Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Original investigation
  • Open Access

Association between epicardial adipose tissue, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and myocardial dysfunction in middle-aged men with suspected metabolic syndrome

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
Contributed equally
Cardiovascular Diabetology201817:95

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-018-0735-7

  • Received: 24 March 2018
  • Accepted: 19 June 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

As body fat composition and metabolism differ between men and women, we evaluated sex-related differences in the association among epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), secretome profile, and myocardial function of subjects with suspected metabolic syndrome.

Methods

We evaluated 277 participants (men, n = 140; 56.1 ± 4.7 years) who underwent conventional echocardiography and two-dimensional speckle tracking from the Seoul Metabolic Syndrome cohort. EAT was measured from the right ventricular free wall perpendicular to the aortic annulus at end systole. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) was obtained from 18 apical segments. Apolipoprotein A1, apolipoprotein B, adiponectin, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were measured using immunoturbidimetry assay.

Results

Mean age, body mass index, and hs-CRP level did not differ by sex. Waist circumference, fasting blood glucose level, and triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio were higher, and apolipoprotein AI and adiponectin levels were lower in men. No significant difference in mean EAT thickness was found (7.02 ± 1.81 vs. 7.13 ± 1.70 mm, p = 0.613). Men had a higher left ventricular (LV) mass index and lower GLS. EAT thickness was associated with hs-CRP level in men alone (ß = 0.206, p = 0.015). LV mass index (ß = 2.311, p = 0.037) and function represented by e′ (ß = − 0.279, p = 0.001) and GLS (ß = − 0.332, p < 0.001) were independently associated with EAT thickness in men alone.

Conclusions

In middle-aged subjects with suspected metabolic syndrome, EAT was associated with inflammation represented by hs-CRP level, LV mass, and subclinical myocardial dysfunction only in men, suggesting that the inflammatory activity of EAT induced myocardial remodeling and dysfunction in middle-aged subjects but was attenuated in women.

Trial registration NCT02077530 (date of registration: November 1, 2013)

Keywords

  • Epicardial adipose tissue
  • Sex
  • Global longitudinal strain
  • High-sensitivity C-reactive protein
  • Metabolic syndrome

Introduction

Middle-aged men are known to be at higher risk than women for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) [1, 2]. Previous studies report that higher metabolic risk factors in men and the protective effect of estrogen in premenopausal women may contribute to the sex-related differences in the middle-aged population [1, 3, 4]. However, the underlying mechanisms of the observed sex-related differences are still unclear.

Generally, women have more body fat than men with a similar body mass index (BMI) [5]. Body fat composition and metabolism differ between men and women [68]. Men tend to have more visceral adipose tissue (VAT), whereas women tend to have more subcutaneous adipose tissue [9]. Sex hormones, including estrogen and testosterone, appear to play a significant role in these differences [7].

Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is an easily measurable VAT by echocardiography [10]. EAT is metabolically bioactive and the source of adipocytokines, proatherogenic mediators, and pro-inflammatory cytokines [1115]. EAT may have important roles in the pathophysiologies of metabolic syndrome and cardiometabolic diseases [1619]. The association of EAT accumulation with subclinical changes in myocardial structure and function has been reported [2022]. Although several studies reported that EAT increases in women after menopause and the relationship between EAT thickness and myocardial function are significant only in women after 60 years old [21, 23], the sex-related difference in EAT thickness and its association with myocardial function have not been investigated in the middle-aged population.

Therefore, we investigated the association of EAT thickness with adipocytokine levels, inflammatory marker level, and myocardial function, and the sex-related difference in its association in a middle-aged population.

Methods

Study population

The Seoul Metabolic Syndrome study is a prospective ongoing cohort study that aims to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of Koreans with suspected metabolic syndrome. Detailed protocols were reported in previously published papers [24, 25]. Participants from 30 to 64 years of age were enrolled from 25 public healthcare centers between January 2014 and September 2014. Participants with a previous history of stroke, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, or any revascularization were excluded from the enrollment. Demographic data, medical history of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, and medications were assessed through a standardized questionnaire. Basic physical examinations were performed by physicians. Among 1130 participants in the cohort, 277 who underwent both conventional echocardiography and two-dimensional (2-D) speckle tracking were enrolled in this study. This study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of the Korea University Anam Hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from each participant (IRB NO. ED13087).

Anthropometric and laboratory parameters

Body weight, height, waist and hip circumferences, and systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressures (DBP) were measured on the day of medical examination. All the subjects fasted for at least 8 h before blood sampling at the first visit. Fasting blood glucose (FBG) level was measured using an ultraviolet assay (Roche, Germany). Levels of total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol were determined using the homogeneous enzymatic colorimetric assay (Roche, Germany). Apolipoprotein A1, apolipoprotein B, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were measured using immunoturbidimetry assay (Roche, Germany). Adiponectin was measured by using multiplex immunoassays (Millipore, USA). All laboratory analyses were performed by Green Cross Laboratories (Gyunggi, Korea). Each assay was controlled within 5% value of coefficient of variation every day.

Conventional echocardiography

Two-dimensional/Doppler echocardiography was performed in each subject by using a commercially available echocardiographic system (Vivid-E9, Vingmed-General Electric, Horten, Norway) with a M5Sc transducer. Chamber quantification was performed from 2-D echocardiography images. Left atrial (LA) volume index (LAVI) and left ventricular (LV) mass index (LVMI) were calculated using the formula recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography [26]. Mitral inflow velocity was obtained in the apical four-chamber view by pulsed-wave Doppler echocardiography during early (E) and late filling (A). The early diastolic mitral annular velocity (e′) of the septal mitral and lateral mitral annuli were evaluated using tissue Doppler imaging. LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) was obtained from 18 apical segments and analyzed using the ECHOPAC PC software (version 201.67.0).

EAT thickness measurement

EAT was defined as the relatively echo-free space between the outer wall of the myocardium and the visceral layer of the pericardium [10]. The parasternal long-axis view was performed to measure the maximal EAT thickness from the right ventricular free wall perpendicular to the aortic annulus at end systole. The values were measured in three cardiac cycles and were averaged. For the reliability of the EAT thickness measurement, the interclass correlation coefficients for the intraobserver and interobserver variability were 0.992 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.983–0.996; p < 0.001) and 0.902 (95% CI 0.795–0.953, p < 0.001), respectively.

Statistical analyses

All results were presented as mean ± SD for continuous variables or as frequencies (percentages) for categorical variables. The differences in the frequency of cardiovascular risk factors between the men and women were compared using the Chi square test, and the differences in the EAT thickness and echocardiographic parameters were compared using the Student t test. The correlations among EAT thickness, cardiovascular risk factors, and laboratory and echocardiographic parameters were evaluated using the correlation analysis. The mean hs-CRP level was compared according to the median value of myocardial dysfunction by Student t test. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to access the association between EAT thickness and myocardial function after adjustment for age, BMI, systolic blood pressure, fasting glucose level, triglyceride level, high-density lipoprotein level and LVMI. SPSS version 22.0 for Windows (IBM, NY, USA) was used to perform the statistical analysis. A two-sided p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics

In this study, 277 participants (140 men and 137 women, 56.1 ± 4.71 years) were enrolled. The baseline characteristics of the men and women are shown in Table 1. Mean age and BMI did not differ between the men and women; however, waist circumference, SBP, and DBP were greater in the men than in the women. No significant differences in the prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia were found between the sexes.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of men and women, including laboratory and echocardiographic parameters

 

Men

Women

p

Anthropometric parameters

 Age (years)

56.3 ± 5.0

55.9 ± 4.4

0.561

 Body mass index (kg/m2)

25.9 ± 2.8

25.5 ± 2.9

0.207

 Waist (cm)

90.6 ± 6.6

84.5 ± 7.6

< 0.001

 Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)

126.5 ± 14.4

121.2 ± 15.1

0.003

 Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)

78.1 ± 9.8

74.2 ± 9.1

0.001

Underlying diseases

 Hypertension (n [%])

12 (9.1%)

6 (4.6%)

0.302

 Diabetes mellitus (n [%])

3 (2.3%)

1 (0.8%)

0.513

 Dyslipidemia (n [%])

16 (12.1%)

7 (5.3%)

0.079

Laboratory findings

 Fasting blood glucose (mg/dl)

104.0 ± 16.2

95.8 ± 11.5

< 0.001

 Total cholesterol (mg/dl)

192.4 ± 32.3

204.3 ± 31.7

0.002

 LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl)

123.5 ± 32.6

134.0 ± 31.9

0.007

 Triglyceride (mg/dl)

170.8 ± 105.0

138.3 ± 77.4

0.004

 HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl)

48.3 ± 13.5

54.3 ± 13.0

< 0.001

 TG/HDL ratio

4.1 ± 4.0

2.9 ± 2.4

0.003

 Apolipoprotein AI (mg/dl)

138.8 ± 26.5

145.8 ± 24.1

0.02

 Apolipoprotein B (mg/dl)

100.8 ± 21.6

101.8 ± 24.1

0.722

 Adiponectin (ng/ml)

7.5 ± 4.9

12.4 ± 6.3

< 0.001

 WBC count (× 103/μl)

3.93 ± 2.70

3.96 ± 3.10

0.937

 High-sensitivity CRP (mg/dl)

1.39 ± 2.58

1.21 ± 1.74

0.513

Echocardiographic parameters

 EAT thickness (mm)

7.02 ± 1.81

7.13 ± 1.70

0.613

 LVMI (g/m2)

75.0 ± 23.2

68.6 ± 14.3

0.006

 LAVI (ml/m2)

24.2 ± 8.5

26.8 ± 7.1

0.006

 EF (%)

58.5 ± 6.4

59.4 ± 9.1

0.352

 E (cm/s)

51.5 ± 12.6

56.3 ± 13.1

0.002

 A (cm/s)

55.7 ± 16.7

59.9 ± 14.7

0.029

 E/A ratio

1.0 ± 0.8

1.0 ± 0.3

0.516

 DT (ms)

193.5 ± 43.6

187.6 ± 41.9

0.263

 e′ (cm/s)

6.3 ± 1.5

6.3 ± 1.6

0.839

 E/e

7.0 ± 1.8

7.8 ± 1.9

< 0.001

 GLS (%)

− 15.3 ± 2.3

− 17.0 ± 2.0

< 0.001

Data are presented as number (%) for categorical variables or mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables

LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; TG/HDL, triglyceride/HDL-cholesterol; WBC, white blood cell; CRP, C-reactive protein; LVMI, left ventricular mass index; LAVI, left atrial volume index; EF, ejection fraction; E, early diastolic mitral inflow velocity; DT, deceleration time; e′, septal early mitral tissue velocity; a′, septal late mitral tissue velocity; s′, septal systolic mitral tissue velocity; GLS, global longitudinal strain

Metabolic laboratory parameters represented by FBG, LDL, TG, HDL, apolipoprotein AI, and adiponectin levels were more impaired in the men than in the women. However, hs-CRP level as a systemic inflammatory marker and apolipoprotein B level were not different between the men and women.

LVMI was higher in the men, but LAVI was higher in the women. Ejection fraction and septal e′ velocity did not differ between the sexes. GLS was more impaired in the men. The mean EAT thickness was 7.07 ± 1.76 mm, without significant difference between the men and women.

EAT and its characteristics in all the participants

EAT thickness significantly correlated with obesity represented by BMI (r = 0.286, p < 0.001) and waist circumference (r = 0.321, p < 0.001). Among the lipid profiles, including apolipoprotein and adiponectin levels, only TG level was weakly associated with EAT thickness (r = 0.121, p = 0.044). An inflammatory marker assessed using hs-CRP level was significantly associated with EAT thickness (r = 0.176, p = 0.003). LVMI (r = 0.128, p = 0.034), GLS (r = − 0.235, p < 0.001), and LV diastolic function represented by septal e′ velocity (r = − 0.205, p = 0.001) and E/e′ ratio (r = 0.137, p = 0.023) also significantly correlated with EAT thickness.

Systemic inflammation according to sex and myocardial dysfunction

To investigate the association between systemic inflammation and myocardial function, the mean hs-CRP level was compared between the men and women according to the medial value of e′ velocity and GLS. Only the men demonstrated a higher mean hs-CRP level in the low septal e′ velocity group (Fig. 1a). The men with low GLS had lower hs-CRP levels than the men with high GLS, but the difference was not statistically significant (Fig. 1b).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Comparison of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels according to median e′ velocity (a), and GLS (b). * means p-value is less than 0.05 compared with the high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level of the subjects without myocardial dysfunction in each group

Sex-related difference in EAT in association with secretome profile and myocardial function

LVMI, septal e′ velocity, and hs-CRP, which were related to EAT thickness in all subjects, were significantly correlated with EAT thickness exclusively in men. GLS was associated with EAT thickness in both the men and women (Fig. 2). The association between EAT thickness and myocardial dysfunction was evaluated using multiple linear regression analysis. EAT thickness was independently associated with septal e′ velocity, and GLS after adjustment for multiple cardiovascular risk factors and LVMI (Table 2).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

The association of epicardial adipose tissue thickness with myocardial function (ad) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level (e, f) in men and women

Table 2

Multiple linear regression analysis between EAT thickness and myocardial function in the men and women after adjustment for age, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and fasting glucose, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein levels and LVMI

 

All

Men

Women

β

95% CI

p

β

95% CI

p

β

95% CI

p

(a) e′ velocity

 EAT

− 0.163

− 0.270

− 0.057

0.003

− 0.222

− 0.363

− 0.081

0.002

− 0.048

− 0.224

0.127

0.586

 Age

− 0.087

− 0.125

− 0.048

< 0.001

− 0.079

− 0.130

− 0.028

0.002

− 0.099

− 0.162

− 0.037

0.002

 BMI

− 0.028

− 0.095

0.040

0.419

− 0.008

− 0.100

0.084

0.866

− 0.059

− 0.161

0.043

0.252

 SBP

0.003

− 0.010

0.015

0.661

− 0.005

− 0.023

0.012

0.545

0.009

− 0.010

0.027

0.358

 FBG

− 0.006

− 0.019

0.006

0.311

− 0.008

− 0.024

0.008

0.316

− 0.010

− 0.034

0.013

0.384

 TG

0.001

− 0.001

0.003

0.312

0.002

− 0.001

0.004

0.221

< 0.001

− 0.004

0.004

0.917

 HDL

0.013

− 0.003

0.028

0.120

0.015

− 0.010

0.039

0.238

0.017

− 0.007

0.040

0.166

 LVMI

− 0.013

− 0.022

− 0.004

0.006

− 0.014

− 0.025

− 0.003

0.010

− 0.012

− 0.032

0.007

0.204

(b) GLS

 EAT

− 0.217

− 0.372

− 0.061

0.007

− 0.376

− 0.595

− 0.158

0.001

− 0.064

− 0.278

0.151

0.560

 Age

0.003

− 0.054

0.060

0.916

0.019

− 0.062

0.099

0.647

− 0.004

− 0.080

0.073

0.921

 BMI

− 0.077

− 0.176

0.022

0.125

− 0.041

− 0.187

0.105

0.581

− 0.101

− 0.226

0.024

0.111

 SBP

− 0.020

− 0.038

− 0.002

0.030

− 0.013

− 0.041

0.015

0.352

− 0.019

− 0.041

0.004

0.101

 FBG

− 0.012

− 0.030

0.006

0.199

0.013

− 0.012

0.037

0.306

− 0.028

− 0.057

0.001

0.060

 TG

0.000

− 0.003

0.003

0.890

0.000

− 0.004

0.004

0.878

− 0.002

− 0.007

0.003

0.408

 HDL

0.023

0.002

0.044

0.029

0.008

− 0.022

0.038

0.618

0.022

− 0.007

0.050

0.140

 LVMI

− 0.024

− 0.037

− 0.010

0.001

− 0.016

− 0.033

0.001

0.070

− 0.014

− 0.038

0.010

0.241

​EAT, epicardial adipose tissue; LVMI, left ventricular mass index; β, standardized coefficient; CI, confidence interval; e′, septal early mitral tissue velocity; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; FBG, fasting blood glucose; TG, triglyceridse; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; GLS, global longitudinal strain

Discussion

This is the first study to manifest sex-related differences in the association among EAT thickness, hs-CRP level, and myocardial function in middle-aged subjects with suspected metabolic syndrome. In the present study, we demonstrate that (1) in an asymptomatic middle aged population, components of metabolic syndrome were more impaired in men than in women; (2) EAT thickness showed no difference between men and women; (3) men had a higher LVMI and more-impaired GLS than women; (4) hs-CRP level was associated with myocardial impairment by GLS and e′ velocity; and (5) only men showed the significant association of EAT thickness with hs-CRP level, LVMI, and myocardial dysfunction.

EAT and myocardial function

Although considerable studies have been conducted on the association between EAT and myocardial dysfunction, it has not been clearly elucidated [20, 22, 27]. In the present study, EAT correlated with LVMI, e′, and GLS. Our findings collaborate to involve EAT with the pathogenic mechanism of myocardial remodeling and subclinical myocardial dysfunction in middle-aged subjects without cardiovascular disease [22, 28]. As EAT thickness is thought to reflect the amount of VAT, the effect of EAT on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is considered a consequence of enhanced insulin resistance and abnormal lipid metabolism. However, various pathogenic mechanisms have been suggested about the influence of EAT on myocardial function. First, because accumulated EAT envelopes the right ventricular free wall, the paracrine effects of EAT-derived adipocytokines and inflammatory mediators could directly influence the myocardium. Second, these cytokines could develop coronary atherosclerosis and then damage the myocardium through myocardial ischemia. In a study with multi-detector computed tomography coronary angiography, EAT thickness surrounding the left anterior descending artery predicted the presence, extent and severity of coronary artery disease after adjustment for confounding factors [29]. Furthermore, in patients with acute coronary syndrome, perivascular fat stranding was related to the culprit lesion, a lower Agatston score, presence of regional wall motion abnormalities, and initial elevation of serum troponin levels [30]. Our cohort study is an ongoing prospective study, and follow-up data of coronary events, including myocardial infarction and any coronary revascularization, will be investigated. The direct mechanical effect of thick EAT could limit and compress myocardial motion [20, 31]. Our previous study that indicated that lateral e′ and s′ (systolic mitral annular velocity) have a stronger relationship than septal e′ and s′ velocity supports this hypothesis [21]. Left atrial (LA) dysfunction has also been suggested as a possible mechanism to link EAT and LV diastolic dysfunction. Evin et al. reported that magnetic resonance imaging derived LA strain correlates well with BMI and EAT volume in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity, suggesting that LA strain could be a sensitive tool for detection of early LV diastolic dysfunction [32].

EAT and secretome profile

EAT is considered as an endocrine organ of bioactive molecules, including various inflammatory mediators. The association between EAT and several adipocytokines has been suggested. Secreted frizzled-related protein 4, a novel adipokine which is related to insulin resistance was increased in human EAT samples in patients with coronary artery disease [33]. EAT derived omentin-1, another novel adipokine which inhibits inflammation and improves insulin resistance was reduced in patients with coronary artery disease [34]. In patients with coronary artery disease, human samples of EAT obtained during elective cardiac surgery demonstrated enhanced inflammatory cell infiltration and inflammatory cytokine activity [14]. This locally enhanced inflammation may affect the pathophysiology of coronary atherosclerosis. Adipose tissue is a source of hs-CRP production that has a reciprocal association with adiponectin and anti-inflammatory protein levels [35]. Previous studies reported that EAT is significantly associated with hs-CRP level as a marker of low-grade systemic inflammation [13, 36]. However, to our knowledge, only few studies investigated the association among EAT, hs-CRP level, and myocardial function. One small-sample study with hypertensive patients reported that increased EAT and hs-CRP level are related with LV diastolic dysfunction [37]. In our study, increased EAT thickness and hs-CRP level were closely associated with subclinical myocardial dysfunction, including e′ and GLS as LV diastolic and systolic functions, respectively.

EAT and metabolic profile

Among other visceral adipose tissues, EAT has the greatest capacity for free fatty acid (FFA) release and uptake. In normal physiology, this FFA provides energy for the myocardium. This mechanism of EAT buffers the myocardium from exposure of high FFA concentration [19]. However, in pathological conditions, the intense metabolic activity of EAT could contribute to myocardial damage. In previous studies, EAT was related to myocardial TG content, LV concentric remodeling, and myocardial dysfunction [38, 39]. This suggests that myocardial infiltration of TG could induce direct myocardial damage. The present study demonstrates that EAT correlates with TG level and men have higher TG levels and TG/HDL ratios than women. Our finding implicates that the high metabolic activity of TG in middle-aged men may induce myocardial TG accumulation and myocardial remodeling and dysfunction.

Sex-related differences

Our study with a middle-aged general population demonstrates that only men had a significant association between EAT thickness and myocardial dysfunction, although EAT thickness was not different each other. Currently, the sex difference in the association between EAT and myocardial dysfunction has not been clearly investigated, but a possible cause could be sexual dimorphism of EAT during aging. In female aged rats, the level of EAT genes for interleukin-6 (IL-6), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), adiponectin and peroxisome proliferators activated receptor γ were lower than in young rats. By comparison, aged male rats showed an increased expression of genes for inflammatory cytokine, IL-6, in EAT [40]. Changes in obesity related genes in EAT were observed only in female rats, but not in males during aging [41]. This indicates that a dysfunctional EAT associated with aging demonstrates different metabolic and inflammatory activities between the two sexes. The sex difference of EAT function might be responsible for the sex difference of EAT-related inflammation and myocardial dysfunction.

Estrogen has a protective role in obesity induced chronic inflammation. Estrogen has immunosuppressive activity, as demonstrated by the effect of 17- β estradiol suppressing proinflammatory T helper 17 cells and M1 macrophage cell differentiation. Moreover, estrogen receptors are expressed on the surface of immune cells and modulate immune activity [42, 43]. Estrogen is also a determining factor for metabolism and function of adipose tissue. In mice models, estrogen prevented impaired glucose tolerance and obesity by regulating adipogenesis, lipolysis, and lipogenesis [44]. Ovariectomy of female rats decreased the vasodilatory effects of perivascular adipose tissue compared to sham rats [45]. Menopause has been reported to occur at about 50 years of age. Thus, majority of the women in this study may have post-menopausal hypoestrogenism. However, the prevalence of CVD rapidly increases after 5–10 years after menopause [46]. Although the age of menopause is not exactly consistent with the mean age of the study population, the protective effect of estrogen over the preceding 50 years could be considered as a factor that explains the sex difference in myocardial function in middle aged population.

Recent studies have reported that EAT has the characteristic of brown adipose tissue. Sacks et al. demonstrated that EAT has high expression of mitochondrial uncoupling protein-1 which is the main marker of brown adipose tissue [47]. Estrogen could increase this gene expression [48] and influence mitocondriogenesis via estrogen receptor-α of the mitochondria of brown adipose tissue [49]. Therefore the brown adipose tissue characteristic of EAT, which was associated with a more favorable risk of cardiovascular disease might be relatively small in men than women [50, 51].

Recently, in a study involving 56 healthy women, increased EAT thickness was significantly associated with increased thrombotic risk, assessed by PAI-1 [52]. To explain the sex difference, the association between EAT and thrombotic activity in men and women should be investigated and discussed in future studies.

Clinical implications

Our study enrolled an asymptomatic middle-aged population without cardiovascular diseases but with suspected metabolic syndrome. Therefore, our finding suggests that EAT thickness could be a marker of the early processes of cardiac remodeling and dysfunction in these subjects. Furthermore, the present study demonstrates that EAT and hs-CRP level as a proinflammatory marker is closely associated with subclinical myocardial function in middle-aged men. Combined with the increasing evidence of the association between inflammation and cardiovascular disease [53], our findings might be a basis for applying medications with anti-inflammatory effects in this middle-aged population.

Study limitations

This study has several limitations. We included in the analysis subjects who agreed to undergo additional speckle tracking study, which can detect subtle changes of myocardial function even in asymptomatic people. However, demographic data, including age, sex, BMI, waist circumference, and blood pressure, did not significantly differ between our 277 subjects and the overall cohort. Second, the cross-sectional analysis of this study could not prove a clear causality with EAT. Our ongoing follow-up study may provide the answer. Third, although mean age and BMI were not significantly different, men had more-impaired metabolic parameters, including blood pressure, and FBG, TG, and adiponectin levels. However, these findings are consistent with those of previous large cohort studies [44, 45]. The sex-related difference in the metabolic component in our study could be representative of that in the real-world population. Moreover, after the multiple linear regression analysis that adjusted for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, EAT remained a significant independent factor of myocardial remodeling and subclinical dysfunction. However, the effects of residual confounding factors cannot be excluded. Lastly, EAT is a well-known source of adipocytokines and inflammatory mediators, but this study only demonstrates the association between EAT and hs-CRP level as a low-grade inflammation marker.

Conclusion

In middle-aged subjects with suspected metabolic syndrome, EAT was associated with inflammation represented by hs-CRP level, LV mass, and subclinical myocardial dysfunction only in men. These findings may suggest that the inflammatory activity of EAT induced myocardial remodeling and dysfunction in the middle-aged subjects and was attenuated in the women.

Notes

Abbreviations

CVD: 

cardiovascular diseases

BMI: 

body mass index

VAT: 

visceral adipose tissue

EAT: 

epicardial adipose tissue

2-D: 

two-dimensional

SBP: 

systolic blood pressure

DBP: 

diastolic blood pressure

FBG: 

fasting blood glucose

TC: 

total cholesterol

LDL: 

low-density lipoprotein

HDL: 

high-density lipoprotein

hs-CRP: 

high-sensitivity C-reactive protein

LA: 

left atrial

LAVI: 

left atrial volume index

LV: 

left ventricular

LVMI: 

left ventricular mass index

E + A: 

velocity of early filling and late filling

e′: 

early diastolic mitral annular velocity

GLS: 

global longitudinal strain

CI: 

confidence interval

s′: 

systolic mitral annular velocity

FFA: 

free fatty acid

IL-6: 

interleukin-6

PAI-1: 

plasminogen activator inhibitor-1

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

DHC and JHJ participated in recruitment of the participants and analysis of the data, and wrote the manuscript. MNK, WJS analyzed and interpreted data. DSL contributed to the funding of study and recruitment of the participants. SMP designed the study and the main conceptual idea, and revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content and approved the final version as a primary investigator. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the participants in this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The Seoul Metabolic Syndrome study dataset generated and analysed during the present study are not publicly accessible due to Korean personal information projection act. Data of Seoul Metabolic Syndrome study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the institutional review board of the Korea University Anam Hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from each participant (IRB NO. ED13087).

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Cardiology, Korea University College of Medicine, Anam Hospital, Inchonro 73, Seongbukgu, Seoul, 136-705, Republic of Korea

References

  1. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, de Ferranti SD, Floyd J, Fornage M, Gillespie C, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2017 update: a report from the american heart association. Circulation. 2017;135(10):e146–603.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Adams RJ, Berry JD, Brown TM, Carnethon MR, Dai S, de Simone G, Ford ES, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123(4):e18–209.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bairey Merz CN, Shaw LJ, Reis SE, Bittner V, Kelsey SF, Olson M, Johnson BD, Pepine CJ, Mankad S, Sharaf BL, et al. Insights from the NHLBI-Sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: part II: gender differences in presentation, diagnosis, and outcome with regard to gender-based pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and macrovascular and microvascular coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(3 Suppl):S21–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Waters DD, Gordon D, Rossouw JE, Cannon RO 3rd, Collins P, Herrington DM, Hsia J, Langer R, Mosca L, Ouyang P et al: Women’s ischemic syndrome evaluation: current status and future research directions: report of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute workshop: October 2–4, 2002 : Section 4: lessons from hormone replacement trials. Circulation 2004, 109(6):e53–5.Google Scholar
  5. Blaak E. Gender differences in fat metabolism. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2001;4(6):499–502.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Makovey J, Naganathan V, Sambrook P. Gender differences in relationships between body composition components, their distribution and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional opposite sex twin study. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(12):1495–505.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Power ML, Schulkin J. Sex differences in fat storage, fat metabolism, and the health risks from obesity: possible evolutionary origins. Br J Nutr. 2008;99(5):931–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ibrahim MM. Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: structural and functional differences. Obes Rev. 2010;11(1):11–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Camhi SM, Bray GA, Bouchard C, Greenway FL, Johnson WD, Newton RL, Ravussin E, Ryan DH, Smith SR, Katzmarzyk PT. The relationship of waist circumference and BMI to visceral, subcutaneous, and total body fat: sex and race differences. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011;19(2):402–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Iacobellis G, Willens HJ. Echocardiographic epicardial fat: a review of research and clinical applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22(12):1311–9 (quiz 1417-1318).View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gruzdeva O, Uchasova E, Dyleva Y, Borodkina D, Akbasheva O, Belik E, Karetnikova V, Brel N, Kokov A, Kashtalap V. Relationships between epicardial adipose tissue thickness and adipo-fibrokine indicator profiles post-myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17(1):40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Iacobellis G, Pistilli D, Gucciardo M, Leonetti F, Miraldi F, Brancaccio G, Gallo P, di Gioia CR. Adiponectin expression in human epicardial adipose tissue in vivo is lower in patients with coronary artery disease. Cytokine. 2005;29(6):251–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lai YH, Yun CH, Yang FS, Liu CC, Wu YJ, Kuo JY, Yeh HI, Lin TY, Bezerra HG, Shih SC, et al. Epicardial adipose tissue relating to anthropometrics, metabolic derangements and fatty liver disease independently contributes to serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein beyond body fat composition: a study validated with computed tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25(2):234–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hirata Y, Kurobe H, Akaike M, Chikugo F, Hori T, Bando Y, Nishio C, Higashida M, Nakaya Y, Kitagawa T. Enhanced inflammation in epicardial fat in patients with coronary artery disease. Int Heart J. 2011;52(3):139–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Malavazos AE, Ermetici F, Cereda E, Coman C, Locati M, Morricone L, Corsi MM, Ambrosi B. Epicardial fat thickness: relationship with plasma visfatin and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 levels in visceral obesity. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2008;18(8):523–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pierdomenico SD, Pierdomenico AM, Cuccurullo F, Iacobellis G. Meta-analysis of the relation of echocardiographic epicardial adipose tissue thickness and the metabolic syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111(1):73–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ueno K, Anzai T, Jinzaki M, Yamada M, Jo Y, Maekawa Y, Kawamura A, Yoshikawa T, Tanami Y, Sato K. Increased epicardial fat volume quantified by 64-multidetector computed tomography is associated with coronary atherosclerosis and totally occlusive lesions. Circ J. 2009;73(10):1927–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mahabadi AA, Berg MH, Lehmann N, Kalsch H, Bauer M, Kara K, Dragano N, Moebus S, Jockel KH, Erbel R, et al. Association of epicardial fat with cardiovascular risk factors and incident myocardial infarction in the general population: the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(13):1388–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Iacobellis G. Local and systemic effects of the multifaceted epicardial adipose tissue depot. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015;11(6):363–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cavalcante JL, Tamarappoo BK, Hachamovitch R, Kwon DH, Alraies MC, Halliburton S, Schoenhagen P, Dey D, Berman DS, Marwick TH. Association of epicardial fat, hypertension, subclinical coronary artery disease, and metabolic syndrome with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110(12):1793–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim SA, Kim MN, Shim WJ, Park SM. Epicardial adipose tissue is related to cardiac function in elderly women, but not in men. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;27(1):41–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Watanabe K, Kishino T, Sano J, Ariga T, Okuyama S, Mori H, Matsushima S, Ohtsuka K, Ohnishi H, Watanabe T. Relationship between epicardial adipose tissue thickness and early impairment of left ventricular systolic function in patients with preserved ejection fraction. Heart Vessels. 2016;31(6):1010–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. El Khoudary SR, Shields KJ, Janssen I, Hanley C, Budoff MJ, Barinas-Mitchell E, Everson-Rose SA, Powell LH, Matthews KA. Cardiovascular Fat, menopause, and sex hormones in women: the SWAN cardiovascular fat ancillary study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(9):3304–12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Cho SA, Joo HJ, Cho JY, Lee SH, Park JH, Hong SJ, Yu CW, Lim DS. Visceral fat area and serum adiponectin level predict the development of metabolic syndrome in a community-based asymptomatic population. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(1):e0169289.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Joo HJ, Cho SA, Cho JY, Lee S, Park JH, Yu CW, Hong SJ, Lim DS. Different relationship between physical activity, arterial stiffness and metabolic status in obese subjects. J Phys Act Health. 2017;14(9):716–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Goldstein SA, Kuznetsova T, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1 e14–39 e14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Lin HH, Lee JK, Yang CY, Lien YC, Huang JW, Wu CK. Accumulation of epicardial fat rather than visceral fat is an independent risk factor for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013;12(1):127.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Fernandes-Cardoso A, Santos-Furtado M, Grindler J, Ferreira LA, Andrade JL, Santo MA. Epicardial fat thickness correlates with P-wave duration, left atrial size and decreased left ventricular systolic function in morbid obesity. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;27(8):731–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Maimaituxun G, Shimabukuro M, Fukuda D, Yagi S, Hirata Y, Iwase T, Takao S, Matsuura T, Ise T, Kusunose K, et al. Local thickness of epicardial adipose tissue surrounding the left anterior descending artery is a simple predictor of coronary artery disease- new prediction model in combination with framingham risk score. Circ J. 2018;82(5):1369–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hedgire S, Baliyan V, Zucker EJ, Bittner DO, Staziaki PV, Takx RA, Scholtz JE, Meyersohn N, Hoffmann U, Ghoshhajra B. Perivascular epicardial fat stranding at coronary CT angiography: a marker of acute plaque rupture and spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Radiology. 2018;287(3):808–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Iacobellis G, Corradi D, Sharma AM. Epicardial adipose tissue: anatomic, biomolecular and clinical relationships with the heart. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2005;2(10):536.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Evin M, Broadhouse KM, Callaghan FM, McGrath RT, Glastras S, Kozor R, Hocking SL, Lamy J, Redheuil A, Kachenoura N, et al. Impact of obesity and epicardial fat on early left atrial dysfunction assessed by cardiac MRI strain analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15(1):164.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Ji Q, Zhang J, Du Y, Zhu E, Wang Z, Que B, Miao H, Shi S, Qin X, Zhao Y, et al. Human epicardial adipose tissue-derived and circulating secreted frizzled-related protein 4 (SFRP4) levels are increased in patients with coronary artery disease. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017;16(1):133.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Du Y, Ji Q, Cai L, Huang F, Lai Y, Liu Y, Yu J, Han B, Zhu E, Zhang J, et al. Association between omentin-1 expression in human epicardial adipose tissue and coronary atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15:90.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Ouchi N, Kihara S, Funahashi T, Nakamura T, Nishida M, Kumada M, Okamoto Y, Ohashi K, Nagaretani H, Kishida K. Reciprocal association of C-reactive protein with adiponectin in blood stream and adipose tissue. Circulation. 2003;107(5):671–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Graner M, Seppala-Lindroos A, Rissanen A, Hakkarainen A, Lundbom N, Kaprio J, Nieminen MS, Pietilainen KH. Epicardial fat, cardiac dimensions, and low-grade inflammation in young adult monozygotic twins discordant for obesity. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109(9):1295–302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Turak O, Ozcan F, Canpolat U, Isleyen A, Cebeci M, Oksuz F, Mendi MA, Cagli K, Golbasi Z, Aydogdu S. Increased echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness and high-sensitivity CRP level indicate diastolic dysfunction in patients with newly diagnosed essential hypertension. Blood Press Monit. 2013;18(5):259–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kankaanpaa M, Lehto HR, Parkka JP, Komu M, Viljanen A, Ferrannini E, Knuuti J, Nuutila P, Parkkola R, Iozzo P. Myocardial triglyceride content and epicardial fat mass in human obesity: relationship to left ventricular function and serum free fatty acid levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(11):4689–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Gaborit B, Kober F, Jacquier A, Moro PJ, Cuisset T, Boullu S, Dadoun F, Alessi MC, Morange P, Clement K, et al. Assessment of epicardial fat volume and myocardial triglyceride content in severely obese subjects: relationship to metabolic profile, cardiac function and visceral fat. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012;36(3):422–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Fei J, Cook C, Blough E, Santanam N. Age and sex mediated changes in epicardial fat adipokines. Atherosclerosis. 2010;212(2):488–94.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Kocher C, Christiansen M, Martin S, Adams C, Wehner P, Gress T, Santanam N. Sexual dimorphism in obesity-related genes in the epicardial fat during aging. J Physiol Biochem. 2017;73(2):215–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Bolego C, Cignarella A, Staels B, Chinetti-Gbaguidi G. Macrophage function and polarization in cardiovascular disease: a role of estrogen signaling? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33(6):1127–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Khan D, Ansar Ahmed S. The immune system is a natural target for estrogen action: opposing effects of estrogen in two prototypical autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol. 2016;6:635.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Stubbins RE, Holcomb VB, Hong J, Nunez NP. Estrogen modulates abdominal adiposity and protects female mice from obesity and impaired glucose tolerance. Eur J Nutr. 2012;51(7):861–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang D, Wang C, Wu X, Zheng W, Sandberg K, Ji H, Welch WJ, Wilcox CS. Endothelial dysfunction and enhanced contractility in microvessels from ovariectomized rats: roles of oxidative stress and perivascular adipose tissue. Hypertension. 2014;63(5):1063–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Arnold AP, Cassis LA, Eghbali M, Reue K, Sandberg K. Sex hormones and sex chromosomes cause sex differences in the development of cardiovascular diseases. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017;37(5):746–56.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Sacks HS, Fain JN, Bahouth SW, Ojha S, Frontini A, Budge H, Cinti S, Symonds ME. Adult epicardial fat exhibits beige features. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(9):E1448–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Pedersen SB, Bruun JM, Kristensen K, Richelsen B. Regulation of UCP1, UCP2, and UCP3 mRNA expression in brown adipose tissue, white adipose tissue, and skeletal muscle in rats by estrogen. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;288(1):191–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Velickovic K, Cvoro A, Srdic B, Stokic E, Markelic M, Golic I, Otasevic V, Stancic A, Jankovic A, Vucetic M, et al. Expression and subcellular localization of estrogen receptors alpha and beta in human fetal brown adipose tissue. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(1):151–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Franssens BT, Hoogduin H, Leiner T, van der Graaf Y, Visseren FLJ. Relation between brown adipose tissue and measures of obesity and metabolic dysfunction in patients with cardiovascular disease. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;46(2):497–504.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Nam H-Y, Jun S. Association between active brown adipose tissue and coronary artery calcification in healthy men. Nuklearmedizin. 2017;56(05):184–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Basurto Acevedo L, Barrera Hernández S, Fernández Muñoz MdJ, Saucedo García RP, Rodríguez Luna AK, Martínez Murillo C. An increase in epicardial fat in women is associated with thrombotic risk. Clínica e Investigación en Arteriosclerosis (English Edition); 2018.Google Scholar
  53. Ridker PM, Luscher TF. Anti-inflammatory therapies for cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(27):1782–91.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement