- Open Access
The vascular function effects of adding exenatide or meal insulin to basal insulin therapy in early type 2 diabetes
Cardiovascular Diabetology volume 22, Article number: 50 (2023)
Basal insulin glargine has a neutral effect on cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). In practice, basal insulin is often paired with a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1-RA) or meal insulin; however, the cardiovascular implications of these combinations have not been fully elucidated. In this context, we sought to evaluate the vascular function effects of adding the GLP1-RA exenatide or meal insulin lispro to basal glargine therapy in early T2DM.
In this 20-week trial, adults with T2DM of < 7-years duration were randomized to 8-weeks treatment with (i) insulin glargine (Glar), (ii) glargine + thrice-daily lispro (Glar/Lispro), or (iii) glargine + twice-daily exenatide (Glar/Exenatide), followed by 12-weeks washout. At baseline, 8-weeks, and washout, fasting endothelial function was assessed with reactive hyperemia index (RHI) measurement by peripheral arterial tonometry.
At baseline, there were no differences in blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) or RHI between participants randomized to Glar (n = 24), Glar/Lispro (n = 24), and Glar/Exenatide (n = 25). At 8-weeks, Glar/Exenatide decreased systolic BP (mean − 8.1 mmHg [95%CI − 13.9 to − 2.4], p = 0.008) and diastolic BP (mean − 5.1 mmHg [− 9.0 to − 1.3], p = 0.012) compared to baseline, with no significant changes in HR or RHI. Notably, baseline-adjusted RHI (mean ± SE) did not differ between the groups at 8-weeks (Glar 2.07 ± 0.10; Glar/Lispro 2.00 ± 0.10; Glar/Exenatide 1.81 ± 0.10; p = 0.19), nor did baseline-adjusted BP or HR. There were no differences between the groups in baseline-adjusted RHI, BP or HR after 12-weeks washout.
Adding either exenatide or lispro to basal insulin therapy does not appear to affect fasting endothelial function in early T2DM.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT02194595.
The 2008 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance requiring ascertainment of the cardiovascular safety of new glucose-lowering medications has launched an era in which the vascular implications of diabetes therapies are fundamental considerations in the management of type 2 diabetes (T2DM)[1, 2]. In this regard, glargine is unique amongst older (i.e. pre-2008) diabetes therapies in having been the subject of a dedicated cardiovascular outcome trial that confirmed its neutral impact on vascular risk . In current clinical practice, basal insulin is often complemented with either a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1-RA) or meal insulin [4,5,6]. However, in the absence of assessment with a dedicated cardiovascular outcome trial, the vascular implications of these combinations are less certain and have generally been inferred from post-hoc analyses of previous trials evaluating their components [7, 8].
In the recently-reported PREserVing Beta-cell Function in Type 2 Diabetes with Exenatide And InsuLin (PREVAIL) Trial, we demonstrated that 3 glargine-based regimens (glargine alone, glargine with thrice daily meal insulin lispro, and glargine with twice daily administration of the GLP1-RA exenatide) had similar effects on both pancreatic beta-cell function after 8 weeks of treatment (primary outcome) and rates of diabetes remission after 12-weeks washout . Recognizing the opportunity to also evaluate the vascular impact of these therapies, the design of the trial included serial assessment of endothelial function at baseline, after the 8-week intervention, and after washout. Thus, in this context, we now report the vascular function effects of adding exenatide or lispro to basal insulin therapy in early T2DM.
PREVAIL was a 20-week, open-label, parallel-arm trial wherein patients aged 30–80 years with T2DM of ≤ 7 years duration were randomized (1:1:1) to 8-weeks treatment with insulin glargine, glargine + thrice-daily lispro, or glargine + twice-daily exenatide, followed by 12-weeks washout. The study protocol and primary outcome have been described in detail previously . The study was approved by the Mount Sinai Hospital Research Ethics Board and registered at ClinicalTrials.Gov (NCT02194595). All participants provided written informed consent. While the primary and metabolic outcomes have been reported recently , the current report presents the pre-specified ancillary outcome of endothelial function and associated vascular measures.
The study intervention has been described in detail . In brief, participants were randomly assigned by computer-generated random allocation sequence to 8-weeks treatment with one of the following regimens:
Glargine, administered at bedtime, with doses titrated to target fasting glucose ≤ 5.3 mmol/l;
Glargine at bedtime with thrice-daily pre-meal lispro, with doses titrated to target fasting glucose ≤ 5.3 mmol/l and 2-h postprandial glucose < 8 mmol/l;
Glargine at bedtime with twice-daily exenatide before breakfast and dinner at doses of 5 ug twice daily for the first 4 weeks, followed by 10ug twice daily for the next 4 weeks (glargine titrated to target fasting glucose ≤ 5.3 mmol/l).
The assigned intervention was stopped at 8-weeks, after which participants entered a 12-week washout during which they were advised to follow healthy lifestyle practices for managing T2DM .
At each of the study visits at baseline, 4-weeks, 8-weeks and washout, heart rate and blood pressure were measured in a seated position, after 10 min of rest, with an automated blood pressure monitor. Two measurements were performed 10 min apart, with the average recorded. At the study visits at baseline, 8-weeks and washout, endothelial function was assessed by peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT) with the Endo-PAT2000 device (Itamar Medical Inc, Framingham, MA). This assessment was performed after overnight fasting (with glargine held that night). On the morning of the testing, meal insulin and exenatide were not administered because of the intention to assess the primary outcome of the trial (beta-cell function) on oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in the absence of these medications . Because it was done prior to the OGTT at the study visits, PAT assessment was performed in the fasting state. For this assessment, PAT finger probes were placed on the distal index fingers of supine participants to enable measurement of baseline pulse amplitude. The measurement was then repeated at 30 s intervals for 4 min following deflation of an occluding blood pressure cuff that was placed on the proximal forearm at 60 mm Hg above systolic blood pressure for 5 min. Pulse amplitude data was recorded electronically and analyzed by the Endo-PAT digital signal processing algorithm, which calculated the Reactive Hyperemia Index (RHI) from the ratio of the average post-deflation pulse amplitude to the baseline pulse amplitude, divided by the corresponding ratio in the contralateral control finger (i.e. this hand did not face an occluding blood pressure cuff). Lower RHI has been shown to predict atherosclerotic coronary artery disease [10, 11].
The COVID-19 pandemic prevented completion of the Endo-PAT portion of the protocol in the full study population of 102 participants, first by preventing some in-person visits and later because of unavailability of the PAT finger probes. Accordingly, Endo-PAT assessment was completed in 73 participants, yielding the study population for the current analysis.
Statistical analyses were conducted with R 4.2.1 and on an intention-to-treat basis. Two-tailed P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Continuous variables were tested for normality of distribution, and natural log transformation of skewed variables were conducted where necessary. Characteristics of the study arms at baseline were compared by Analysis of Variance (normally distributed variables) or Kruskal–Wallis test (skewed variables), or either Chi-Square test or Fischer exact test (categorical variables) (Table 1). Paired t-tests were conducted to assess changes in vascular measures from baseline to 8-weeks within each treatment arm (Table 2). The longitudinal changes in vascular measures from baseline to 8-weeks were compared between the 3 treatment groups by generalized estimating equation (GEE) model, wherein the treatment effect and time effect were examined. Vascular outcomes after intervention and after 3-month washout were compared between the groups by Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) with adjustment for their baseline measurements (Table 3).
Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the study participants randomized to (i) insulin glargine alone (Glar; n = 24), (ii) glargine + pre-prandial lispro (Glar/Lispro; n = 24), and (iii) glargine + twice-daily exenatide (Glar/Exenatide, n = 25), respectively. There were no significant differences between the groups in clinical, metabolic or vascular measures, apart from a higher prevalence of hypertension in the Glar/Lispro group (p = 0.02). Of note, there were no differences between the groups in blood pressure (BP), heart rate and RHI (Table 1).
Figure 1 shows the similar improvement in mean fasting capillary glucose in the 3 groups across the 8 weeks of intervention. As in the overall trial , baseline-adjusted A1c at 8-weeks was lowest in Glar/Exenatide followed by Glar/Lispro and Glar (mean 5.79% vs 5.85% vs 6.16%; p = 0.0002), as was baseline-adjusted BMI (mean 30.9 vs 31.6 vs 32.1 kg/m2; p < 0.0001). After 8-weeks of therapy, Glar/Exenatide decreased systolic BP (mean − 8.1 mmHg [95%CI − 13.9 to − 2.4], p = 0.008) and diastolic BP (mean -5.1 mmHg [-9.0,-1.3], p = 0.012), while there no significant BP changes in the Glar and Gar/Lispro groups (Table 2). There were no significant changes in heart rate and RHI between baseline and 8-weeks in any of the 3 groups (Table 2). Importantly, as shown in Fig. 2, there were no differences in (A) systolic BP, (B) diastolic BP, (C) heart rate or (D) RHI between the 3 groups at either 4-weeks or 8-weeks, nor were there differences between the groups in the changes over time in these measures during the 8-week intervention (systolic BP: p = 0.92; diastolic BP: p = 0.97; heart rate: p = 0.54; RHI: p = 0.22). Indeed, at 8-weeks, the pre-specified ancillary outcome of baseline-adjusted RHI (mean ± SE) did not differ between the groups (Glar 2.07 ± 0.10; Glar/Lispro 2.00 ± 0.10; Glar/Exenatide 1.81 ± 0.10; p = 0.19), nor did baseline-adjusted BP or heart rate (Table 3). Similarly, at the washout visit at 20-weeks, the baseline-adjusted vascular measures also did not differ between the groups (Table 3).
In this study, 8-weeks of glargine/exenatide combination therapy decreased BP in patients with T2DM of modest duration, without inducing significant changes in heart rate or RHI. Notably, there were no differences in baseline-adjusted RHI between glargine alone, glargine + lispro and glargine + exenatide after the 8-week intervention or after subsequent 12-weeks washout. These data thus suggest that adding either exenatide or lispro to basal insulin therapy does not affect endothelial function in early T2DM.
For determining the cardiovascular risk implications of a glucose-lowering regimen, the optimal evaluation would be provided by a dedicated cardiovascular outcome trial. Though such trials have shown neutral effects of both glargine  and exenatide once weekly  on cardiovascular risk, combination therapy has not been prospectively assessed in this way. The knowledge gap arising from the absence of such a trial is underscored by work from Ceriello et al. demonstrating that the simultaneous infusion of insulin and GLP-1 acutely improves endothelial function in patients with T2DM more than either therapy on its own . These data thus raise the question of how chronic basal insulin/GLP1-RA combination therapy may impact vascular function.
To date, there has been limited investigation of this question. In a recent study of 34 glargine-treated patients with T2DM with mean A1c ~ 8.0% at baseline, the addition of either once daily lixisenatide or insulin glulisine (administered only before breakfast) for 8-weeks was found to yield similar effects on systemic hemodynamic measures in the fasted state (including BP, HR, stroke volume, cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance index, and normalized augmentation index) . The current study builds upon that report, but with salient design differences in (i) evaluating more than twice as many participants (n = 73) with well-controlled T2DM, (ii) providing prandial insulin at all 3 meals in the lispro group, and (iii) including a third arm with glargine alone. With this design, we show that adding either twice-daily exenatide or thrice-daily lispro to glargine therapy for 8-weeks did not affect RHI, BP or HR.
Our data suggest that, in the setting of basal insulin therapy, the postprandial metabolic coverage provided by exenatide and lispro does not improve endothelial function. However, this interpretation should be coupled with certain caveats. First, with well-controlled T2DM of modest duration and relatively high rates of adoption of cardioprotective medications (renin-angiotensin system blockers, statins), it is possible that this study population may not have had sufficiently advanced vascular disease for demonstration of a therapeutic effect on endothelial function or had insufficient dysfunction for such a demonstration at this sample size. Indeed, at baseline, the mean RHI values in each group (ranging from 1.83 to 1.88) exceeded the threshold that typically reflects abnormal function (< 1.67). Second, since RHI was assessed in only 73 of the 102 participants, it is possible that there was insufficient statistical power to detect differences in this measure. Third, the absence of differences in RHI under fasting conditions (as measured herein) may not exclude differences in endothelial function in the postprandial state. Of note, previous studies have shown that a single dose of exenatide can improve RHI when the latter is measured after a meal challenge [15, 16]. Also, while lower RHI has been shown to predict atherosclerotic coronary artery disease [10, 11], it remains to be established whether improvement in RHI in response to intervention reduces future risk of cardiovascular events.
Another consideration is that, in current practice, long-acting GLP1-RAs have surpassed short-acting formulations in popularity (both with and without basal insulin). Interestingly, a recent study in 112 individuals with T2DM showed that the long-acting GLP1-RA dulaglutide (which has been previously shown to reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in T2DM ) improved RHI after 9-months of treatment but that this effect was not apparent at 3-months . Accordingly, in the current study, the absence of an impact on RHI after 8-weeks may not rule out the possibility of beneficial effects on vascular function emerging with longer duration of therapy.
In conclusion, 8-weeks of glargine/exenatide combination therapy decreased BP, without significant changes in heart rate or RHI. Importantly, RHI at fasting did not differ between glargine alone, glargine + lispro, and glargine + exenatide either after 8-weeks of treatment or after subsequent washout. These data thus suggest that the prandial metabolic coverage provided by adding either exenatide or lispro to basal insulin therapy does not appear to affect fasting endothelial function in early T2DM.
Availability of data and materials
De-identified data can be made available under restricted access from the corresponding author, for academic purposes, subject to a material transfer agreement and approval of the Mount Sinai Hospital Research Ethics Board.
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist
Peripheral arterial tonometry
Reactive hyperemia index
Cefalu WT, Kaul S, Gerstein HC, Holman RR, Zinman B, Skyler JS, Green JB, Buse JB, Inzucchi SE, Leiter LA, Raz I, Rosenstock J, Riddle MC. Cardiovascular outcomes trials in type 2 diabetes: where do we go from here? reflections from a diabetes care editors’ expert forum. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(1):14–31.
Davies MJ, Aroda VR, Collins BS, Gabbay RA, Green J, Maruthur NM, Rosas SE, Del Prato S, Mathieu C, Mingrone G, Rossing P, Tankova T, Tsapas A, Buse JB. A consensus report by the american diabetes association (ADA) and the European association for the study of diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2022;45(11):2753–86.
ORIGIN Trial Investigators. Basal insulin and cardiovascular and other outcomes in dysglycemia. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:319–28.
Eng C, Kramer CK, Zinman B, Retnakaran R. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist and basal insulin combination treatment for the management of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2014;384:2228–34.
Maiorino MI, Chiodini P, Bellastella G, Capuano A, Esposito K, Giugliano D. Insulin and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist combination therapy in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:614–24.
Huthmacher JA, Meier JJ, Nauck MA. Efficacy and safety of short- and long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists on a background of basal insulin in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(9):2303–12.
Tack CJ, Jacob S, Desouza C, Bain SC, Buse JB, Nauck MA, Petrie JR, Poulter NR, Pratley RE, Stegmann HVBK, Bosch-Traberg H, Startseva E, Zinman B. Long-term efficacy and safety of combined insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 therapy: evidence from the LEADER trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21(11):2450–8.
Brown-Frandsen K, Emerson SS, McGuire DK, et al. Lower rates of cardiovascular events and mortality associated with liraglutide use in patients treated with basal insulin: a DEVOTE subanalysis (DEVOTE 10). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21:1437–44.
Retnakaran R, Ye C, Emery A, Kramer CK, Zinman B. The metabolic effects of adding exenatide to basal insulin therapy when targeting remission in early type 2 diabetes in a randomized clinical trial. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):6109.
Bonetti PO, Pumper GM, Higano ST, Holmes DR Jr, Kuvin JT, Lerman A. Noninvasive identification of patients with early coronary atherosclerosis by assessment of digital reactive hyperemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:2137–41.
Matsue Y, Yoshida K, Nagahori W, Ohno M, Suzuki M, Matsumura A, Hashimoto Y, Yoshida M. Peripheral microvascular dysfunction predicts residual risk in coronary artery disease patients on statin therapy. Atherosclerosis. 2014;232:186–90.
Holman RR, Bethel MA, Mentz RJ, et al. Effects of once-weekly exenatide on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(13):1228–39.
Ceriello A, Novials A, Canivell S, La Sala L, Pujadas G, Esposito K, Testa R, Bucciarelli L, Rondinelli M, Genovese S. Simultaneous GLP-1 and insulin administration acutely enhances their vasodilatory, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant action in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(7):1938–43.
Tonneijck L, Muskiet MHA, Twisk JW, Kramer MHH, Danser AHJ, Joles JA, Smits MM, van Raalte DH. Lixisenatide versus insulin glulisine on fasting and postbreakfast systemic hemodynamics in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Hypertension. 2018;72(2):314–22.
Torimoto K, Okada Y, Mori H, et al. Effects of exenatide on postprandial vascular endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015;14:25.
Koska J, Schwartz EA, Mullin MP, et al. Improvement of postprandial endothelial function after a single dose of exenatide in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance and recent-onset type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:1028–30.
Gerstein HC, Colhoun HM, Dagenais GR, et al. Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10193):121–30.
Tuttolomondo A, Cirrincione A, Casuccio A, Del Cuore A, Daidone M, Di Chiara T, Di Raimondo D, Corte VD, Maida C, Simonetta I, Scaglione S, Pinto A. Efficacy of dulaglutide on vascular health indexes in subjects with type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20(1):1.
RR holds the Boehringer Ingelheim Chair in Beta-cell Preservation, Function and Regeneration at Mount Sinai Hospital. RR is guarantor and had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
This study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (MOP 136938) and the University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Banting and Best Diabetes Centre and Heart & Stroke/Richard Lewar Centre of Excellence in Cardiovascular Research.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Mount Sinai Hospital Research Ethics Board and registered at ClinicalTrials.Gov (NCT02194595). All participants provided written informed consent.
RR reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants and personal fees from Novo Nordisk, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from Eli Lilly, outside the submitted work. CKK reports research support from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Retnakaran, R., Pu, J., Ye, C. et al. The vascular function effects of adding exenatide or meal insulin to basal insulin therapy in early type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol 22, 50 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-023-01781-z
- Endothelial function
- Peripheral arterial tonometry
- Reactive hyperemia