Skip to main content

Elevated plasma triglyceride concentration and risk of adverse clinical outcomes in 1.5 million people: a CALIBER linked electronic health record study



Assessing the spectrum of disease risk associated with hypertriglyceridemia is needed to inform potential benefits from emerging triglyceride lowering treatments. We sought to examine the associations between a full range of plasma triglyceride concentration with five clinical outcomes.


We used linked data from primary and secondary care for 15 M people, to explore the association between triglyceride concentration and risk of acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, new onset diabetes, myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality, over a median of 6–7 years follow up.


Triglyceride concentration was available for 1,530,411 individuals (mean age 56·6 ± 15·6 years, 51·4% female), with a median of 1·3 mmol/L (IQR: 1.9). Severe hypertriglyceridemia, defined as > 10 mmol/L, was identified in 3289 (0·21%) individuals including 620 with > 20 mmol/L. In multivariable analyses, a triglyceride concentration > 20 mmol/L was associated with very high risk for acute pancreatitis (Hazard ratio (HR) 13·55 (95% CI 9·15–20·06)); chronic pancreatitis (HR 25·19 (14·91–42·55)); and high risk for diabetes (HR 5·28 (4·51–6·18)) and all-cause mortality (HR 3·62 (2·82–4·65)) when compared to the reference category of ≤ 1·7 mmol/L. An association with myocardial infarction, however, was only observed for more moderate hypertriglyceridaemia between 1.7 and 10 mmol/L. We found a risk interaction with age, with higher risks for all outcomes including mortality among those ≤ 40 years compared to > 40 years.


We highlight an exponential association between severe hypertriglyceridaemia and risk of incident acute and chronic pancreatitis, new diabetes, and mortality, especially at younger ages, but not for myocardial infarction for which only moderate hypertriglyceridemia conferred risk.


Despite being widely measured as part of routine lipid panels, the risks associated with severe hypertriglyceridemia remain incompletely understood. There has been a re-emergence of interest in understanding these risks for several reasons. First, the prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia is increasing worldwide as more individuals become obese and diabetics [1], the emergence of novel and costly therapies to lower triglyceride concentrations, will require better risk based prioritisation [2]. Third, the relationship between hypertriglyceridemia and coronary heart disease has been revisited with Mendelian Randomization studies suggesting a possible causal link [3].

Triglycerides in plasma are carried by chylomicrons and VLDL, collectively called triglyceride rich lipoproteins (TGRL). Hypertriglyceridemia ranges in severity from mild to very severe with differences in TGRL composition and metabolism [4]. Clinical guidelines broadly advocate lowering triglycerides when concentrations reach ~ 10 mmol/L, to reduce risk of acute pancreatitis, as a causal and mechanistic link is widely accepted [5, 6]. For myocardial infarction (MI), causality is far less certain, and measured triglyceride concentrations may represent more of a biomarker of risk, with risk mediated by smaller apoB carrying TGRL and remnants arising from incomplete lipolysis of larger TGRLs [7, 8]. In either case, there remains a need to fully understand the degree of risk associated with clinically measured hypertriglyceridemia, for relevant outcomes, especially at very high concentrations given these are now more prevalent, to aid clinical decision making and risk stratification.

In this regard, where observational data on hypertriglyceridemia in general populations exist, for different endpoints, including AP and MI studies have mostly examined people with mild to moderate triglyceride elevations between 1.7 and 10 mmol/L [9,10,11,12,13,14]. Higher ranges of triglycerides > 10 mmol/L have mostly been assessed in smaller studies of patients with prior pancreatitis, including those referred to lipid clinics, with associated selection bias [15]. In contrast, studies that have examined risks of severe hypertriglyceridemia in the general population, have been limited to evaluating only those with triglyceride concentrations > 5·6 mmol/L or > 11·3 mmol/L, often without reference to normal values or lacking external validity by using claims data or insurance databases [16, 17].

To provide a clearer understanding of the risks associated with hypertriglyceridemia, and especially severe hypertriglyceridemia in the general population, we report on the associations between a full spectrum of routinely measured triglyceride values from < 1·7 mmol/L to > 20 mmol/L and risks of multiple clinically relevant incident outcomes, including acute pancreatitis (AP), chronic pancreatitis (CP), myocardial infarction (MI), new onset diabetes and all-cause mortality. We do this using a representative population with linked primary care, secondary care and mortality records, leveraging the universal healthcare coverage provided by the NHS in England.


Study design and data sources

We conducted a cohort study (Additional file 2) using linked electronic health records (EHR) between primary care data (CPRD), hospital admissions (HES) and cause of death registry (ONS) in England from 1997 to 2016. CPRD has been shown to be representative of the English population by age, sex and ethnicity, and validated for research [18]. The study was approved by the MHRA (UK) Independent Scientific Advisory Committee 17_033, under Sect. 251 (NHS Social Care Act 2006). This study was carried out as part of the CALIBER resource ( which provides validated EHR phenotyping algorithms and tools for national structured data sources [19].

Study population

Patients of all ages were eligible for inclusion into the study if they had at least one triglyceride measurement recorded in CPRD and at least one year follow up. The baseline date for each patient was the date of their first triglyceride record that occurred at least 1 year after registration with their general practitioner (GP). They were followed up until they had an outcome, transferred out of their GP practice, died or until the administrative censoring date for data collection, up to a maximum of 5 years.


The primary exposure in this study, baseline triglyceride concentration, was categorised into the following five groups: ≤1·7 (reference, “normal”), > 1·7 − 4·5 (mild hypertriglyceridemia), > 4·5–10 (moderate hypertriglyceridemia), > 10–20 (severe hypertriglyceridemia), > 20 (very severe hypertriglyceridemia) mmol/L.

Baseline covariate definitions

Baseline covariates included demographics (age and sex), behaviours (alcohol consumption and smoking status), prior medical history (AP, CP, diabetes, hypertension and MI), clinical biomarkers (body mass index (BMI), blood pressure and lipids [total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)]), and prescriptions for lipid regulating drugs (statins, fibrates, nicotinic acid, bile acid sequestrants and omega-3 fatty acids). Medical histories were defined as any record of a diagnosis prior to baseline date. Behaviours and clinical biomarkers were captured in primary care data and were taken as the most recent record in the year prior to a patient’s baseline date. Prescribed drugs were defined as any record of prescription in primary care prior to the baseline date.

Follow up for clinical outcomes

Patients were followed-up for up for occurrences of new clinical outcome diagnoses made during the follow up period in primary care or hospital admissions records or listed as a cause of death in mortality records for: (1) acute pancreatitis, (2) chronic pancreatitis, (3) new-onset diabetes (type 1,2 or unspecified), (4) acute myocardial infarction and (5) all-cause mortality. The Read and ICD-10 codes used to define each of the covariates and outcomes can be found at the CALIBER portal.

Statistical analyses

Patient characteristics grouped by baseline triglyceride concentration, were summarised using mean and standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables and frequency and percent for categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to estimate the observed cumulative incidence of each outcome, stratified by triglyceride groups. For each outcome, Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the risks across triglyceride groups with the reference category of ≤ 1·7 mmol/L. The proportional hazards assumption was checked using log (-log) and Schoenfeld residual plots. Each outcome was investigated independently and therefore patients could potentially have events contributing to all models. The presented models were:

  1. (1)

    Unadjusted for baseline covariates (univariable analysis).

  2. (2)

    Adjusted for age and sex.

  3. (3)

    Adjusted for age, sex, BMI, alcohol consumption, diabetes, smoking, hypertension, lipid lowering drug prescriptions, HDL, total cholesterol and stratified by general practice.

Missing data

Covariate values missing at baseline were imputed using multiple imputation using chained equations (MICE). We imputed 10 datasets using models with all covariates and outcomes included to estimate missing values. In addition to analyses performed using multiply imputed data we fitted models using complete cases only. Calculated LDL-C data for triglyceride concentrations > 4.5 mmol/L were missing as LDL-C estimation is inaccurate at these levels when using the standard Friedewald equation and not usually reported clinically in these circumstances [20].

Subgroup and sensitivity analyses

We conducted a-priori specified subgroup analyses: by age (≤ 40 years and > 40 years), choosing this cut point based on current guidelines for familial chylomicronaemia syndrome; history of prior pancreatitis (acute or chronic) and prescribed lipid lowering therapy. As some studies used peak triglyceride concentrations rather than first, we also fitted models using each patient’s peak triglyceride concentration recorded in a 12-month window prior to baseline date. Finally, we explored the shape of the association between baseline triglyceride and each outcome, by modelling continuous triglyceride concentrations using restricted cubic splines (3 knot points) in Cox proportional hazard models.

All analyses were performed using R (version 3·6).


In total, 1,530,441 patients were included in the study with a median follow-up time of 6·7 years (Interquartile range (IQR): 3·4–10·5 years). The median baseline triglyceride concentration was 1·3 mmol/L (IQR: 0·9 − 1·9). Patients were grouped according to their baseline triglyceride concentration: 1,053,783 (68·9%) had triglycerides ≤ 1·7 mmol/L, 443,768 (29·0%) had 1·7 − 4·5 mmol/L, 29,601 (1·9%) had 4·5-10 mmol/L, 2669 (0·2%) had 10-20 mmol/L, and 620 (0·04%) had > 20 mmol/L. In total 3289 (0·21%) patients had severe hypertriglyceridemia > 10 mmol/L. In follow up 980,302 (64%) individuals had at least one further triglyceride value recorded. Overall, individuals had a mean (SD) of 3.0 (4.2) triglyceride records in follow-up. 427,613 (27.9%) had at least one deviation from their baseline triglyceride category during follow-up, indicating reasonable stability of baseline triglyceride categories.

Study population characteristics

The population characteristics reflected a clinical cohort from primary care and are described in Table 1. The population with a measured triglyceride concentration was relatively young (mean age 56·6 years (SD: 15·6 years), with a trend to higher concentrations among the younger age groups and those with prior AP. We also observed greater concentrations in those who were underweight (BMI < 18) as well as those who were obese (BMI > 30). There was an increased prevalence of both type 1 and 2 diabetes, more excess alcohol use and lower HDL as well as greater prescribing of lipid lowering drugs with increasing triglyceride concentrations (Table 1). Characteristics of the study population by age group (≤ 40 years and > 40 years) are presented in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Table 1 Patient baseline characteristics stratified by baseline triglycerides

Association between baseline triglyceride concentrations and clinical outcomes

Over a median follow up of 6·7 years, there were 7758 (0·5%) AP admissions; 2773 (0·1%) CP diagnoses; 143,209 (9·4%) new onset diabetes diagnoses; 84,874 (5·5%) MI admissions along with 179,807 (11·7%) deaths among the cohort. Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the associations between triglyceride concentrations and each outcome.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Kaplan-Meier analysis for triglyceride groups and clinical outcomes. Absolute risk at each triglyceride strata for each of the 5 clinical outcomes over 5 years is presented, along with numbers at risk

Fig. 2
figure 2

Forest plots of hazard ratios for association of triglyceride concentrations and clinical outcomes. Models include age and sex adjusted and fully multivariable adjusted for age, sex BMI, alcohol consumption, diabetes, smoking, hypertension, lipid lowering drug prescriptions, HDL, total cholesterol and stratified by general practice

Compared to the referent group with a triglyceride concentration ≤ 1·7 mmol/L we found the following absolute and relative risks at five years:

Acute pancreatitis

The risk for AP was highest in the > 20 mmol/L group (3·5%, 95% CI: 1·9, 5·0) compared to the referent group (0·3% (95% CI: 0·2, 0·3), (Fig. 1A). After multivariable adjustment, equating to a 13-fold increase in relative risk (HR: 13·55 (9·15, 20·06)) (Fig. 2).

Chronic pancreatitis

The risk for those with concentrations > 20 mmol/L was 1·4% (95% CI: 0·4, 2·4) compared to 0·12% (95% CI: 0·11, 0·13)) in the referent group (Fig. 1B), and a 25-fold increase in relative risk (HR: 25·19 (14·91, 42·55) (Fig. 2).

Diabetes mellitus

The risk of developing new onset diabetes (any type) was highest in the > 20 mmol/L group, with 38% of the population developing the disease (95% CI: 33·7, 42·8), compared with 4·5% (95% CI: 4·4, 4·5) in the referent group. (Fig. 1C). Adjusted for covariates there remained a 5-fold increase in relative risk (HR: 5·28 (4·51, 6·18) (Fig. 2).

Myocardial infarction

Unlike other outcomes, the risk of MI was highest in the moderate triglyceride group (4·5-10 mmol/L (4·8%)), not the highest triglyceride group (> 20 mmol/L (3·7%)) (Fig. 1D). After adjustment, only those with mild and moderate triglyceride elevation (1·7 –4·5 and 4·5–10 mmol/L) had a modest but statistically significant risk of incident MI compared to the referent group (HR: 1·07 (1·05, 1·09) and 1·17 (1·12, 1·23) respectively) (Fig. 2).

All-cause mortality

The risk of death was 4·1% (95% CI: 2·4, 5·8) in those with triglyceride concentrations > 20 mmol/L compared to 7·0% (95% CI: 6·9, 7·0) in the referent group (Fig. 1E). However, in adjusted analysis, accounting for the confounding effect of age and other risk factors, we observed a near fourfold increased relative risk for those with triglyceride concentrations > 20 mmol/L compared to the referent group (HR: 3·62 (2·82, 4·65)) (Fig. 2).

The hazard ratios for all variables in the multivariable models described are presented in Additional file 1: Table S2. In addition to triglycerides, we observed associations between alcohol consumption, smoking status, diabetes and hypertension and the outcomes.

Subgroup analyses

Age group

Risks from severe hypertriglyceridemia were greater in those ≤ 40 years compared to those > 40 years (Fig. 3, Additional file 1: Table S3). In younger people, with triglyceride concentrations of > 20 mmol/L, there was a near 40-fold increase in risk of AP compared to the referent group (HR 37·3 (20·9, 66·5)), versus a comparable 8-fold risk in those aged > 40 years (HR 8·5 (5·2, 13·9)) (Additional file 1: Figure S2). Similar estimates were observed for CP (Additional file 1: Figures S1, S2; Table S3). The risk of diabetes at triglyceride concentrations > 20 mmol/L compared to < 1.7 mmol/L was twice as high in those ≤ 40 years compared to those > 40 years (Additional file 1: Figure S2). Event rates for MI and all-cause mortality were higher in the older age group across all triglyceride groups. (Additional file 1: Figure S1; Table S3), but the relative association of MI with moderate triglyceride concentrations was also greater in those aged ≤ 40 years (Additional file 1: Figure S2).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Kaplan-Meier analysis for triglyceride groups and AP stratified by age group ≤ 40 years and > 40 years

Prior pancreatitis

The absolute risks of AP at 5 years in patients with prior pancreatitis ranged from 9·4–37.2% in those with triglyceride concentrations ≤ 1·7 mmol/L and > 20 mmol/L, respectively. Corresponding risks in those without prior pancreatitis were 0·3% and 1·8% (Additional file 1: Figure S3; Table S4). Similarly, higher risks of CP, diabetes, MI and all-cause mortality were also observed in patients with prior pancreatitis. Despite the higher incidence of events, the relative risk association between triglyceride concentrations and all clinical outcomes was attenuated when compared to those without prior pancreatitis. (Additional file 1: Figure S4).

Prescribed lipid lowering therapy

Overall, risk associations were attenuated among people taking statins or any lipid lowering therapy, including fibrates, for risk of MI and new onset diabetes, and to a lesser extent for all-cause mortality. However, for both AP and CP, there was little difference in risk for patients with 10-20 mmol/L and > 20 mmol/L of triglycerides whether on prior lipid lowering treatment or not. Figure 4.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Hazard ratios for triglyceride concentrations and clinical outcomes, adjusted for age and sex and stratified by lipid lowering therapy prescriptions [statins (n = 241,801), no statins (n = 1,288,640), fibrates(n = 15,891), no fibrates (n = 1,514,550), any LLD (n = 250,806), no LLD’s (n = 1,279,635)]

Sensitivity analysis

We also explored the association with outcomes using continuous triglyceride concentrations. Age-sex adjusted associations using restricted cubic splines (3 knot points) is provided in supplementary materials. Notably, increasing triglyceride concentrations were associated exponentially with increasing risk for each outcome (Additional file 1: Figure S5).

We repeated our analyses using the highest recorded triglyceride within a 12-month window as opposed to the first recorded concentration. The median peak triglyceride concentration across patients was 1·63 mmol/L (IQR: 0·91 –1·94). Overall, association estimates for each clinical outcome were similar to the primary analysis (Additional file 1: Table S5).

Finally, to ensure our imputation approach did not bias our results, we repeated analyses using non-missing data, and found similar estimates for association with each of the 5 clinical outcomes and triglyceride concentrations (Additional file 1: Table S6).


Using nationally linked primary and secondary care electronic health records in over 1·5 M people with a triglyceride measurement, we report on the associations between a full range of triglyceride concentrations from < 1·7 to > 20 mmol/L and multiple clinically relevant outcomes. We observed four novel findings: (1) the risk of MI is modest and observed with moderately elevated triglyceride concentration but not severe hypertriglyceridemia; (2) all observed risks were greater in younger people where primary rather than secondary causes of hypertriglyceridemia are likely to predominate, (3) lipid lowering medication prescribing at baseline did not attenuate the risk between high triglycerides and incident acute or chronic pancreatitis and (4) the observed risks from raised triglyceride concentration are continuous and exponential starting at values much lower than established treatment thresholds. Our findings inform our evolving understanding of the full spectrum of risks associated with hypertriglyceridemia.

Prior studies in general population settings, have mostly explored risk associated with moderate elevations in triglyceride concentration, [9,10,11,12,13,14] or sought to examine only the higher range of triglycerides. For example, Toth et al. found those with a triglyceride concentration > 22·8 mmol/L had a 12-fold increase in risk for AP compared to those < 8·6 mmol/L [16].  A more recent Israeli study, again from a health insurance provider, found a stepwise increase in risk for severe hypertriglyceridemia with AP but not with CVD [17]. However, both studies had limited external validity coming from insurance databases and only explored two outcomes, without reference to more usual triglyceride concentrations. Our study adds to the existing literature, by reporting simultaneously on 5 relevant clinical outcomes across the full range of triglycerides encountered in a representative primary care population.

The incidence of AP in our study was low, but consistent with prior studies [15, 21]. Pederson et al. reported an 11-fold risk for AP for those with concentrations > 5 mmol/L, compared to the lowest group < 1.0  mol/L, although the lower than usual referent group concentration could have inflated the risk estimate. Importantly with only 2100 individuals having triglycerides > 5·0 mmol/L, information for severe hypertriglyceridemia was limited [9]. We extend this work, including 3300 patients with hypertriglyceridemia > 10 mmol/L, finding a 13-fold increase in future risk of AP for those with triglyceride > 20 mmol/L compared to those with more usual concentrations of ≤-1.7 mmol/L. We also found that young patients had significantly higher risk from severe hypertriglyceridemia pointing to potentially different aetiologies with genetic factors contributing to risk earlier in life [22]. For example, prevalence of FCS is thought to be enriched in this group and diagnostic criteria include an AP event at ≤ 40 years [23]. Finally in multivariable analysis we noted that alcohol excess and smoking were independent predictors of AP, highlighting the important role of lifestyle factors in this condition [24].

We found that CP risk followed AP risk with even higher estimates, perhaps unsurprising as these are not always mutually exclusive [25]. Diabetes is usually reported as a cause of hypertriglyceridemia rather than a consequence [26]. Yet here we demonstrate that high triglyceride concentrations may be a quantifiable precursor to diabetes, both from insulin insufficiency and resistance with a remarkably linear risk. Triglyceride concentrations are known to be associated with insulin resistance and are a sensitive and early marker of metabolic syndrome [27]. Of note, in our analysis 11% of the new onset diabetes diagnoses occurred within 30 days of the baseline triglyceride measurement. This is likely explained by blood testing identifying both high triglycerides and high glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and a recording of diabetes in the electronic health record in the days afterwards. The associated cardiovascular risk from metabolic dyslipidaemia along with greater AP risk for those in the highest triglyceride strata may together explain the association with mortality, which has also been reported previously in a follow up study of the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) trial [28].

Of particular interest is the association between triglycerides and MI. Observational studies have repeatedly demonstrated that mild-to-moderate hypertriglyceridemia is associated with a higher risk of MI, but when adjusted for non-HDL-C the risk is usually attenuated [12]. These findings are consistent with the idea that cardiovascular risk associated with hypertriglyceridemia is mediated by atherogenic apoB containing TGRLs and remnants, captured by non-HDL, and not the triglycerides per se [7]. Our findings, extend prior work by including the full range of triglyceride concentrations including severe hypertriglyceridemia, and provide similar results. The lack of association with severe hypertriglyceridemia is likely explained by the greater dominance of large triglycerides containing lipoprotein particles (mainly chylomicrons and large VLDLs) at these levels, which themselves are too large to enter the intima and thus less atherogenic than smaller lipoprotein particles [29]. In contrast more moderate hypertriglyceridemia may be a marker for greater burden of smaller atherogenic TGRL. Of note, patients ≤ 40 years with moderate hypertriglyceridemia had the highest risk for MI, potentially due to additional contributions from inherited mixed dyslipidaemias such as Familial Combined Hyperlipidaemia and more atherogenic lipoproteins conferring atherosclerotic risk [30]. Of course, MI risk could also be explained by the co-presence of other metabolic disturbances such as insulin resistance, diabetes and obesity themselves contributing to triglyceride concentrations in this range [7, 31].

Statin use in our study was associated with a lower risk for MI and death for any given concentration of triglycerides, likely due to the LDL-C lowering effect and associated CVD risk benefit [32]. The lower risk of new onset diabetes among statin users is unusual given the small statin mediated increase in the risk of new onset diabetes in major clinical trials, although these typically excluded those with fasting triglycerides > 4·5 mmol/L. Our finding could reflect an unmeasured bias such as greater lifestyle and medical intervention efforts to prevent diabetes in those attending GP visits and prescribed statins compared to those who were not. Among patients taking fibrates, risks for all clinical events were only marginally lower compared to those not on fibrates which is perhaps unsurprising given some studies have found an increase in risk of pancreatitis with fibrate use[33, 34]. Importantly, lipid lowering therapy of any kind was not associated with reduced risk for AP and CP at triglyceride concentrations > 10 or > 20 mmol/L indicating perhaps a ceiling of effect for commonly used lipid lowering therapies, and highlighting the need for novel triglyceride lowering agents [35].

Our study has several limitations. First, as is common with real world data, fasting status was unclear within clinical records. However, our risk estimates for moderate hypertriglyceridemia and AP were similar to published cohort studies with fasting samples and there is recognition that non-fasting samples may be more indicative of health risk[9, 11]. Second, we had significant missing data for relevant comorbidities, which we resolved by using imputation techniques. Sensitivity analyses did not indicate any major distortion of estimates with complete case analysis. Third, we used the first recorded triglyceride measurement rather than peak, given that in clinical practice clinicians rarely wait to determine the highest reading but intervene with the data to hand. Sensitivity analyses did not show any meaningful difference in associations when peak or first values were used. Finally, while we did not include any events on the same day as the baseline triglyceride measure, we did not censor events occurring within 30 days, and therefore some events may have co-occurred if there was a delay in recording. However, aside from diabetes (explained above), the separate data sources for hospital admissions (secondary care) and blood tests (primary care) limits this possibility as does the low rate of the non-diabetes outcomes occurring within 30 days (0.6 to 3%).

Clinically, our findings provide insight into the serious health risks associated with both moderate and severe hypertriglyceridemia, especially in younger patients. Our continuous trait analysis identifies that the risk of adverse outcomes, especially for acute pancreatitis increases exponentially once triglycerides are just moderately elevated. This finding potentially challenges current treatment thresholds, [5, 6] while supporting guidelines advocating intervention at lower triglyceride concentrations[36]. Further, our findings support measurement of triglycerides for cardiovascular risk management, if only as a marker of TGRLs, for which emerging therapies may provide cardiovascular benefit [37]. Finally, unlike many studies on triglycerides our findings represent “real world” association analyses, with patients who have treated and untreated lipids and various comorbidities. As such the findings are more generalizable but could also explain why some estimates may differ from more bespoke studies.

In conclusion, we show in over 1·5 M people that moderate and severe triglyceride elevation is associated with risk of AP and CP, new onset diabetes, and death, but for MI only moderate hypertriglyceridemia is associated with risk. Of note, these risks are continuous and start at modest elevations of triglyceride concentrations, are higher in younger people and current drugs may have limited impact for reducing these risks from severe and very severe hypertriglyceridemia. We anticipate these findings will support clinical interpretation of triglyceride concentrations, decisions for investigation and treatment, and cost effectiveness analyses for emerging triglyceride lowering therapies.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink ( but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Due to privacy laws and the data user agreement between the University College London and Clinical Practice Research Datalink, authors are not authorised to share individual patient data from these electronic health records. Requests to access data provided by Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) should be sent to CPRD. The CALIBER phenotype Library ( offers open sharing of phenotypic and analytic algorithms for use by other researchers/.


  1. Hansen SEJ, Madsen CM, Varbo A, Nordestgaard BG. Body mass index, triglycerides, and risk of acute pancreatitis: a population-based study of 118,000 individuals. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(1):163–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Witztum JL, Gaudet D, Freedman SD, et al. Volanesorsen and triglyceride levels in familial chylomicronemia syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(6):531–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Holmes MV, Asselbergs FW, Palmer TM, et al. Mendelian randomization of blood lipids for coronary heart disease. Eur Heart J 2015; 36(9): 539–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Simha V. Management of hypertriglyceridemia. BMJ 2020; 371: m3109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berglund L, Brunzell JD, Goldberg AC, et al. Evaluation and treatment of hypertriglyceridemia: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012; 97(9): 2969–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, et al. 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J 2020; 41(1): 111–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nordestgaard BG. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: new insights from epidemiology, genetics, and biology. Circ Res. 2016;118(4):547–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boren J, Williams KJ. The central role of arterial retention of cholesterol-rich apolipoprotein-B-containing lipoproteins in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a triumph of simplicity. Curr Opin Lipidol 2016; 27(5): 473–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sandhu S, Al-Sarraf A, Taraboanta C, Frohlich J, Francis GA. Incidence of pancreatitis, secondary causes, and treatment of patients referred to a specialty lipid clinic with severe hypertriglyceridemia: a retrospective cohort study. Lipids Health Dis 2011; 10: 157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Toth PP, Grabner M, Ramey N, Higuchi K. Clinical and economic outcomes in a real-world population of patients with elevated triglyceride levels. Atherosclerosis 2014; 237(2): 790–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zafrir B, Jubran A, Hijazi R, Shapira C. Clinical features and outcomes of severe, very severe, and extreme hypertriglyceridemia in a regional health service. J Clin Lipidol 2018; 12(4): 928–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Herrett E, Shah AD, Boggon R, et al. Completeness and diagnostic validity of recording acute myocardial infarction events in primary care, hospital care, disease registry, and national mortality records: cohort study. BMJ 2013; 346: f2350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Denaxas S, Gonzalez-Izquierdo A, Direk K, et al. UK phenomics platform for developing and validating electronic health record phenotypes: CALIBER. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26(12): 1545–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972; 18(6): 499–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pedersen SB, Langsted A, Nordestgaard BG. Nonfasting mild-to-moderate hypertriglyceridemia and risk of acute pancreatitis. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(12):1834–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nordestgaard BG, Benn M, Schnohr P, Tybjaerg-Hansen A. Nonfasting triglycerides and risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, and death in men and women. JAMA 2007; 298(3): 299–308.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bansal S, Buring JE, Rifai N, Mora S, Sacks FM, Ridker PM. Fasting compared with nonfasting triglycerides and risk of cardiovascular events in women. JAMA 2007; 298(3): 309–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Emerging Risk Factors C, Di Angelantonio E, Sarwar N, et al. Major lipids, apolipoproteins, and risk of vascular disease. JAMA 2009; 302(18): 1993–2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nordestgaard BG, Varbo A. Triglycerides and cardiovascular disease. Lancet 2014; 384(9943): 626–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sarwar N, Danesh J, Eiriksdottir G, et al. Triglycerides and the risk of coronary heart disease: 10,158 incident cases among 262,525 participants in 29 Western prospective studies. Circulation 2007; 115(4): 450–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Christian JB, Arondekar B, Buysman EK, Johnson SL, Seeger JD, Jacobson TA. Clinical and economic benefits observed when follow-up triglyceride levels are less than 500 mg/dL in patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia. J Clin Lipidol 2012; 6(5): 450–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chait A, Eckel RH. The chylomicronemia syndrome is most often multifactorial: a narrative review of causes and treatment. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(9):626–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Brahm AJ, Hegele RA. Chylomicronaemia–current diagnosis and future therapies. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2015; 11(6): 352–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Veenstra J, Ockhuizen T, van de Pol H, Wedel M, Schaafsma G. Effects of a moderate dose of alcohol on blood lipids and lipoproteins postprandially and in the fasting state. Alcohol Alcohol 1990; 25(4): 371–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vipperla K, Somerville C, Furlan A, et al. Clinical profile and natural course in a large cohort of patients with hypertriglyceridemia and pancreatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017;51(1):77–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Girman CJ, Kou TD, Cai B, et al. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have higher risk for acute pancreatitis compared with those without diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2010; 12(9): 766–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Grundy SM. Hypertriglyceridemia, insulin resistance, and the metabolic syndrome. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83(9B): 25F-9F.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Klempfner R, Erez A, Sagit BZ, et al. Elevated triglyceride level is independently associated with increased all-cause mortality in patients with established coronary heart disease: twenty-two-year follow-up of the bezafibrate infarction prevention study and registry. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9(2):100–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nordestgaard BG, Zilversmit DB. Large lipoproteins are excluded from the arterial wall in diabetic cholesterol-fed rabbits. J Lipid Res 1988; 29(11): 1491–500.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Luijten J, van Greevenbroek MMJ, Schaper NC, et al. Incidence of cardiovascular disease in familial combined hyperlipidemia: a 15-year follow-up study. Atherosclerosis. 2019;280:1–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sniderman AD, Couture P, Martin SS, et al. Hypertriglyceridemia and cardiovascular risk: a cautionary note about metabolic confounding. J Lipid Res 2018; 59(7): 1266–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, et al. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet 2005; 366(9493): 1267–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Preiss D, Tikkanen MJ, Welsh P, et al. Lipid-modifying therapies and risk of pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2012; 308(8): 804–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Rashid N, Sharma PP, Scott RD, Lin KJ, Toth PP. Severe hypertriglyceridemia and factors associated with acute pancreatitis in an integrated health care system. J Clin Lipidol 2016; 10(4): 880–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gaudet D, Alexander VJ, Baker BF, et al. Antisense inhibition of apolipoprotein C-III in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(5):438–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2019; 139(25): e1082-e143.

  37. Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Miller M, et al. Cardiovascular risk reduction with icosapent ethyl for hypertriglyceridemia. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(1):11–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references




The Corresponding Author has the right to grant on behalf of all authors and does grant on behalf of all authors, a worldwide licence to the Publishers and its licensees in perpetuity, in all forms, formats and media (whether known now or created in the future), to (i) publish, reproduce, distribute, display and store the Contribution, (ii) translate the Contribution into other languages, create adaptations, reprints, include within collections and create summaries, extracts and/or, abstracts of the Contribution, (iii) create any other derivative work(s) based on the Contribution, (iv) to exploit all subsidiary rights in the Contribution, (v) the inclusion of electronic links from the Contribution to third party material where-ever it may be located; and, (vi) licence any third party to do any or all of the above.

Transparency declaration

The guarantors (RP, LP, HH) affirm that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned have been explained.


RSP was funded by the BHF Fellowship (FS/14/76/30933). Analysis was funded through a research grant provided by AkceaTherepeutics. The funder provided input into the study design but was not involved in analysis or writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



RP, LP, RJ and HH contributed to the conception of the study and study design. RP, LP and HH led the development of the statistical analysis plan, review of results and drafted and revised the final manuscript; LP obtained and analysed all data; HS, PD, DN, AH critically reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riyaz S. Patel.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study is based in part on data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink obtained under licence from the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. The data is provided by patients and collected by the NHS as part of their care and support. The interpretation and conclusions contained in this study are those of the author/s alone. The study was approved by the MHRA (UK) Independent Scientific Advisory Committee 17_033, under Sect. 251 (NHS Social Care Act 2006).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Analysis was funded through a research grant provided by AkceaTherepeutics. RJ is an employee of AkceaTherepeutics and provided intellectual input into the study design and final review of the manuscript, but was not involved in analysis or writing of the paper.

RSP has received speaker fees and honoraria from Amgen, Sanofi and Bayer and research grant funding from Regeneron, for cholesterol management; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. HS has received research grants and honoraria from AMGEN, AMRYT, MSD, AKEA and Alexion.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. STROBE Statement—checklist of items that should be included in reports of observational studies.

Additional file 2: Table S1

. Baseline characteristics of the study population by age group. Table S2. Hazard ratios for all variables in the multivariable models. Table S3. Kaplan Meier point estimates (%) at 1 and 5 years for each clinical outcome stratified by baseline TG and age >40 and ≤40 years. Table S4. Kaplan Meier point estimates at 1 and 5 years for each clinical outcome stratified by baseline TG and prior pancreatitis. Table S5. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals from multivariable cox regression models using patients peak triglyceride record over 12 months. Table S6. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals from multivariable cox regression models using complete-cases only (complete-cases n=505,579 overall and n= 446,091 for the subset of diabetes-free patients). Figure S1. Kaplan Meier curves for association of triglycerides and clinical outcomes stratified by age >40 and ≤40 years. Figure S2. Hazard ratios for triglyceride values and clinical outcomes, adjusted for age and sex and stratified by Age ≤ 40 or > 40 years. Figure S3. Kaplan Meier curves for association of triglycerides and clinical outcomes stratified by prior pancreatitis. Figure S4. Hazard ratios for triglyceride values and clinical outcomes, adjusted for age and sex and stratified by prior pancreatitis. Figure S5. Multivariable adjusted association between triglycerides and each endpoint. Triglyceride level was fitted in the model using restricted cubic splines (3 knot points).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patel, R.S., Pasea, L., Soran, H. et al. Elevated plasma triglyceride concentration and risk of adverse clinical outcomes in 1.5 million people: a CALIBER linked electronic health record study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 21, 102 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: