Open Access

New onset diabetes in adulthood is associated with a substantial risk for mortality at all ages: a population based historical cohort study with a decade-long follow-up

Cardiovascular Diabetology201716:105

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-017-0583-x

Received: 25 May 2017

Accepted: 29 July 2017

Published: 15 August 2017

Abstract

Background

Diabetes has been reported to be associated with an increased relative risk for mortality, with estimates ranging from 1.1 to 2.1. Findings are inconsistent regarding modification of the risk by gender and by age. The aim of this study was to estimate the mortality risk associated with new-onset diabetes in adulthood, by age group and gender.

Methods

From the database of a large health care provider, we identified 31,987 individuals diagnosed with diabetes during 2003–2005; and 162,656 individuals without diabetes, group-matched by age. We used Cox regression to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for overall mortality adjusted for age, gender, socioeconomic (SE) level, obesity, smoking and comorbidities at baseline.

Results

During a median follow-up of 9.5 years, 4464 (14%) of persons with diabetes and 13,327 (8.2%) of those without died. Among persons with incident diabetes, the proportion of men, smokers, obese and patients of low SE level was higher, as was the prevalence of cardiovascular disease and renal impairment at baseline. Incident diabetes was associated with an adjusted HR for mortality of 1.38 (95% CI 1.32–1.43). Mortality HR for DM was comparable with hypertension (1.42; 1.37–1.46), smoking (1.65; 1.58–1.71) and atherosclerosis (1.40; 1.35–1.46). Diabetes associated mortality HR was somewhat higher among women 1.78 (95% CI 1.58–2.08) as compared with men 1.51 (95% CI 1.41–1.62).

Conclusions

Incident diabetes in adults is associated with a substantial risk for mortality, especially in younger adults. Further efforts should be allocated to diabetes primary prevention.

Keywords

DiabetesAll-cause mortalityPopulation based study

Introduction

Diabetes is a chronic disease that can impair the normal function of many body systems. It affects almost 10% of the adult population in Israel and its prevalence is on the rise [1]. Numerous studies conducted in different countries have reported an association of diabetes with an increased risk for overall mortality, ranging from 1.1 to 2.07 [29]. Some studies found similar relative risk for men and women [2, 4, 6], while others reported a higher relative risk among women [3, 10]. The association between diabetes and mortality risk, according to age, also differed among studies. In most studies the highest relative risk was observed in the youngest age groups [4, 5], but in a study from Canada and the UK, the highest relative risk for mortality was observed in the 45–64 year age group [6]. Previous work conducted in Israel [4], with an average follow-up of 4.6 years, included both prevalent and incident diabetes cases, and did not address individual characteristics (except age and gender) that could confound the association between diabetes and mortality. In the decade since that work was published, major improvements have emerged in the field of diabetes care: new drugs were added to the therapeutic arsenal [11] and national quality control programs were developed [12]. The present study extends prior work by using a historical cohort design that enables comparing persons with and without diabetes, while controlling for differences in individual characteristics. The objectives of this study were: to provide an updated estimate of the risk for mortality associated with new-onset diabetes; to assess whether age and gender modify this risk and to assess the proportion of the risk that can be attributed to baseline co-morbidities.

Methods

Data sources

The study was carried out at Maccabi Healthcare Services (MHS) in Israel, which is the nation’s second-largest health maintenance organization, with coverage of 25% of the population. Since 1997, information on all members’ interactions (i.e., visits to outpatient clinics, hospitalizations, laboratory tests and dispensed medications) are downloaded daily to a central computerized database. Using this database, MHS developed and validated disease registries for major chronic diseases including diabetes, hypertension and heart disease. These registries served as the basis for the data extracted for this study [13]. The study was approved by the institutional review board of MHS.

Study population

The MHS diabetes registry has been described in detail elsewhere [13]. Briefly, the registry was constructed in 1999 by an automated search in the MHS computerized databases, using the disease criteria suggested by the American Diabetes Association (ADA), including fasting blood glucose of ≥126 mg/ml, or a casual plasma glucose concentration of ≥200 mg/dl [14]. In accordance with the ADA guidelines [15] an HbA1c result of ≥6.5% in conjunction with a physician diagnosis of diabetes was later added to the registry inclusion criteria. The registry is continuously validated by computerized feedbacks from practitioners and was found to have 99.9% specificity [16]. As the registry does not include information about the type of diabetes we restricted the study population to age 35 years and older. The study cohort included all patients who entered the MHS diabetes registry at the age of 35 years or older during 2000–2005. The entry date to the registry served as the index date. The source population for establishing the comparison group comprised the diabetes-free members of MHS who were aged 35 years or older in 2003 and who were not included in the diabetes registry before the end of 2005. The index date of the diabetes-free group was set to January 1, 2003. Individuals who were diabetes-free were frequency-matched to cases by age (±1 year) in a ratio of 5:1. Active membership in MHS for at least 2 years prior to the index date was served as a study inclusion criterion; this was to enable an equal period for baseline data collection. Individuals who were diagnosed with cancer before the index date (n = 8560) or who were on dialysis treatment (n = 208) were excluded from the analysis.

Data collection

Information of death is provided to MHS by the Israeli National Insurance Institute on a monthly basis. Follow up continued until death, leaving MHS or January 1, 2013, whichever came first.

Co-variates

Demographic variables included age at index date, gender and socioeconomic (SE) level, as assessed by the locality of residence. Based on the population census of 2008, the 210 localities in Israel were ranked on a 10-level ordinal scale according to the SE index of its population, as measured by 16 components including education, employment status and car ownership. For the current analysis, the localities were categorized into 3 groups: low (levels 1–4), medium (levels 5–7), and high (levels 8–10). Data on smoking status at baseline were retrieved from the electronic medical file. Smoking status was categorized as ‘current smoker’ and ‘not known to be a current smoker’, since the distinction between past-smoker and non-smoker was not accurate. For about 30% of the cohort smoking status was not recorded. We used two approaches to complete the missing data: (1) multiple imputations (MI), (2) expanding the time-window for smoking documentation to ±4 years from baseline. Individuals with any recording of active smoking within that period were classified as current smokers. These two approaches yielded similar results, therefore only the analysis using MI is presented. Data regarding baseline hypertension, cardiovascular disease (including ischemic heart disease, stroke and peripheral artery disease) and renal impairment were extracted from MHS medical registries. Since body weight was not routinely documented in the electronic medical record before 2005, weight data at baseline was available to only 10% of the cohort. Based on the relative stability of weight at adulthood [17], we performed a sensitivity analysis that included body weight documented within 5 years from baseline (available for 63% of the cohort). BMI was calculated based on weight and height, and obesity level was defined as: under/normal weight (BMI 14–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 29.9 kg/m2) (mildly obese (30 ≤ BMI < 35 kg/m2) and severely obese (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2).

Statistical analysis

The χ2 tests for categorical variables (e.g. smoking, gender and hypertension) and the T test for continuous variables (e.g. age) were performed to determine differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate the risk for mortality associated with diabetes, by means of hazard ratios and their 95% confidence intervals. Model 1 was adjusted to age and gender. Model 2 included, in addition, the baseline co-morbidities: smoking status and SE level.

To examine whether age and gender modify the association between diabetes and mortality, the final model included the interactions terms of diabetes with age and gender.

Diabetes is often diagnosed indirectly throughout the work up of other, possibly fatal, disease. In such cases, diabetes is not what led to the death; rather, the fatal illness is what either caused the diabetes or led to its diagnosis. To minimize the possibility of this reverse causation bias, a sensitivity analysis was performed, in which the first year of follow-up was excluded.

All analyses were performed using IBM-SPSS software (IBM Corp. Released 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp).

Results

The study comprised 31,987 incident diabetes patients and 162,656 individuals without diabetes. In the diabetes compared to the non-diabetes group, the proportion of men, smokers, obese individuals and persons of low SE level was higher, as was the prevalence of cardiovascular disease and renal impairment at baseline (Table 1).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the study groups

 

With diabetes

N = 31,987

n (%)

Without diabetes

N = 162,656

n (%)

p*

Age at baseline (years) mean ± SD

58.1 ± 11.9

57.2 ± 11.6

<0.001

Females

14,258 (44.6)

86,961 (53.5)

<0.001

Comorbidity at baseline

   

 Hypertension

14,274 (44.6)

38,933 (23.9)

<0.001

 Chronic renal failure

1984 (6.2)

5.843 (3.6)

<0.001

 Atherosclerosisa

4666 (14.6)

11,795 (7.3)

<0.001

 Heart failure

798 (2.5)

1421 (0.9)

<0.001

 Arrhythmia

1405 (4.4)

4495 (2.8)

<0.001

Socio-economic level

  

<0.001

 Low

4763 (15.3)

20,503 (12.9)

<0.001

 Medium

18,343 (59.1)

90,761 (57.0)

<0.001

 High

7944 (25.6)

47,940 (30.1)

<0.001

Current smoking

5599 (17.5)

25,967 (16.0)

<0.001

Under/normal weight (BMI 14–24.9 kg/m2)

3554 (12.4)

39,628 (30.5)

<0.001

Over weight (BMI 25–29.9 kg/m2)

10,533 (36.6)

53,931 (41.5)

<0.001

Mild obesity (BMI 30–34.9 kg/m2)

8950 (31.1)

26,336 (20.3)

<0.001

Severe obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2)

5706 (19.9%)

9973 (7.7%)

<0.001

* T test or Chi square test as appropriate

a Including history of ischemic heart disease, stroke and peripheral artery disease

The median follow-up period was 9.5 (IQR 7.9–11.1) years, for the diabetes group, with a total of 294,204 person-years, and 10 (IQR 10–10) years, for the non-diabetes group, with a total of 1,522,185 person-years.

During the follow-up period, 4464 (14%) of those with diabetes and 13,327 (8.2%) of those without diabetes died; mortality rates were 1.52 (95% CI 1.47–1.56) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.86–0.89) per 100 person-years respectively (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Survival plot according to diabetes status

Incident diabetes was associated with a 56% increased risk for mortality adjusted for age and gender (HR 1.56 95% CI 1.51–1.62). Age, male gender, smoking, low SE level and baseline comorbidity were all associated with an increased risk for mortality (Additional file 1: Table S1). In the fully adjusted model, the increased risk for mortality attributed to diabetes was reduced to 1.38 (95% CI 1.32–1.43) (Table 2). The sensitivity analysis of excluding death cases in the first year of follow up, yielded similar results (Table 2).
Table 2

Hazard ratio for mortality in individuals with new onset diabetes

 

With diabetes deaths/total

Without diabetes deaths/total

Model 1 HR (95% CI)

Model 2 HR (95% CI)

Model 3

All

4464/31,987

13,327/162,656

1.56 (1.51–1.62)

1.38 (1.32–1.43)

1.61 (1.56–1.66)

Minimum 1-year follow-up

3772/31,132

12,212/160,040

1.46 (1.40–1.51)

1.28 (1.23–1.33)

1.58 (1.49–1.68)

Multivariate Cox regression analysis of people with new onset diabetes compared to people without diabetes. Model 1 adjusted for age and gender; Model 2 adjusted also for current smoking, SE level and baseline comorbidities; Model 3 included interaction term for diabetes with age (interaction term 0.98 for 1 year increase) and interaction term for diabetes with gender (1.12 for women)

Age-specific mortality rates were higher among diabetic persons compared with non-diabetic persons in both genders and in all age groups. The mortality rates were higher in men than women in people with and without diabetes; (Fig. 2), but the diabetes associated HR for mortality was somewhat higher among women, (HR 1.78 95% CI 1.58–2.08) compared to men (HR 1.51 95% CI 1.41–1.62) (p for the interaction of diabetes and gender ≤ 0.001). In both genders, the diabetes associated HR for all-cause mortality decreased with older age (Table 3). The interaction of age with diabetes was statistically significant (p < 0.001).
Fig. 2

Mortality rate by diabetes status, gender and age

Table 3

Hazard ratios for all-cause mortality of diabetics compared to non-diabetics by age and gender

 

Men

Women

HRa

95% CI

HRa

95% CI

35–44

Diabetes n = 4071

No diabetes n = 23,477

1.87

1.38–2.54

2.69

1.34–5.38

45–54

Diabetes n = 9429

No diabetes n = 49,423

1.64

1.42–1.89

1.67

1.23–2.26

55–64

Diabetes n = 9020

No diabetes n = 44,381

1.47

1.33–1.63

1.55

1.28–1.88

65–74

Diabetes n = 6086

No diabetes n = 30,915

1.32

1.23–1.43

1.50

1.33–1.70

≥75

Diabetes n = 3381

No diabetes n = 14,460

1.14

1.07–1.21

1.24

1.14–1.34

All

1.51

1.41–1.62

1.78

1.58–2.08

a HR adjusted to age, gender, current smoking, SE level and baseline comorbidities, and including interaction with age

Discussion

In this historical cohort study we found that adults (aged 35 years and above) with newly diagnosed diabetes have an overall 38% increased risk for all-cause mortality compared to individuals without diabetes. This is higher than the 15% (95% CI 9–22%) increased risk for mortality reported by a Scottish population based study of individuals aged 35 and older with new onset diabetes, after adjusting for deprivation status and previous cardiovascular disease [18]. The population of that study was older than in our study (45% and 35% respectively were older than 65 years) which may explain the lower diabetes-associated mortality risk observed. Studies from the UK, Canada, and the US [3, 8, 19, 20] found that individuals with prevalent diabetes had an almost twofold increased risk for mortality compared to individuals without diabetes. Other studies conducted in Israel, Sweden and the Netherlands found lower relative risks, of <1.5 [2, 4, 9]. Comparing between studies is difficult due to differences in populations, in methodologies (the use of Cox regression vs. standardized mortality rates) and in the co-variates included in the multivariate analysis. In addition, due to the finding that age and gender modify the risk, overall estimates of the effect of diabetes on mortality are specific to study populations, since they are influenced by variations in population composition. The increased risk for mortality associated with diabetes was only partially explained by baseline risk factors (in the multivariate model the risk was attenuated by 18% from 1.56 to 1.38). Moreover, due to the insidious course of diabetes, its damage to the micro and macro vasculature often starts years before diabetes is diagnosed [21]. It is possible then, that some of the baseline comorbidities that we included in the multivariable model (e.g. ischemic heart disease and renal failure) were, in effect, caused by the diabetes, so they mediated the mortality risk and did not confound it. Therefore, the actual diabetes-related mortality risk may be somewhere between 1.38 and 1.56. Our finding of a higher diabetes associated risk for mortality among women as compared to men especially in the age group of 35–44 years is congruent with other reports [3, 4, 2224]. Diabetes is a known risk factor for cardiovascular events [25] and was hypothesized to attenuate the female natural protection against cardiovascular complications [26, 27]. Similar to previous studies [3, 4, 2224, 28] we report that the relative risk for mortality associated with diabetes decreased with age. This may be due to higher background mortality in older ages, or due to a survivor bias, i.e. a less severe course of diabetes that develops in those who survive to older age. Yet, even in those patients who were 75 years and older the risk remained pronounced, similar to a recent work from Taiwan [29]. Moreover, in the elderly, the lower relative risk translates to an addition of a larger number of deaths associated with diabetes, due to the high background mortality of this age group.

We found that the increased risk for mortality was already evident shortly following the diagnosis of diabetes as can be seen by the early separation of the survival curves (Fig. 1). Similarly, in the Cardiovascular Health Study, the diagnosis of diabetes among individuals aged 65 years and older was associated with a HR of 2.3 for mortality within the first 2 years after the diagnosis [10]. An immediate risk for mortality was also found among Danish males [30]. Taken together, this suggests that the mortality risk associated with the hyperglycemic state is not mediated solely through atherosclerotic pathways. The mortality associated with diabetes may be influenced by risk factors that are closely linked with hyperglycemia. One such possibility is insulin resistance, which was previously reported to be associated with cardiovascular events [31]. The finding that diabetes is associated with an increased risk for mortality at any age should be considered when prescribing medications for primary prevention of cardiovascular events, that have been reported to increase the risk for diabetes [32, 33]. This highlights the need to tailor treatments according to patient characteristics. The strengths of this study include the population-based design together with the usage of a large and valid electronic database with few dropouts. This minimizes the potential for selection and information biases. Another advantage is the comparison to individuals free of diabetes that belong to the same population as those with diabetes. Yet; our study has a few limitations. The data did not include information regarding the type of the diabetes; though by limiting the study population to patients diagnosed with diabetes at age 35 years and older the proportion with type 1 diabetes was presumably small [34]. The non-diabetes group may have included individuals with undiagnosed diabetes, as the disease can be asymptomatic for years. In a different project we found that 60% of MHS members at the age 35 years and older had their glucose tested at least once a year (data not published), so the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes is expected to be low in this population. Similarly, it is possible that some individuals in the control group developed diabetes later on, causing some misclassification of the exposure, but the expected effect of this (if any) is to cause underestimation of the true risk. Another limitation was the fact that we did not have baseline BMI data and any data regarding important risk factors for mortality including physical activity, sedentary lifestyle and nutritional habits, which may differ between individuals with and without diabetes. In addition, we lacked data about the baseline level of important risk factors for mortality in diabetic patients including Hba1c, cholesterol and triglycerides [35, 36], and about the level of glucose or blood pressure control. In conclusion, our finding of 38% increased diabetes associated risk for mortality shows that despite the major advances in diabetes care and the introduction of new treatments, onset of diabetes still carries a significant increased risk for mortality. Furthermore, the increased risk was observed at all ages even among the elderly aged 75 years and above. These findings highlight the need to allocate resources to diabetes primary prevention and improved care in all ages.

Abbreviations

HR: 

hazard ratio

CI: 

confidence interval

MHS: 

Maccabi Healthcare Services

ADA: 

American Diabetes Association

SE: 

socioeconomic

MI: 

multiple imputations

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

IZ, GC, RD and TS contributed to the design of the study. IZ, GC contributed to data collection and data analysis and draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to revising the manuscript for publication. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author (IZ) on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

All authors gave their consent to the publication.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the institutional review board of MHS.

Funding

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Israel Center for Disease Control (ICDC) Ministry of Health
(2)
School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University
(3)
Unit for Cardiovascular Epidemiology, The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research
(4)
Maccabi Healthcare Services

References

  1. Jaffe DHSA, Ben-Yehuda A, Paltiel O, Calderon R, Manor O. National Program for Quality indicators in Community Healthcare 2011–2013 Report. Israel: The Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research; 2014. p. 2014.Google Scholar
  2. Ubink-Veltmaat L, Bilo H, Groenier K, Houweling S, Rischen R, Meyboom-de Jong B. Prevalence, incidence and mortality of type 2 diabetes mellitus revisited: a prospective population-based study in The Netherlands (ZODIAC-1). Eur J Epidemiol. 2003;18(8):793–800.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Mulnier H, Seaman H, Raleigh V, Soedamah-Muthu S, Colhoun H, Lawrenson R. Mortality in people with type 2 diabetes in the UK. Diabet Med. 2006;23(5):516–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Shalev V, Chodick G, Bialik M, Green MS, Heymann AD. In a population-based cohort of diabetes patients, men and women had similar risks for all-cause mortality. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):86–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gu K, Cowie CC, Harris MI. Mortality in adults with and without diabetes in a national cohort of the US population, 1971–1993. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(7):1138–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lind M, Garcia-Rodriguez L, Booth G, Cea-Soriano L, Shah B, Ekeroth G, et al. Mortality trends in patients with and without diabetes in Ontario, Canada and the UK from 1996 to 2009: a population-based study. Diabetologia. 2013;56(12):2601–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gregg EW, Cheng YJ, Saydah S, Cowie C, Garfield S, Geiss L, et al. Trends in death rates among US adults with and without diabetes between 1997 and 2006. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(6):1252–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Taylor KS, Heneghan CJ, Farmer AJ, Fuller AM, Adler AI, Aronson JK, et al. All-cause and cardiovascular mortality in middle-aged people with type 2 diabetes compared with people without diabetes in a large UK primary care database. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(8):2366–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Tancredi M, Rosengren A, Svensson A-M, Kosiborod M, Pivodic A, Gudbjörnsdottir S, et al. Excess mortality among persons with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(18):1720–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Smith NL, Barzilay JI, Kronmal R, Lumley T, Enquobahrie D, Psaty BM. New-onset diabetes and risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(9):2012–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Meneghini L, Hirsch IB. Pharmacotherapies for diabetes management: an update for the practicing clinician. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;18(4):379–89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jaffe DH, Shmueli A, Ben-Yehuda A, Paltiel O, Calderon R, Cohen AD, et al. Community healthcare in Israel: quality indicators 2007–2009. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2012;1(1):3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Chodick G, Heymann AD, Shalev V, Kookia E. The epidemiology of diabetes in a large Israeli HMO. Eur J Epidemiol. 2003;18(12):1143–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Association AD. Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Clin Diabetes. 2002;20(1):24–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Association AD. Summary of revisions for the 2010 clinical practice recommendations. Am Diabetes Assoc. 2010.Google Scholar
  16. Heymann AD, Chodick G, Halkin H, Kokia E, Shalev V. Description of a diabetes disease register extracted from a central database. Harefuah. 2007;146(1):15–7, 79.Google Scholar
  17. Heo M, Faith M, Pietrobelli A. Resistance to change of adulthood body mass index. Int J Obes. 2002;26(10):1404.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Barnett KN, Ogston SA, McMurdo ME, Morris AD, Evans J. A 12-year follow-up study of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among 10,532 people newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in Tayside, Scotland. Diabet Med. 2010;27(10):1124–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Collaboration ERF. Diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose, and risk of cause-specific death. N Engl J Med. 2011;2011(364):829–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Almdal T, Scharling H, Jensen JS, Vestergaard H. The independent effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus on ischemic heart disease, stroke, and death: a population-based study of 13,000 men and women with 20 years of follow-up. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(13):1422–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Selph S, Dana T, Bougatsos C, Blazina I, Patel H, Chou R. Screening for abnormal glucose and type 2 diabetes mellitus. 2015.Google Scholar
  22. Walker JJ, Livingstone SJ, Colhoun HM, Lindsay RS, McKnight JA, Morris AD, et al. Effect of socioeconomic status on mortality among people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(5):1127–32.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Gregg EW, Gu Q, Cheng YJ, Narayan KV, Cowie CC. Mortality trends in men and women with diabetes, 1971 to 2000. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(3):149–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hu G, Group DS. Gender difference in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality related to hyperglycaemia and newly-diagnosed diabetes. Diabetologia. 2003;46(5):608–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hermans MP, Bouenizabila E, Amoussou-Guenou DK, Ahn SA, Rousseau MF. Baseline diabetes as a way to predict CV outcomes in a lipid-modifying trial: a meta-analysis of 330,376 patients from 47 landmark studies. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015;14(1):60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Juutilainen A, Kortelainen S, Lehto S, Rönnemaa T, Pyörälä K, Laakso M. Gender difference in the impact of type 2 diabetes on coronary heart disease risk. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(12):2898–904.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kautzky-Willer A, Harreiter J, Pacini G. Sex and gender differences in risk, pathophysiology and complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocr Rev. 2016;37(3):278–316.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Kang YM, Kim Y-J, Park J-Y, Lee WJ, Jung CH. Mortality and causes of death in a national sample of type 2 diabetic patients in Korea from 2002 to 2013. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15(1):131.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Chi M-J, Liang C, Lee W-J, Peng LN, Chou M-Y, Chen L-K. Association of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus in Older People and Mortality in Taiwan: a 10-Year Nationwide Population-Based Study. J Nutr Health Aging. 2017;21(2):227–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hansen LJ, de Fine Olivarius N, Siersma V. 16-year excess all-cause mortality of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients: a cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(1):400.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Mills JD, Grant PJ. Insulin resistance, haemostatic factors and cardiovascular risk. Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis. 2002;2(1):19–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Jones M, Tett S, Peeters GM, Mishra GD, Dobson A. New-onset diabetes after statin exposure in elderly women: the Australian longitudinal study on women’s health. Drugs Aging. 2017;34(3):203–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lin Z-F, Wang C-Y, Shen L-J, Hsiao F-Y, F-LL Wu. Statin use and the risk for incident diabetes mellitus in patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Taiwan. Can J Diabetes. 2016;40(3):264–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Thunander M, Petersson C, Jonzon K, Fornander J, Ossiansson B, Torn C, et al. Incidence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in adults and children in Kronoberg, Sweden. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;82(2):247–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Bots SH, Graaf Y, Nathoe HM, Borst GJ, Kappelle JL, Visseren FL, et al. The influence of baseline risk on the relation between HbA1c and risk for new cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and symptomatic cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15(1):101.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Klempfner R, Erez A, Sagit B-Z, Goldenberg I, Fisman E, Kopel E, et al. Elevated triglyceride level is independently associated with increased all-cause mortality in patients with established coronary heart disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9(2):100–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement