4) and a specificity of 97.9% (95% CI 96.5, 98.8%) [47]. While this definition misses about one-fifth of cases of diabetes and wrongly classifies 2.1% of non-cases in the population as diabetes cases, it is likely sensitive enough for analyzing trends in the general population, if its accuracy remains reasonably stable overtime.

We used four prespecified years (2002, 2006, 2010, 2014) as representative of the time trends in number of cases and outcomes of the admissions for cardiovascular events in our population, thus lacking continuous information for the whole 12-year period. Our database is also limited by its anonymity (no identifying items, such as clinical history number), what precludes the extraction of some specific pieces of information (i.e., people who moved from one hospital to another would appear twice). We had no access to additional variables, such as duration of diabetes or drugs exposure.

Finally, a possible methodological limitation is that we did not match for the comorbidities included in the CCI. According to several authors matching for too many variables may lead to overmatching that would not only decrease the number of case–control pairs but also probably increase the number of concordant (uninformative) pairs [48,49,50]. In fact, in our study matching for the CCI would reduce the number of matched pair to under 40% of diabetic patients.

Szklo concludes that over-adjustment occurs when adjustment (or matching) is carried out for a variable so closely related to the variable of interest that no variability in the latter is allowed. For example in case–control study, making the case and control groups very similar o identical regarding the confounder results in their also very similar or identical regarding the exposure, thereby resulting in apparent null association. In general it must be kept in mind that when adjustment is carried out for a given confounding variable, it is also carried out for variables related to it [48].

So, to avoid losing sample size and overmatching we considered a better option to match for only three variables, age, sex and province of residence including comorbidity using the CCI as a covariable within the multivariable model, since it allowed us to explore its role over the outcomes, avoiding the risk of overmatching and maximizing the number of informative pairs.

Conclusions

In Spain, the number of hospital admissions for stroke, aortic aneurysm and dissection and acute lower limb ischemia increased overtime (2002–2012), but remained stable for myocardial infarction. LHS and IHM declined overtime, though IHM only did it significantly in all years analyzed in people with T2DM. T2DM patients had a significantly 15% higher mortality rate during admission for myocardial infarction, a 6% higher mortality for stroke, and a 6% higher mortality rate for “all cardiovascular events combined”, than non-diabetic matched controls. Further research is needed to confirm these findings in countries similar to ours, and to help us understand the reasons for an apparently increased mortality in T2DM patients when admitted to hospital for some major cardiovascular events.

Abbreviations

CIs:

confidence intervals

SNHDD:

Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database

EVAR:

endovascular implantation of graft in abdominal aorta

ICD-9-CM:

International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification

IHM:

in-hospital mortality

LHS:

length of hospital stay

MHSSE:

Spanish Ministry of Health, Social Services and Equality

ORs:

odds ratios

PCI:

percutaneous coronary intervention

T2DM:

type 2 diabetes mellitus

TEVAR:

endovascular implantation of graft in thoracic aorta

References

  1. Soriguer F, Goday A, Bosch-Comas A, Bordiú E, Calle-Pascual A, Carmena R, et al. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose regulation in Spain: the Di@bet.es study. Diabetologia. 2012;55:88–93. doi:10.1007/s00125-011-2336-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yusuf S, Rangarajan S, Teo K, Islam S, Li W, Liu L, et al. Cardiovascular risk and events in 17 low-, middle-, and high-income countries. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:818–27. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1311890.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. GBD 2015 Obesity Collaborators, Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, Sur P, Estep K, et al. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:13–27. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1614362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135:e146–603. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lopez-de-Andres A, Jimenez-Garcia R, Hernandez-Barrera V, Jimenez-Trujillo I, Gallardo-Pino C, de Miguel AG, Carrasco-Garrido P. National trends over one decade in hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction among Spanish adults with type 2 diabetes: cumulative incidence, outcomes and use of percutaneous coronary intervention. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e85697. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085697.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Muñoz-Rivas N, Méndez-Bailón M, Hernández-Barrera V, de Miguel-Yanes JM, Jiménez-García R, Esteban-Hernández J, et al. Time trends in ischemic stroke among type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients: analysis of the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Data (2003–2012). PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0145535. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145535.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lopez-de-Andrés A, Jiménez-Trujillo I, Jiménez-García R, Hernández-Barrera V, de Miguel-Yanes JM, Méndez-Bailón M, et al. National trends in incidence and outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm among elderly type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients in Spain (2003–2012). Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015;14:48. doi:10.1186/s12933-015-0216-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lopez-de-Andres A, Jiménez-García R, Aragón-Sánchez J, Jiménez-Trujillo I, Hernández-Barrera V, Méndez-Bailón M, et al. National trends in incidence and outcomes in lower extremity amputations in people with and without diabetes in Spain, 2001–2012. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015;108:499–507. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2015.01.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Instituto Nacional de Gestión Sanitaria, Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad. Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos, Hospitales del INSALUD. http://www.ingesa.msc.es/estadEstudios/documPublica/CMBD-2001.htm. Accessed 30 Apr 2017.

  10. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. George J, Newman JM, Ramanathan D, Klika AK, Higuera CA, Barsoum WK. Administrative databases can yield false conclusions-An example of obesity in total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.052.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Barker-Collo SL, Parag V. Worldwide stroke incidence and early case fatality reported in 56 population-based studies: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:355–69. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70025-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R, Mensah GA, Connor M, Bennett DA, et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2014;383:245–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Gabet A, Juillière Y, Lamarche-Vadel A, Vernay M, Olié V. National trends in rate of patients hospitalized for heart failure and heart failure mortality in France, 2000–2012. Eur J Heart Fail. 2015;17:583–90. doi:10.1002/ejhf.284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shaya FT, Breunig IM, Mehra MR. Disease-modifying therapy and hospitalization risk in heart failure patients. Am J Manag Care. 2015;21:39–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Alonso N, Lupón J, Barallat J, de Antonio M, Domingo M, Zamora E, et al. Impact of diabetes on the predictive value of heart failure biomarkers. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15(1):151. doi:10.1186/s12933-016-0470-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cerdà P, Franco J, Chivite D, Formiga F. Mortality in type 2 diabetes patients admitted because of acute heart failure. Rev Clin Esp. 2016;216(6):341–3. doi:10.1016/j.rce.2016.03.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. American College of Emergency Physicians; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE Jr, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:485–510. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bundhun PK, Wu ZJ, Chen MH. Coronary artery bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 6 randomized controlled trials. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15:2. doi:10.1186/s12933-015-0323-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kearney K, Tomlinson D, Smith K, Ajjan R. Hypofibrinolysis in diabetes: a therapeutic target for the reduction of cardiovascular risk. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017;16:34. doi:10.1186/s12933-017-0515-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lombardo FL, Maggini M, De Bellis A, Seghieri G, Anichini R. Lower extremity amputations in persons with and without diabetes in Italy: 2001–2010. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e86405. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086405.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Mohammedi K, Woodward M, Hirakawa Y, Zoungas S, Colagiuri S, Hamet P, et al. Presentations of major peripheral arterial disease and risk of major outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: results from the ADVANCE-ON study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15(1):129. doi:10.1186/s12933-016-0446-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Loudon BL, Gollop ND, Carter PR, Uppal H, Chandran S, Potluri R. Impact of cardiovascular risk factors and disease on length of stay and mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Int J Cardiol. 2016;220:745–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.188.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gaeta M, Campanella F, Gentile L, Schifino GM, Capasso L, Bandera F, et al. European cardiovascular mortality over the last three decades: evaluation of time trends, forecasts for 2016. Ann Ig. 2017;29:206–17. doi:10.7416/ai.2017.2148.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Helis E, Augustincic L, Steiner S, Chen L, Turton P, Fodor JG. Time trends in cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in the ‘old’ and ‘new’ European Union countries. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2011;18:347–59. doi:10.1177/1741826710389361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nichols M, Townsend N, Scarborough P, Rayner M. Trends in age-specific coronary heart disease mortality in the European Union over three decades: 1980–2009. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:3017–27. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht159.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hartley A, Marshall DC, Salciccioli JD, Sikkel MB, Maruthappu M, Shalhoub J. Trends in mortality from ischemic heart disease and cerebrovascular disease in Europe: 1980–2009. Circulation. 2016;133:1916–26. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018931.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gore MO, Patel MJ, Kosiborod M, Parsons LS, Khera A, de Lemos JA, et al. Diabetes mellitus and trends in hospital survival after myocardial infarction, 1994–2006: data from the national registry of myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5:791–7. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.965491.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Icks A, Claessen H, Kirchberger I, Heier M, Peters A, Trentinaglia I, et al. Mortality after first myocardial infarction in diabetic and non-diabetic people between 1985 and 2009. The MONICA/KORA registry. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014;29:899–909. doi:10.1007/s10654-014-9964-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lettino M, Andell P, Zeymer U, Widimsky P, Danchin N, Bardaji A, et al. Diabetic patients with acute coronary syndromes in contemporary European registries: characteristics and outcomes. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2017. doi:10.1093/ehjcvp/pvw049 (Epub ahead of print).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ahmed B, Davis HT, Laskey WK. In-hospital mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction: results from the national inpatient sample, 2000–2010. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(4):pii: e001090. doi:10.1161/JAHA.114.001090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Muñoz-Rivas N, Méndez-Bailón M, Hernández-Barrera V, de Miguel-Yanes JM, Jimenez-Garcia R, Esteban-Hernández J, et al. Type 2 diabetes and hemorrhagic stroke: a population-based study in Spain from 2003 to 2012. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25(6):1431–43. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.02.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Eriksson M, Carlberg B, Eliasson M. The disparity in long-term survival after a first stroke in patients with and without diabetes persists: the Northern Sweden MONICA study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;34:153–60. doi:10.1159/000339763.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2017. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(Suppl. 1):S1–135.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Avogaro A, Fadini GP, Sesti G, Bonora E, Del Prato S. Continued efforts to translate diabetes cardiovascular outcome trials into clinical practice. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15(1):111. doi:10.1186/s12933-016-0431-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang P, Huang R, Lu S, Xia W, Sun H, Sun J, et al. HbA1c below 7% as the goal of glucose control fails to maximize the cardiovascular benefits: a meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015;14:124. doi:10.1186/s12933-015-0285-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Tsujimoto T, Sugiyama T, Yamamoto-Honda R, Kishimoto M, Noto H, Morooka M, et al. Beneficial effects through aggressive coronary screening for type 2 diabetes patients with advanced vascular complications. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(33):e4307. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000004307.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. López-de-Andrés A, Martínez-Huedo MA, Carrasco-Garrido P, Hernández-Barrera V, Gil-de-Miguel A, Jiménez-García R. Trends in lower-extremity amputations in people with and without diabetes in Spain, 2001–2008. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:1570–6. doi:10.2337/dc11-0077.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Salinero-Fort MA, San Andrés-Rebollo FJ, Gómez-Campelo P, de Burgos-Lunar C, Cárdenas-Valladolid J, Abánades-Herranz JC, et al. Body mass index and all-cause mortality among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: findings from the 5-year follow-up of the MADIABETES cohort. Eur J Intern Med. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2017.06.021 (Epub ahead of print).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Jimenez-Trujillo I, Jiménez-García R, Esteban-Hernández J, Hernández-Barrera V, Carrasco Garrido P, Salinero-Fort MA, et al. Predictors of adherence to multiple clinical preventive recommendations among adults with diabetes in Spain. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0131844.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. de Burgos-Lunar C, Jiménez-García R, Salinero-Fort MA, Gómez-Campelo P, Gil A, Abánades-Herranz JC, et al. Trends in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment and control in an adult type 2 diabetes Spanish population between 2003 and 2009. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e86713.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Won KB, Hur SH, Cho YK, Yoon HJ, Nam CW, Kim KB, et al. Comparison of 2-year mortality according to obesity in stabilized patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after acute myocardial infarction: results from the DIAMOND prospective cohort registry. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015;14:141. doi:10.1186/s12933-015-0305-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Martin BJ, Chen G, Graham M, Quan H. Coding of obesity in administrative hospital discharge abstract data: accuracy and impact for future research studies. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:70. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Lujic S, Watson DE, Randall DA, Simpson JM, Jorm LR. Variation in the recording of common health conditions in routine hospital data: study using linked survey and administrative data in New South Wales, Australia. BMJ Open. 2014;4(9):e005768.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Gregg EW, Li Y, Wang J, Burrows NR, Ali MK, Rolka D, et al. Changes in diabetes-related complications in the United States, 1990–2010. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(16):1514–23. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1310799.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Buckley CM, O’Farrell A, Canavan RJ, Lynch AD, De La Harpe DV, Bradley CP, et al. Trends in the incidence of lower extremity amputations in people with and without diabetes over a 5-year period in the Republic of Ireland. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(7):e41492. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041492.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Leong A, Dasgupta K, Bernatsky S, Lacaille D, Avina-Zubieta A, Rahme E. Systematic review and meta-analysis of validation studies on a diabetes case definition from health administrative records. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e75256. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075256.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Szklo M, Nieto FJ. Epidemiology beyond the basics. Gaithersburg: Aspen., pag; 2000. p. 189–90.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. ‘Chapter 11. Design strategies to improve study accuracy’ in Modern Epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Brookmeyer R, Liang KY, Linet M. Matched case-control designs and overmatched analyses. Am J Epidemiol. 1986;124:693–701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

All authors were involved in the conception and design of the survey and in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

According to the contract signed with the Spanish Ministry of Health and Social Services that provided us the databases of the Spanish National Hospital Database, (Conjunto Mínimo Basico de Datos; CMBD) we cannot provide the databases to any other investigator and we have to destroy the databases once the investigation has been concluded. As a consequence of the previous we cannot upload the databases in any public repository. However, any investigator can apply for the databases filling the questionnaire available at http://www.msssi.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/estadisticas/estMinisterio/SolicitudCMBDdocs/Formulario_Peticion_Datos_CMBD.pdf. All other relevant data are in the paper.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

This study forms part of research funded by the FIS (Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias—Health Research Fund, Grant No. PI16/00564, Instituto de Salud Carlos III) and by the Grupo de Excelencia Investigadora URJC-Banco Santander No. 30VCPIGI03: Investigación traslacional en el proceso de salud—enfermedad (ITPSE).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Comunidad De Madrid, Spain

    José M. de Miguel-Yanes

  2. Preventive Medicine and Public Health Teaching and Research Unit, Health Sciences Faculty, Rey Juan Carlos University, Avda. de Atenas s/n, 28922, Alcorcon, Madrid, Comunidad De Madrid, Spain

    Rodrigo Jiménez-García, Valentín Hernández-Barrera & Ana Lopez-de-Andrés

  3. Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Comunidad De Madrid, Spain

    Manuel Méndez-Bailón

  4. Respiratory Department, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Comunidad De Madrid, Spain

    Javier de Miguel-Díez

Authors
  1. José M. de Miguel-Yanes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rodrigo Jiménez-García
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Valentín Hernández-Barrera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Manuel Méndez-Bailón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Javier de Miguel-Díez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ana Lopez-de-Andrés
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodrigo Jiménez-García.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Miguel-Yanes, J.M., Jiménez-García, R., Hernández-Barrera, V. et al. Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on in-hospital-mortality after major cardiovascular events in Spain (2002–2014). Cardiovasc Diabetol 16, 126 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-017-0609-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-017-0609-4

Keywords

Cardiovascular Diabetology

ISSN: 1475-2840