Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Nut consumption is associated with a shift of the NMR lipoprotein subfraction profile to a less atherogenic pattern among older individuals at high CVD risk

Cardiovascular Diabetology volume 21, Article number: 189 (2022) Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 26 October 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Scientific evidence has accumulated on the beneficial effects of nut consumption on cardiovascular risk and cholesterol reduction, but few studies have examined the effects of nuts on advanced measures of lipoprotein atherogenicity determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. We analyzed associations between the amount and type of of nuts consumed and advanced measures of lipoprotein atherogenity and insulin resistance in older individuals at high cardiovascular risk.

Methods

The present observational study was carried out within the framework of the Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea (PREDIMED) trial. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses after 1-year of follow-up were conducted in 196 men and women recruited in the PREDIMED-Reus (Spain) center. Dietary intake was assessed using a validated semi-quantitative food questionnaire. Baseline and 1-year fasting plasma lipoprotein and metabolite profiling were performed in plasma using NMR spectra Vantera® Clinical Analyzer. Associations by tertiles of nut consumption between baseline and 1-year changes and advanced measures of lipoprotein atherogenicity, branched chain amminoacids, and measures of insulin resistance were tested by multivariable-adjusted ANCOVA models.

Results

Compared to paticipants in the bottom tertile, those in the top tertile of total nut consumption showed higher levels of large HDL particles and HDL-cholesterol, lower levels of branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) and GlycA, and reduced lipoprotein insulin resistance and diabetes risk index. Participants in the top tertile of walnut consumption disclosed lower levels of very large VLDL, total LDL particles, LDL-cholesterol, and GlycA. Participants in the top tertile of non-walnut nut consumption displayed higher levels of total HDL particles, HDL-cholesterol and apoliporotein A1, lower BCAA and GlycA, and reduced lipoprotein insulin resistance. Participants in the top tertile of 1-year changes in walnut consumption showed increases in medium-sized HDL particles in comparison to the bottom tertile.

Conclusions

In older individuals at high cardiovascular risk, increasing nut consumption was associated with a shift of the NMR lipoprotein subfraction profile to a less atherogenic pattern, as well as lower circulating concentrations of BCAA and decreased insulin resistance. These results provide novel mechanistic insight into the cardiovascular benefit of nut consumption.

Trial registration ISRCTN35739639; registration date: 05/10/2005; recruitment start date 01/10/2003.

Background

Nuts are important components of healthy, plant-based dietary patterns [1]. A large body of evidence from prospective cohort studies suggests a beneficial effect of nut consumption on various health outcomes, including reduction of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease (CVD), coronary artery disease (CAD), hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and total cancer [2, 3]. The 5-year PREDIMED (PREvención con DIeta MEDiterránea) randomized trial also reported that a Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) supplemented with mixed nuts reduced incident CVD events [4]. Nuts are good sources of healthy nutrients and phytochemicals, such as unsaturated fatty acids, fiber, non-sodium minerals (potassium, calcium, and magnesium), vitamin E, folate, polyphenols, and phytosterols [5], which help explain the positive effects of nuts on the risk of non-communicable diseases and mortality.

Evidence from small, short-term randomized clinical trials in middle-aged individuals indicates a consistent but modest cholesterol-lowering effect of diets supplemented with nuts in general [6] or walnuts in particular [7], which is dose-related and greatest among those with high baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) [8]. Most nut feeding trials have selected young or middle-aged adults [6,7,8], and few feeding studies have examined the effects of nuts on advanced measures of lipoprotein atherogenicity, such as sub-particle number, size, and composition determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Those who have reported such parameters have shown equivocal results [9].

We hypothesized that nut consumption in general, and walnut consumption in particular, would have a beneficial effect on the lipoprotein profile obtained via NMR. To address this issue, we performed advanced lipoprotein and metabolomic testing in a cohort of older individuals with different levels of total nut and walnut consumption participating in the PREDIMED study, a 5-year nutrition intervention trial testing the effects of a Mediterranean diet supplemented with virgin olive oil or nuts versus a low-fat diet on incident CVD [4].

Methods

Study design

The present study was carried out within the framework of the PREDIMED study, a large randomized, multicenter, parallel-group, clinical trial aiming to assess the effects of MedDiet on the primary prevention of CVD in a cohort of older individuals at high cardiovascular risk. Participants were aged between 55 and 80 years and had no CVD at enrollment, but they were at high risk because of the presence of type 2 diabetes or at least three of the following risk factors: current smoking, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, low high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, overweight or obesity, and family history of premature CVD. Exclusion criteria included any severe chronic illness, drug or alcohol addiction, or allergy or intolerance to olive oil or nuts, two key supplemental foods. In the main study, participants were randomly assigned to three intervention groups: a MedDiet supplemented with virgin olive oil, a MedDiet supplemented with mixed nuts, or a low-fat diet according to the American Heart Association guidelines (control group). The trial is registered at http://www.controlled-trials.com as ISRCTN35739639 and the study protocol and results of the primary outcome have been published elsewhere [4]. The PREDIMED trial was conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration, and the institutional review boards of all recruiting centers approved the study protocol (for the Reus center, the protocol was approved by Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus Ethical Committee). Participants agreed and gave their written informed consent to authorize the use of biological samples for biochemical measurements and genetic studies.

The present cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses were conducted on 196 participants recruited in the PREDIMED-Reus (Spain) center with full food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) data and plasma samples available at baseline and 1 year of follow-up.

Dietary assessment

Trained dietitians assessed dietary intake in face-to-face interviews at baseline using a validated semi-quantitative 137-item FFQ [10]. For each item, the portion size was established, and nine consumption frequencies were available, ranging from “never or rarely” to “ ≥ 6 times/day”. Energy and nutrient intakes were obtained using data from Spanish food composition tables [11].

Data on self-reported nut consumption were derived from the FFQ, which included an item on the consumption of almonds, peanuts, hazelnuts, pistachios, and pine nuts, and another specific question on the consumption of walnuts. For the present analysis, 28 g of nuts was considered a serving. The number of reported servings was converted into grams per day. The Pearson correlation coefficients for reproducibility and validity of the FFQ regarding nut consumption were 0.66 and 0.38, respectively, and intraclass correlation coefficients for the same measurements in a similar population to the PREDIMED participants were 0.80 and 0.55, respectively [10].

Covariates

Information about sociodemographic and lifestyle variables, including smoking status, medical conditions, family history of the disease, and medication use, were collected at baseline. Physical activity was estimated with the validated Spanish version of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire [12]. Trained staff measured height and bodyweight without shoes and wearing light clothing to the nearest 0.5 cm for height and 0.1 kg for bodyweight using a wall-mounted stadiometer and calibrated scales, respectively.

Lipoprotein and metabolite profiling

Fasting blood samples were collected at baseline and 1-year visits. EDTA plasma was obtained and aliquots were stored at – 80 °C until metabolomic analysis. NMR spectra were acquired on a Vantera® Clinical Analyzer, a 400 MHz NMR instrument, from EDTA plasma samples as described for the NMR LipoProfile® test (Labcorp, Morrisville, NC) [13, 14]. The LP4 deconvolution algorithm was used to report lipoprotein particle concentrations and sizes, as well as concentrations of metabolites such as total branched-chain amino acids, valine, leucine, isoleucine, alanine, glucose, citrate, glycine, total ketone bodies, β-hydroxybutyrate, acetoacetate, acetone [15]. The diameters of the various lipoprotein classes and subclasses are total triglyceride-rich lipoprotein particles (VLDL-P) (24–240 nm), very large VLDL-P (90–240 nm), large VLDL-P (50–89 nm), medium VLDL-P (37–49 nm), small VLDL-P (30–36 nm), very small VLDL-P (24–29 nm), total low-density lipoprotein particles (LDL-P) (19–23 nm), large LDL-P (21.5–23 nm), medium LDL-P (20.5–21.4 nm), small LDL-P (19–20.4 nm), total high-density lipoprotein particles (HDL-P) (7.4–12.0 nm), large HDL-P (10.3–12.0 nm), medium HDL-P (8.7–9.5 nm), and small HDL-P (7.4–7.8 nm). The peak diameters for the largest (H7) to the smallest (H1) of the HDL subspecies are 12.0, 10.8, 10.3, 9.5, 8.7, 7.8, and 7.4 nm. Mean VLDL, LDL, and HDL particle sizes are weighted averages derived from the sum of the diameters of each of the subclasses multiplied by the relative mass percentage. Linear regression against serum lipids measured chemically in a healthy study population (n = 698) provided the conversion factors to generate NMR-derived concentrations of total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), VLDL-TG, VLDL-C, LDL-C, and HDL-C. NMR-derived concentrations of these parameters are highly correlated with those measured by standard chemistry methods. Details regarding the performance of the assays that quantify branched-chain amino acids (BCAA), citrate, and ketone bodies have been reported [16,17,18]. Development of the Lipoprotein Insulin Resistance Index (LP-IR) (0–100; least to most insulin resistant), the Diabetes Risk Index (DRI) (1–100; the lowest to the highest risk of type 2 diabetes), and GlycA, a composite measure of systemic inflammation, as well as their analytical and clinical validation, have been published previously [19,20,21].

Statistical analyses

Participantsʼ baseline characteristics are described as means ± SD for quantitative traits and percentages for categorical traits. Nut consumption at baseline and 1-year changes were adjusted for total energy intake using the residual method [22]. Nut consumption was categorized into tertiles according to total nuts, walnuts, or non-walnut nuts at baseline and 1-year changes.

Baseline values and 1-year changes in individual lipoprotein, lipid, apolipoprotein, amino acid, ketone bodies, and other molecules were normalized and scaled using Blom's rank-based inverse normal transformation to improve normality [23].

We assessed differences in lipoprotein values between tertiles of nut consumption (total nuts, walnuts, and non-walnut nuts) at baseline using ANCOVA models adjusted by age, gender, body mass index (kg/m2), smoking status (ever smoker/never smoker), physical activity (met/day), diabetes (yes/no), dyslipidemia (yes/no), hypertension (yes/no), and statin treatment (yes/no). Data are presented as means and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We also assessed differences in 1-year changes in lipoprotein values between tertiles of nut consumption using ANCOVA models additionally adjusted by the baseline lipid value, baseline nuts consumption, and intervention group (MedDiet + EVOO, MedDiet + Nuts, Low-fat diet). The Tukey test was used to perform multiple comparisons between tertiles. We repeated the same analyses with other molecules including apolipoprotein, amino acids, and ketone bodies.

The assumptions of the ANCOVA models were assessed using visual or quantitative methods. All graphs and tests (Shapiro–Wilk test and Levene’s tests) yielded models that met the criteria for the independence of observations, homogeneity of variance (all Levene’s test P values > 0.05), and normality of residuals (all Shapiro–Wilk test P values > 0.05).

P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant for these analyses. All statistical analyses were performed with the R software v3.6.1 (www.r-project.org) (R Development Core Team, 2012).

Results

Participants had a mean age of 67 ± 6 years and 57% were women. The mean BMI was 29.5 ± 3.3 kg/m2 and the mean self-reported energy expenditure in physical activity was 263 ± 242 METs/day. 62% of participants never smoked, and the prevalence of T2D was 2%. Mean total nut, walnut and non-walnut consumption at baseline was 14 ± 15 g/day, 7 ± 8 g/day, and 7 ± 9 g/day, respectively.

Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the study population by tertiles of energy-adjusted total nut consumption. Mean total nut consumption by tertiles was 3.1 ± 2.9 g/day (tertile 1, T1), 8.5 ± 3.7 g/day (tertile 2, T2), and 29.7 ± 15.3 g/day (tertile 3, T3).

Table 1 Baseline participants’ characteristics in a subcohort of the PREDIMED-Reus trial by tertiles of energy-adjusted nut consumption at baseline
Full size table

Figure 1 and Additional file 1: Table S1 shows the differences between baseline tertiles of energy-adjusted nut consumption by nut subtypes (total nuts, walnuts, and non-walnut nuts) and normalized values of lipoprotein particles at baseline. Significant differences in baseline values between tertiles of nut consumption were observed for some lipoprotein particles. Large HDL-P (total nuts) and HDL-C (total nuts and non-walnut nuts) were higher in participants in the top tertile compared to those in the lower tertile, whereas TRL (VLDL) size was lower in participants with higher consumption of non-walnut nuts (Fig. 1G, H, I). Compared to participants in the lowest tertile of walnut consumption, very large VLDL-P, total LDL-P, medium LDL-P, and LDL-C were lower in those in the top tertile (Fig. 1D, E, F).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Lipoprotein particle parameters at baseline by tertiles of energy-adjusted nut consumption in a subcohort of the PREDIMED-Reus trial. Metabolomics data are means (95% CI) of normalized values scaled in multiples of 1 SD with Blom’s rank-based inverse normal transformation data. Nuts groups were adjusted by energy intake and values are means (95% CI). The Tukey test was used to perform multiple comparisons between tertiles. *P-value < 0.05 in ANCOVA adjusted by age, gender, body mass index (kg/m2), smoking status (ever smoker/never smoker), physical activity (met/day), diabetes (yes/no), dyslipidemia (yes/no), hypertension (yes/no), and statin treatment (yes/no). P-value < 0.05 for comparison between T1 and T3 after the Tukey test. LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; TRL-P, Triglyceride-Rich Lipoprotein Particle; TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; TRL, Triglyceride-Rich Lipoprotein; VLDL, very low-density lipoprotein; T1, tertile 1; T3, tertile 3

Full size image

Table 2 shows the differences between tertiles of 1-year changes in energy-adjusted nut consumption and 1-year changes in normalized values of lipoprotein particles. Participants in the top tertile of 1-year changes in walnut consumption showed a higher increase in H7P and H4P. In addition, non-significant increases in very large VLDL-P (P-value = 0.057 for total nuts and P-value = 0.076 for non-walnuts nuts), and H3P (P-value = 0.083 for walnuts) were observed in participants in the top tertile of 1-year changes in these food groups.

Table 2 1-year changes of lipoprotein particle parameters by tertiles of 1-year energy-adjusted nut consumption in a subcohort of the PREDIMED-Reus trial
Full size table

Differences between the tertiles of total nuts, walnuts, or non-walnut nuts consumption and other metabolites at baseline are shown in Fig. 2 and Additional file 1: Table S2. ApoA1 was higher in top consumers of non-walnut nuts. Participants in the highest tertile of total nut consumption (Fig. 2A) showed lower concentrations of BCAA, valine, and leucine; those with higher consumption of walnuts (Fig. 2C) had lower concentrations of BCAA and valine; and participants in the top tertile of non-walnut nut consumption (Fig. 2E) exhibited lower concentrations of BCAA, leucine, and isoleucine. There were no between-group differences at baseline in glucose, citrate, or ketone bodies. Concerning diabetes risk markers, GlycA was lower in top nut consumers of all groups (Fig. 2B, D, F), while LP-IR was lower in top consumers of total nuts (Fig. 2B) and non-walnut nuts (Fig. 2F), and DRI was lower only in top consumers of total nuts (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Apolipoproteins, small molecule metabolites, and markers of diabetes risk at baseline by tertiles of baseline energy-adjusted nut consumption in a subcohort of the PREDIMED-Reus trial. Metabolomics data are means (95% CI) of normalized values scaled in multiples of 1 SD with Blom’s rank-based inverse normal transformation data. Nuts groups were adjusted by energy intake and values are means (95% CI). The Tukey test was used to perform multiple comparisons between tertiles. P-value < 0.05 in ANCOVA adjusted by age, gender, body mass index (kg/m2), smoking status (ever smoker/never smoker), physical activity (met/day), diabetes (yes/no), dyslipidemia (yes/no), hypertension (yes/no), and statin treatment (yes/no). P-value < 0.05 for comparison between T1 and T3 after the Tukey test. Apo, apolipoprotein; BCAA, Branched-Chain Amino Acids; KB, ketone body; LP-IR, lipoprotein insulin resistance; DRI, diabetes risk index; TMAO, Trimethylamine N-oxide; T1, tertile 1; T3, tertile 3

Full size image

Table 3 shows the differences between tertiles of 1-year changes in the different types of energy-adjusted nuts and 1-year changes in normalized values of other molecules. Participants in the top tertile of 1-year changes in walnut consumption showed a larger decrease in plasma glycine levels in comparison to the lower tertile (p-value = 0.030).

Table 3 1-year changes of apolipoproteins, small molecule metabolites, and markers of diabetes risk by tertiles of 1-year changes of energy-adjusted nuts consumption in a subcohort from PREDIMED-Reus trial
Full size table

Discussion

The results of this cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of 196 participants in the PREDIMED study, a feeding trial in which the diets were supplemented or not with nuts, support an antiatherogenic effect of nut consumption on lipoprotein subfractions as assessed by NMR. At baseline, increasing consumption of total nuts, walnuts, and non-walnut nuts was associated with increased HDL-C; decreased total and medium LDL-P, very large VLDL, and LDL-C; and decreased VLDL particle size and increased HDL-P and HDL-C, respectively, in multivariable models that included adjustment for non-lipid cardiovascular risk factors and statin use. In the longitudinal study, HDL sub-particles H7P and H4P increased in the upper category of walnut consumption.

High-density lipoproteins

First, higher consumption of total nuts and non-walnut nuts was associated with increased HDL-C. This finding is counter to known evidence on the null effect of nuts on HDL-C, as summarized in meta-analyses [6,7,8]. As large HDL-P contain more cholesterol, their increase with higher total nut consumption supports higher HDL-C. Both total HDL-P and ApoA1 were also higher in the top category of non-walnut nut consumption. Of note, HDL-P was more strongly associated with measures of CAD and was a better predictor of incident CVD events than HDL-C in high-risk statin-treated patients [24], as well as in a pooled analysis of cohorts free of CVD [25]. Interestingly, increased walnut consumption in the longitudinal analysis was also associated with increased H4P and H7P HDL-P. H4P are medium HDL subspecies that have been inversely associated with the development of type-2 diabetes in a large population-based cohort study [26], while H7P are the largest HDL-P and carry the highest cholesteryl ester content.

Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins

Second, increased consumption of walnuts and non-walnut nuts was associated with a reduction of very large VLDL particles and VLDL size, respectively. While large VLDL were initially considered pro-atherogenic, discordant results have been obtained in recent studies and presently it is the small VLDL, which make up remnants, that is considered the most atherogenic TG-rich lipoprotein species [27]. Thus, the present findings on NMR-related VLDL characteristics are not easily interpretable in terms of CVD risk. However, these findings do suggest a reduction in diabetic dyslipidemia, which is prevalent in metabolic disease and insulin resistance [28,29,30].

Low-density lipoproteins

Third, increasing dietary walnuts was associated with reduced LDL-C and LDL-P. That nuts in general and walnuts, in particular, have an LDL-C lowering effect has been consistently observed in feeding trials [6,7,8]. Lower LDL-P with increasing walnut doses is an important finding. As reviewed [31], in the last 15 years large prospective studies focusing on CVD outcomes have reported that LDL-P consistently outperforms LDL-C in CVD risk prediction, which is due to the fact that some individuals, particularly those with increased triglycerides, disclose increased LDL-P numbers while having normal LDL-C. In our study, nut consumption was unrelated to the concentrations of small LDL-P and LDL subspecies that are closely related to TG-rich lipoproteins and with CVD risk independently of LDL-C [31].

Comparison with other studies

Lipoprotein subclass phenotyping by NMR or other techniques has been performed in a few nut-feeding studies. A recent review [9] summarized the results of 5 controlled nut trials that reported data on small LDL, which decreased in 3 of them. Three controlled nut trials have reported LDL-P changes by NMR: LDL-P was reduced with mixed nuts with a predominance of walnuts in one study [32], while pistachios had no effect in another trial [33]. Recently, a large 2-year randomized trial has reported again a significant reduction of both total and small LDL-P with a diet containing walnuts at 15% of energy compared with a control diet [34]. The present findings add evidence to the antiatherogenic shift of LDL particles with nuts, particularly walnuts.

Advanced metabolomic analyses

Concerning other advanced metabolomic analyses, total circulating BCAA and concentrations of valine, leucine, and isoleucine were variably lower at baseline in the top categories of nut consumption. Plasma BCAA have been related to the risk of both CVD [20, 35] and diabetes [36]. Case-cohort studies within the PREDIMED study have also uncovered associations of baseline circulating BCAA with CVD [37] and diabetes [38]. Of note, the Mediterranean diet enriched with nuts appeared to offset the CVD risk associated with increased BCAAs [37]. Measures of insulin resistance (LP-IR) and risk of incident diabetes (DRI) were also lower with higher baseline nut consumption. This is consistent with the reduced very large VLDL particles and increased large HDL particles and HDL-C. This is also in line with limited research that has evaluated the long-term effect of nut consumption on glycemic markers. A pooled analysis of intervention trials conducted in individuals with or without diabetes concluded that nut consumption reduced fasting insulin and HOMA-IR, whereas no effects on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) or fasting glucose were observed [39]. However, increasing nut consumption in the longitudinal study did not affect future risk of insulin resistance or diabetes. Finally, baseline GlycA, a novel biomarker of systemic inflammation and cardiometabolic risk [21, 40], was consistently reduced with increased nut consumption. Given that increased GlycA levels are associated with future CVD events and diabetes, these results further suggest that nut consumption has beneficial effects on cardiometabolic risk.

Mechanistic insights

The association of nut consumption with antiatherogenic shifts of NMR lipoproteins and improvement of both the blood amino acid profile, insulin resistance, and GlycA shown in this study contributes novel mechanistic insight into the known benefit of nut consumption on CVD risk [2,3,4,5]. Nuts are rich in unsaturated fats, soluble fiber, polyphenols, and phytosterols [5], which help explain their beneficial effect on lipid metabolism.

Limitations and strenghts

Our study has limitations. While at baseline all participants ate nuts on their own, during follow-up those participating in one of the trial arms were given nuts for free, which biases consumption in one subgroup. Additionally, the study subjects were older individuals at high CVD risk, thus the results cannot be generalized to younger individuals. There are also strengths to our study, such as the measurement of lipoprotein subfractions with an up-to-date NMR spectroscopy technique, which provides precise physical–chemical data on a wide range of lipoprotein particles.

Conclusions

In conclusion, in older individuals at high CVD risk, increasing nut consumption was associated with a shift of the NMR lipoprotein subfraction profile to a less atherogenic pattern, as well as lower circulating concentrations of BCAA and reduced insulin resistance and diabetes risk index, two specific NMR measures. The present results provide novel mechanistic insight into the benefit of nut consumption on CVD risk.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the lack of authorization from PREDIMED participants but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Change history

Abbreviations

BCAA:

Branched-chain amino acids

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

DRI:

The diabetes risk index

FFQ:

Food frequency questionnaire

HDL:

High-density lipoprotein

HDL-P:

High-density lipoprotein particles

LDL-C:

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

LDL-P:

Low-density lipoprotein particles

LP-IR:

The lipoprotein insulin resistance index

MedDiet:

Mediterranean diet

NMR:

Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

PREDIMED:

PREvención con DIeta MEDiterránea

T1:

Tertile 1

T2:

Tertile 2

T3:

Tertile 3

TC:

Total cholesterol

TG:

Triglycerides

TRL-P:

Triglyceride-rich lipoprotein particles

References

  1. Lichtenstein AH, Appel LJ, Vadiveloo M, Hu FB, Kris-Etherton PM, Rebholz CM, et al. Dietary guidance to improve cardiovascular health: a scientific statement from the american heart association. Circulation. 2021;144(23):e472-87. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aune D, Keum NN, Giovannucci E, Fadnes LT, Boffetta P, Greenwood DC, et al. Nut consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer, all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMC Med. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0730-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Becerra-Tomás N, Paz-Graniel I, Kendall C, Kahleova H, Rahelić D, Sievenpiper JL, et al. Nut consumption and incidence of cardiovascular diseases and cardiovascular disease mortality: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Nutr Rev. 2019;77(10):691–709.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Estruch R, Ros E, Salas-Salvadó J, Covas M-I, Corella D, Arós F, et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with a mediterranean diet supplemented with extra-virgin olive oil or nuts. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(25):e34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ros E, Singh A, O’keefe JH. Nuts: natural pleiotropic nutraceuticals. Nutrients. 2021;13(9):3269.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Del Gobbo LC, Falk MC, Feldman R, Lewis K, Mozaffarian D. Effects of tree nuts on blood lipids, apolipoproteins, and blood pressure: systematic review, meta-analysis, and dose-response of 61 controlled intervention trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102(6):1347–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Guasch-Ferré M, Li J, Hu FB, Salas-Salvadó J, Tobias DK. Effects of walnut consumption on blood lipids and other cardiovascular risk factors: an updated meta-analysis and systematic review of controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;108(1):174–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sabaté J, Oda K, Ros E. Nut consumption and blood lipid levels: a pooled analysis of 25 intervention trials. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(9):821–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Talebi S, Bagherniya M, Atkin SL, Askari G, Orafai HM, Sahebkar A. The beneficial effects of nutraceuticals and natural products on small dense LDL levels, LDL particle number and LDL particle size: a clinical review. Lipids Health Dis. 2020;19(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-020-01250-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fernández-Ballart JD, Piñol JL, Zazpe I, Corella D, Carrasco P, Toledo E, et al. Relative validity of a semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire in an elderly mediterranean population of Spain. Br J Nutr. 2010;103(12):1808–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moreiras O, Carvajal A, Cabrera L. Tablas de Composición de Alimentos [Food Composition Tables]. 9th ed. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elosua R, Garcia M, Aguilar A, Molina L, Covas MI, Marrugat J. Validation of the Minnesota leisure time physical activity questionnaire in Spanish women. investigators of the MARATDON group. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(8):1431–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jeyarajah EJ, Cromwell WC, Otvos JD. Lipoprotein particle analysis by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Clin Lab Med. 2006;26(4):847–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Matyus SP, Braun PJ, Wolak-Dinsmore J, Jeyarajah EJ, Shalaurova I, Xu Y, et al. NMR measurement of LDL particle number using the vantera clinical analyzer. Clin Biochem. 2014;47(16–17):203–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bedi S, Garcia E, Jeyarajah EJ, Shalaurova I, Perez-Matos MC, Jiang ZG, et al. Characterization of LP-Z lipoprotein particles and quantification in subjects with liver disease using a newly developed NMR-based assay. J Clin Med. 2020;9(9):1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolak-Dinsmore J, Gruppen EG, Shalaurova I, Matyus SP, Grant RP, Gegen R, et al. A novel NMR-based assay to measure circulating concentrations of branched-chain amino acids: elevation in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus and association with carotid intima media thickness. Clin Biochem. 2018;54:92–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Garcia E, Shalaurova I, Matyus SP, Oskardmay DN, Otvos JD, Dullaart RPF, et al. Ketone bodies are mildly elevated in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus and are inversely associated with insulin resistance as measured by the lipoprotein insulin resistance index. J Clin Med. 2020;9(2):321.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Garcia E, Connelly MA, Matyus SP, Otvos JD, Shalaurova I. High-throughput nuclear magnetic resonance measurement of citrate in serum and plasma in the clinical laboratory. Pract Lab Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2021.e00213.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Shalaurova I, Connelly MA, Garvey WT, Otvos JD. Lipoprotein insulin resistance index: a lipoprotein particle-derived measure of insulin resistance. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2014;12(8):422–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Flores-Guerrero JL, Gruppen EG, Connelly MA, Shalaurova I, Otvos JD, Garcia E, et al. A newly developed diabetes risk index, based on lipoprotein subfractions and branched chain amino acids, is associated with incident type 2 diabetes mellitus in the PREVEND cohort. J Clin Med. 2020;9(9):1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Otvos JD, Shalaurova I, Wolak-Dinsmore J, Connelly MA, Mackey RH, Stein JH, et al. GlycA: a composite nuclear magnetic resonance biomarker of systemic inflammation. Clin Chem. 2015;61(5):714–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Willet W. Nutritional epidemiology. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Blom G. Statistical estimates and transformed beta-variables. New York: Wiley; 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Khera AV, Demler OV, Adelman SJ, Collins HL, Glynn RJ, Ridker PM, et al. Cholesterol efflux capacity, high-density lipoprotein particle number, and incident cardiovascular events: an analysis from the JUPITER trial (Justification for the use of statins in prevention: an intervention trial evaluating rosuvastatin). Circulation. 2017;135(25):2494–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Singh K, Chandra A, Sperry T, Joshi PH, Khera A, Virani SS, et al. Associations between high-density lipoprotein particles and ischemic events by vascular domain, sex, and ethnicity: a pooled cohort analysis. Circulation. 2020;142(7):657–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sokooti S, Flores-Guerrero JL, Kieneker LM, Heerspink HJL, Connelly MA, Bakker SJL, et al. HDL particle subspecies and their association with incident type 2 diabetes: the PREVEND study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106(6):1761–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ma S, Xia M, Gao X. Biomarker discovery in atherosclerotic diseases using quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.681444.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Garvey WT, Kwon S, Zheng D, Shaughnessy S, Wallace P, Hutto A, et al. Effects of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes on lipoprotein subclass particle size and concentration determined by nuclear magnetic resonance. Diabetes. 2003;52(2):453–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Goff DC, D’Agostino RB, Haffner SM, Otvos JD. Insulin resistance and adiposity influence lipoprotein size and subclass concentrations. Results from the insulin resistance atherosclerosis study. Metabolism. 2005;54(2):264–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. MacKey RH, Mora S, Bertoni AG, Wassel CL, Carnethon MR, Sibley CT, et al. Lipoprotein particles and incident type 2 diabetes in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(4):628–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Superko H, Garrett B. Small dense LDL: scientific background, clinical relevance, and recent evidence still a risk even with “Normal” LDL-C levels. Biomedicines. 2022;10(4):829.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Damasceno NRT, Sala-Vila A, Cofán M, Pérez-Heras AM, Fitó M, Ruiz-Gutiérrez V, et al. Mediterranean diet supplemented with nuts reduces waist circumference and shifts lipoprotein subfractions to a less atherogenic pattern in subjects at high cardiovascular risk. Atherosclerosis. 2013;230(2):347–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hernández-Alonso P, Salas-Salvadó J, Baldrich-Mora M, Mallol R, Correig X, Bulló M. Effect of pistachio consumption on plasma lipoprotein subclasses in pre-diabetic subjects. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;25(4):396–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rajaram S, Cofán M, Sala-Vila A, Haddad E, Serra-Mir M, Bitok E, et al. Effects of walnut consumption for 2 years on lipoprotein subclasses among healthy elders: findings from the WAHA randomized controlled trial. Circulation. 2021;144(13):1083–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Shah SH, Bain JR, Muehlbauer MJ, Stevens RD, Crosslin DR, Haynes C, et al. Association of a peripheral blood metabolic profile with coronary artery disease and risk of subsequent cardiovascular events. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010;3(2):207–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang TJ, Larson MG, Vasan RS, Cheng S, Rhee EP, McCabe E, et al. Metabolite profiles and the risk of developing diabetes. Nat Med. 2011;17(4):448–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ruiz-Canela M, Toledo E, Clish CB, Hruby A, Liang L, Salas-Salvado J, et al. Plasma branched-chain amino acids and incident cardiovascular disease in the PREDIMED trial. Clin Chem. 2016;62(4):582–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Ruiz-Canela M, Guasch-Ferré M, Toledo E, Clish CB, Razquin C, Liang L, et al. Plasma branched chain/aromatic amino acids, enriched mediterranean diet and risk of type 2 diabetes: case-cohort study within the PREDIMED trial. Diabetologia. 2018;61(7):1560–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Tindall AM, Johnston EA, Kris-Etherton PM, Petersen KS. The effect of nuts on markers of glycemic control: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109(2):297–314.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Ballout RA, Remaley AT. GlycA: a new biomarker for systemic inflammation and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment. J Lab Precis Med. 2020;5:17–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the PREDIMED participants for their collaboration, all the dietitians, nurses and affiliated primary care centers personnel for making the PREDIMED trial possible.

Funding

The PREDIMED study was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Health (Instituto de Salud Carlos III, The PREDIMED Network grant RD 06/0045, 2006–2013 and network grant RTIC-G03/140, 2003–2005). Additional grants were received from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad-Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (Projects CNIC-06/2007, CIBER 06/03, PI06-1326, PI07-0954, PI11/02505, PI1001407, SAF2009-12304, and AGL2010-22319-C03-03). JS-S gratefully acknowledges the financial support by ICREA under the ICREA Academia program.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Emilio Ros and Jordi Salas-Salvadó have shared seniority of this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Departament de Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Unitat de Nutrició Humana, 43201, Reus, Tarragona, Spain

    Jesús F. García-Gavilán, Nancy Babio & Jordi Salas-Salvadó

  2. Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili (IISPV), Reus, Spain

    Jesús F. García-Gavilán, Nancy Babio & Jordi Salas-Salvadó

  3. Consorcio CIBER, Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERObn), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain

    Jesús F. García-Gavilán, Nancy Babio, Emilio Ros & Jordi Salas-Salvadó

  4. Laboratory Corporation of America® Holdings (Labcorp), Morrisville, Raleigh, NC, USA

    Margery A. Connelly

  5. Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA

    Christos S. Mantzoros

  6. Section of Endocrinology, VA Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Boston, MA, 02130, USA

    Christos S. Mantzoros

  7. Lipid Clinic, Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Agust Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Emilio Ros

Authors
  1. Jesús F. García-Gavilán
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Margery A. Connelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nancy Babio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christos S. Mantzoros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Emilio Ros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jordi Salas-Salvadó
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CSM, ER, and JSS conceptualized the research; JFGG, ER and JSS designed the work; JFGG, MAC, and CSM acquired and analyzed the data; JFGG, MAC, CSM, ER, and JSS interpreted the results, JFGG, JSS and ER drafted the work and MAC, CSM substantively revised it. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Emilio Ros or Jordi Salas-Salvadó.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Research Ethic Committee of the Institut d’Investigacions Sanitàries Pere i Virgili approved the PREDIMED study protocol and all participants provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

MAC is an employee and owns stock in Labcorp. CSM reports over the past 3 years grants through his institution from Merck, has been a shareholder of and has received grants through his Institution and personal consulting fees from Coherus Inc. and AltrixBio, he reports personal consulting fees from Novo Nordisk, reports personal consulting fees and support with research reagents from Ansh Inc., collaborative research support from LabCorp Inc., reports personal consulting fees from Genfit, Lumos, Amgen, Corcept, Intercept, and Regeneron, reports support (educational activity meals through his institution or national conferences) from Amarin, Novo Nordisk, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim and travel support and fees from TMIOA, Elsevier, the California Walnut Commission, Sacramento, CA, USA (CWC), College Internationale Researche Servier and the Cardio Metabolic Health Conference. None is related to the work presented herein. ER reports receiving grant support through his institution from the CWC, in addition to personal funds for project supervision and advice, and serving as non-paid member of its Scientific Advisory Committee; funds for travel and accommodation from the International Nut and Dried Fruit Council (INC); and personal funds from Alexion for serving in advisory committee. JS-S reports serving on the boards of the INC and receiving grant support from these entities through his institution. He has received research funding from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain; Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, Spain; Departament de Salut Pública de la Generalitat de Catalunya, Catalonia, Spain; and the European Commission. He has also received research funding (nuts for free to the PREDIMED participants) from the CWC; La Morella Nuts, Spain; and Borges SA, Spain. He has also received research funding (nuts for free to the PREDIMED-Plus participants) from the Almond Board of California, USA and Pistachio Growers of California, USA. He is on the Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), and has served on the Scientific Committee of the Spanish Food and Safety Agency, and the Spanish Federation of the Scientific Societies of Food, Nutrition, and Dietetics. He is a member of the International Carbohydrate Quality Consortium (ICQC), and an Executive Board Member of the Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group (DNSG) of the EASD.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: The errors in author group have been corrected

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Lipoprotein particle parameters at baseline by tertiles of energy-adjusted nut consumption in a subcohort of the PREDIMED-Reus trial. Table S2. Apolipoproteins, small molecule metabolites, and markers of diabetes risk at baseline by tertiles of baseline energy-adjusted nut consumption at baseline in a subcohort of the PREDIMED-Reus trial.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

García-Gavilán, J.F., Connelly, M.A., Babio, N. et al. Nut consumption is associated with a shift of the NMR lipoprotein subfraction profile to a less atherogenic pattern among older individuals at high CVD risk. Cardiovasc Diabetol 21, 189 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-022-01624-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-022-01624-3

Keywords

Cardiovascular Diabetology

ISSN: 1475-2840