Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub
  • Original investigation
  • Open access
  • Published:

Empagliflozin prevents doxorubicin-induced myocardial dysfunction

Cardiovascular Diabetology volume 19, Article number: 66 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Empagliflozin showed efficacy in controlling glycaemia, leading to reductions in HbA1c levels, weight loss and blood pressure, compared to standard treatment. Moreover, the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial demonstrated a 14% reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a 38% reduction in cardiovascular (CV) death and a 35% reduction in the hospitalization rate for heart failure (HF). These beneficial effect on HF were apparently independent from glucose control. However, no mechanistic in vivo studies are available to explain these results, yet. We aimed to determine the effect of empagliflozin on left ventricular (LV) function in a mouse model of doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy (DOX-HF).

Methods

Male C57Bl/6 mice were randomly assigned to the following groups: controls (CTRL, n = 7), doxorubicin (DOX, n = 14), DOX plus empagliflozin (DOX + EMPA, n = 14), or DOX plus furosemide (DOX + FURO group, n = 7). DOX was injected intraperitoneally. LV function was evaluated at baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment using high-resolution echocardiography with 2D speckle tracking (Vevo 2100). Histological assessment was obtained using Haematoxylin and Eosin and Masson’s Goldner staining.

Results

A significant decrease in both systolic and diastolic LV function was observed after 6 weeks of treatment with doxorubicin. EF dropped by 32% (p = 0.002), while the LS was reduced by 42% (p < 0.001) and the CS by 50% (p < 0.001). However, LV function was significantly better in the DOX + EMPA group, both in terms of EF (61.30 ± 11% vs. 49.24 ± 8%, p = 0.007), LS (− 17.52 ± 3% vs. − 13.93 ± 5%, p = 0.04) and CS (− 25.75 ± 6% vs. − 15.91 ± 6%, p < 0.001). Those results were not duplicated in the DOX + FURO group. Hearts from the DOX + EMPA group showed a 50% lower degree of myocardial fibrosis, compared to DOX mice (p = 0.03). No significant differences were found between the DOX + FURO and the DOX group (p = 0.103).

Conclusion

Empagliflozin attenuates the cardiotoxic effects exerted by doxorubicin on LV function and remodelling in nondiabetic mice, independently of glycaemic control. These findings support the design of clinical studies to assess their relevance in a clinical setting.

Background

Empagliflozin (EMPA), a selective inhibitor of the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2), is very effective in controlling glycaemia, leading to a significant reduction in HbA1c levels, blood pressure and body weight, compared to standard optimal treatments [1, 2]. Moreover, the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial demonstrated a 14% reduction in the primary composite endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a 38% reduction in cardiovascular (CV) death and a 35% reduction in the hospitalization rate for heart failure (HF) [1,2,3,4]. Notwithstanding the beneficial clinical response, the pathophysiological underlying mechanisms are not straightforward [5,6,7]. Indeed, multiple mechanisms have been suggested to explain the unexpected favourable effect on CV outcomes in heart failure. Hence, it has been speculated that it might be apparently independent from glucose lowering [5,6,7]. In line with this hypothesis, the DAPA-HF trial found that the incidence of the composite endpoint of worsening of heart failure or death was significantly lower in the dapagliflozin treatment arm, regardless the absence of diabetes [8]. Similarly, treatment with canagliflozin was associated with a 22% reduction of the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure in the CANVAS study [9]. Most interesting, the benefit seems to be significantly larger in patients with heart failure at baseline. These results point to a protective effect of gliflozin drugs in heart failure, both for type 2 diabetes patients and for nondiabetics, which propelled the development of large clinical trials to evaluate this hypothesis (EMPEROR-Reduced, NCT03057977; EMPEROR-Preserved, NCT03057951; DELIVER, NCT03619213). Meanwhile, the mechanisms underlying these effects remain elusive.

Although, advances in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer have markedly prolonged the survival of cancer patients, the “double edged sword” of novel and traditional cancer chemotherapies is represented by detrimental effects on cardiac function [10]. Beside the consistent efforts for the early identification and treatment of patients who may develop cardiotoxicity [11, 12], the most difficult challenge remains the lack of effective cardioprotective drugs in primary prevention [13, 14]. Currently, there is no molecule with actual cardioprotective effect on anthracycline toxicity, without side effects, reduced sensitivity to cancer treatment or incidence of secondary cancers.

For this reason, we evaluated the impact of empagliflozin on anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity and studied the underlying molecular mechanisms on adult mammalian hearts. In particular, we spotlighted the involvement of SGLT1 and SGLT2 receptors and the stress signalling pathways, including extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), Janus kinase (JNK), and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), in a murine model of cardiotoxicity induced by doxorubicin.

In this context, we aimed to assess the effect of empagliflozin on left ventricular (LV) function in mice with doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy (DOX), using high resolution 2-D echocardiography and advanced speckle tracking (STE) analyses.

Methods

Animal model

Male 8 weeks old C57Bl/6 mice were housed in plexiglass cages, at 12 h light/dark cycles at 22 ± 2 °C, with free access to food and water. Animal experiments were performed according to European Directive 63/2010/UE and italian DL 26/2014. Chronic myocardial injury was obtained using a standardized model of DOX-induced toxicity, already described in previous studies [15].

Urine volume and glycosuria measurements by metabolic cages

Ten conscious mice were individually placed in metabolic cages in a soundproof room, randomized to either EMPA (n = 6) or placebo (n = 4). After acclimatization urine volume and water intake were measured for 5 days.

Standard echocardiographic analyses

In vivo, cardiac function was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) using a Vevo 2100 high-resolution imaging system (VisualSonics), with 22–55 hMHz transducer at a frame rate of 233 Hz [11], under light anesthesia [16, 17].

Diastolic- (LVIDd) and systolic-LV diameters (LVIDs) were measured using the M-mode. Fractional shortening (FS = [(LVIDd − LVIDs)/LVIDd] × 100) and ejection fraction (EF = [(EDvol − ESvol)/EDvol] × 100) were calculated.

Speckle tracking analysis

Acquired B-mode loops were analysed with VevoStrain (VisualSonics) [11].

Morphological examination and cardiac fibrosis analysis

Hearts were fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Masson’s trichrome staining. Measured were obtained using a Nikon NIS ELEMENTS BRV system.

Blood pressure measurements

Non-invasive blood pressure measurements were performed in the three study groups at baseline and at the end of the treatment, by means of BP-2000 Blood Pressure Analysis System. Mice were “trained” on the procedure to minimize agitation and pressure values measured as the mean of three measurement after having discarded the first three measurements [18, 19].

Blood samples analysis

Troponin T (TnT), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and glucose were measured on whole blood using the point-of-care Samsung LABGEO PT10.

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

After RNA extraction, real-time PCR was performed with SYBR-green based detection using an ABI-7500 system (Applied Biosystems) [20]. Results were expressed as fold-change compared to the control.

Protein extraction and western blot

Proteins were extracted using a lysis buffer containing protease- and phosphatase-inhibitors. Cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane. After treatment with 5% non-fat milk, these were first incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies (SGLT1, SGLT2, ERK, phospho-ERK), then with secondary antibodies and finally measured by enhanced chemiluminescence. GAPDH and β-actin were used as internal controls.

Statistical analysis

Continuous data were expressed as mean ± SD. Nonparametric tests were used both for paired and unpaired comparisons [21, 22]. Repeated measures ANOVA was used for all baseline to end-of-study comparisons. A p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Fortytwo C57BL/6 mice were assigned to the following groups: CTRL (n = 7), DOX (n = 14), DOX + EMPA (n = 14) and DOX + FURO (n = 7) (Additional file 1: Figure S1). All mice had a structurally and functionally normal heart at baseline (Table 1). Four mice died before the 6-weeks echocardiographic control (primary study endpoint): two from the DOX group, one from the DOX + EMPA group and one from the DOX + FURO group.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics
Full size table

Baseline body weight was 22.2 ± 3.5 g at the beginning of treatment, with no difference between the groups (p = 0.361). There was no difference in body weight at 6 weeks between the groups (p = 0.587) (Table 2).

Table 2 Study endpoints at 6 weeks
Full size table

Blood pressure

C57BL/6 mice had normal blood pressure (BP) at baseline (122 ± 10/81 ± 7 mmHg), with no difference between the groups (p = 0.36). At 6 weeks, systolic BP (sysBP) (p < 0.001) and diastolic BP (diaBP) (p < 0.001) were lower in DOX-treated mice compared to controls (Additional file 1: Figure S2). This drop in blood pressure was attenuated in the DOX + EMPA group, where both sysBP (119 ± 20 vs. 102 ± 37; p = 0.023) and diaBP (65 ± 28 vs. 41 ± 10; p < 0.001) were significantly higher compared to DOX mice (Additional file 1: Figure S2). No significant difference was observed for sysBP between DOX + FURO and DOX mice (105 ± 33 vs. 102 ± 37; p = 0.705) (Additional file 1: Figure S2A). DiaBP in the DOX + FURO group was significantly higher than in DOX mice (60 ± 24 vs. 41 ± 10; p = 0.001), although this difference was numerically smaller compared to DOX + EMPA animals (Additional file 1: Figure S2B).

Glycemia and glycosuria

Mean basal blood glucose level was 210.5 ± 50 mg/dl, with no difference between the groups (p = 0.28). Similarly, no significant difference was observed between the groups at the end of treatment (p = 0.37).

In a parallel experiment involving ten mice in metabolic cages, we did not find significant differences in glycosuria or urine volume between EMPA mice (n = 6) and controls (n = 4) (p = 0.31).

Effects on systolic LV function

At the sixth week of treatment, mice treated with DOX presented a significant reduction of multiple LV function parameters compared to baseline. In particular, we found a 32% reduction in EF (p = 0.002), a 36% reduction in FS (p = 0.002), a 29% increase in LVEDd (p = 0.002) a 50% increase in LVESd (p = 0.002).

At 6 weeks, mice in the DOX + EMPA group had a significantly better LV function compared to the DOX group, both in terms of EF (61.30 ± 11% vs. 49.24 ± 8%, p = 0.007) and FS (33.08 ± 8% vs.. 24.70 ± 5%, p = 0.008) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

LV systolic function. Mice treated with DOX presented a significant reduction of LV function parameters compared to baseline. On the other hand, mice in the DOX + EMPA group had a significantly better LV function compared to the DOX group

Full size image

No significant differences were observed in EF and FS between the DOX + FURO and the DOX groups, as measured by EF (55.79 ± 11% vs. 49.24 ± 8%, p = 0.188) or FS (28.62 ± 8% vs. 24.70 ± 5%, p = 0.221).

LV strain parameters were significantly impaired in the DOX group compared to baseline (Fig. 2). In details, we found a significant worsening of longitudinal strain (LS) from − 23.9 ± 4% to − 13.93 ± 5% (p < 0.001) of circumferential (CS) from − 30.2 ± 8% to − 15.91 ± 6% (p < 0.001) and of radial strain (RS) from 43.4 ± 9% to 26.7 ± 13% (p < 0.001). At the sixth week of treatment, DOX + EMPA mice had significantly better LS (− 17.52 ± 3% vs. − 13.93 ± 5%, p = 0.04) (Fig. 2a) and CS values (− 25.75 ± 6% vs. − 15.91 ± 6%, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2b) compared to DOX mice. No significant difference in RS (Fig. 2c). DOX + FURO mice presented no significant difference in mean LS, CS, RS compared to DOX (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Speckle tracking analysis. LV strain parameters were severely impaired in the DOX group compared to baseline. Moreover, DOX + EMPA mice had significantly better longitudinal and circumferential strains values compared to the DOX group

Full size image

Effects on diastolic LV function

No significant differences were observed in the ratio of the early (E) to late (A) ventricular filling velocities (E/A) between the experimental groups (Table 2, Fig. 3). On the other hand, treatment with doxorubicin was associated with a significant reduction of the early mitral inflow velocity to mitral annular early diastolic velocity (E/Eʹ) ratio (p < 0.001). Both DOX + EMPA (p < 0.001) and DOX + FURO (p < 0.001) mice had a lower E/Eʹ ratio compared to the DOX group (Table 2, Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

LV diastolic function. a Shows results of E/A Ratio across the groups. b Shows results of E/Eʹ ratio

Full size image

Effects on myocardial fibrosis and LV remodelling

Mice were sacrificed after 7 weeks of treatment with doxorubicin. Masson’s trichrome staining revealed that hearts from DOX + EMPA mice (insert of lower right panel, Fig. 4) had a 50% lower degree of myocardial fibrosis (p = 0.03) compared to DOX mice (insert of upper right panel, Fig. 4). On the contrary, treatment with furosemide (DOX + FURO) (insert of lower left panel, Fig. 4) was not associated to a significant change in myocardial fibrosis (p = 0.103).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Histological sections. The figure shows the effects on myocardial fibrosis and remodelling in the different study groups compared to controls (CTRL)

Full size image

The characteristic attenuation of fibrillar bands observed after treatment with doxorubicin (92% in DOX mice) (upper mid panel, Additional file 1: Figure S3) was prevented by 2.3-fold to 40% (p = 0.010) by the concomitant treatment with empagliflozin (DOX + EMPA), while furosemide had no effect (75% in DOX + FURO mice; p = 0.880).

Severe disarray of myocardial fibers was more frequent in DOX (67%) compared to DOX + EMPA mice (30%; p = 0.087). No significant difference was observed between FURO and DOX (p = 0.800).

Wavy myocardial fibers were significantly reduced in DOX + EMPA (40%), compared to DOX (100%; p = 0.002). No significant difference was observed between DOX + FURO (75%) compared to DOX (p = 0.054).

Vacuolization of myocytes was observed in 100% of fields from DOX mice, in 60% in DOX + EMPA (p = 0.015) and 75% of DOX + FURO (p = 0.054).

Troponin T and BNP levels in C57BL/6 mice

Mean blood troponin T (TnT) in C57BL/6 mice was 0.19 ± 0.05 ng/ml at baseline. A significant increase in TnT values was observed at the end of the study in the DOX group (TnT = 0.70 ± 0.32; p = 0.028), but not the the DOX + EMPA (TnT = 0.22 ± 0.18; p = 0.317), nor in the DOX + FURO (TnT = 0.46 ± 0.26; p = 0.109) groups.

Baseline BNP values were below the detection limit of the qualitative assay used (< 30 pg/ml) at baseline. BNP values were increased above the positivity threshold of the assay used (> 150 pg/ml) in all three study groups.

Expression of SGLT2 in mice heart

Expression of SGLT2 at western blot showed a substantial variation across different organs and tissues, with the highest expression levels in kidneys followed by the left myocardium (Fig. 5a). RT-PCR confirmed detectable levels of the SGLT2 mRNA in LV myocardium from study animals (Fig. 5b). Similar results were observed for SGLT1 (Additional file 1: Figure S4).

Fig. 5
figure 5

SGLT2 in mice heart. a Shows the expression of SGLT2 at western blot (the insert report a cropped picture of the blotting plate). b Reports results of RT-PCR analysis

Full size image

Immunohistochemistry confirmed the expression of SGLT2 in mice hearts (Additional file 1: Figure S5). SGLT2 expression showed a 75% reduction in DOX mice, compared to baseline (p < 0.001). This effect was significantly attenuated in EMPA + DOX mice (20% reduction compared to ctrl) (p = 0.263).

Signalling pathways modulated by empagliflozin treatment

As ERK is a known pharmacological target of empagliflozin, we measured ERK activity in myocardial tissue samples obtained from all mice. ERK activity was significantly increased in DOX mice compared to controls (p = 0.018). Interestingly, treatment with empagliflozin (EMPA + DOX) was associated with a 36%-lower level of ERK activity compared with doxorubicin alone (DOX) (p = 0.038). On the contrary, the additional treatment with furosemide (FURO + DOX) had no significant impact on ERK activity compared to doxorubicin treatment alone (DOX) (12% reduction in ERK activity; p = 0.177) (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

LV ERK activity. The bar graph reports mean ERK Activity across all study groups

Full size image

Discussion

Our results demonstrate that the treatment with empagliflozin, a SGLT2 inhibitor, prevents the reduction in cardiac systolic function induced by a cardiotoxic anthracycline in a model of non-diabetic mice. The protective impact of empagliflozin on systolic function was also associated with better systolic and diastolic blood pressures in mice treated with empagliflozin compared to those treated with doxorubicin alone. Finally, histological examination showed a lower degree of myocardial fibrosis and fibres disarray in mice treated with empagliflozin.

Effects of empagliflozin on LV function

The improvement in LV systolic function recorded in our study, not only by 2-D high resolution echocardiography but also by STE, provides a potential explanation for the unexpected favorable cardiovascular outcomes of SGLT2 inhibitors both in T2DM and in non-diabetics in recent clinical trials [4, 8, 9]. Our results, confirm and extend recent evidence in different animal models and experimental conditions. In fact, SGLT2 were associated to reverse LV remodeling by attenuating sodium and calcium dysregulation [23, 24], mitigation of atrial remodeling [25], attenuation of negative effects on electric LV remodeling [26], normalization of LV mitochondrial function [27] and reduced mortality in diabetic rats [23]. More recently, empagliflozin was shown to improve post-MI cardiac function in non-diabetic rats [28] and to improve LV hemodynamics in hypertensive rats [29]. Very recently, empagliflozin was shown to improve cardiac contractility alongside microvascular function in pre-diabetic or early-stage diabetic mice [30].

Effects of empagliflozin on cardiac fibrosis

Previous animal studies demonstrated that empagliflozin improves cardiac diastolic function in a female murine model of T2DM, db/db mice [16]. Similar results were independently obtained on diabetic mice through the attenuation of oxidative stress [31]. Accordingly, the improvement in diastolic function was associated with improved glycemia, but also with a positive LV remodeling, such as reduction in interstitial myocardial fibrosis and attenuation of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy [16]. In line with the above reported studies, we found reduced myocardial fibrosis also in mice with DOX-induced cardiomyopathy that received a concomitant treatment with empagliflozin. However, our results extend those observations to demonstrate a protective effect in non-diabetic individuals, opening promising new perspectives for the prevention and the treatment of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in patients treated with antitumoral chemotherapy, such as in breast cancer.

Pathophysiological mechanisms

The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the remarkable cardiac effects of empagliflozin in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial are still unresolved. The SGLTs are a family of proteins able to translocate glucose in different tissues [32]. Both SGLT2 and SGLT1 co-transport Na+ together with glucose. While SGLT1 is expressed in small intestine, lungs, kidneys, liver and cardiac myocytes, SGLT2 has been primarily found in the kidney, but it is also expressed by pancreatic alpha cells. We demonstrated that SGLT2 is expressed in murine cardiac myocytes of C57BL/6 mice. Notwithstanding the previous report by Yoshii et al., that did not find transcription of the SGLT2 gene in mice hearts [33], we were able to demonstrate SGLT2 expression in C57BL/6 mice hearts using 3 different methodologies: transcription as shown by RT-PCR (Fig. 5b); protein expression, using western blotting (Fig. 5a); and immunohistochemistry (Additional file 1: Figure S5). This apparent discrepancy of results might be related to some differences between the work by Yoshii and colleagues and ours [33]. First, they only performed PCR experiments (n = 3), whereas we found consistent results using two different techniques. It should be noted that protein expression levels we found were higher than one might have expected from SGLT2 transcription levels, suggesting that post-transcriptional regulation might be particularly relevant to SGLT2 expression in this model. In this regard, it should be mentioned that SGLT2 is target of multiple microRNAs, a class of post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression (Additional file 1: Table S1). In particular, the highly conserved miR-296-5p, recently found to be involved in the modulation of cardiac hypertrophy [34] and myocardial fibrosis [35] was able to promote healing of diabetic wounds, directly targeting SGLT2 [36]. In addition, SGLT2 translation is also influenced by glucose level [37]. Our findings of SGLT2 expression in mice are in line with the recent demonstration of expression SGLT2 in both mouse [38] and human heart tissue [39]. The same authors also report that high glucose levels were associated with a significant increase in expression levels of both of SGLT1 (7.1 folds; p < 0.01) and SGLT2 (7.5-folds; p < 0.01) and that treatment with empagliflozin was able to restore physiological SGLT1 and SGLT2 expression levels, opening the way for potential relevance of our finding in humans [39].

The expression of functional SGLT1 in human hearts was already demonstrated by von Lewinsky et al. [40], that reported that SGLT1 contributes to the positive inotropic effect exerted by insulin in patients with end-stage HF. Hence, our direct targeting of cardiac SGLT2 receptors is a further potential mechanism.

Therefore, our hypothesis is that SGLT2 inhibition may affect the tissue and cellular Na+ homeostasis that is responsible for the excitation–contraction coupling and the mitochondrial redox regulation in cardiomyocytes. In the 2000s Despa et al. [41] observed that [Na+]i is increased in failing cardiac myocytes, as a consequence of increased Na+ influx via the late Na+ current, increased activity of the sarcolemmal Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE), and a reduction in Na+/K+ ATPase activity. Moreover, SGLT1 expression in the heart was found to be upregulated both in animal models of type 2 diabetes and in patients with diabetic cardiomyopathy, and its activity contributes to the increase in [Na+]i.

Moreover, Baartscheer et al. recently reported that EMPA reduced [Na+]i and [Ca2+]c in isolated ventricular myocytes independently of the presence of glucose [42]. In line with this pathophysiological hypothesis, the beneficial effect exerted by EMPA in our experimental model was independent of any significant impact on glycemia, glycosuria or diuresis ad demonstrated by the experiments performed using metabolic cages.

EMPA is reported to reduce glycemia by increasing glycosuria and natriuresis in diabetic humans [43]. However, in line with human findings we did not observe significantly lower glycemia in EMPA-treated non-diabetic mice. Furthermore, in line with the latter findings we did not observe an increase in glycosuria or diuresis compared to mice not receiving EMPA, thus excluding that the effect of EMPA on LV structure and function could have been mediated by changes in blood volume or loading conditions. Hence, cardiac functional and structural improvements in EMPA-treated non-diabetic mice occurred independently of glycemia, glycosuria or diuresis.

In light of these considerations, it is tempting to speculate that our positive results on LV function in non-diabetic mice may be—at least in part—related to direct effects of EMPA on cardiac ion homeostasis. By decreasing [Na+]i and restoring mitochondrial Ca2+ handling, EMPA may ameliorate mitochondrial energetic mismatch and production of ROS, thus interrupting the vicious circle which underlies Na+ overload and oxidative stress in cardiomyocytes.

Study limitations

We analysed blood levels of Troponin, BNP and glucose under basal conditions and 6 weeks later. Since in mice they are obtained from the retro-orbital vein, the blood samples volumes were not quantitatively adequate to be analysed by standard ELISA assays. To overcome this limitation we used a point-of-care analyzer (Samsung LABGEO PT10, Thermo Fischer Scientific, Henningsdorf, Germany). However, we could not measure very high or low levels of BNP and this is due to the technical limitations of this method. In fact, we found that baseline BNP values were < 30 pg/ml at baseline; on the other hand, a significant increase in BNP blood levels was observed at the end of doxorubicin treatment (> 150 pg/ml in all the study groups). Pressure measurement was performed using the tail-cuff method in this study, to avoid the surgical procedure to implant telemetric devices. Nevertheless, this method presents some limitations in mice, which are mostly related to the agitation caused by the restraint. It should be noticed that blood pressure was not a key outcome in this study. However, some measures were adopted to minimize variability in measurements: mice were “trained” on the procedure, pressure values measured as the mean of three measurement after having discarded the first three measurements.

Clinical perspective

Our results might have an impact on the development of a novel treatment for antineoplastic therapy-induces cardiotoxicity, a relevant unmet need in medicine. In fact, despite the increasingly target selectivity of antineoplastic treatments, the risk of serious cardiotoxic effects treatment is still a clinical issue. In particular, no effective cardioprotective treatment is available, yet, to contrast anthracycline- and/or trastuzumab-induced toxicity [44]. Several therapeutic approaches have been attempted, including beta-blockers and angiotensin antagonists [45], spironolactone [46] and statins [47]. However, none of these studies could reliably demonstrate a protective effect, leaving cardio-oncologists with a relevant unsolved issue. In fact, up to one quarter of women with breast cancer are ErbB2 positive and are therefore eligible for treatment with anthracycline–trastuzumab, which is associated to a higher rate (28%) of heart failure [48]. Unfortunately, results from recent primary prevention studies using single- or multiple-drug approach were also disappointing [49,50,51].

Conclusion

Empagliflozin, independently from the glycaemic lowering, prevents the cardiotoxic side effects exerted by doxorubicin on LV function and remodelling in a model of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in non-diabetic mice. These findings strongly support the design of clinical studies to assess their relevance in a clinical setting.

Availability of data and materials

Additional data will be made available to all readers upon request per email.

Abbreviations

MACE:

Major adverse cardiovascular events

CV:

Cardiovascular

HF:

Heart failure

DOX:

Doxorubicin

DOX-HF:

Doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy

DOX + EMPA:

Doxorubicin plus empagliflozin

DOX + FURO:

Doxorubicin plus furosemide

STE:

Speckle tracking echocardiography

LV:

Left ventricular

EF:

Ejection fraction

LS:

Longitudinal strain

CS:

Circumferential strain

EMPA:

Empagliflozin

SGLT2:

Selective inhibitor of the sodium glucose co-transporter 2

SGLT1:

Selective inhibitor of the sodium glucose co-transporter 1

ERK:

Extracellular signal-regulated kinase

JAK:

Janus kinase

MAPK:

Mitogen-activated protein kinases

TTE:

Transthoracic echocardiography

LVIDd:

Left ventricular internal dimension in diastole

LVIDs:

Left ventricular internal dimension in systole

FS:

Fractional shortening

TnT:

Troponin T

BNP:

Brain natriuretic peptide

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

SD:

Standard deviations

sysBP:

Systolic blood pressure

diaBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

RS:

Radial strain

NHE:

Na+/H+ exchanger

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

References

  1. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Seshasai SR, Kaptoge S, Thompson A, Di Angelantonio E, Gao P, Sarwar N, Whincup PH, Mukamal KJ, Gillum RF, Holme I, Njølstad I, Fletcher A, Nilsson P, Lewington S, Collins R, Gudnason V, Thompson SG, Sattar N, Selvin E, Hu FB, Danesh J. Diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose, and risk of cause-specific death. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(9):829–41. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1008862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S, Mattheus M, Devins T, Johansen OE, Woerle HJ, Broedl UC, Inzucchi SE, EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2117–28. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1504720.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marx N, McGuire DK. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibition for the reduction of cardiovascular events in high-risk patients with diabetes mellitus. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(42):3192–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fitchett D, Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Hantel S, Salsali A, Johansen OE, Woerle HJ, Broedl UC, Inzucchi SE, EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial investigators. Heart failure outcomes with empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk: results of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(19):1526–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv728.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Zannad F. Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for the treatment of patients with heart failure: proposal of a novel mechanism of action. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(9):1025–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rajasekeran H, Lytvyn Y, Cherney DZ. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition and cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes: the emerging role of natriuresis. Kidney Int. 2016;89(3):524–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Heerspink HJ, Perkins BA, Fitchett DH, Husain M, Cherney DZ. Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in the treatment of diabetes mellitus: cardiovascular and kidney effects, potential mechanisms, and clinical applications. Circulation. 2016;134(10):752–72. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021887.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McMurray JVC, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, Køber L, Kosiborod MN, Martinez FA, Ponikowski P, Sabatine MS, Anand IS, Bělohlávek J, Böhm M, Chiang CE, Chopra VK, de Boer RA, Desai AS, Diez M, Drozdz J, Dukát A, Ge J, Howlett JG, Katova T, Kitakaze M, Ljungman CEA, Merkely B, Nicolau JC, O’Meara E, Petrie MC, Vinh PN, Schou M, Tereshchenko S, Verma S, Held C, DeMets DL, Docherty KF, Jhund PS, Bengtsson O, Sjöstrand M, Langkilde AM, DAPA-HF Trial Committees and Investigators. Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1995–2008. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1911303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rådholm K, Figtree G, Perkovic V, Solomon SD, Mahaffey KW, de Zeeuw D, Fulcher G, Barrett TD, Shaw W, Desai M, Matthews DR, Neal B. Canagliflozin and heart failure in type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from the CANVAS program (Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study). Circulation. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.118.034222.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Brana I, Tabernero J. Cardiotoxicity. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(Suppl 7):vii173–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdq295.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Coppola C, Riccio G, Barbieri A, Monti MG, Piscopo G, Rea D, Arra C, Maurea C, De Lorenzo C, Maurea N. Antineoplastic-related cardiotoxicity, morphofunctional aspects in a murine model: contribution of the new tool 2D-speckle tracking. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:6785–94 (eCollection 2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Oliveira MS, Melo MB, Carvalho JL, Melo IM, Lavor MS, Gomes DA, de Goes AM, Melo MM. Doxorubicin cardiotoxicity and cardiac function improvement after stem cell therapy diagnosed by strain echocardiography. J Cancer Sci Ther. 2013;5(2):52–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu J, Banchs J, Mousavi N, Plana JC, Scherrer-Crosbie M, Thavendiranathan P, Barac A. Contemporary role of echocardiography for clinical decision making in patients during and after cancer therapy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(8):1122–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.03.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schneeweiss A, Chia S, Hickish T, Harvey V, Eniu A, Hegg R, Tausch C, Seo JH, Tsai YF, Ratnayake J, McNally V, Ross G, Cortés J. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in combination with standard neoadjuvant anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free chemotherapy regimens in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a randomized phase II cardiac safety study (TRYPHAENA). Ann Oncol. 2013;24(9):2278–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hullin R, Métrich M, Sarre A, Basquin D, Maillard M, Regamey J, Martin D. Diverging effects of enalapril or eplerenone in primary prevention against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Cardiovasc Res. 2018;114:272–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvx162.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Habibi J, Aroor AR, Sowers JR, Jia G, Hayden MR, Garro M, Barron B, Mayoux E, Rector RS, Whaley-Connell A, DeMarco VG. Sodium glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibition with empagliflozin improves cardiac diastolic function in a female rodent model of diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017;16(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-016-0489-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsai TH, Lin CJ, Hang CL, Chen WY. Calcitriol attenuates doxorubicin-induced cardiac dysfunction and inhibits endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in mice. Cells. 2019;8(8):865. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8080865.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao X, Ho D, Gao S, Hong C, Vatner DE, Vatner SF. Arterial pressure monitoring in mice. Curr Protoc Mouse Biol. 2011;1:105–22.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang Y, Thatcher SE, Cassis LA. Measuring blood pressure using a noninvasive tail cuff method in mice. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1614:69–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7030-8_6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. De Rosa S, Eposito F, Carella C, Strangio A, Ammirati G, Sabatino J, Abbate FG, Iaconetti C, Liguori V, Pergola V, Polimeni A, Coletta S, Gareri C, Trimarco B, Stabile G, Curcio A, Indolfi C, Rapacciuolo A. Transcoronary concentration gradients of circulating microRNAs in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018;20(6):1000–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Li H, Johnson T. Wilcoxon’s signed-rank statistic: what null hypothesis and why it matters. Pharm Stat. 2014;13(5):281–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.1628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vickers AJ. Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5:35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee TI, Chen YC, Lin YK, Chung CC, Lu YY, Kao YH, Chen YJ. Empagliflozin attenuates myocardial sodium and calcium dysregulation and reverses cardiac remodeling in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20071680.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou Y, Wu W. The sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, empagliflozin, protects against diabetic cardiomyopathy by inhibition of the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;41(6):2503–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shao Q, Meng L, Lee S, Tse G, Gong M, Zhang Z, Zhao J, Zhao Y, Li G, Liu T. Empagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor, alleviates atrial remodeling and improves mitochondrial function in high-fat diet/streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019;18(1):165.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Durak A, Olgar Y, Degirmenci S, Akkus E, Tuncay E, Turan B. A SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin suppresses prolonged ventricular-repolarization through augmentation of mitochondrial function in insulin-resistant metabolic syndrome rats. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17(1):144.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Mizuno M, Kuno A, Yano T, Miki T, Oshima H, Sato T, Nakata K, Kimura Y, Tanno M, Miura T. Empagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, reduced the mortality rate after acute myocardial infarction with modification of cardiac metabolomes and antioxidants in diabetic rats. Physiol Rep. 2018;6(12):e13741.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Yurista SR, Silljé HHW, Oberdorf-Maass SU, Schouten EM, Pavez Giani MG, Hillebrands JL, van Goor H, van Veldhuisen DJ, de Boer RA, Westenbrink BD. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibition with empagliflozin improves cardiac function in non-diabetic rats with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21(7):862–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee HC, Shiou YL, Jhuo SJ, Chang CY, Liu PL, Jhuang WJ, Dai ZK, Chen WY, Chen YF, Lee AS. he sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin attenuates cardiac fibrosis and improves ventricular hemodynamics in hypertensive heart failure rats. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019;18(1):45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Adingupu DD, Göpel SO, Grönros J, Behrendt M, Sotak M, Miliotis T, Dahlqvist U, Gan LM, Jönsson-Rylander AC. SGLT2 inhibition with empagliflozin improves coronary microvascular function and cardiac contractility in prediabetic ob/ob−/− mice. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019;18(1):16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Li C, Zhang J, Xue M, Li X, Han F, Liu X, Xu L, Lu Y, Cheng Y, Li T, Yu X, Sun B, Chen L. Empa attenuates ox stress and fibrosis in diabetic mice. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019;18(1):15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Wood IS, Trayhurn P. Glucose transporters (GLUT and SGLT): expanded families of sugar transport proteins. Br J Nutr. 2003;89(1):3–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yoshii A, Nagoshi T, Kashiwagi Y, Kimura H, Tanaka Y, Oi Y, Ito K, Yoshino T, Tanaka TD, Yoshimura M. Cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury under insulin-resistant conditions: sGLT1 but not SGLT2 plays a compensatory protective role in diet-induced obesity. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019;18(1):85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-019-0889-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang W, Liu N, Xin L, Ruan Y, Du X, Bai R, Dong J, Ma C. Inhibition of miR-296-5p protects the heart from cardiac hypertrophy by targeting CACNG6. Gene Ther. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41434-019-0109-0(Epub ahead of print).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Fang L, Ellims AH, Moore XL, White DA, Taylor AJ, Chin-Dusting J, Dart AM. Circulating microRNAs as biomarkers for diffuse myocardial fibrosis in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Transl Med. 2015;13:314. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-015-0672-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu X, Wang Y, Zhang X, Zhang X, Guo J, Zhou J, Chai Y, Ma ZL. MicroRNA-296-5p promotes healing of diabetic wound by targeting sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2019;35(2):e3104. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Li H, Gu Y, Zhang Y, Lucas MJ, Wang Y. High glucose levels down-regulate glucose transporter expression that correlates with increased oxidative stress in placental trophoblast cells in vitro. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2004;11(2):75–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Oh CM, Cho S, Jang JY, Kim H, Chun S, Choi M, Park S, Ko YG. Cardioprotective potential of an SGLT2 inhibitor against doxorubicin-induced heart failure. Korean Circ J. 2019;49(12):1183–95. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2019.0180.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ng KM, Lau YM, Dhandhania V, Cai ZJ, Lee YK, Lai WH, Tse HF, Siu CW. Empagliflozin ammeliorates high glucose induced-cardiac dysfuntion in human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):14872. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33293-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. von Lewinski D, Gasser R, Rainer PP, Huber MS, Wilhelm B, Roessl U, Haas T, Wasler A, Grimm M, Bisping E, Pieske B. Functional effects of glucose transporters in human ventricular myocardium. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12(2):106–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfp191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Despa S, Islam MA, Weber CR, Pogwizd SM, Bers DM. Intracellular Na(+) concentration is elevated in heart failure but Na/K pump function is unchanged. Circulation. 2002;105(21):2543–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Baartscheer A, Schumacher CA, Wüst RC, Fiolet JW, Stienen GJ, Coronel R, Zuurbier CJ. Empagliflozin decreases myocardial cytoplasmic Na+ through inhibition of the cardiac Na+/H+ exchanger in rats and rabbits. Diabetologia. 2017;60(3):568–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-016-4134-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kovacs CS, Seshiah V, Swallow R, Jones R, Rattunde H, Woerle HJ, Broedl UC, EMPA-REG PIO trial investigators. Empagliflozin improves glycaemic and weight control as add-on therapy to pioglitazone or pioglitazone plus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16:147–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. van Dalen EC, Caron HN, Dickinson HO, Kremer LC. Cardioprotective interventions for cancer patients receiving anthracyclines. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (6):CD003917. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd003917.pub4.

  45. Vejpongsa P, Yeh ET. Prevention of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity: challenges and opportunities. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(9):938–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1167.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kalam K, Marwick TH. Role of cardioprotective therapy for prevention of cardiotoxicity with chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(13):2900–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.04.030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Akpek M, Ozdogru I, Sahin O, Inanc M, Dogan A, Yazici C, Berk V, Karaca H, Kalay N, Oguzhan A, Ergin A. Protective effects of spironolactone against anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2015;17(1):81–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.196.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Maurea N, Coppola C, Ragone G, Frasci G, Bonelli A, Romano C, Iaffaioli RV. Women survive breast cancer but fall victim to heart failure: the shadows and lights of targeted therapy. J Cardiovasc Med. 2010;11(12):861–8. https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0b013e328336b4c1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Gulati G, Heck SL, Røsjø H, Ree AH, Hoffmann P, Hagve TA, Norseth J, Gravdehaug B, Steine K, Geisler J, Omland T. Neurohormonal blockade and circulating cardiovascular biomarkers during anthracycline therapy in breast cancer patients: results from the PRADA (prevention of cardiac dysfunction during adjuvant breast cancer therapy) study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.117.006513.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Boekhout AH, Gietema JA, Milojkovic Kerklaan B, van Werkhoven ED, Altena R, Honkoop A, Los M, Smit WM, Nieboer P, Smorenburg CH, Mandigers CM, van der Wouw AJ, Kessels L, van der Velden AW, Ottevanger PB, Smilde T, de Boer J, van Veldhuisen DJ, Kema IP, de Vries EG, Schellens JH. Angiotensin II-receptor inhibition with candesartan to prevent trastuzumab-related cardiotoxic effects in patients with early breast cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(8):1030–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1726.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Pituskin E, Haykowsky M, Mackey JR, Thompson RB, Ezekowitz J, Koshman S, Oudit G, Chow K, Pagano JJ, Paterson I. Rationale and design of the Multidisciplinary Approach to Novel Therapies in Cardiology Oncology Research Trial (MANTICORE 101–Breast): a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to determine if conventional heart failure pharmacotherapy can prevent trastuzumab-mediated left ventricular remodeling among patients with HER2+ early breast cancer using cardiac MRI. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:318. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-318.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy

    Jolanda Sabatino, Salvatore De Rosa, Laura Tammè, Claudio Iaconetti, Sabato Sorrentino, Alberto Polimeni, Carmen Spaccarotella, Masakazu Yasuda & Ciro Indolfi

  2. Cardiovascular Research Center, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy

    Jolanda Sabatino, Salvatore De Rosa, Laura Tammè, Claudio Iaconetti, Sabato Sorrentino, Alberto Polimeni, Carmen Spaccarotella & Ciro Indolfi

  3. Department of Health Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy

    Chiara Mignogna & Andrea Amorosi

  4. URT CNR of IFC, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy

    Ciro Indolfi

Authors
  1. Jolanda Sabatino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Salvatore De Rosa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Laura Tammè
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Claudio Iaconetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sabato Sorrentino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Alberto Polimeni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Chiara Mignogna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Andrea Amorosi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Carmen Spaccarotella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Masakazu Yasuda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Ciro Indolfi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JS, SDR and CI designed the study. JS, MY, LT, SS AP and SDR performed animal surgery experiments. JS, LT, MY and CIa managed all remaining animal experiments. LT, CIa and SDR performed in vitro and ex vivo experiments. CM and AA performed histology. JS and SDR drafted the manuscript. CI, MY, CS and CIa did a critical revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Salvatore De Rosa or Ciro Indolfi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The experimental protocol was reviewed and approved by the local animal care review board.

Consent for publication

All authors gave their consent for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Extended methods. Extended version of study methodology, including all details that the limited word count available did not allow to keep in the main manuscript. Table S1. MicroRNAs targeting SGLT2. List of microRNAs potentially targeting SGLT2 within the highest context score percentiles. The upper row shows the microRNA targeting a conserved site of SGLT2, while the remaining microRNAs target poorly conserved sites. Figure S1. Study timeline. The figure depicts the study timeline with the breakdown of mice into three groups. Figure S2. Systemic blood pressure. At the sixth week, both systolic (panel A) and diastolic blood pressure (panel B) was significantly lower in the DOX group compared to DOX+EMPA. Figure S3. Histological examples of doxorubicin myocardial injuries. The figure shows the characteristic attenuation of fibrillar bands observed after treatment with doxorubicin, in some morphological variants (lower left and mid panels and upper mid panel). Masson’s trichrome staining highlights the degree of fibrosis in hearts from control group (upper right panel) and hearts from the DOX group (lower right panel). Figure S4. Expression of SGLT-1 in mice hearts. Results RT-PCR showing the expression levels of SGLT-1 in different mouse hearts. Figure S5. Expression of SGLT-2 in mice hearts. Immunohistochemistry shows the expression of SGLT-2 in mice hearts. SGLT-2 expression showed a 75% reduction in DOX mice (upper right panel), compared to baseline. This effect was significantly attenuated in EMPA+DOX mice (lower right panel).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sabatino, J., De Rosa, S., Tammè, L. et al. Empagliflozin prevents doxorubicin-induced myocardial dysfunction. Cardiovasc Diabetol 19, 66 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-020-01040-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-020-01040-5

Keywords

Cardiovascular Diabetology

ISSN: 1475-2840