Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

FSTL3 partially mediates the association of increased nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis risk with acute myocardial infarction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Cardiovascular Diabetology volume 22, Article number: 297 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The study aimed to investigate an association of increased liver fibrosis with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and to investigate the mediating effect of serum follistatin-like protein 3 (FSTL3) on the association in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Method

A total of 1424 participants were included in this study, and were firstly divided into two groups: 429 T2DM patients and 995 T2DM patients with NAFLD to assess the association of NAFLD and AMI. Then 995 T2DM co-existent NAFLD patients were categorized by NAFLD fibrosis risk to explore the association between NAFLD fibrosis risk and AMI. Immunohistochemistry staining and semi-quantitative analysis of liver FSTL3 were performed in 60 patients with NAFLD. There were 323 individuals (191 without AMI and 132 with AMI) in T2DM co-existent NAFLD patients who had serum samples, and serum FSTL3 was tested and mediation effect of FSTL3 in association of NAFLD fibrosis and AMI was performed.

Results

First, increased NAFLD fibrosis risk was an independent risk factor for AMI in patients with T2DM and co-existent NAFLD. In addition, analysis of Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and immunohistochemical staining confirmed the increased expression of FSTL3 in the liver of NAFLD patients with fibrosis. Serum FSTL3 significantly increased in patients with high NAFLD fibrosis risk and AMI, and closely associated with NAFLD fibrosis and AMI severity in T2DM patients with co-existent NAFLD. Most importantly, analysis of the level of mediation revealed that increased serum FSTL3 partially mediated the association of increased NAFLD fibrosis risk with AMI in T2DM patients with co-existent NAFLD.

Conclusions

NAFLD fibrosis was closely associated with AMI in T2DM patients. FSTL3 expression was enriched in the liver of NAFLD patients with significant and advanced fibrosis, and serum FSTL3 partially mediated the association of increased liver fibrosis risk with AMI in T2DM patients.

Introduction

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common chronic liver diseases worldwide. It comprises a spectrum of liver abnormalities ranging from a nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with or without fibrosis, and may progress to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma [1]. Further more, NAFLD may be complicated with extra hepatic cancers such as colorectal cancer, thyroid cancer, genitourinary system tumors and bladder cancer, etc. [2, 3]. As a liver manifestation of metabolic syndrome, NAFLD poses a similar cardiometabolic risk to coronary artery disease (CAD) including inflammation, dyslipidemia and endothelial dysfunction. There is mounting evidence that NAFLD is independently related to coronary artery disease [4, 5].

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the most serious clinical manifestation of CAD and the most common cause of death in NAFLD patients due to acute coronary artery occlusion [6, 7]. Previous studies showed that NAFLD increases the risk of myocardial infarction [8, 9]. At present, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) usually co-existent with NAFLD and metabolic syndrome (MetS) [10] prompting a need to explore the relationship between NAFLD fibrosis and AMI in patients with T2DM.

Previous studies in patients with T2DM showed that NAFLD, as determined by liver ultrasound, was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events [11, 12]. Recent studies showed that both liver steatosis and fibrosis are associated with cardiovascular diseases [13,14,15]. Nonetheless other researchers report that significant fibrosis, detected by FibroScan, not liver steatosis, was closely associated with the occurrence of AMI in T2DM patients [13, 16]. It is unclear whether the presence of NAFLD or fibrosis confers an additional risk of developing CAD in patients with T2DM. In addition, the molecular mechanism underlying the association of NAFLD/fibrosis with AMI has not been fully illustrated.

Follistatin-like protein 3 (FSTL3) is a lipoendocrine factor that is found in various tissues such as placenta, heart and liver [17]. It mainly binds to members of the transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) superfamily such as activin A and myostatin to inhibit their bioactivity [18]. FSTL3 has been found to regulate glucose and lipid metabolism in mice [19]. Clinical studies have shown that serum FSTL3 level is higher in patients with NASH than in those with NAFL, even after adjusting for body mass index (BMI), age and sex [20]. In addition, peripheral FSTL3 level and cardiac FSTL3 level have been found to be related to coronary atherosclerosis and AMI, respectively [21, 22]. Koplev et al. revealed that FSTL3 is associated with atherosclerosis, and injection of recombinant FSTL3 protein could affect triglyceride content in the liver [23]. Nonetheless in patients with co-existent T2DM and NAFLD, the relationship between FSTL3 and AMI is unclear.

The purposes of this study are as follows: firstly, to investigate the association of NAFLD and its fibrosis risk with occurrence and severity of AMI in patients with T2DM; and secondly, to determine the mediating role of serum FSTL3 in the association of increased NAFLD fibrosis risk with occurrence and severity of AMI.

Materials and methods

Participants

From January 2017 to December 2022, a total of 1586 participants participated in the study at Shanghai Fifth People’s Hospital Fudan University, Maqiao and Gumei Community Hospital in Minhang District of Shanghai. The study process is shown in Fig. 1. The diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus was according to the 2017 criteria of the Chinese Diabetes Association: (1) Typical symptoms of diabetes (polydipsia, polyuria, polydipsia, weight loss) plus (1) random blood glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/L; or (2) fasting blood glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L; or (3) 2 h blood glucose for oral glucose tolerance test ≥ 11.1 mmol/L. NAFLD was dignosed based on the same criteria: echogenicity of the liver significantly increased relative to that of the kidneys, the ultrasound beam was attenuated with the diaphragm indistinct, or the echogenic walls of the portal veins were less visible [24] rather than biopsy due to the easy availability and affordability of the former (Machine model of ultrasound instruments in the three hospitals we selected are all GE LOGIQ series which ensures the comparability of ultrasonography results to the greatest extent and all the utrasound staff are uniformly trained). The diagnosis of AMI was based on the criteria set by the European Heart Association (ESC) in 2012: The cardiac biomarker hypersensitive troponin (hs-cTnT or I) increases and / or decreases, and at least one value is higher than the 99th percentile of the reference upper limit, and at least one of the following criteria was met: (1) symptoms of myocardial ischemia; (2) new or presumed new significant ST-T changes or newly developed left vertical bundle branch block (LBBB); (3) pathological Q wave appeared on ECG; (4) imaging examination showed viable myocardial loss or new abnormal wall motion consistent with ischemic etiology; (5) coronary artery thrombosis confirmed by angiographic examination or autopsy.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of study

Full size image

A total of 1424 participants were included in the final analysis, and were firstly divided into two groups: 429 T2DM patients and 995 T2DM patients with NAFLD to assess the association of NAFLD and AMI. Then 995 T2DM co-existent NAFLD patients were categorized by NAFLD fibrosis risk to explore the association between NAFLD fibrosis risk and AMI, among which 323 individuals (191 without AMI collected from the Department of Endocrinology in Fifth People’s Hospital of Shanghai and 132 with AMI collected from the Metabolic Disease and Stroke and AMI Nursing Center) in 995 T2DM co-existent NAFLD patients had serum samples, then serum FSTL3 were measured and mediation analysis were performed.

Patients were excluded if they had: (1) viral hepatitis such as autoimmune hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease or other liver diseases caused by toxicity; (2) type 1 diabetes or other specific types of diabetes; (3) a history of acute or chronic infectious disease in the two weeks prior to blood testing; (3) pregnancy; (4) other diseases known to affect serum FSTL3 level such as eclampsia, abortion, gastric or kidney cancer.

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Fifth People’s Hospital Fudan University. Informed consent was obtained from patients or their representatives, and the protocol conformed with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Data collection and laboratory measurements

Height, weight, waist circumference (WC), and blood pressure of all patients were measured according to standard protocols. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing weight in kilograms by height in meters squared. Venous blood samples were obtained after an overnight fast (at least 10 h) and biochemical parameters (Automatic Biochemical Analyzer, Roche Cobas 8000) and blood cell count (Automatic blood cell analyzer, Sysmex XN 9000) measured. Fasting blood glucose (FBG), glycated hemoglobin (HBA1C), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TGs), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total protein (TP), serum albumin (ALB), globulin (GLB), glutamine transpeptide (γ-GT), white blood cell count (WBC), red blood cell count (RBC), hemoglobin (HGB), platelet (PLT), total bilirubin (TBIL), direct bilirulin (DBIL), serum creatinine (Scr), uric acid (UA), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), C reactive protein (CRP), cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were measured.

Measurement of serum FSTL3 concentration

Whole blood (1 mL) was collected from each patient and serum obtained to measure FSTL3 concentration using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit purchased from R&D Systems (#DFLRGO) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Semi-quantitative analysis of immunohistochemistry staining

A semi-quantitative analysis of formalin paraffin-embedded liver biopsy specimens was performed in 30 NAFLD patients with significant and advanced fibrosis and 30 non-NAFLD patients using FSTL3 immunohistochemical staining. The antibody was purchased from Sigma (no. HPA045378, 1:40). Image J was used to observe the results under 20 times amplification and average FSTL3 positive area in each section converted to the average optical density (AOD) before comparation.

Fibrosis risk in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

NFS was calculated according to the published formula NFS =  − 1.675 + 0.037 × age (years) + 0.094 × BMI (kg/m2) + 1.13 × impaired fasting glucose or diabetes (yes = 1, no = 0) + 0.99 × AST/ALT− 0.013 × PLT count (× 109/L)− 0.66 × serum albumin (g/dL). Two cut-off values were used to divide NAFLD patients into three groups: low risk group (NFS <− 1.455), medium risk (NFS: − 1.455–0.676) and high risk (NFS > 0.676 or > 65 years old, NFS > 0.12) [25]. The FIB-4 index was calculated according to the formula FIB-4 index = age (years) × AST (U/L)/(PLT(× 109/L) × (ALT (U/L))1/2). Two cut-off values were applied to divide NAFLD patients into three groups: low risk group (FIB-4 < 1.30), medium risk (FIB-4: 1.30–3.25) and high risk (FIB-4 > 3.25 or > 65 years old, FIB4 > 2.0) [25].

Gensini score

An ACC/AHA scoring method was adopted to generate the Gensini score [26] (score was performed at the most severe stenosis site): stenosis ≤ 25% 1 point; stenosis 26 to 50% 2 points; stenosis 51 to 75% 4 points; stenosis 76 to 90% 8 points; stenosis 91 to 99% 16 points; stenosis 100% 32 points. Coronary artery score (CAS) of each vessel was calculated as the stenosis score × weight coefficient of the vessel. The Gensini score was the sum of all vascular scores.

Statistical analysis

Baseline characteristics were analyzed by the frequency of categorical variables and the mean ± SD or median (quartile range) of continuous variables. Categorical variables were analyzed by chi-square test. All continuous variables were tested for normality and then t tests/analysis of variance or nonparametric tests used to determine inter-group differences. Pearson correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between noninvasive hepatic fibrosis score NFS/FIB-4 and Gensini score and other indicators. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between NFS/FIB-4 and the risk of AMI. Spearman correlation was used to analyze the correlation between serum FSTL3 concentration and NFS/FIB-4 and Gensini score and other indicators in T2DM patients with co-existent NAFLD. Analysis of degree of mediation was performed to demonstrate the effect of serum FSTL3 on the association of increased fibrosis risk and AMI in T2DM patients. The mediating effect percentage was evaluated by R function. The main parameter was the proportion of mediation, and based on the formula: (indirect effect/total effect) × 100%. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 27.0 software (IBM SPSS Inc) and R (version 4.0.5, R Foundation for Statistical Computing). All p values were two-tailed (p < 0.05).

Results

NAFLD fibrosis risk was closely associated with AMI in patients with T2DM

Among 1429 individuals, although patients with T2DM co-existent with NAFLD had a higher prevalence of artery hypertension, waist circumference, BMI, DBP, increased level of FBG, lipids (TG, TC, LDL-C), liver enzymes (ALT, AST), TP, ALB, prealbumin, γ-GT, WBC, lymphocyte (%), lymphocyte, eosinophilic granulocyte (%), basophilic granulocyte (%), RBC, HGB, TBIL, UA and eGFR compared with those without NAFLD, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of AMI between the two groups (32.7% vs 33.1%, p = 0.872) (Additional file 1: Table S1). Logistic regression analysis showed that NAFLD was not an independent risk factor for AMI (Additional file 1: Table S2).

When 995 patients with T2DM and NAFLD were divided into low, intermediate and high fibrosis risk subgroups based on NFS, there was a stepwise increase in the prevalence of AMI with increasing NAFLD fibrosis risk (13.86% vs 28.05% vs 50.92%, p < 0.001) (Table 1). When stratified by FIB-4, the prevalence of AMI also increased in a stepwise manner from low NAFLD fibrosis risk to high fibrosis risk (20.20% vs 30.74% vs 63.59%, p < 0.001) (Table 1). Subsequently, T2DM patients with co-existent NAFLD who had AMI were then divided into low-to-intermediate risk and high risk subgroups on the basis of NFS (Table 2). Gensini scores were much higher in patients with high fibrosis risk group than patients with low-to-intermediate risk (55.0 [31.0, 80.0] vs 42.0 [26.5, 62.5], p = 0.036). When patients were divided into low-to- intermediate risk and high-risk subgroups according to FIB-4, Gensini score was also much higher in patients with high fibrosis risk than patients with low-to-intermediate risk (58.0 [32.0, 90.0] vs 42.0 [27.0, 62.2], p < 0.001). Pearson correlation analysis showed a significant positive correlation between NFS/FIB-4 and Gensini score in T2DM patients with co-existent NAFLD and AMI (Additional file 1: Table S3).

Table 1 Comparison of parameters among different NAFLD fibrosis risk stages stratified according to NFS and FIB-4
Full size table
Table 2 Comparison of parameters of different NAFLD fibrosis risk stages in patients with acute myocardial infarction
Full size table

Increased NAFLD fibrosis risk was an independent risk factor for AMI in patients with T2DM co-existent NAFLD

Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent risk factors for AMI in patients with T2DM co-existent NAFLD. When stratified according to NFS index, both NAFLD fibrosis intermediate risk and high risk were independent risk factors for AMI (OR = 2.663; 95% CI 1.531 to 4.630; OR = 6.388; 95% CI 3.618 to 11.277, respectively) after adjusting for sex, artery hypertension, smoking, waist circumference and eGFR. When stratified according to FIB-4 index and after adjusting for all other variables, NAFLD fibrosis high risk (OR = 6.508; 95% CI 4.316 to 9.813; p < 0.001) was an independent risk factors for AMI development (Table 3).

Table 3 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of NAFLD fibrosis risk for acute myocardial infarction
Full size table

Hepatic expression of FSTL3 was increased in patients with T2DM and NAFLD with fibrosis

To investigate the potential link between NAFLD fibrosis and occurrence of AMI, four RNA-seq datasets for livers with NAFLD and fibrosis/cirrhosis were obtained from the GEO database: 1 human case (GSE162694) [27] and 3 mouse cases (GSE152250 [28], GSE148849 [29], GSE207856 [30]) (Fig. 2A). To identify the specific genes involved in NAFLD fibrosis, we focused on the differentially expressed genes (> 2.5 fold change, p < 0.05) that showed significant changes between the fibrosis group and control group in four datasets. After overlapping, only 6 genes were identified: Fstl3, Cd48, regulator of G protein signaling 1 (Rgs1), regulator of G protein signaling 2 (Rgs2), activating transcription factor 3 (Atf3) and lymphocyte antigen 9 (Ly9). The expression of these six genes was up-regulated, among which FSTL3 and CD48 are secretory proteins, while the others are non-secretory membrane proteins. In addition, FSTL3 has also been shown to be closely associated with the occurrence and development of AMI [21, 22].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Hepatic expression of FSTL3 was increased in patients with T2DM and NAFLD with fibrosis. A: GEO database analysis showed FSTL3 expression in the liver of NAFLD fibrosis patients was increased. B–C: H&E staining and immunohistochemical staining of FSTL3 in liver biopsy specimens from 30 NAFLD patients with significant and advanced fibrosis (F2 and F3) and 30 NAFLD patients with fibrosis stage F0 and F1

Full size image

Immunohistochemical staining of FSTL3 was also performed on liver biopsy specimens from 30 NAFLD patients with significant and advanced fibrosis (F2 and F3) and 30 NAFLD patients with fibrosis stage F0 and F1 (Fig. 2B, C). Both significant and advanced NAFLD fibrosis patients had far more FSTL3-positive area shown by AOD [0.37 (0.32, 0.41) vs 0.09 (0.07, 0.15), p < 0.001] than patients with F0 and F1 fibrosis. Typical histological images of both hematoxylin–eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining with FSTL3 are presented in Fig. 2C.

Serum FSTL3 was closely associated with AMI and NAFLD fibrosis in patients with T2DM co-existent NAFLD

To investigate the potential mediator of the liver-heart axis, we measured serum FSTL3 of 323 T2DM and co-existent NAFLD patients (132 had AMI, and another 191 without AMI served as controls) who had serum samples in 995 T2DM co-existent NAFLD patients. As shown in Fig. 3A, serum FSTL3 level in patients with AMI was significantly higher than in those without AMI among patients with co-existent T2DM and NAFLD (7950.44 [6369.34 to 11,551.23] vs 6585.82 [5278.60 to 7933.12], p < 0.001) (Additional file 1: Table S4). After matching for age and BMI, serum FSTL3 level in AMI patients remained significantly higher than that in the non-AMI group (7713.23 [6339.19 to 11,441.58] vs 6314.38 [4992.49 to 7880.49], p < 0.001) (Additional file 1: Table S4 and Fig. 3A). Spearman correlation analysis showed that serum FSTL3 level was significantly and positively correlated with Gensini score (Fig. 3F and Additional file 1: Table S6).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Serum FSTL3 was significantly increased in high NAFLD fibrosis risk and AMI patients, and closely associated with NAFLD fibrosis and AMI severity in patients with T2DM and co-existent NAFLD. A: Serum FSTL3 level in AMI patients with co-existent T2DM and NAFLD patients was significantly higher than in those without AMI. B–C: Serum FSTL3 level was much higher in NAFLD fibrosis high risk than those with NAFLD fibrosis low and intermediate risk, both by NFS and FIB-4. D–F: Serum FSTL3 was closely associated with NAFLD fibrosis and AMI severity in patients with T2DM and NAFLD

Full size image

Likewise, serum FSTL3 level was much higher in NAFLD fibrosis high risk patients than in those with NAFLD fibrosis low and intermediate risk, both by NFS and FIB-4 (Fig. 3B, C and Additional file 1: Table S5). More importantly, spearman correlation analysis showed that serum FSTL3 level was significantly and positively correlated with NFS, FIB-4 index (Fig. 3D, E, and Additional file 1: Table S6).

Increased serum FSTL3 partially mediated the association of increased NAFLD fibrosis risk with AMI in T2DM patients and co-existent NAFLD

323 patients with T2DM and co-existent NAFLD who had serum samples were categorized by NAFLD fibrosis risk with or without AMI (191 without AMI and 132 with AMI). After standardizing the serum FSTL3 level, we performed mediation analysis of serum FSTL3 level and AMI (Additional file 1: Table S7). We found that high NAFLD fibrosis risk (stratified both by NFS and FIB-4) was an independent risk factor for AMI without adjusting for confounding factors (OR = 5.61; 95% CI 3.27 to 9.79; OR = 11.31; 95% CI 6.00 to 22.77, respectively), and high NAFLD fibrosis risk remained an independent risk factor for AMI after adjusting for sex, artery hypertension, smoking, waist circumference and eGFR (OR = 5.03; 95% CI 2.77 to 9.36; OR = 9.39, 95% CI 4.51 to 20.84, respectively). Finally, serum FSTL3 partially mediated the association of increased NFS fibrosis risk and AMI in NAFLD and T2DM patients without adjusting for other factors, and explained 27.97% of the association (Fig. 4A). After adjusting for sex, artery hypertension, smoking, waist circumference and eGFR, serum FSTL3 level explained 24.30% of the association (Fig. 4B). Serum FSTL3 partially mediated the association of increased FIB-4 fibrosis risk with AMI in NAFLD and T2DM patients without adjusting for other factors, and explained 21.92% of the association (Fig. 4C). After adjusting for all confounding factors, serum FSTL3 level explained 19.40% of the association (Fig. 4D).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Serum FSTL3 partially mediated the association of increased fibrosis risk and AMI in NAFLD and T2DM patients. A, C: When stratified according to NFS/FIB-4, and before adjusting for other relevant variables, the mediating effect of serum FSTL3 on association of increased fibrosis risk with AMI. B, D: When stratified according to NFS/FIB-4, and after adjusting for sex, artery hypertension, smoking, waist circumference and eGFR, the mediating effect of serum FSTL3 on association of increased fibrosis risk with AMI

Full size image

Discussion

To date, a number of studies have explored the association between NAFLD and CAD, however, this is the first one to combine noninvasive fibrosis risk indicators, NFS and FIB-4, to study the association of NAFLD liver fibrosis with AMI in T2DM co-existent NAFLD patients with large sample size. Then, GEO database analysis and immunohistochemical staining demonstrated overexpression of hepatic FSTL3 as NAFLD fibrosis progressed. Finally, the mediating role of serum FSTL3 in the association of increased fibrosis risk degree with AMI in T2DM patients with co-existent NAFLD was explored.

We first found NAFLD did not increase the risk of AMI in T2DM patients. Subsequently, using two noninvasive hepatic fibrosis indices NFS and FIB-4 (verified to be best in T2DM patients) to evaluate fibrosis risk, we confirmed the association of increased liver fibrosis with the occurrence and severity of AMI. Increased NAFLD fibrosis was an independent risk for AMI in T2DM patients. These results also demonstrated that NAFLD fibrosis was the strongest factor underlying cardiovascular events in T2DM patients with co-existent NAFLD.

GEO database analysis and semi-quantitative analysis of immunohistochemistry data showed that hepatic FSTL3 expression was enriched in the liver of patients with significant and advanced fibrosis. Elevated serum FSTL3 was verified in AMI patients with co-existent T2DM and NAFLD, and consistent with the results of previous studies in atherosclerosis patients and AMI animal models [21, 22]. Finally, this is the first study to demonstrate that serum FSTL3 level partially mediates the association of increased NAFLD fibrosis risk and AMI in patients with T2DM and co-existent NAFLD. We propose a liver-heart axis that may affect the occurrence and development of AMI. Simply described, liver fibrosis will increase serum FSTL3, and FSTL3 will reach the coronary artery through the circulation and affect the prevalence and development of AMI.

NAFLD, a hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome, has similar cardiometabolic risk factors to AMI, and there are several hypothesized mechanisms linking the two: 1) The association of NAFLD with other factors associated with obesity, T2DM and metabolic syndrome [31, 32] such as lipid metabolism disorder, inflammation, insulin resistance, adipokine abnormalities [33] in which mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) may play an important role in linking NAFLD and CAD [34], 2) genetic factors, oxidative stress, intestinal microbial disorders, adipokine and cytokine and increased activity of serum liver enzymes [35, 36]. Our study provides another possible mechanism that links NAFLD fibrosis risk with the occurrence and development of AMI. Previous studies have partially clarified the possible relationship between FSTL3 and coronary atherosclerosis and AMI. For example, it has been shown that the expression of Fstl3 is up-regulated in the heart of an AMI animal model, and induction of FSTL3 inhibits the cardioprotective effect of activin A, thus increasing sensitivity of the myocardium to ischemia [22]. Another study proved that up-regulation of FSTL3 in the serum of patients with coronary atherosclerosis could induce lipid accumulation and an inflammatory response in macrophages, thus promoting the occurrence and progression of atherosclerosis [21]. It is possible that elevated circulating FSTL3 derived from the liver of patients with hepatic fibrosis mediates the pro-atherogenic effect in T2DM. It is also acknowledged that a mechanistic insight into the potentially pathophysiological role of FSTL3 linking NAFLD fibrosis and AMI is lacking in this clinical study. Further studies using reliable rodent models to clarify the mediating function of FSTL3 are warranted.

The following limitations should be acknowledged: this study did not include patients with only NAFLD so it was not possible to analyze the association of liver fibrosis with occurrence and development of AMI in patients with only NAFLD. It was not able to determine whether serum FSTL3 played a mediating role in it, nor to verify whether T2DM and NAFLD had an additive effect on the occurrence and development of AMI.

In conclusion, this study demonstrated that hepatic fibrosis was an independent risk factor for AMI in T2DM patients, and was correlated with the severity of AMI. Increased FSTL3 expression in the liver of NAFLD fibrosis patients was also confirmed. Most importantly, we found that serum FSTL3 partially mediated the association of increased liver fibrosis risk with AMI in T2DM patients.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

NAFLD:

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

NAFL:

Nonalcoholic fatty liver

NASH:

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

GEO:

Gene expression omnibus

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

AMI:

Acute myocardial infarction

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

MetS:

Metabolic syndrome

LSM:

Liver stiffness measurement

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

TGF-β:

Transforming growth factor β

FSTL3:

Follistatin-like protein 3

BMI:

Body mass index

FBG:

Fasting blood glucose

HBA1C:

Glycated hemoglobin

TC:

Total cholesterol

TG:

Triglycerides

HDL-C:

High density lipoprotein cholesterol

LDL-C:

Low density lipoprotein cholesterol

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

TP:

Total protein

ALB:

Albumin

GLB:

Globulin

γ-GT:

Glutamine transpeptide

RBC:

Red blood cell count

WBC:

White blood cell count

PLT:

Platelets

HGB:

Hemoglobin

TBIL:

Total bilirubin

DBIL:

Direct bilirubin

Scr:

Serum creatinine

UA:

Uric acid

BUN:

Blood urea nitrogen

CRP:

C reactive protein

cTnI:

Cardiac troponin I

eGFR:

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

AOD:

Average optical density

H&E:

Hematoxylin–eosin

IHC:

Immunohistochemical

NFS:

NAFLD fibrosis score

FIB-4:

Fibrosis index based on 4 factors

mTOR:

Mammalian target of rapamycin

Rgs1:

Regulator of G protein signaling 1

Rgs2:

Regulator of G protein signaling 2

Atf3:

Activating transcription factor 3

Ly9:

Lymphocyte antigen 9

Ref:

Reference

References

  1. Friedman SL, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Rinella M, et al. Mechanisms of NAFLD development and therapeutic strategies. Nat Med. 2018;24(7):908–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Tarantino G, Crocetto F, Di Vito C, et al. Association of NAFLD and insulin resistance with non metastatic bladder cancer patients: a cross-sectional retrospective study. J Clin Med. 2021;10(2):346.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu Z, Lin C, Suo C, et al. Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and the risk of 24 specific cancers. Metabolism. 2022;127: 154955.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ren Z, Simons P, Wesselius A, et al. Relationship between NAFLD and coronary artery disease: a mendelian randomization study. Hepatology. 2023;77(1):230–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong VW, Wong GL, Yip GW, et al. Coronary artery disease and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut. 2011;60(12):1721–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2016. 64(6): 1388–1402.

  7. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2012;126(16):2020–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim JH, Moon JS, Byun SJ, et al. Fatty liver index and development of cardiovascular disease in Koreans without pre-existing myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke: a large population-based study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19(1):51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Sinn DH, Kang D, Chang Y, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and the incidence of myocardial infarction: a cohort study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;35(5):833–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tuttle KR, Bakris GL, Bilous RW, et al. Diabetic kidney disease: a report from an ADA consensus conference. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(10):2864–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Targher G, Bertolini L, Rodella S, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is independently associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(8):2119–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Targher G, Bertolini L, Padovani R, et al. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and its association with cardiovascular disease among type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(5):1212–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mikolasevic I, Domislovic V, Ruzic A, et al. Elastographic parameters of liver steatosis and fibrosis predict independently the risk of incident chronic kidney disease and acute myocardial infarction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Complications. 2022;36(8): 108226.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Josloff K, Beiriger J, Khan A, et al. Comprehensive review of cardiovascular disease risk in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022;9(12):419.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Park J, Kim G, Kim BS, et al. The associations of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis using fatty liver index and BARD score with cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in patients with new-onset type 2 diabetes: a nationwide cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21(1):53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lombardi R, Airaghi L, Targher G, et al. Liver fibrosis by FibroScan((R)) independently of established cardiovascular risk parameters associates with macrovascular and microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Liver Int. 2020;40(2):347–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsuchida K, Arai KY, Kuramoto Y, et al. Identification and characterization of a novel follistatin-like protein as a binding protein for the TGF-beta family. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(52):40788–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sidis Y, Mukherjee A, Keutmann H, et al. Biological activity of follistatin isoforms and follistatin-like-3 is dependent on differential cell surface binding and specificity for activin, myostatin, and bone morphogenetic proteins. Endocrinology. 2006;147(7):3586–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brandt C, Hansen RH, Hansen JB, et al. Over-expression of follistatin-like 3 attenuates fat accumulation and improves insulin sensitivity in mice. Metabolism. 2015;64(2):283–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Polyzos SA, Perakakis N, Boutari C, et al. Targeted analysis of three hormonal systems identifies molecules associated with the presence and severity of NAFLD. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(3):e390–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Runhua M, Qiang J, Yunqing S, et al. FSTL3 induces lipid accumulation and inflammatory response in macrophages and associates with atherosclerosis. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2019;74(6):566–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Oshima Y, Ouchi N, Shimano M, et al. Activin A and follistatin-like 3 determine the susceptibility of heart to ischemic injury. Circulation. 2009;120(16):1606–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Koplev S, Seldin M, Sukhavasi K, et al. A mechanistic framework for cardiometabolic and coronary artery diseases. Nat Cardiovasc Res. 2022;1(1):85–100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Williams CD, Stengel J, Asike MI, et al. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis among a largely middle-aged population utilizing ultrasound and liver biopsy: a prospective study. Gastroenterology. 2011;140(1):124–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vilar-Gomez E, Chalasani N. Non-invasive assessment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: clinical prediction rules and blood-based biomarkers. J Hepatol. 2018;68(2):305–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gensini GG. A more meaningful scoring system for determining the severity of coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 1983;51(3):606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pantano L, Agyapong G, Shen Y, et al. Molecular characterization and cell type composition deconvolution of fibrosis in NAFLD. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):18045.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang J, Muise ES, Han S, et al. Molecular profiling reveals a common metabolic signature of tissue fibrosis. Cell Rep Med. 2020;1(4): 100056.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Bates J, Vijayakumar A, Ghoshal S, et al. Acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibition disrupts metabolic reprogramming during hepatic stellate cell activation. J Hepatol. 2020;73(4):896–905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Xi Y, LaCanna R, Ma HY, et al. A WISP1 antibody inhibits MRTF signaling to prevent the progression of established liver fibrosis. Cell Metab. 2022;34(9):1377–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Azzam H, Malnick S. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease - the heart of the matter. World J Hepatol. 2015;7(10):1369–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang QQ, Lu LG. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: dyslipidemia, risk for cardiovascular complications, and treatment strategy. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2015;3(1):78–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Ismaiel A, Dumitrascu DL. Cardiovascular risk in fatty liver disease: the liver-heart axis-literature review. Front Med. 2019;6:202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tarantino G, Capone D. Inhibition of the mTOR pathway: a possible protective role in coronary artery disease. Ann Med. 2013;45(4):348–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nseir W, Shalata A, Marmor A, et al. Mechanisms linking nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with coronary artery disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56(12):3439–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Francque SM, van der Graaff D, Kwanten WJ. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and cardiovascular risk: pathophysiological mechanisms and implications. J Hepatol. 2016;65(2):425–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the participants for their cooperation. Special thanks to Professor Junping Shi of Department of Hepatology, Hangzhou Normal University Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China for friendly sponsorship of liver puncture specimens.

Funding

This study was funded by the Scientific Research Project funded by Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission (21ZR1450500) and the National Natural Science Foundation Youth Science Fund Project (82100906) and the Community Health Research Project funded by Community Health Research Center of Fudan University (2020SJ10).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Wenfei Duan, Ruixiao Shi and Fang Yang have co-first author.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Endocrinology, The Fifth People’s Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, 801 Heqing Road, Minhang District, Shanghai, 200240, China

    Wenfei Duan, Zhoujunhao Zhou, Lihong Wang & Shufei Zang

  2. Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Maqiao Community Health Service Center, Minhang District, Shanghai, 20111, China

    Ruixiao Shi

  3. Center of Community-Based Health Research, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

    Ruixiao Shi

  4. Department of Genetics and Developmental Science, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai, 200240, China

    Fang Yang & Zhe Huang

Authors
  1. Wenfei Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ruixiao Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fang Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhoujunhao Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lihong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhe Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shufei Zang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DWF: Clinical data collection, Formal analysis, Writing—original draft. SRX: Clinical data collection, Formal analysis. YF: Data curation. ZZJH: Clinical data collection. WLH: Clinical data collection. HZ: Supervision, Writing review and editing. ZSF: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhe Huang or Shufei Zang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital Fudan University. Informed consent was obtained from patients or their representatives, and the protocol conformed with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Comparison of parameters between non-NAFLD and NAFLD patients with T2DM. Table S2. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of NAFLD for acute myocardial infarction. Table S3. Factors associated with NFS and FIB4 in patients with NAFLD co-existent T2DM. Table S4. Comparison of parameters between non-AMI and AMI patients with NAFLD co-existent T2DM. Table S5. Comparison of parameters among different NAFLD fibrosis risk stages stratified according to NFS and FIB-4. Table S6. Factors associated with FSTL3 in patients with NAFLD and co-existent T2DM. Table S7. Mediation analysis of FSTL3 in the association of increased NAFLD fibrosis risk and AMI in T2DM co-existent NAFLD patients.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duan, W., Shi, R., Yang, F. et al. FSTL3 partially mediates the association of increased nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis risk with acute myocardial infarction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol 22, 297 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-023-02024-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-023-02024-x

Keywords

Cardiovascular Diabetology

ISSN: 1475-2840