Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Higher systolic blood pressure is specifically associated with better islet beta-cell function in T2DM patients with high glycemic level

Cardiovascular Diabetology volume 21, Article number: 283 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) usually have higher blood viscosity attributed to high blood glucose that can decrease blood supply to the pancreas. A mild increase in blood pressure (BP) has been reported as a potential compensatory response that can maintain blood perfusion in the islet. However, how BP influences beta-cell function in T2DM subjects remains inconsistent. This study aimed to examine the relationship between BP and beta-cell function in patients with T2DM under different HbA1c levels.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study of 615 T2DM patients, whose clinical data were extracted from hospital medical records. Beta-cell function was assessed by insulin secretion-sensitivity index-2 (ISSI2). Multivariable linear regression analysis and restricted cubic splines (RCS) analysis were performed to identify the association between systolic BP (SBP) and ISSI2. Mediation analysis was performed to determine whether higher SBP could reduce blood glucose by enhancing beta-cell function.

Results

After adjustment of potential confounders, in participants with HbA1c ≥ 10%, the SBP between 140 to150 mmHg had the highest log ISSI2 (b = 0.227, 95% CI 0.053–0.402), an association specific to participants with < 1 year duration of diabetes. RCS analyses demonstrated an inverted U-shaped association between SBP and ISSI2 with the SBP at 144 mmHg corresponding to the best beta-cell function. This higher SBP was “paradoxically” associated with lower 2 h postprandial blood glucose (PBG) when SBP < 150 mmHg that was almost exclusively mediated by ISSI2 (mediating effect = − 0.043, 95%CI − 0.067 to − 0.018; mediating effect percentage = 94.7%, P < 0.01). SBP was however not associated with improvement in ISSI2 or 2 h PBG in participants with HbA1c < 10%.

Conclusions

In early stage of diabetes, a slightly elevated SBP (140–150 mmHg) was transiently associated with better beta-cell function in T2DM patients with HbA1c ≥ 10% but not in those with HbA1c < 10%.

Background

Normal islet beta-cell function is critical for maintaining blood glucose homeostasis. Beta-cell function is vulnerable to changes in islet blood supply, which ensures delivery of nutrients and oxygen to islet cells, removes metabolic wastes and circulates the released hormones [1]. Endocrine cells constitute only ~ 1% of total pancreatic cell mass but consume 5–15% of the blood supply to pancreas [2].

Blood pressure (BP) is the driving force of organ perfusion. Animal models were used to show that elevated BP promoted islet blood supply, resulting in increased number and volume of islet cells and consequent enhancement of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion [3]. Some clinical studies also support the importance of elevated BP in organ perfusion in patients with diabetes. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the increased blood viscosity induced by hyperglycemia and some erythrocyte-related abnormalities together can reduce the blood flow rate, which would require raising the BP as a compensatory mechanism to avoid tissue ischemia [4,5,6,7]. A positive association between blood viscosity and a higher BP was observed in both diabetic and non-diabetic individuals [8, 9]. This led us to hypothesize that a relatively higher BP might enhance beta-cell function in T2DM patients that have a high glycemic level.

The population-based evidence on the relationship between BP and beta-cell function has been inconsistent. Some studies from newly diagnosed T2DM patients and non-diabetic individuals demonstrated that higher systolic BP (SBP) was associated with improved beta-cell function [10, 11]. In contrast, other studies found that hypertension or elevated SBP was a risk factor for beta-cell dysfunction [12,13,14]. Notably, there are no study that examines what range of SBP corresponds to better islet beta-cell function and whether this association may be different in T2DM patients with different glycemic status.

A better beta-cell function is associated with not only favorable metabolic control but also decreased risk of cardiovascular complications and hypoglycemia [15,16,17]. Currently, a paradigm shift from the glucose-centric to beta cell-centric concept has been proposed in the management of T2DM, which emphasizes the importance of beta-cell preservation rather than just lowering the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level [18]. Given the approximately 80% rate of hypertension prevalence in adults with diabetes and nearly 50% rate of inadequate glycemic control in treated T2DM patients [19, 20], there is urgent need to clarify the relationship between BP and islet beta-cell function in order to optimize the latter.

In this study, we performed the analysis in T2DM patients with different HbA1c levels to examine the relationship between BP and beta-cell function, with the aim to determine the optimal BP that ensures better beta-cell function which we hypothesize is different at the different glycemic levels.

Methods

Study design and participants

This was a cross-sectional study. We enrolled 623 adult (age ≥ 18 years) patients with T2DM who were in hospital due to poor glycemic control from January 2019 to July 2022 at the Department of Endocrinology, Jining First People’s Hospital that is affiliated to the Jining Medical University, Jining, China. Patients with acute pancreatitis, pancreatic atrophy, and SBP < 90 mmHg or diastolic BP (DBP) < 60 mmHg were excluded. Finally, a total of 615 patients were included in the analysis. The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Jining Medical University (No. JNMC-2022-YX-019).

Clinical and laboratory measurements

All data were extracted from hospital medical records by trained staff using the quality-control Epidata version 3.1 software.

Demographics, lifestyle, history of chronic diseases, duration of diabetes, medications used were collected. Body height and weight were measured by height and weight meters (OMRON HNH-318; OMRON Corporation, Shenzhen, China). Blood pressure was measured by an electronic BP meter (OMRON HBP-1100U; OMRON Corporation, Dalian, China) in the seated position, with feet on the floor and arm supported at heart level. Laboratory examination items, including lipid profiles and hepatorenal function, were tested enzymatically by an automatic biochemistry analyzer (AU5831, Beckman Coulter, USA). HbA1c was tested by a hemoglobin analyzer (Bio-Rad D-10) using high-pressure liquid chromatography. All information above was collected at the time of admission of the patients.

A standardized steamed bread meal test (SBMT) was conducted before patient discharge. The night before the SBMT, patients stopped taking medications that would affect the trial and kept overnight fasting. The next morning, before patients took medications, venous blood samples were drawn to measure blood glucose, insulin, and C-peptide at fasting, 60 min, 120 min, and 180 min following the ingestion of 100-g flour. Insulin and C-peptide were tested by an automatic electrochemiluminescence analyzer (Cobas e801, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Blood glucose was tested enzymatically by an automatic biochemistry analyzer (AU5831, Beckman Coulter, USA).

Definitions

The diagnosis of T2DM was made according to the 1999 World Health Organization criteria: fasting blood glucose (FBG) ≥ 7.0 mmol/L or 2-h oral glucose tolerance test plasma glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/L or self-reported physician-diagnosed diabetes. Hypertension was defined as SBP ≥ 140 mmHg and/or DBP ≥ 90 mmHg, self-reported physician-diagnosed hypertension, or taking antihypertensive medications even with SBP < 140 mmHg or DBP < 90 mmHg. Overweight was defined as body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 25 kg/m2 but < 30 kg/m2, and obesity is BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, according to the American Heart Association recommendations [21].

Index calculation

BMI was calculated as weight (kg)/[height (m) × height (m)]. Insulin secretion-sensitivity index-2 (ISSI2) = (AUCinsulin/AUCglucose) × Matsuda, where AUCinsulin and AUCglucose are the areas under the insulin curve and glucose curve within 120 min of SBMT [22]. Matsuda = 10,000/√(MG × MI) × (FG × FI), where MG is mean glucose, MI is mean insulin, FG is fasting glucose, and FI is fasting insulin. Homeostatic model assessment 2-insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR) and homeostatic model assessment 2-beta (HOMA2-B) were calculated by HOMA2 model based on blood glucose and C-peptide [23]. The unit of blood glucose, insulin, and C-peptide were mmol/L, μIU/ml, and nmol/L, respectively. Antihypertensive treatment rate = (number of participants undergoing oral antihypertensive agent treatment/number of participants with hypertension) × 100%.

Statistical analysis

We used spline function in the RStudio version 1.4.1106. to estimate the blood glucose, insulin, and C-peptide at 30 min of SBMT. We divided participants into two groups based on the threshold of 10% of HbA1c and performed analyses in each group.

Continuous variables with normal distribution were presented as mean ± SD and compared by two independent sample t-test or one-way analysis of variance. Continuous variables with skewed distribution were presented as median (25th–75th) and compared by Wilcoxon rank sum test or Kruskal–Wallis H test. Categorical variables were presented as numbers (percentages) and compared by Chi-square test.

To identify the association between BP and beta-cell function (ISSI2), multivariable linear regression analysis was performed with adjustment of age, sex, duration of diabetes, BMI, triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), Matsuda index, and medications used. BP was analyzed in the model as a continuous variable and a categorical variable, respectively. Among participants with HbA1c ≥ 10%, we performed sensitivity analyses in following subjects: insulin sensitivity in 10th–90th percentiles, without taking oral antihypertensive agents, without accepting insulin treatment, and duration of diabetes < 1 year or ≥ 1 year.

To identify the dose–response relationship between SBP and ISSI2, we conducted restricted cubic splines (RCS) analyses. We set four knots at the 5th, 25th, 75th, and 95th percentiles, and set SBP of 120 mmHg as a reference. In addition, to determine the dose–response relationship between SBP and blood glucose, we further analyzed the association between SBP and blood glucose by RCS with the same parameters set. Poverall < 0.05 and Pnon-linear < 0.05 indicated that the association was nonlinear.

To determine whether beta-cell function mediated the association between SBP and 2 h postprandial blood glucose (PBG) in participants with HbA1c ≥ 10%, we performed mediation analyses. Bootstrap method was used to estimate the confidence interval with the seed set to 5000.

All statistical analyses were conducted in SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). A two-tailed P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Characteristics of participants

This study included 615 T2DM participants with 411 (66.8%) male and a mean age of 49.2 ± 12.1 years. The mean HbA1c for all participants was 9.8 ± 2.1% (83.6 ± 23.4 mmol/mol) and the median duration of diabetes was 3.7 (0.1–10.0) years. Compared to those with HbA1c < 10%, participants with HbA1c ≥ 10% were younger (46.3 ± 12.3 years vs. 51.5 ± 11.4 years, P < 0.01), had a shorter duration of diabetes [1.0 (0.1–7.0) years vs. 5.6 (1.3–10.7) years, P < 0.01], a lower prevalence of self-reported hypertension (27.6% vs. 35.6%, P < 0.05), coronary heart disease (8.5% vs. 20.3%, P < 0.01), stroke (6.4% vs. 12.8%, P < 0.01); and manifested a lower level of beta-cell function [97.1 (66.5–136.5) vs. 141.0 (87.9–198.0), P < 0.01]. Amongst all the hypertensive subjects, those that were on antihypertensive treatment was 53.1% (172/324), which when divided into those with HbA1c < 10% versus ≥ 10%, it was 57.6% (110/191), and 44.7% (55/123), respectively (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants
Full size table

Higher SBP was associated with better beta-cell function in participants with HbA1c ≥ 10%

To examine whether a relatively higher BP level might enhance the beta-cell function in T2DM patients with a high glycemic level, we first performed the multivariable linear regression analysis in participants with HbA1c < 10% versus ≥ 10%, respectively. In participants with HbA1c ≥ 10%, the DBP was positively associated with log ISSI2 (b = 0.058, 95% CI 0.007–0.110), and SBP was marginally associated with log ISSI2 (b = 0.023, 95% CI − 0.011 to 0.056) after adjustment for age, sex, duration of diabetes, BMI, log TG, LDL-C, log Matsuda index, insulin treatment, oral hypoglycemic agent treatment, ACE inhibitor/ARB treatment, and other antihypertensive agent treatment (Table 2).

Table 2 Association between blood pressure and ISSI2 in participants with HbA1c < 10% or ≥ 10%
Full size table

Then, we divided the participants into different SBP groups (90–120 mmHg group and the other four groups at 10 mmHg increment from 120 to150 mmHg) or DBP groups (60–80 mmHg group and the other two groups at 10 mmHg increment from 80 to 90 mmHg), and then compared their ISSI2. The characteristics of participants with different BP groups in HbA1c < 10% or ≥ 10% were demonstrated in the Additional file 1: Table S1 or Table S2. The level of HbA1c, FBG, 2 h PBG, TG, total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and LDL-C were not significantly different among these SBP groups or DBP groups. Remarkably, we found that a SBP between 140–150 mmHg had the highest log ISSI2 (b = 0.227, 95% CI 0.053–0.402) in participants with HbA1c ≥ 10%, but this phenomenon was not found in participants with HbA1c < 10%. The DBP was not associated with log ISSI2 either in participants with HbA1c ≥ 10% or < 10% (Table 2).

To evaluate the robustness of these results in participants with HbA1c ≥ 10%, we conducted sensitivity analyses in the following subjects: (1) insulin sensitivity in 10th–90th percentiles; (2) without taking oral antihypertensive agents; (3) without accepting insulin treatment; (4) duration of diabetes < 1 year; (5) duration of diabetes ≥ 1 year. This robust sensitivity analysis employing all these parameters supported the observation that a SBP of 140–150 mmHg was associated with the better log ISSI2 except for the parameter of the duration of diabetes ≥ 1 year. However, the DBP was not associated with log ISSI2 improvement in the same sensitivity analyses (Additional file 1: Table S3), indicating the previous result that DBP as a continuous variable shown to be positively associated with log ISSI2 was not a robust finding. Thus, in the subsequent analyses, we did not further analyze the relationship between DBP and beta-cell function.

To further identify the optimal SBP level corresponding to the best beta-cell function, we performed RCS analyses in participants with HbA1c < 10% versus ≥ 10%, respectively. In participants with HbA1c ≥ 10%, we observed an inverted U-shape association between SBP and beta-cell function. Notably, ISSI2 progressively increased with increasing SBP reaching optimal at the SBP of 144 mmHg (difference between 144 mmHg and Ref. = 22.19, 95% CI 5.28–39.10), followed by reduction in ISSI2 at further increases in SBP (Fig. 1a). In contrast, in participants with HbA1c < 10%, there was neither a linear nor a non-linear association of the SBP with ISSI2 (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

RCS analysis on the association between SBP and ISSI2. a association in participants with HbA1c ≥ 10%. b association in participants with HbA1c < 10%. Poverall and Pnon-linear were from the generalized linear model, in which age, sex, duration of diabetes, BMI, TG, LDL-C, Matsuda index, insulin treatment, oral hypoglycemic agent treatment, ACE inhibitor/ARB treatment, and other antihypertensive agent treatment were adjusted. ISSI2, insulin secretion-sensitivity index-2; SBP, systolic blood pressure; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; BMI, body mass index; TG, triglyceride; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; ACE, angiotensin converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker

Full size image

Higher SBP was “paradoxically” associated with a lower 2 h PBG in participants with HbA1c ≥ 10%

The above results suggested that a certain degree of elevated SBP was associated with a better performing beta-cell function in participants with HbA1c ≥ 10%. We therefore next assessed whether an increasing SBP could improve blood glucose level, presumably resulting from the improved beta-cell function. We performed the RCS analysis on the association of SBP with 2 h PBG and also with FBG. In participants with HbA1c ≥ 10%, we found the SBP to be associated with the 2 h PBG, but in a non-linear pattern. Specifically, the 2 h PBG decreased as SBP increased from 120 to 145 mmHg (difference between 145 mmHg and Ref. = − 2.03 mmol/L, 95% CI − 3.20 to − 0.86), the 2 h PBG then tended to rise with further increases in SBP (Fig. 2a). In contrast, in participants with HbA1c < 10%, there was neither a linear nor a non-linear association of the SBP with the 2 h PBG (Fig. 2b). With FBG, there was also neither a linear nor non-linear association of the SBP with HbA1c ≥ 10% (Fig. 2c) or < 10% (Fig. 2d).

Fig. 2
figure 2

RCS analysis on the association of SBP with 2 h PBG (a, b) and FBG (c, d). Poverall and Pnon-linear were from the generalized linear model, in which age, sex, duration of diabetes, BMI, TG, LDL-C, Matsuda index, insulin treatment, oral hypoglycemic agent treatment, ACE inhibitor/ARB treatment, and other antihypertensive agent treatment were adjusted. ISSI2, insulin secretion-sensitivity index-2; SBP, systolic blood pressure; PBG, postprandial blood glucose; FBG, fasting blood glucose; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; BMI, body mass index; TG, triglyceride; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; ACE, angiotensin converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker

Full size image

Beta-cell function mediated the association between SBP and 2 h PBG in participants with HbA1c ≥ 10%

The above results demonstrated that in participants with HbA1c ≥ 10%, SBP at less than 150 mmHg was associated with increased ISSI2 and decreased 2 h PBG. We then interrogated whether this association of the SBP and 2 h PBG was attributed to the postulated effects on beta-cell function by performing mediation analyses in participants with SBP < 150 mmHg. Mediation analyses showed that SBP was negatively associated with 2 h PBG before adjusting for ISSI2 (total effect = − 0.045, 95% CI − 0.082 to − 0.008) but not after adjusting for ISSI2 (direct effect = − 0.002, 95% CI − 0.032 to 0.027). The mediating effect of ISSI2 was − 0.043 (95% CI − 0.067 to − 0.018), which translates to indicate that beta-cell function might have mediated 94.7% (P < 0.01) of the association between SBP and 2 h PBG (Fig. 3a). To avoid reverse causality, we repeated the analysis with SBP as the dependent variable, 2 h PBG as the independent variable, and ISSI2 as the potential mediating variable. The direct effect of 2 h PBG on SBP was 0.102 (95% CI − 0.448 to 0.653) and the mediating effect of ISSI2 was − 0.359 (95% CI − 0.725 to 0.007), which indicated that 2 h PBG may not influence SBP and beta-cell function may not be a mediator in this analysis (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Mediating effect of islet beta-cell function. a effect of SBP on 2 h PBG. b effect of 2 h PBG on SBP. All analyses were performed in participants with HbA1c ≥ 10% and in the SBP < 150 mmHg. Mediating effect = Indirect effect 1 × Indirect effect 2. a N = 240 and adjusted age, sex, duration of diabetes, BMI, TG, LDL-C, Matsuda index, insulin treatment, oral hypoglycemic agent treatment, ACE inhibitor/ARB treatment, and other antihypertensive agent treatment. b N = 237 and adjusted age, sex, duration of diabetes, current smoking, current alcohol consumption, BMI, TG, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, oral antihypertensive agent treatment, and self-reported hypertension. ISSI2, insulin secretion-sensitivity index-2; SBP, systolic blood pressure; PBG, postprandial blood glucose; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; BMI, body mass index; TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; ACE, angiotensin converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker

Full size image

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that a certain degree of elevated SBP, specifically 140–150 mmHg, was associated with better beta-cell function in participants with HbA1c ≥ 10% but not in those with HbA1c < 10%. This association was confirmed by the finding that beta-cell function mediated the “paradoxically” association of “higher blood pressure” and “lower 2 h PBG” in participants with HbA1c ≥ 10%. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the optimal range of SBP that would attain better islet beta-cell function in patients with T2DM.

We provided consistent evidence to support our conclusion that a slightly increased SBP (140–150 mmHg) rather than progressive increases in SBP contributed to the better beta-cell function in patients with HbA1c ≥ 10%. First, we demonstrated that the SBP of 140–150 mmHg group had the best beta-cell function among different SBP groups even after adjusting for important potential confounders (Table 2). Second, the robustness of this result was supported by performing sensitivity analyses in subjects with different characteristics (Additional file 1: Table S3). Third, the RCS analysis supported an inverted U-shape association between SBP and beta-cell function with the SBP at 144 mmHg corresponding to the best islet function (Fig. 1a). Notably, we further demonstrated that ISSI2 may mediate almost all of influence (94.7%) of SBP on 2 h PBG in participants with HbA1c ≥ 10% (Fig. 3). This finding in turn confirmed that a certain narrow range of high SBP may enhance beta-cell function and consequently reduce PBG.

Hyperglycemia has a direct effect on increasing blood viscosity [4, 6]. Additionally, hyperglycemia could trigger osmotic diuresis to increase blood hematocrit, plasma fibrinogen level and reduce plasma volume, all of which contribute to higher blood viscosity [5, 24]. To overcome perfusion resistance resulting from the increased blood viscosity, an increase in BP might be a compensatory mechanism to ensure adequate blood supply to vital organs [4]. Increase in blood glucose concentration from 100 to 400 mg/dL in patients with T2DM led to a 25% increase in blood viscosity and a 20% decrease in blood flow rate. Accordingly, BP had to increase by 25% to compensate for the reduced blood flow rate [4]. Moreover, the studies conducted in diabetic and non-diabetic individuals also confirmed that BP elevated along with increases in blood viscosity [8, 9, 25]. These studies taken together could explain the reason for the association of higher BP and better beta-cell function. Indeed, the compensatory effect of a higher BP has been observed in patients with acute primary intracerebral hemorrhage. Compared to those with the BP target of SBP < 140 mmHg, a higher BP target (SBP < 160 mmHg) was associated with decreased remote cerebral ischemic lesions, acute neurologic deterioration, and shorter health-care time in hospital since the higher BP presumably reduces brain tissue ischemia [26].

As for why BP was only associated with PBG but not with FBG in participants with HbA1c ≥ 10%, this might be related to the complex regulation of blood glucose. Glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) mainly occurs in the post-prandial state [27], wherein the pancreatic islets acutely secrete large amounts of insulin at full peak capacity [28]. However, due to the loss of the early phase of insulin secretion in patients with T2DM [28], PBG would rise rapidly to cause a remarkable increase in blood viscosity, which reduces the perfusion of the pancreas and consequently inhibits beta-cell function [6]. In this situation, a higher SBP level can overcome the perfusion resistance and maintain blood supply that would maintain beta-cells in good function [1]. In contrast, FBG is usually significantly lower than PBG, and FBG is mainly regulated by basal insulin secretion, whose level and secretion rate are significantly lower than that of GSIS [28, 29]. Thus, in the fasting state, islet cells might be able to regulate FBG without mobilizing all insulin secretory capacity nor the compensatory enhancement from high BP.

We demonstrated that elevated BP was associated with better beta-cell function in T2DM patients with the duration of diabetes < 1 year rather than in those with the duration of diabetes ≥ 1 year (Additional file 1: Table S3), which was consistent with a previous study [10]. This study investigated the factors that can influence beta-cell function in patients with newly diagnosed T2DM and found that a higher level of SBP was associated with an improved beta-cell function [10]. However, our study showed this positive association only occurred in an increased but narrow SBP range of 140–150 mmHg, and not with further increases in SBP beyond this range.

This study therefore raises the possibility that transiently elevated BP may not always have deleterious effect on patients with early T2DM, especially when they have poor glycemic control. Short-term elevation in SBP might be a compensatory mechanism in response to hyperglycemia-induced increase in blood viscosity, which aims to ensure sufficient blood supply to vital organs, in this case, the pancreatic islets. We should nevertheless recognize that hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease [30], which is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality for individuals with diabetes [31,32,33]. Thus, we must highlight that our study does not encourage the maintenance of a sustained state of hypertension in T2DM patients with poor glycemic control. Maintaining a blood pressure and blood glucose level within appropriate ranges remains to be the recommended strategy for diabetes management.

This study has two strengths. First, we diminished the influence of oral antihypertensive agents, insulin treatment, and duration of diabetes on islet beta-cell function by performing analyses only on subjects without taking oral antihypertensive agents, without accepting insulin treatment, and with duration of diabetes < 1 year, respectively. Second, we confirmed that higher SBP may have a favorable effect on beta-cell function by demonstrating that beta-cell function mediated the influence of SBP on 2 h PBG but not a reverse causality. Nevertheless, there remain some limitations. First, the cross-sectional study design is not warranted to infer causal relationships between SBP and beta-cell function. Second, the sample size in some SBP groups is relatively small. More prospective studies with large sample size are needed to verify the relationship between elevated BP and islet beta-cell function. Third, the possibility of spurious association findings still cannot be ruled out due to the exploratory nature of the study, multiple dichotomies of input parameters, and multiple testing. Fourth, the heterogeneity of the patient population studied, especially regarding hemodynamic status and treatments, may bias data interpretation through residual confounders despite adjustments. Finally, the dissociation of the findings that SBP rather than DBP was associated with beta-cell function may weaken the proposed pathophysiological hypothesis. However, clinical data have shown that SBP, not DBP, was positively associated with beta-cell function [10, 11]. Organ perfusion is more vulnerable to changes in SBP than DBP [34]. Thus, more studies are desired to elucidate the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the effects of BP on beta-cell function.

Conclusions

A slight elevation in SBP (140–150 mmHg) was associated with better beta-cell function and reduced 2 h PBG in T2DM patients with HbA1c ≥ 10% with a duration of diabetes of < 1 year. This study adds new knowledge to our understanding that during the progression of T2DM, there might be a unique period in which a slightly elevated SBP may enhance islet beta-cell function.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BP:

Blood pressure

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

HbA1c:

Glycosylated hemoglobin

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

SBMT:

Steamed bread meal test

ISSI2:

Insulin secretion-sensitivity index-2

HOMA2-IR:

Homeostatic model assessment 2-insulin resistance

HOMA2-B:

Homeostatic model assessment 2-beta

TG:

Triglyceride

LDL-C:

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

TC:

Total cholesterol

HDL-C:

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

RCS:

Restricted cubic splines

PBG:

Postprandial blood glucose

FBG:

Fasting blood glucose

GSIS:

Glucose-stimulated insulin secretion

ACE:

Angiotensin converting enzyme

ARB:

Angiotensin receptor blocker

References

  1. Lwase M, Uchizono Y, Tashiro K, Goto D, Lida M. Islet hyperperfusion during prediabetic phase in OLETF rats, a model of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2002;51(8):2530–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Penicaud L. Autonomic nervous system and pancreatic islet blood flow. Biochimie. 2017;143:29–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nowińska P, Kasacka I. Changes in the pancreas caused by different types of hypertension. Acta Biochim Pol. 2017;64(4):591–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cinar Y, Senyol AM, Duman K. Blood viscosity and blood pressure: Role of temperature and hyperglycemia. Am J Hypertens. 2001;14(5):433–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun J, Han K, Xu M, Li L, Qian J, Li L, et al. Blood viscosity in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus: roles of hyperglycemia and elevated plasma fibrinogen. Front Physiol. 2022;13: 827428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mushtaq M, Abdul Mateen M, Kim UH. Hyperglycemia associated blood viscosity can be a nexus stimuli. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2019;71(1):103–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gyawali P, Lillicrap TP, Tomari S, Bivard A, Holliday E, Parsons M, et al. Whole blood viscosity is associated with baseline cerebral perfusion in acute ischemic stroke. Neurol Sci. 2022;43(4):2375–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dhas Y, Banerjee J, Mishra N. Blood viscosity, glycemic markers and blood pressure: a study in middle-aged normotensive and hypertensive type 2 diabetics. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2020;35(1):102–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marini MA, Fiorentino TV, Andreozzi F, Mannino GC, Perticone M, Sciacqua A, et al. Elevated 1-h post-challenge plasma glucose levels in subjects with normal glucose tolerance or impaired glucose tolerance are associated with whole blood viscosity. Acta Diabetol. 2017;54(8):775–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Duan Y, Liu J, Xu Y, Yang N, Yang W, Wang G. Factors that influence pancreatic beta cell function and insulin resistance in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients: a sub-analysis of the MARCH trial. Diabetes Ther. 2018;9(2):743–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee KS, Gi MY, Cha JA, Lee JM, Jung SH, Yoon H. The relationship between pulse pressure, insulin resistance, and beta cell function in non-diabetic Korean adults. Prim Care Diabetes. 2019;13(5):422–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tremmel DM, Feeney AK, Mitchell SA, Chlebeck PJ, Raglin SA, Fernandez LA, et al. Hypertension, but not body mass index, is predictive of increased pancreatic lipid content and islet dysfunction. Am J Transplant. 2020;20(4):1105–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen G, Lai X, Jiang Q, Chen F, Chen N, Huang H, et al. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, insulin resistance and beta-cell function in prehypertension population of China. Atherosclerosis. 2011;217(1):279–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Geragotou T, Jainandunsing S, Ozcan B, Rooij FW, Kokkinos A, Tentolouris N, et al. The relationship of metabolic syndrome traits with beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity by oral minimal model assessment in South Asian and European families residing in the Netherlands. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao L, Ma J, Wang S, Xie Y. Relationship between beta-cell function, metabolic control, and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015;17(1):29–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gubitosi-Klug RA, Braffett BH, Hitt S, Arends V, Uschner D, Jones K, et al. Residual beta cell function in long-term type 1 diabetes associates with reduced incidence of hypoglycemia. J Clin Investig. 2021;131(3): e143011.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Christensen MH, Rubin KH, Petersen TG, Nohr EA, Vinter CA, Andersen MS, et al. Cardiovascular and metabolic morbidity in women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus: a nationwide register-based cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21(1):179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Saisho Y. An emerging new concept for the management of type 2 diabetes with a paradigm shift from the glucose-centric to beta cell-centric concept of diabetes - an Asian perspective. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2020;21(13):1565–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2018;138(17):e484-594.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang L, Peng W, Zhao Z, Zhang M, Shi Z, Song Z, et al. Prevalence and treatment of diabetes in China, 2013–2018. JAMA. 2021;326(24):2498–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, Ard JD, Comuzzie AG, Donato KA, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25):2985–3023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kramer CK, Choi H, Zinman B, Retnakaran R. Glycemic variability in patients with early type 2 diabetes: the impact of improvement in β-cell function. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(4):1116–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wallace TM, Levy JC, Matthews DR. Use and abuse of HOMA modeling. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(6):1487–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Godoy DA, Behrouz R, Di Napoli M. Glucose control in acute brain injury: Does it matter? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2016;22(2):120–7.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gori T, Wild PS, Schnabel R, Schulz A, Pfeiffer N, Blettner M, et al. The distribution of whole blood viscosity, its determinants and relationship with arterial blood pressure in the community: cross-sectional analysis from the Gutenberg health study. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;9(6):354–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Buletko AB, Thacker T, Cho SM, Mathew J, Thompson NR, Organek N, et al. Cerebral ischemia and deterioration with lower blood pressure target in intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2018;91(11):e1058–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Campbell JE, Newgard CB. Mechanisms controlling pancreatic islet cell function in insulin secretion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22(2):142–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Del Prato S, Marchetti P, Bonadonna RC. Phasic insulin release and metabolic regulation in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2002;51(Suppl 1):S109–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fletcher PA, Marinelli I, Bertram R, Satin LS, Sherman AS. Pulsatile basal insulin secretion is driven by glycolytic oscillations. Physiology (Bethesda). 2022;37(4):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sala L, Pontiroli AE. Role of obesity and hypertension in the incidence of atrial fibrillation, ischaemic heart disease and heart failure in patients with diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20(1):162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. American Diabetes Association. 10. Cardiovascular disease and risk management: standards of medical care in diabetes-2022. Diabetes Care. 2022;45(Suppl 1):S144–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ma CX, Ma XN, Guan CH, Li YD, Mauricio D, Fu SB. Cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus: progress toward personalized management. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21(1):74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Osch MJ, Jansen PA, Vingerhoets RW, Grond J. Association between supine cerebral perfusion and symptomatic orthostatic hypotension. Neuroimage. 2005;27(4):789–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge all investigators and study staff for their dedication to this study.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China [82073648], Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [ZR2021QH135], and Doctoral Fund of Jining NO.1 People’s Hospital [2021-BS-004]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation of data, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, No.10 Xitoutiao, You’anmen Wai, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100069, China

      Zhang Xia, Deqiang Zheng, Yuhao Li, Xin Su, Qi Zhai, Yingting Zuo, Yibo Zhang & Yan He

    2. Department of Endocrinology, Jining No.1 People’s Hospital, 6 Jiankang Road, Rencheng District, Jining, Shandong, 272000, China

      Lijuan Song, Dongdong Fang, Wenjun You, Feng Li & Jiajia Jiang

    3. Institute for Chronic Disease Management, Jining No.1 People’s Hospital, Jining, Shandong, China

      Feng Li & Jiajia Jiang

    4. Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, Beijing, China

      Deqiang Zheng & Yan He

    5. Department of Endocrinology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China

      Lu Lin & Jingtao Dou

    6. Departments of Medication and Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

      Herbert Y. Gaisano

    Authors
    1. Zhang Xia
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Lijuan Song
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Dongdong Fang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Wenjun You
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Feng Li
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Deqiang Zheng
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Yuhao Li
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Lu Lin
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    9. Jingtao Dou
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    10. Xin Su
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    11. Qi Zhai
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    12. Yingting Zuo
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    13. Yibo Zhang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    14. Herbert Y. Gaisano
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    15. Jiajia Jiang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    16. Yan He
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Contributions

    ZX and YH conceived and designed the work. LS, DF, WY, FL, and JJ contributed to data acquisition. ZX, XS, DZ, and YTZ contributed to methodology. ZX wrote the first draft of the paper. ZX, YH, JJ, and LL contributed to data analysis and data interpretation. YL, LL, JD, XS, QZ, YTZ, YBZ, and HYG contributed to the revision of the paper. YH is the guarantor of this work. JJ had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Corresponding authors

    Correspondence to Jiajia Jiang or Yan He.

    Ethics declarations

    Ethics approval and consent to participate

    The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Jining Medical University (No. JNMC-2022-YX-019). The requirement for informed consent was waived because we used deidentified retrospective data.

    Consent for publication

    Not applicable.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Additional information

    Publisher's Note

    Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

    Zhang Xia and Lijuan Song are co-first authors

    Supplementary Information

    Additional file 1

    : Additional Tables.

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

    Reprints and Permissions

    About this article

    Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Xia, Z., Song, L., Fang, D. et al. Higher systolic blood pressure is specifically associated with better islet beta-cell function in T2DM patients with high glycemic level. Cardiovasc Diabetol 21, 283 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-022-01723-1

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-022-01723-1

    Keywords

    • Type 2 diabetes mellitus
    • Beta-cell function
    • Blood pressure
    • Mediating effect

    Cardiovascular Diabetology

    ISSN: 1475-2840