Open Access

Diagnostic approaches for diabetic cardiomyopathy

Cardiovascular Diabetology201716:28

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-017-0506-x

Received: 3 January 2017

Accepted: 3 February 2017

Published: 23 February 2017

Abstract

Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a cardiac dysfunction which affects approximately 12% of diabetic patients, leading to overt heart failure and death. However, there is not an efficient and specific methodology for DCM diagnosis, possibly because molecular mechanisms are not fully elucidated, and it remains asymptomatic for many years. Also, DCM frequently coexists with other comorbidities such as hypertension, obesity, dyslipidemia, and vasculopathies. Thus, human DCM is not specifically identified after heart failure is established. In this sense, echocardiography has been traditionally considered the gold standard imaging test to evaluate the presence of cardiac dysfunction, although other techniques may cover earlier DCM detection by quantification of altered myocardial metabolism and strain. In this sense, Phase-Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 2D/3D-Speckle Tracking Echocardiography may potentially diagnose and stratify diabetic patients. Additionally, this information could be completed with a quantification of specific plasma biomarkers related to related to initial stages of the disease. Cardiotrophin-1, activin A, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-7 (IGFBP-7) and Heart fatty-acid binding protein have demonstrated a stable positive correlation with cardiac hypertrophy, contractibility and steatosis responses. Thus, we suggest a combination of minimally-invasive diagnosis tools for human DCM recognition based on imaging techniques and measurements of related plasma biomarkers.

Keywords

Diabetic cardiomyopathy Diagnosis Imaging Biomarker

Diabetes and cardiovascular risk

Cardiovascular pathologies are the most common cause of mortality in the world, and diabetes mellitus is one of the major risk factor for cardiovascular disease development [1]. By 2025, diabetes is expected to affect 300 million people with a prevalence of 5.4%. According to the Framingham Heart Study, the risk of heart failure in diabetes is increased 2.4-fold in men and fivefold in women compared to non-diabetic population [2]. In this regard, though cardiovascular diseases debut approximately ten years later in women than in men, in diabetes, that ‘female protection’ may not defend from cardiovascular injuries, suggesting a key role of sexual hormones in diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) development [3].

The relationship between diabetes and heart disease has been known for many years, but the first description was made by Leyden et al. in 1881 [4], when he stated that heart failure (HF) was a “frequent and noteworthy complication of diabetes mellitus”. Later in 1972, Rubler et al. introduced the entity named DCM, in order to distinguish this condition from other types of cardiomyopathy [5]. Nowadays, the minimal criteria to be diagnosed with DCM include left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and/or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), pathological left ventricle hypertrophy, and interstitial fibrosis [6]. This left ventricular remodeling may be presented as dilated eccentric with left ventricular systolic dysfunction or concentric with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, being the later the most frecuent observed by general cardiologist and diabetologist [7]. DCM is defined as a ventricular dysfunction observed in diabetic patients, independently of coronary artery disease, valve disease or hypertension. Also, DCM may be present in up to 60% normotensive patients with diabetes as a pseudonormalization of diastolic pattern, which is an advanced left ventricular diastolic dysfunction characterized by an intermediate stage between impaired relaxation and restrictive filling with reduced myocardial contractility and strain [8]. Finally, DCM can be also present as a diminished contractile function while exercising [9].

DCM affects approximately 12% diabetic patients, disturbing almost 22% subjects over 64 years-old, which represent between 36 and 66 millions of diabetic people, respectively [10]. However, vascular pathologies frequently coexist with DCM. The accelerated atherosclerosis in T2DM may be explained by several factors including low-grade inflammation, metabolic disorders such as hyperglycemia with increased formation of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), obesity, dyslipidemia, hyperinsulinemia, oxidative stress, and autonomic imbalance. Macroangiopathy complications include heart disease, stroke and peripheral arterial disease [11], whereas microangiopathy comprise retinopathy [12], neuropathy [13], and nephropathy [14]. In this sense, a clear association between myocardial strain and albuminuria has been observed in T1DM patients [15], and protective effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors on kidney have been also seen for HF prevention in T2DM individuals [16]. In addition, DCM concurs with cardiovascular risk comorbidities such as hypertension and overall obesity, which complicates its diagnosis and specific treatment [17]. A major risk factor for the development of T2DM is obesity, and according to the World Health Organization, over 600 million adults worldwide were obese as of 2014 [18]. Since lipids can accumulate in the hearts of both obese and T2DM subjects, subsequent metabolic disbalance and lipotoxicity are major mechanism contributing to diabetes-related ventricular dysfunction. Also, obesity-induced hyperinsulinemia stimulates hepatic expression of lipogenic genes, de novo lipogenesis and the secretion of VLDL lipoproteins [19]. In type-II diabetes (T2DM), the coexistence with these cardiovascular risk factors and insulin resistance highlights the different pathogeny with type-I diabetes (T1DM), which is more related to genetic factors.

Cardiac responses to diabetes

There are different structural and functional modifications in the myocardial tissue after diabetes. These events emerge from metabolic alterations induced by hyperglycemia, insulin resistance and hyperlipidemia (Fig. 1). The lack of insulin sensitivity and glucose assimilation in the heart is evident by the reduction in number of glucose transporters Glut1, and mainly, Glut4. In this line, impaired fasting glucose and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction have been correlated in middle-age adults [20]. As a compensatory mechanism, fatty acid transporters are increased, and most ATP generation relies on fatty acid degradation [21]. However, fatty acid may saturate ß-oxidation and accumulate in the cytosol, leading to lipotoxic effects by generation of ceramides, diacylglycerol and reactive species of oxygen (ROS). In this sense, hyperglycemia elicits also ROS and advanced glycation product (AGE) formation, which lead to cardiac glucotoxicity. Both, the lack of fuel and lipo/gluco-toxicity are promoters of calcium misbalance, mitochondrial/endoplasmic reticulum failure and apoptosis, triggering cardiac low-grade chronic inflammation, fibrosis and contractile dysfunction [22]. Among others, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAA) and TGFß systems, together with specific cytokine/chemokine production, are remarkably enhanced.
Fig. 1

Cardiac scenario in diabetic patients. Biomarkers discovery for DCM diagnosis. In diabetes, high levels of blood glucose and fatty-acid, together with a defect in insulin signalling (insulin resistance) activate diferent cellular mechanism in the myocardium. Glucose cannot be appropriately assimilated by cardiomyocyte and deviate to glucose metabolites such as AGEs (with ECM proteins), polyols and hexosamine, which may activate pro-oxidant and pro-inflammatory responses. Energy relies on FFA only, which are uptaken in excess and accumulated as secoundary toxic products such as TAG (in lipid droplets; LD), ceramide and DAG, leading to steatosis. They also decrease calcium flux between sarcoplasmic reticulum and cytosol, reducing actin-myosin-TnI/T complexes, and contractibility. FFA also bind PPAR receptors for upregulation of mitochondrial beta-oxidation enzymes, which produce non-efficient ATP and ROS, triggering mitochondrial dysfunction (release of cytochrome-C) and apoptosis. All these stimuli promote the expression specific miRNAs, and pro-hypertrophic and pro-fibrotic factors such as RAA and TGFβ systems, which may play autocrine and paracrine roles on (myo)fibroblast and adipocytes (from EAT). Interestingly, some of these molecules (in bold) can be released to the circulation and being used as biomarkers of cardiac dysfunction. UR unspecific receptor, TLRs toll-like receptors

Several animal models have somehow mirrored human DCM to further deep into the molecular mechanisms and key mediators [23]. Diabetic rodents have been widely studied because of their natural resistance to atherosclerosis [24]. T1DM can be harshly induced by toxins (i.e., streptozotocin, alloxan) and genetic modifications (i.e., calmodulin, insulin), whereas T2DM is mostly reproduced by diets (i.e., high-fatty) and genetic (i.e., leptin system) mutations. All of them showed cardiac abnormalities, including myocyte hypertrophy and myocardial inflammation and fibrosis. An increase in steatosis and apoptosis have been also seen, reflecting a multifactorial pathogeny in the disease [25]. In humans, T1DM-associated cardiac dysfunction has been mostly related to hyperglycemia, oxidative stress and subsequent myocardial fibrosis. Instead, cardiac dysfunction in T2DM has been linked to hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance and coexistence of obesity, dislipemia and/or hypertension, promoting cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and steatosis. Thus, since T1DM may exhibit better glucose control and absence of comorbidities, cardiac dysfunction can be more severe in T2DM [26]. In this sense, T1DM patients improved cardiac indexes after intensive glucose control [27]. However, intensive glycemic goals (HbA1c < 7%) have failed to prevent cardiac complications in long-term diabetic patients or have even increased cardiovascular mortality [28, 29]. The failure of the therapy approaches employed to date calls for accelerating efforts towards the development of new therapeutic strategies capable of preserving heart function while contributing to the overall care of diabetes. In this regard, an early and specific detection of DCM could be critical for therapeutic success avoiding further HF and fatal fate.

Diagnosis of diabetic cardiomyopathy

Diastolic dysfunction is defined as a defect in ventricular relaxation in that leads to increase pressures and a subsequent impaired filling during diastole. Systolic dysfunction is the inability of the myocardium to eject the adequate blood volume, what it means, heart exhibits a low EF. Diastolic dysfunction is twice more common in diabetic than non-diabetic subjects, and appears earlier [30]. Also, age can influence detection of diastolic dysfunction in DM patients, and thus, this deficiency should be judged for every age. At initial stages of DCM, left ventricular EF could be preserved, whereas diastolic dysfunction with reduced diastolic filling, prolonged isovolumetric relaxation and increased atrial filling, is established. Relaxation abnormalities at the heart are observed concurrently with autonomic neuropathy, and are frequently related to hyperglycaemia [31]. In addition, a decrease in longitudinal systolic function and a compensatory increase in radial function can be also present. More than 25% of diabetic patients showed systolic strain abnormalities preceding diastolic dysfunction, which may be influenced by risk factors such as hypertension or obesity, for clinical interpretation and imaging quality [14, 30]. However, DCM is currently detected at late stages of the pathology through identification of systolic dysfunction, when HF has been already instituted [32]. Diabetic patients arriving to emergency departments with symptoms of HF are examined by non-invasive tests such as chest X-ray, to assess fluid accumulation in the lungs, electrocardiography, to identify ventricular overload, and conventional cardiac ultrasound, to assess structural and functional abnormalities of the myocardium. Additionally, natriuretic peptides plasma levels may also be of help in the diagnosis of heart failure. Other biomarkers not used in the clinical practice in this setting, could provide also additional information. These biomarkers can be released after a wide variety of cardiac and/or skeletal muscle injuries such as inflammation (i.e., C-reactive protein), hypertrophy/stiffness and necrosis (i.e., troponins) in relation to different diseases such as myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, myocarditis, hypertension, or any secondary cardiac injury (i.e., chemotherapy, renal kidney disease). Thus, recent human and mainly pre-clinical data suggest new techniques for detection of premature DCM based on imaging and biomarkers analysis.

Approaching to DCM diagnosis by imaging technologies

An accurate method to diagnose DCM could include endomyocardial biopsy sampling [33]. The morphological features observed in the biopsy, usually taken from interventricular septum to avoid complications of transmural procedure within the free wall (i.e., perforation or arrhythmias), may be considered as representative of the whole cardiac tissue. Kumar Das et al. biopsied the heart of a group of hyperglycemic and asymptomatic or symptomatic T2DM patients [34], correlating the metabolic alterations with the different ultrastructural changes. Indeed, collagen [35] and fat [36] deposits were found in left ventricular transmural biopsies from T2DM patients with no evidence of hypertension or coronary artery disease. Also, endomyocardial biopsies from symptomatic T2DM patients with HF exhibited higher loss of myofibrils than in asymptomatic T2DM patients by electron microscopy [37]. However, due to its invasive nature and high potential risks, this approach has been relegated to research studies. Similarly, a classic method to characterize cardiac dysfunction in DCM may include cardiac catheterization. In this method, a catheter is introduced through the radial or femoral artery up to the left ventricle to directly measure cardiac pressures and motility. A coronary angiogram may be performed in parallel to exclude coronary artery disease. An end-diastolic pressure over 16 mmHg in the left ventricle may confirm diastolic dysfunction [38]. However, this methodology is invasive and not specific to diagnose the DCM-associated diastolic dysfunction. Then, non-invasive techniques are preferred for this purpose.

Echocardiography

Nowadays, this non-invasive approach is the gold standard diagnostic tool to identify structural cardiac disorders. It provides a reliable identification of the structural abnormalities seen in early stages of DCM, such as impaired diastolic filling and left ventricle hypertrophy. It can also be helpful for the assessment of the progression of the disease and evaluation of treatments [39]. Echocardiography has been widely studied in rodent models even without using anesthesia, and thus, eluding the cardiodepressant effect [40]. Several modalities can be used (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Main imaging approaches for DCM identification. Several methodologies can be addressed to both T1DM and T2DM patients for evaluation of cardiac dysfunction. Early, middle or late responses of DCM may be detected. However, some inconvenient must be contemplated to personalize suitable strategies

Conventional Döppler-echocardiography

Two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography allows to examine cardiac structures and their movement. Furthermore, Döppler technology, that is based on the shift in frequency of ultrasound signals reflected from moving objects, is useful to study blood flow [41]. In addition to detecting anomalous flows, such as those seen in valve regurgitation, or to estimate the severity of valve stenoses, it may be of help to analyze diastolic function. Some manoeuvres such as Valsalva could be also used with trans-mitral Döppler signals to increase accuracy [42]. In this regard, ventricular diastolic filling velocities are known to be altered in the presence of diastolic dysfunction. A reduction of the E-wave, which represents the early ventricular filling, or a raise in A-wave, that corresponds to the atrial-driven ventricular filling (decreased E/A ratio), as well as a prolonged deceleration time of the E wave are signs of relaxation impairment, and have been observed in T1DM patients [27]. Similarly, a high incidence of diastolic dysfunction has been demonstrated in asymptomatic T2DM patients by this approach [43]. Moreover, other early DCM-associated abnormalities in T1DM and T2DM subjects, such as left ventricular hypertrophy, could be also detected with 2D-Echo-Döppler [44]. Importantly, in diabetic primates 2D-Echo-Döppler detected both diastolic (by decreased E/A ratio and prolonged deceleration time) and systolic (by decreased EF) dysfunction, accompanied by left atrial hypertrophic remodeling [45]. In T1DM rodents, Wichi et al. found similar results using 2D-Echo-Döppler or catheterization in relation to diastolic and systolic left ventricle function [46]. Also, in T2DM mice, 2D-Echo-Döppler successfully detected early changes in diastolic function and myocardial hypertrophy [47, 48]. Additionally, 2D-Echo-Döppler can be used to detect epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) accumulation in DCM. EAT can correlate with visceral adipose tissue and thus, is increased in obesity. EAT is an important player in the physiological and biochemical regulation of cardiac homeostasis by release of proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukins, monocyte chemoattractive protein-1, leptin, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, resistin, and TNFα. Although EAT thickening could be related to other cardiomyopathies such as ischemic cardiac disease, an enlargement of EAT has been observed by 2D-Echo-Döppler in both T1DM [49] and T2DM [50] patients in correlation with HF and cardiac biomarkers (i.e., BNP, troponin-T and C-reactive protein). However, some limitations for 2D-Echo-Döppler, such as inter/intra-observer variability, angle dependence or noise interference, have to be considered. This approach may be also influenced by heart rate and volume status. Also, the pseudonormal filling pattern in diabetic patients could be underestimated [51].

Tissue Döppler imaging (TDI)

Since tissue has a greater reflectivity and slower motion that blood flow, TDI applies filters that exclude high velocities and low-intensity reflectors (that is, the red blood cell motion) to quantify velocities through myocardial tissue. Thus, TDI allows measurements of motion during cardiac cycle,analogous to the conventional Döppler [51]. In this regard, it is important the diastolic mitral annular motion analysis: E′ wave (early diastolic velocity) and A′ wave (atrial-driven motion) The E/E′ ratio (early transmitral velocity to TDI mitral annular early diastolic velocity) has been described as an indirect measure of diastolic dysfunction when it is over 15 [7]. Furthermore, the strain rate, and global and regional ventricular strains can be analysed with TDI. Both parameters provide a more direct assessment of intrinsic myocardial contractility. With strain and strain rate, myocardial velocities in different myocardial segments are evaluated, independently of pre-load changes and providing an extra advantage over 2D-Echo-Döppler. Longitudinal, circumferential and radial cardiac contractions are examined in myocardial fibres, allowing the quantification of ischemia and fibrosis. In this regard, in forty recently-diagnosed T2DM patients, 50% of them were diagnosed with TDI as early-staged DCM [41]. TDI with Valsalva was also useful for detection of diastolic dysfunction with pseudonormal filling patterns in T2DM monkeys [52]. Although heart rate and circumferential/torsion cardiac movements in rodents are different than in humans, an impairment in radial direction rather than in longitudinal was detected in T1DM rats as a marker of fibrosis [53]. However, TDI achieves absolute tissue velocity but cannot discriminate passive motion (related to translation or tethering) from active motion (fiber shortening or lengthening). Also, active segments or compensatory contractility may interfere with radial measurements. Moreover, quantification is limited to the segments in which deformation aligns with the ultrasound beam [54].

Intravenous contrast echocardiography (ICE)

This procedure is based in the increased reflectivity of intravenous contrast agents (microbubbles) due to the differential reflection of the contained gas compared with surrounding blood and tissue.Thus, ventricular opacification enhances endocardial borders by delineating anatomy, leading to higher accuracy of ventricular size and, more importantly, ventricular motion [55]. The addition of ICE to 2D-echocardiography showed an improvement in the accuracy of left ventricular function evaluation in a non-selected cardiac population [56]. Although ICE has not been tested in human diabetes, the alteration of contractility and systolic function, as well as microcirculation, were demonstrated in T1DM rats [57]. However, most studies performed in DCM assessed myocardial blood flow instead of motion, and the intravenous administration of contrast media may also limit its use. Moreover, not all endocardial segments can be correctly visualized [55].

Döppler acoustic echocardiography

This modality of Echo is focused on the acoustic properties of the heart, which are modified when fibrosis is present. A decrease in cyclic variation index allows to diagnose early fibrosis, and also, hypertrophy. Although there are no data in experimental DCM, Pérez et al. [58] characterized the myocardial acoustic properties in T1DM patients. They found that cyclic variation of integrated backscatter was reduced and delayed among diabetic subjects. Indeed, patients with diabetic complications such as neuropathy or retinopathy had the greatest reduction in cyclic variation and the highest increase in delay [58]. These data were confirmed in other clinical study in T1DM patients as an intensification of myocardial echo-density defined by the integrated backscatter index [59]. However, the mechanisms of cyclic variation of integrated backscatter are not completely understood and may be a reflection of myocardial physiology rather than biochemical changes assessed by acoustic ultrasound [43].

Three dimensional (3D)-echocardiography

Current generation 3D-Echo allows for collection of a full pyramidal data set in real time (opposite to the triangular data set of the 2D technique). 3D-Echo provides several advantages over conventional ultrasound methodology since it can evaluate ventricles with abnormal shapes or mobility. It also overcomes disadvantages of 2D-Echo by reducing calculation errors and interferences, and increasing the visualization [60]. 3D-Echo improves anatomical localization and measurement accuracy with the use of tomographic images and strain techniques, giving information of both diastolic and systolic dysfunction [61]. Although there are no data in experimental DCM, subjects with prediabetes or T2DM exhibited by 3D-Echo a right ventricular and atrial deformation, and cardiac dysfunction [62]. However, high quality imaging and appropriate heart rate is a prerequisite to accurately measure cardiac function. Thus, the assessment of regional wall segments could be challenging under stress conditions [63].

Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE)

STE is a relatively new technique to achieve myocardial mechanical deformation (strain and strain rate). STE overcomes major drawbacks of conventional techniques (i.e., TDI) such as inter/intra-observer variability, angle dependence or noise interference [64]. It uses sequence of images obtained from 2D- or 3D-echocardiography and quantifies the distance between pixels during the cardiac cycle. Thus, alterations in myocardial deformation in the three axes (radial, circumferential, and longitudinal strain) are detected. In this sense, strain and the strain rate are solid indexes for left ventricular contractility, and more independent of pre/after-load than EF [65]. 3D-STE successfully confirmed the correlation between diabetic microangiopathy and myocardial deformation in asymptomatic T2DM patients by reduction of global longitudinal and circumferential strains [66]. In this regard, 24% diabetic patients were diagnosed with impaired systolic function by 2D-STE, but not by other conventional strategy [67]. Importantly, a decreased longitudinal systolic strain detected by STE was associated with cardiovascular events and provided incremental prognostic value up to ten years after revealing [6870]. Also, longitudinal strain and subsequent increased torsional deformation have been crucial to diagnose early myocardial disease in T1DM patients [71]. In asymptomatic T1DM, 2D-STE also demonstrated subclinical left ventricular dysfunction and right systolic dysfunction [72]. In pediatric T1DM, 2D-STE showed impaired longitudinal and circumferential strain as signs of hyperdynamic left ventricular contractility early in the course of the disease [73]. In addition, 2D/3D-STE have been found to be highly reliable in animals [74]. In sheep, 2D-STE provided earlier information about left ventricular function. Specifically, left ventricle free wall was affected in both short and long-axis, whereas the strain and the strain rate were altered in the radial axis [75]. In early stage T2DM rats, 2D-STE detected left ventricular deformation associated with cardiomyocyte Ca2+ transients delay [76]. In T1DM rabbits, longitudinal and circumferencial strain gradually diminished from endocardium to epicardium, which was consistent with invasive labelling studies [77]. Recently, in T1DM mice, 2D-STE showed early alterations such as systolic radial strain, radial strain rate, radial displacement, and radial velocity, as well as decreased circumferential and longitudinal strain rate during the progression of disease and earlier than contractile changes detected by 2D-Echo [78]. However, as a weakness, irregular ventricular remodeling and wall thinning may affect STE accuracies.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Cardiac MRI can be also useful for DCM diagnosis. In contrast to echocardiography, MRI operates with greater spatial and temporal resolution to evaluate chamber size, left ventricular EF and myocardial mass distribution. MRI provides extra information about myocardial fibrosis and subclinical ischemia, as premature parameters of cardiac dysfunction. There are two main pulse-sequence MRI defined by the relaxation properties of the different tissues, known as T1 and T2 weighted, that allow the characterization of the tissues. In T1-weighted imaging, tissue regions with high fat content or fibrosis appear bright, whereas in T2-weighted imaging those areas with an increase in the water content look bright. Thus, MRI attains also higher characterization of regional and local systolic contractility [27], through several modalities.

Gradient-Echo-MRI

Gradient-Echo-MRI creates a cine display about different moments of the cardiac cycle by combining radiofrequency pulses with electrocardiogram [32]. Thus, MRI provides also higher characterization of regional contractility of the left ventricle [27], and has been used to determine right ventricle dimensions and function, which were found to be impaired in men with uncomplicated T2DM [79].

Phase-contrast-MRI

Phase contrast imaging is an MRI technique that can be used to visualise moving fluid and quantify the velocity in a certain area (myocardial valves). Mitral valve inflow velocities, early deceleration time, and pulmonary vein flow velocities are diastolic parameters that can be measured by phase-contrast MRI. Phase-contrast-MRI can obtain images under any circumstance without influence of breathing and minimal variability [80]. The direction and velocity of flow, as well as turbulences, provide information about intra-myocardial velocities and hypertrophy [32]. Although there are not data in preclinical diabetes, this procedure revealed diastolic dysfunction in association with low levels of myocardial phosphocreatine to adenosine-triphosphate (PCr/ATP)-ratio, and impaired cardiac metabolism in T1DM patients [81]. Also, phase-contrast MRI revealed left ventricular dysfunction in well controlled T2DM normotensive patients [82].

Tagged-MRI

This technology uses radiofrequency pulses of the myocardium to determine cardiac deformation along cardiac cycles through strain rates and torsion recoveries [83]. Tagged-MRI indicated higher left ventricular torsion with normal EF and left ventricular mass in well controlled T1DM patients [84]. Similarly, by tagged-MRI coupled to 3D-Echo, a decrease in circumferential and longitudinal strains and strain rates was found among T2DM patients with poor glycemic control and presence of other cardiovascular risk factors [85]. These data were not confirmed in well-controlled T1DM patients, suggesting a detrimental role of comorbidities and metabolic disturbances in cardiac strain [84]. In experimental T1DM, tagged-MRI showed an increase of left ventricular volumes and mass, and left ventricular hypertrophy and fibrosis, in parallel to metabolic alterations [86, 87]. In addition, T1 mapping incorporated on MRI can provide an alternative method of quantification of diffuse non-specific fibrosis [88]. In asymptomatic T2DM subjects, an early correlation between myocardial dysfunction (detected by Echo-Döppler) and an enhanced T1 mapping was disclosed [88].

However, MRI may not be available to all patients, and has some limitations. It may underestimate diastolic dysfunction, cannot be compatible with some pacemakers or implantable desfibrilators, and may produce claustrophobia in some patiens. Also, in animals, MRI requires anesthesia, which could interfere with cardiac performance [24].

Multi-slice computed tomography (MsCT)

MsCT uses volumetric methods to obtain ventricular function parameters. End-systolic and -diastolic volume are calculated pixel-by-pixel in different cardiac rotations arranged and reconstructed by an automated software. Small segments of data are collected along several cardiac cycles to generate a final image of computed tomography [89]. High temporal resolution is needed to obtain artefact-free images during systole and diastole. Moreover MsCT has been proved as a promising tool for ischemic cardiac disease by estimation of coronary artery calcification and atherosclerosis. Although there are no data in experimental DCM, in T2DM patients, MsCT could be a reliable assessment of left ventricular dysfunction [90]. However, radiation exposure and the use of contrast media along with side effects may relegate diagnosis of DCM to other techniques [91].

Nuclear imaging

These techniques focus on cardiac autonomic dysfunction, as a common finding in early stages of diabetes, as occurs during impaired glucose tolerance, where heart rate and myocardial blood flow may be disturbed.

Gated-SPECT (G-SPECT)

G-SPECT provides simultaneous assessment of cardiac perfusion and left ventricular function by using labeled myocardial perfusion agents, providing real information about ventricular function in 3D, wall thickening, motion, and diastolic parameters [92]. G-SPECT, with either Tl-201 or Tc-99m tracers, was considered a reliable assessment of left ventricular global and regional function in non-diabetic patients compared to 2D-echocardiography. Furthermore, this technique seemed to be highly reproducible, when compared to conventional echo [93]. However, there is not data in human or experimental DCM, but G-SPECT might be especially useful in these patients, as the metabolism of tracers depends on metabolic alterations found in the disease [94].

Positron emission tomography (PET)

Similarly, PET scan has been proposed to diagnose DCM, in special, for those subjects with obesity or advanced left ventricular dysfunction and coronary artery disease, who cannot be analysed by G-SPECT [95]. Asymptomatic T2DM patients exhibited an increase in myocardial fatty acid metabolism by PET, though no relation was found between diastolic dysfunction and energy metabolism parameters [96]. In a rat model of early DCM, an small-animal PET using 18Fluoro-desoxyglucose as a tracer, revealed a decrease of myocardial glucose utilization and increased fatty acids oxidation, in association with impaired myocardial function [97]. In T2DM rats, PET showed alterations in myocardial glucose utilization that were linked with cardiac dysfunction [98]. However, 18Fluoro-desoxyglucose itself may constitute a drawback for diabetic patients with impairment in glucose uptake.

Approaching to DCM diagnosis by biomarkers detection and quantification

Several efforts have been made to improve DCM detection by non-invasive quantification of biomarkers in body fluids such as urine, saliva, semen or tears, but all of them were not conclusive [99]. However, by minimally invasive blood sampling, plasma biomarkers have headed consistent and stable results. Cardiac autocrine, paracrine or excreted molecules could be released from the diabetic heart in response to damage, following (mal)-adaptive mechanisms associated to structural and functional alterations. Chronic, late or irreversible events such as inflammation or apoptosis, detected by markers as C-reactive protein or Creatine kinase-MB, may not provide valuable information. However, detection of early and reversible responses such as hypertrophy, contractibility, steatosis or even fibrosis by related factors might be optimal for DCM diagnosis.

Myocardial pro-hypertrophic biomarkers for DCM

Non-physiological cardiac hypertrophy is adaptive and compensatory in DCM. This cellular growth presents as increased myocardial cell surface area, protein synthesis and reactivation of foetal genes (such as atrial natriuretic peptides and β-myosin heavy chain). However, in the long term, hypertrophy leads loss of function and death of cardiomyocytes, favoring HF. Thus, a premature detection of pro-hypertrophic factors could be helpful to diagnose early DCM (Fig. 1). In this sense, the family of natriuretic peptides that comprises the atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and its biologically inactive fragment N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP), has been used as a HF biomarker. The half‐life of BNP is higher than that of ANP, raising 20 min, whereas NT‐proBNP is degraded after 120 min. These neurohormones are secreted by the atrial and ventricular myocardium in response to HF [100]. Interestingly, association between HF and DM was blunted due to the considerable effect of BNP in counteracting insulin resistance [101]. ANP is stored in granules and can be released immediately after stimulation, but only small amounts of BNP are stored, being its rapid gene expression the underlying mechanism that stimulates its secretion [102]. Biological actions of these cardiac hypertrophic markers are mediated through specific membrane-bound receptors coupled to cGMP signaling. Both ANP and BNP promote diuresis, natriuresis, hypotension and smooth muscle relaxant activities.

In T1DM patients, high circulating NT-proBNP levels identify left ventricular systolic dysfunction in 96% cases [103], whereas ANP was elevated after early diastolic dysfunction and cardiac sympathetic dysinnervation [104]. However, both peptides were useful sensors for diastolic dysfunction in diabetic patients who were symptomatic, had a restrictive filling pattern or pseudo-normalized mitral flow pattern, but not in those subjects asymptomatic or with relaxation abnormalities [100]. Another studies also demonstrated elevated levels of NT-proBNP in diabetic patients with diastolic dysfunction and uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c > 7%), but not in asymptomatic diabetic patients with mild diastolic dysfunction [105, 106]. Moreover, NT-proBNP played a prognostic rather than a diagnostic role in another population of diabetic patients [107]. In experimental DCM, natriuretic peptides have been able to predict HF. Both NT-proBNP and ANP were significantly increased in plasma and atrial muscle of T1DM rats [108, 109]. Studies in pre-diabetic rats demonstrated that NT-proBNP levels could diagnose left ventricle hypertrophy [110]. Plasma NT-proBNP was significantly higher in T2DM with HF rats [111]. Nevertheless, natriuretic proteins are also secreted in response to acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina and increased wall pressure/volume overload [100].

Thus, new prospective pro-hypertrophic biomarkers are needed for DCM detection. In this regard, cardiotrophin-1 (CT-1), a member of the gp130 cytokine family, is mainly released from cardiomyocytes after oxidative and mechanical stress or RAA system stimulation [112] (Fig. 1). CT-1 can modulate cardiac hypertrophy, contractility, fibrosis and ischemia through reduction of cell proliferation, apoptosis, oxidative stress and inflammation, by activation of JAK/STAT and MAPK pathways [112, 113]. However, chronic activation of CT-1 promotes cardiovascular remodelling (i.e., cardiac hypertrophy) and HF In cardiomyocytes of neonatal rats [114, 115]. Interestingly, CT-1 is also a key regulator of cardiac glucose metabolism by increasing insulin-stimulated glucose uptake [116]. In this sense, higher plasma CT-1 levels positively correlated with basal glycaemia and left ventricular hypertrophy in T2DM patients [117]. Also, patients with impaired glucose tolerance or recently diagnosed diabetes exhibited elevated CT-1 plasma levels [118], but intriguingly, low concentrations were found in non-diabetic obeses and overweighted [97]. However, expression of CT-1 is not exclusive for the heart, and high levels of CT-1 have been also found in different cardiomyopathies including ischemia.

Myocardial contractile biomarkers for DCM

Troponins have been related with myocardial contractility in different cardiomyopathies. This multiprotein complex is constituted by Troponin I (TnI), C (TnC) and T (TnT) in all striated muscles. Troponin controls calcium mediated interaction between actin and myosin (Fig. 1). In particular, TnC is the calcium-binding subunit of the complex and its interaction with TnI and TnT is crucial for cardiac contraction [119]. The myocardial-specific isoforms TnI and TnT are sensitive markers of necrosis, and thus, are widely used in the routine clinical practice [120]. Interestingly, TnI and TnT were found to be phosphorylated in human myocardial biopsies, which may lead to depressed myofilament function and calcium-sensitivity [121]. Data have been reported in non-adult population. Newborns of diabetic women showed a significant correlation between plasma TnI levels and decreased left ventricular end diastolic diameter and increased interventricular septum [122]. Circulating TnT was also high in infants born from T1DM mothers [120]. In experimental models of DCM, particularly in T2DM rats with HF, plasma Tn-T were notably higher [111].

Thus, new prospective biomarkers related with the contractile function of the cardiomyocyte are needed for DCM detection. For this purpose, EAT can release autocrine and paracrine molecules (Fig. 1). Interestingly, isolation of these secreted factors from TDM2 patients induced contractile dysfunction and insulin resistance in primary rat cardiomyocytes [123]. In particular, activin A and angiopoietin-2 stimulated insulin-mediated phosphorylation of Akt, a key regulator of myocardial glucose uptake [124]. Activin A, belonging to TGFβ family, was released from cultured EAT biopsies from T2DM patients inhibited insulin action via Akt pathway blockade [125]. Similarly, in high-fat feeding guinea pigs, where EAT-secreted molecules increased activin A-signalling, decreased calcium ATPase-2a expression and sarcomere shortening, and reduced insulin-mediated phosphorylation of Akt in primary rat cardiomyocytes [123]. Outstandingly, in T2DM patients, plasma activin A levels were inversely associated with myocardial glucose metabolism, and positively with left ventricular mass/volume-ratio, reflecting a potential detrimental role of this molecule in early human diabetic cardiomyopathy [126].

Myocardial pro-steatosis biomarkers for DCM

Fat accumulation in the myocardium may be a protective response to provide a store of fuel for subsequent oxidation and to prevent exposure to toxic lipid metabolites such as ceramides. However, in DCM, a chronic imbalance of lipid storage versus lipid oxidation may lead to mechanical dysfunction [127]. Quantification of lipid droplets in cardiomyocytes by MRI has shown a direct measurement of myocardial steatosis, but it was not independently associated with diastolic dysfunction, possibly because of motion artefacts owing to contraction and breathing [128]. Thus, pro-steatosis factors released from heart may be useful for early DCM identification.

Hfabp is a cardiac cytosolic protein that acts transporting fatty acids to the mitochondria, for degradation and ATP consecution (Fig. 1). After lipid delivery, Hfabp is up-regulated and located at the sarcolemma but remains undetectable in serum of healthy subjects [129]. However, after myocardial injury such as myocardial infarction, systolic dysfunction or HF, Hfabp can be released to the plasma [129131]. Interestingly, the presence of Hfabp has been observed in early cardiac injury of T2DM patients [132]. In addition, Shearer et al. demonstrated a correlation between Hfabp plasma levels and the severity of cardiac insulin resistance of T2DM mice [133].

Myocardial pro-fibrotic biomarkers for DCM

Cardiac transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) has been associated with the fibrotic degree in DCM [134]. TGFβ activates Smad signaling to increase expression of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins and reducing ECM-degradative enzymes [131]. Myocardial ECM is a complex network of fibrillar collagen types I and III (as well as less abundant collagen types IV, V and VI), and fibronectin, laminin, elastin, fibrillin, and proteoglycans. ECM mediates the mechanical connection among cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts and blood vessels within the myocardium, transmits extracellular mechanical signals, supports cell migration and endows architecture and integrity (Fig. 1). Importantly, diastolic dysfunction was ameliorated by inhibition of TGFβ in experimental T2DM, suggesting a central role of TGFβ-signalling in DCM pathogeny [135]. In this sense, a TGFβ mediator, Smad-3, has been also implicated cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, and diastolic dysfunction in T2DM mice [136]. Interestingly, an up-regulation of plasma TGFβ has been observed in diabetic patients with and without diastolic dysfunction. The highest levels were observed when both conditions coexisted [137]. Also, in T2DM mice, TGFβ was increased, independently of glucose levels, but associated with left ventricle collagen accumulation, myocardial stiffness and diastolic dysfunction [138].

In addition, cardiac fibroblasts could play a critical role in maintaining normal cardiac function, as well as in cardiac remodeling during pathological conditions such as DCM. Fibroblasts undergo phenotypic transition to myofibroblastic cells for ECM protein expression [139]. In this sense, collagens are synthesized as procollagen molecules, which are cleaved after secretion to become actives. This process is enhanced by the TGFβ/Smad pathway among other growth factors, such as PDGF and FGF. Cardiac fibroblasts also produce degradative proteins for ECM (i.e., metalloproteinases; MMPs) and their corresponding inhibitors (tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases; TIMPs) to maintain an adequate balance between ECM deposition and degradation (Fig. 1). MMP-1, -2, -3 and -9 degrade collagens type-I, -II, -III and -IV. MMP-3 and -7 lyse laminin, proteoglycans, basal collagen membrane, and fibronectin [140]. However, MMPs can be inhibited by TIMPs and the MMPs/TIMPs ratio may indicate the grade of ECM degradation [141]. Thus, collagen synthesis and turnover could be useful for DCM recognition. In this sense, a relationship between increased procollagen type-1 propeptide (PINP) levels and the presence of diastolic dysfunction was unveiled in early T2DM patients [142]. In these patients, an elevation of serum MMP-7 was also demonstrated [141]. Similarly, in experimental T1DM, low expression of plasma MMP-2 has been observed in parallel with cardiac fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction [143]. In T2DM rats, decreased MMP-2 plasma activity, and elevated TIMP-2 levels were described in association with cardiac fibrosis [144].

A more forthcoming biomarker may be linked to the fibrotic, insulin-resistance and hypertrophic components of DCM (Fig. 1). Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-7 (IGFBP-7) is a modulator of insulin receptor activity by interaction with insulin growth factor-1 (IGF-1). IGFBP-7 has been evidenced as a serum biomarker for diastolic dysfunction associated with vascular remodelling and cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis, in the metabolic syndrome [145]. A positive correlation between IGFBP7 levels and diastolic dysfunction was also detected in diabetic patients with reduced EF (detected by 2D-Echo) and increased collagen deposition [146].

Conclusions and perspectives

Ideally, the presence of DCM should be investigated in both T1DM and T2DM patients when still asymptomatic. Thus, alterations in cardiac metabolism and myocardial strain in the myocardium, could be identified as early events in DCM. For this purpose, Phase-MRI could quantify metabolic disruptions, in spite of potential claustrophobia or incompatibility with pacemakers in some patients, and 2D/3D-STE may detect longitudinal and circumferential myocardial strains. In addition, imaging approaches may be complemented with a minimally-invasive quantification of specific plasma biomarkers. Previous reports showed that a quantification of NT-proBNP combined with 2D-Echo-Döppler imaging was more reliable to diagnose DCM in T2DM patients than any of them alone [147]. Furthermore, plasma molecules related to primary myocardial changes in DCM could be addressed. In particular, those related with hypertrophy, contractile alteration and steatosis such as CT-1, activin A and Hfabp, respectively. Additionally, IGFBP-7 plasma levels may inform about the insulin-resistance, hypertrophy and fibrotic status of the heart. However, key values or ranges of all these parameters have not been established yet for DCM patients, according with their sex, type of diabetes, and clinical history.

Moreover, early diagnosis of DCM could allow not only a reliable assessment of this pathology, but also, the use of preventive strategies to slow or avoid overt heart failure. For example, a DPP-4 inhibitor triggered beneficial effects on fatty acid uptake and oxidation, and prevention of diastolic dysfunction of T1DM rats [148]. In this regard, further investigations are needed for the discovery of new activated molecular pathways and mediators. Interestingly, noncoding RNA molecules such as microRNAs could play a role in cell-to-cell communications in different stages of DCM through their release into circulation [149]. In particular, a decrease of miR-133a may mediate diabetes-induced hypertrophy in mice, which resulted in upregulation of pro-hypertrophic transcription factors SGK1 and IGFR1 [150]. Also, miR-133a has been involved in GLUT4 regulation and glucose uptake in cardiomyocytes [151], and promotion of cardiac fibrosis via CTGF increase [152]. Further research in human DCM might also suggest miR-133a as a soluble biomarker for DCM. In this regard, another non-coding circulating RNA, long intergenic non-coding RNA predicting cardiac remodelling (lipcar), was positively associated with diastolic dysfunction in T2DM patients even before than NT-proBNP and c-reactive protein [153]. Thus, together with Phase-MRI or 2D/3D-STE imaging approaches, epigenetic molecules may complete a panel of predictive biomarkers for cardiac dysfunction in diabetic patients.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

AL and OL designed, discussed and wrote the work. JT, MO, MC and JE provided critical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declares that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This work was supported by Banco de Santander-Autónoma University grant (CEAL-AL/2015-17) and the Spanish Society of Cardiology and FIS (PI14/01567).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Renal, Vascular and Diabetes Laboratory, Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Universidad Autónoma
(2)
Department of Cardiology, Fundación Jiménez Díaz
(3)
Spanish Biomedical Research Centre in Diabetes and Associated Metabolic Disorders (CIBERDEM) network

References

  1. Bertoni AG, Hundley WG, Massing MW, Bonds DE, Burke GL, Goff DC. Heart failure prevalence, incidence, and mortality in the elderly with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:699–703.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kannel WB, Hjortland M, Castelli WP. Role of diabetes in congestive heart failure: the Framingham study. Am J Cardiol. 1974;34:29–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown RA, Anthony MJ, Petrovski P, Ren J. The influence of gender, diabetes, and acetaldehyde on the intrinsic contractile properties of isolated rat myocardium. Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2001;1:35–42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Asghar O, Al-Sunni A, Khavandi K, Khavandi A, Withers S, Greenstein A, et al. Diabetic cardiomyopathy. Clin Sci Lond Engl. 1979;2009(116):741–60.Google Scholar
  5. Rubler S, Dlugash J, Yuceoglu YZ, Kumral T, Branwood AW, Grishman A. New type of cardiomyopathy associated with diabetic glomerulosclerosis. Am J Cardiol. 1972;30:595–602.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Fontes-Carvalho R, Ladeiras-Lopes R, Bettencourt P, Leite-Moreira A, Azevedo A. Diastolic dysfunction in the diabetic continuum: association with insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015;14:4.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Seferović PM, Paulus WJ. Clinical diabetic cardiomyopathy: a two-faced disease with restrictive and dilated phenotypes. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1718–1727–1727a–c.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Poirier P, Bogaty P, Garneau C, Marois L, Dumesnil JG. Diastolic dysfunction in normotensive men with well-controlled type 2 diabetes: importance of maneuvers in echocardiographic screening for preclinical diabetic cardiomyopathy. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:5–10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Ha J-W, Lee H-C, Kang E-S, Ahn C-M, Kim J-M, Ahn J-A, et al. Abnormal left ventricular longitudinal functional reserve in patients with diabetes mellitus: implication for detecting subclinical myocardial dysfunction using exercise tissue Doppler echocardiography. Heart Br Card Soc. 2007;93:1571–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Trachanas K, Sideris S, Aggeli C, Poulidakis E, Gatzoulis K, Tousoulis D, et al. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: from pathophysiology to treatment. Hell J Cardiol. 2014;55:411–21.Google Scholar
  11. Franconi F, Campesi I, Occhioni S, Tonolo G. Sex-gender differences in diabetes vascular complications and treatment. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2012;12:179–96.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Kurioka S, Ose H, Fukuma K, Yoshimoto K. Severity of diabetic retinopathy is associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013;99:287–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Mochizuki Y, Tanaka H, Matsumoto K, Sano H, Toki H, Shimoura H, et al. Association of peripheral nerve conduction in diabetic neuropathy with subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015;14:47.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Mochizuki Y, Tanaka H, Matsumoto K, Sano H, Toki H, Shimoura H, et al. Clinical features of subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015;14:37.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Jensen MT, Sogaard P, Andersen HU, Bech J, Fritz Hansen T, Biering-Sørensen T, et al. Global longitudinal strain is not impaired in type 1 diabetes patients without albuminuria: the Thousand & 1 study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:400–10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2117–28.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Ofstad AP. Myocardial dysfunction and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2016;76:271–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Hebert JR, Allison DB, Archer E, Lavie CJ, Blair SN. Scientific decision making, policy decisions, and the obesity pandemic. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88:593–604.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Zlobine I, Gopal K, Ussher JR. Lipotoxicity in obesity and diabetes-related cardiac dysfunction. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2016;1861:1555–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Milwidsky A, Maor E, Kivity S, Berkovitch A, Zekry SB, Tenenbaum A, et al. Impaired fasting glucose and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in middle-age adults: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 2971 subjects. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015;14:119.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Cai L, Wang Y, Zhou G, Chen T, Song Y, Li X, et al. Attenuation by metallothionein of early cardiac cell death via suppression of mitochondrial oxidative stress results in a prevention of diabetic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1688–97.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Frustaci A, Kajstura J, Chimenti C, Jakoniuk I, Leri A, Maseri A, et al. Myocardial cell death in human diabetes. Circ Res. 2000;87:1123–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Bugger H, Abel ED. Molecular mechanisms of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Diabetologia. 2014;57:660–71.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Severson DL. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: recent evidence from mouse models of type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2004;82:813–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Fuentes-Antras J, Picatoste B, Gomez-Hernandez A, Egido J, Tunon J, Lorenzo O. Updating experimental models of diabetic cardiomyopathy. J Diabetes Res. 2015;2015:656795.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Robillon JF, Sadoul JL, Jullien D, Morand P, Freychet P. Abnormalities suggestive of cardiomyopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes of relatively short duration. Diabète Métabolisme. 1994;20:473–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Korosoglou G, Humpert PM. Non-invasive diagnostic imaging techniques as a window into the diabetic heart: a review of experimental and clinical data. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2007;115:211–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Leung M, Wong VW, Hudson M, Leung DY. Impact of improved glycemic control on cardiac function in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:e003643.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Mazzone T. Intensive glucose lowering and cardiovascular disease prevention in diabetes: reconciling the recent clinical trial data. Circulation. 2010;122:2201–11.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Ernande L, Bergerot C, Rietzschel ER, De Buyzere ML, Thibault H, Pignonblanc PG, et al. Diastolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: is it really the first marker of diabetic cardiomyopathy? J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24(1268–1275):e1.Google Scholar
  31. Sánchez-Barriga JJ, Rangel A, Castañeda R, Flores D, Frati AC, Ramos MA, et al. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction secondary to hyperglycemia in patients with type II diabetes. Arch Med Res. 2001;32:44–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Tillquist MN, Maddox TM. Update on diabetic cardiomyopathy: inches forward, miles to go. Curr Diab Rep. 2012;12:305–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Gil KE, Pawlak A, Gil RJ, Frontczak-Baniewicz M, Bil J. The role of invasive diagnostics and its impact on the treatment of dilated cardiomyopathy: a systematic review. Adv Med Sci. 2016;61:331–43.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Das AK, Das JP, Chandrasekar S. Specific heart muscle disease in diabetes mellitus–a functional structural correlation. Int J Cardiol. 1987;17:299–302.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Shimizu M, Umeda K, Sugihara N, Yoshio H, Ino H, Takeda R, et al. Collagen remodelling in myocardia of patients with diabetes. J Clin Pathol. 1993;46:32–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Regan TJ, Lyons MM, Ahmed SS, Levinson GE, Oldewurtel HA, Ahmad MR, et al. Evidence for cardiomyopathy in familial diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest. 1977;60:884–99.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Pasyk S, Wojnicz R, Szafranek A, Zielińska T, Krupa H. Cardiomyopathy in diabetes. Ultrastructural examinations. Kardiol Pol. 1993;39:439–445; discussion 446.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Zile MR, Baicu CF, Gaasch WH. Diastolic heart failure–abnormalities in active relaxation and passive stiffness of the left ventricle. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1953–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Aneja A, Tang WHW, Bansilal S, Garcia MJ, Farkouh ME. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: insights into pathogenesis, diagnostic challenges, and therapeutic options. Am J Med. 2008;121:748–57.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang XP, Liu YH, Rhaleb NE, Kurihara N, Kim HE, Carretero OA. Echocardiographic assessment of cardiac function in conscious and anesthetized mice. Am J Physiol. 1999;277:H1967–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Di Bonito P, Moio N, Cavuto L, Covino G, Murena E, Scilla C, et al. Early detection of diabetic cardiomyopathy: usefulness of tissue Doppler imaging. Diabet Med. 2005;22:1720–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Dumesnil JG, Gaudreault G, Honos GN, Kingma JG. Use of Valsalva maneuver to unmask left ventricular diastolic function abnormalities by Doppler echocardiography in patients with coronary artery disease or systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 1991;68:515–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Patil VC, Patil HV, Shah KB, Vasani JD, Shetty P. Diastolic dysfunction in asymptomatic type 2 diabetes mellitus with normal systolic function. J Cardiovasc Dis Res. 2011;2:213–22.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Teupe C, Rosak C. Diabetic cardiomyopathy and diastolic heart failure—difficulties with relaxation. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;97:185–94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Gu H, Liu Y, Mei S, Wang B, Sun G, Wang X, et al. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in nonhuman primate model of dysmetabolism and diabetes. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015;15:141.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Wichi R, Malfitano C, Rosa K, De Souza SB, Salemi V, Mostarda C, et al. Noninvasive and invasive evaluation of cardiac dysfunction in experimental diabetes in rodents. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2007;6:14.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Mori J, Patel VB, Abo Alrob O, Basu R, Altamimi T, Desaulniers J, et al. Angiotensin 1-7 ameliorates diabetic cardiomyopathy and diastolic dysfunction in db/db mice by reducing lipotoxicity and inflammation. Circ Heart Fail. 2014;7:327–39.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Christoffersen C, Bollano E, Lindegaard MLS, Bartels ED, Goetze JP, Andersen CB, et al. Cardiac lipid accumulation associated with diastolic dysfunction in obese mice. Endocrinology. 2003;144:3483–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Yazıcı D, Özben B, Yavuz D, Deyneli O, Aydın H, Tarcin Ö, et al. Epicardial adipose tissue thickness in type 1 diabetic patients. Endocrine. 2011;40:250–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Lima-Martínez MM, Paoli M, Rodney M, Balladares N, Contreras M, D’Marco L, Iacobellis G. Effect of sitagliptin on epicardial fat thickness in subjects with type 2 diabetes and obesity: a pilotstudy. Endocrine. 2016;51(3):448–55, doi:10.1007/s12020-015-0710-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Takenaka K, Sakamoto T, Amano K, Oku J, Fujinami K, Murakami T, et al. Left ventricular filling determined by Doppler echocardiography in diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 1988;61:1140–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Qian C, Gong L, Yang Z, Chen W, Chen Y, Xu Z, et al. Diastolic dysfunction in spontaneous type 2 diabetes rhesus monkeys: a study using echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015;15:59.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Weytjens C, Franken PR, D’hooge J, Droogmans S, Cosyns B, Lahoutte T, et al. Doppler myocardial imaging in the diagnosis of early systolic left ventricular dysfunction in diabetic rats. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008;9:326–33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Hayat SA, Patel B, Khattar RS, Malik RA. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment. Clin Sci Lond Engl. 1979;2004(107):539–57.Google Scholar
  55. Stewart MJ. Contrast echocardiography. Heart Br Card Soc. 2003;89:342–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Malm S, Frigstad S, Sagberg E, Larsson H, Skjaerpe T. Accurate and reproducible measurement of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by contrast echocardiography: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1030–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Cosyns B, Droogmans S, Hernot S, Degaillier C, Garbar C, Weytjens C, et al. Effect of streptozotocin-induced diabetes on myocardial blood flow reserve assessed by myocardial contrast echocardiography in rats. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2008;7:26.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Pérez JE, McGill JB, Santiago JV, Schechtman KB, Waggoner AD, Miller JG, et al. Abnormal myocardial acoustic properties in diabetic patients and their correlation with the severity of disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:1154–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Fang ZY, Yuda S, Anderson V, Short L, Case C, Marwick TH. Echocardiographic detection of early diabetic myocardial disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:611–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Jiang L, Levine RA, Weyman AE. Echocardiographic assessment of right Ventricular volume and function. Echocardiography. 1997;14:189–206.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Vogel M, Gutberlet M, Dittrich S, Hosten N, Lange PE. Comparison of transthoracic three dimensional echocardiography with magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of right ventricular volume and mass. Heart Br Card Soc. 1997;78:127–30.Google Scholar
  62. Tadic M, Celic V, Cuspidi C, Ilic S, Pencic B, Radojkovic J, et al. Right heart mechanics in untreated normotensive patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a two- and three-dimensional echocardiographic study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:317–27.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Badano LP, Boccalini F, Muraru D, Bianco LD, Peluso D, Bellu R, et al. Current clinical applications of transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2012;20:1–22.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang J, Khoury DS, Yue Y, Torre-Amione G, Nagueh SF. Preserved left ventricular twist and circumferential deformation, but depressed longitudinal and radial deformation in patients with diastolic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:1283–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Greenberg NL, Firstenberg MS, Castro PL, Main M, Travaglini A, Odabashian JA, et al. Doppler-derived myocardial systolic strain rate is a strong index of left ventricular contractility. Circulation. 2002;105:99–105.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Enomoto M, Ishizu T, Seo Y, Kameda Y, Suzuki H, Shimano H, et al. Myocardial dysfunction identified by three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in type 2 diabetes patients relates to complications of microangiopathy. J Cardiol. 2016;68:282.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Fang ZY, Schull-Meade R, Leano R, Mottram PM, Prins JB, Marwick TH. Screening for heart disease in diabetic subjects. Am Heart J. 2005;149:349–54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Ernande L, Bergerot C, Girerd N, Thibault H, Davidsen ES, Gautier Pignon-Blanc P, et al. Longitudinal myocardial strain alteration is associated with left ventricular remodeling in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27:479–88.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Holland DJ, Marwick TH, Haluska BA, Leano R, Hordern MD, Hare JL, et al. Subclinical LV dysfunction and 10-year outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Heart Br Card Soc. 2015;101:1061–6.Google Scholar
  70. Liu J-H, Chen Y, Yuen M, Zhen Z, Chan CW-S, Lam KS-L, et al. Incremental prognostic value of global longitudinal strain in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15:22.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Geyer H, Caracciolo G, Abe H, Wilansky S, Carerj S, Gentile F, et al. Assessment of myocardial mechanics using speckle tracking echocardiography: fundamentals and clinical applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:351–369–455.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Jędrzejewska I, Król W, Światowiec A, Wilczewska A, Grzywanowska-Łaniewska I, Dłużniewski M, et al. Left and right ventricular systolic function impairment in type 1 diabetic young adults assessed by 2D speckle tracking echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17:438–46.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Hensel KO, Grimmer F, Roskopf M, Jenke AC, Wirth S, Heusch A. Subclinical alterations of cardiac mechanics present early in the course of pediatric type 1 diabetes mellitus: a prospective blinded speckle tracking stress echocardiography study. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:2583747.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Wu J, Bu L, Gong H, Jiang G, Li L, Ma H, et al. Effects of heart rate and anesthetic timing on high-resolution echocardiographic assessment under isoflurane anesthesia in mice. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29:1771–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Hashimoto I, Li X, Hejmadi Bhat A, Jones M, Zetts AD, Sahn DJ. Myocardial strain rate is a superior method for evaluation of left ventricular subendocardial function compared with tissue Doppler imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1574–83.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Liu X-Y, Liu F-C, Deng C-Y, Zhang M-Z, Yang M, Xiao D-Z, et al. Left ventricular deformation associated with cardiomyocyte Ca(2+) transients delay in early stage of low-dose of STZ and high-fat diet induced type 2 diabetic rats. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016;16:41.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Qiao Y-Y, Zeng M, Li R-J, Leng Z-T, Yang J, Yang Y. Layer-specific myocardial strain analysis: investigation of regional deformation in a rabbit model of diabetes mellitus during different stages. Med Ultrason. 2016;18:339–44.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Shepherd DL, Nichols CE, Croston TL, McLaughlin SL, Petrone AB, Lewis SE, et al. Early detection of cardiac dysfunction in the type 1 diabetic heart using speckle-tracking based strain imaging. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2016;90:74–83.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Widya RL, van der Meer RW, Smit JWA, Rijzewijk LJ, Diamant M, Bax JJ, et al. Right ventricular involvement in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:457–62.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Daneshvar D, Wei J, Tolstrup K, Thomson LEJ, Shufelt C, Merz CNB. Diastolic dysfunction: improved understanding using emerging imaging techniques. Am Heart J. 2010;160:394–404.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Scheuermann-Freestone M, Madsen PL, Manners D, Blamire AM, Buckingham RE, Styles P, et al. Abnormal cardiac and skeletal muscle energy metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes. Circulation. 2003;107:3040–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Diamant M, Lamb HJ, Groeneveld Y, Endert EL, Smit JWA, Bax JJ, et al. Diastolic dysfunction is associated with altered myocardial metabolism in asymptomatic normotensive patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:328–35.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Fischer SE, McKinnon GC, Maier SE, Boesiger P. Improved myocardial tagging contrast. Magn Reson Med. 1993;30:191–200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Chung J, Abraszewski P, Yu X, Liu W, Krainik AJ, Ashford M, et al. Paradoxical increase in ventricular torsion and systolic torsion rate in type I diabetic patients under tight glycemic control. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:384–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Fonseca CG, Dissanayake AM, Doughty RN, Whalley GA, Gamble GD, Cowan BR, et al. Three-dimensional assessment of left ventricular systolic strain in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, diastolic dysfunction, and normal ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:1391–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Al-Shafei AIM, Wise RG, Gresham GA, Bronns G, Carpenter TA, Hall LD, et al. Non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging assessment of myocardial changes and the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in diabetic rats. J Physiol. 2002;538:541–53.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Loganathan R, Bilgen M, Al-Hafez B, Smirnova IV. Characterization of alterations in diabetic myocardial tissue using high resolution MRI. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2006;22:81–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Jellis C, Wright J, Kennedy D, Sacre J, Jenkins C, Haluska B, et al. Association of imaging markers of myocardial fibrosis with metabolic and functional disturbances in early diabetic cardiomyopathy. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2011;4:693–702.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Schroeder J, Peterschroeder A, Vaske B, Butz T, Barth P, Oldenburg O, et al. Cardiac volumetry in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a comparative study correlating multi-slice computed tomography and magnetic resonance tomography. Reasons for intermodal disagreement. Clin Res Cardiol. 2009;98:739–47.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, Lamb HJ, Vliegen HW, Salm LP, et al. Noninvasive angiography and assessment of left ventricular function using multislice computed tomography in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2905–10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Zanzonico P, Rothenberg LN, Strauss HW. Radiation exposure of computed tomography and direct intracoronary angiography: risk has its reward. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1846–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Di Carli MF, Hachamovitch R. Should we screen for occult coronary artery disease among asymptomatic patients with diabetes? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:50–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Cwajg E, Cwajg J, Keng F, He ZX, Nagueh S, Verani MS. Comparison of global and regional left ventricular function assessed by gated-SPECT and 2-D echocardiography. Rev Port Cardiol. 2000;19(Suppl 1):I39–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Sasso FC, Rambaldi PF, Carbonara O, Nasti R, Torella M, Rotondo A, et al. Perspectives of nuclear diagnostic imaging in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2010;20:208–16.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. American Diabetes Association. Consensus development conference on the diagnosis of coronary heart disease in people with diabetes: 10–11 February 1998, Miami, Florida. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1551–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Rijzewijk LJ, van der Meer RW, Lamb HJ, de Jong HWAM, Lubberink M, Romijn JA, et al. Altered myocardial substrate metabolism and decreased diastolic function in nonischemic human diabetic cardiomyopathy: studies with cardiac positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:1524–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. van den Brom CE, Huisman MC, Vlasblom R, Boontje NM, Duijst S, Lubberink M, et al. Altered myocardial substrate metabolism is associated with myocardial dysfunction in early diabetic cardiomyopathy in rats: studies using positron emission tomography. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2009;8:39.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Welch MJ, Lewis JS, Kim J, Sharp TL, Dence CS, Gropler RJ, et al. Assessment of myocardial metabolism in diabetic rats using small-animal PET: a feasibility study. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:689–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Ban CR, Twigg SM. Fibrosis in diabetes complications: pathogenic mechanisms and circulating and urinary markers. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4:575–96.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Dahlström U. Can natriuretic peptides be used for the diagnosis of diastolic heart failure? Eur J Heart Fail. 2004;6:281–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Inoue Y, Kawai M, Minai K, Ogawa K, Nagoshi T, Ogawa T, et al. The impact of an inverse correlation between plasma B-type natriuretic peptide levels and insulin resistance on the diabetic condition in patients with heart failure. Metabolism. 2016;65:38–47.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. D’Alessandro R, Masarone D, Buono A, Gravino R, Rea A, Salerno G, et al. Natriuretic peptides: molecular biology, pathophysiology and clinical implications for the cardiologist. Future Cardiol. 2013;9:519–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. Epshteyn V, Morrison K, Krishnaswamy P, Kazanegra R, Clopton P, Mudaliar S, et al. Utility of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) as a screen for left ventricular dysfunction in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:2081–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Bayerle-Eder M, Zangeneh M, Kreiner G, Raffesberg W, Nowotny P, Vierhapper H, et al. ANP but not BNP reflects early left diastolic dysfunction in type 1 diabetics with myocardial dysinnervation. Horm Metab Res. 2003;35:301–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Dencker M, Stagmo M, Dorkhan M. Relationship between natriuretic peptides and echocardiography parameters in patients with poorly regulated type 2 diabetes. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010;6:373–82.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. Valle R, Bagolin E, Canali C, Giovinazzo P, Barro S, Aspromonte N, et al. The BNP assay does not identify mild left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in asymptomatic diabetic patients. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2006;7:40–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Kiencke S, Handschin R, von Dahlen R, Muser J, Brunner-Larocca HP, Schumann J, et al. Pre-clinical diabetic cardiomyopathy: prevalence, screening, and outcome. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12:951–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Howarth FC, Al-Shamsi N, Al-Qaydi M, Al-Mazrouei M, Qureshi A, Chandranath SI, et al. Effects of brain natriuretic peptide on contraction and intracellular Ca2+ in ventricular myocytes from the streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2006;1084:155–65.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Howarth FC, Adem A, Adeghate EA, Al Ali NA, Al Bastaki AM, Sorour FR, et al. Distribution of atrial natriuretic peptide and its effects on contraction and intracellular calcium in ventricular myocytes from streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat. Peptides. 2005;26:691–700.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Nunes S, Soares E, Fernandes J, Viana S, Carvalho E, Pereira FC, et al. Early cardiac changes in a rat model of prediabetes: brain natriuretic peptide overexpression seems to be the best marker. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013;12:44.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  111. Korkmaz-Icöz S, Lehner A, Li S, Vater A, Radovits T, Brune M, et al. Left ventricular pressure-volume measurements and myocardial gene expression profile in type 2 diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2016;311:H958–71.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. Ruiz-Hurtado G, Gómez-Hurtado N, Fernández-Velasco M, Calderón E, Smani T, Ordoñez A, et al. Cardiotrophin-1 induces sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) leak and arrhythmogenesis in adult rat ventricular myocytes. Cardiovasc Res. 2012;96:81–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. Jougasaki M. Cardiotrophin-1 in cardiovascular regulation. Adv Clin Chem. 2010;52:41–76.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. García-Cenador MB, Lopez-Novoa JM, Díez J, García-Criado FJ. Effects and mechanism of organ protection by cardiotrophin-1. Curr Med Chem. 2013;20:246–56.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  115. Pennica D, King KL, Shaw KJ, Luis E, Rullamas J, Luoh SM, et al. Expression cloning of cardiotrophin 1, a cytokine that induces cardiac myocyte hypertrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:1142–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. Moreno-Aliaga MJ, Romero-Lozano MA, Castaño D, Prieto J, Bustos M. Role of cardiotrophin-1 in obesity and insulin resistance. Adipocyte. 2012;1:112–5.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  117. Gamella-Pozuelo L, Fuentes-Calvo I, Gómez-Marcos MA, Recio-Rodriguez JI, Agudo-Conde C, Fernández-Martín JL, et al. Plasma cardiotrophin-1 as a marker of hypertension and diabetes-induced target organ damage and cardiovascular risk. Medicine. 2015;94:e1218.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. Hung H-C, Lu F-H, Ou H-Y, Wu H-T, Wu J-S, Yang Y-C, et al. Increased cardiotrophin-1 in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance and newly diagnosed diabetes. Int J Cardiol. 2013;169:e33–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. Gomes AV, Potter JD, Szczesna-Cordary D. The role of troponins in muscle contraction. IUBMB Life. 2002;54:323–33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  120. Russell NE, Higgins MF, Amaruso M, Foley M, McAuliffe FM. Troponin T and pro-B-type natriuretic Peptide in fetuses of type 1 diabetic mothers. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:2050–5.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  121. Jweied EE, McKinney RD, Walker LA, Brodsky I, Geha AS, Massad MG, et al. Depressed cardiac myofilament function in human diabetes mellitus. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005;289:H2478–83.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  122. Korraa A, Ezzat MH, Bastawy M, Aly H, El-Mazary A-A, Abd El-Aziz L. Cardiac troponin I levels and its relation to echocardiographic findings in infants of diabetic mothers. Ital J Pediatr. 2012;38:39.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  123. Greulich S, de Wiza DH, Preilowski S, Ding Z, Mueller H, Langin D, et al. Secretory products of guinea pig epicardial fat induce insulin resistance and impair primary adult rat cardiomyocyte function. J Cell Mol Med. 2011;15:2399–410.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  124. Ouwens DM, Diamant M. Myocardial insulin action and the contribution of insulin resistance to the pathogenesis of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Arch Physiol Biochem. 2007;113:76–86.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  125. Blumensatt M, Greulich S, Herzfeld de Wiza D, Mueller H, Maxhera B, Rabelink MJ, et al. Activin A impairs insulin action in cardiomyocytes via up-regulation of miR-143. Cardiovasc Res. 2013;100:201–10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  126. Chen WJY, Greulich S, van der Meer RW, Rijzewijk LJ, Lamb HJ, de Roos A, et al. Activin A is associated with impaired myocardial glucose metabolism and left ventricular remodeling in patients with uncomplicated type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013;12:150.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  127. Carley AN, Severson DL. Fatty acid metabolism is enhanced in type 2 diabetic hearts. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1734:112–26.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  128. Nyman K, Granér M, Pentikäinen MO, Lundbom J, Hakkarainen A, Sirén R, et al. Cardiac steatosis and left ventricular function in men with metabolic syndrome. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15:103.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  129. Hoffmann U, Espeter F, Weiß C, Ahmad-Nejad P, Lang S, Brueckmann M, et al. Ischemic biomarker heart-type fatty acid binding protein (hFABP) in acute heart failure—diagnostic and prognostic insights compared to NT-proBNP and troponin I. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015;15:50.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  130. Fosshaug LE, Dahl CP, Risnes I, Bohov P, Berge RK, Nymo S, et al. Altered levels of fatty acids and inflammatory and metabolic mediators in epicardial adipose tissue in patients with systolic heart failure. J Card Fail. 2015;21:916–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  131. García-Rúa V, Otero MF, Lear PV, Rodríguez-Penas D, Feijóo-Bandín S, Noguera-Moreno T, et al. Increased expression of fatty-acid and calcium metabolism genes in failing human heart. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e37505.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  132. Akbal E, Özbek M, Güneş F, Akyürek Ö, Üreten K, Delibaşı T. Serum heart type fatty acid binding protein levels in metabolic syndrome. Endocrine. 2009;36:433–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  133. Shearer J, Fueger PT, Wang Z, Bracy DP, Wasserman DH, Rottman JN. Metabolic implications of reduced heart-type fatty acid binding protein in insulin resistant cardiac muscle. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1782:586–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  134. Asbun J, Villarreal FJ. The pathogenesis of myocardial fibrosis in the setting of diabetic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:693–700.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  135. Tan SM, Zhang Y, Wang B, Tan CYR, Zammit SC, Williams SJ, et al. FT23, an orally active antifibrotic compound, attenuates structural and functional abnormalities in an experimental model of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2012;39:650–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  136. Biernacka A, Cavalera M, Wang J, Russo I, Shinde A, Kong P, et al. Smad3 signaling promotes fibrosis while preserving cardiac and aortic geometry in obese diabetic mice. Circ Heart Fail. 2015;8:788–98.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  137. Shaver A, Nichols A, Thompson E, Mallick A, Payne K, Jones C, et al. Role of serum biomarkers in early detection of diabetic cardiomyopathy in the West Virginian population. Int J Med Sci. 2016;13:161–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  138. Hutchinson KR, Lord CK, West TA, Stewart JA. Cardiac fibroblast-dependent extracellular matrix accumulation is associated with diastolic stiffness in type 2 diabetes. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e72080.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  139. Russo I, Frangogiannis NG. Diabetes-associated cardiac fibrosis: cellular effectors, molecular mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2016;90:84–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  140. Dollery CM, McEwan JR, Henney AM. Matrix metalloproteinases and cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 1995;77:863–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  141. Ban CR, Twigg SM, Franjic B, Brooks BA, Celermajer D, Yue DK, et al. Serum MMP-7 is increased in diabetic renal disease and diabetic diastolic dysfunction. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;87:335–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  142. Ihm S-H, Youn H-J, Shin D-I, Jang S-W, Park C-S, Kim PJ, et al. Serum carboxy-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PIP) is a marker of diastolic dysfunction in patients with early type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Cardiol. 2007;122:e36–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  143. Thompson EW. Structural manifestations of diabetic cardiomyopathy in the rat and its reversal by insulin treatment. Am. J. Anat. 1988;182:270–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  144. Van Linthout S, Seeland U, Riad A, Eckhardt O, Hohl M, Dhayat N, et al. Reduced MMP-2 activity contributes to cardiac fibrosis in experimental diabetic cardiomyopathy. Basic Res Cardiol. 2008;103:319–27.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  145. Ruan W, Lai M. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein: a possible marker for the metabolic syndrome? Acta Diabetol. 2010;47:5–14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  146. Gandhi PU, Gaggin HK, Sheftel AD, Belcher AM, Weiner RB, Baggish AL, et al. Prognostic usefulness of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a novel biomarker of myocardial diastolic function? Am J Cardiol. 2014;114:1543–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  147. Betti I, Castelli G, Barchielli A, Beligni C, Boscherini V, De Luca L, et al. The role of N-terminal PRO-brain natriuretic peptide and echocardiography for screening asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction in a population at high risk for heart failure. The PROBE-HF study. J Card Fail. 2009;15:377–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  148. Hamdani N, Hervent A-S, Vandekerckhove L, Matheeussen V, Demolder M, Baerts L, et al. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and myocardial stiffness in diabetic mice is attenuated by inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase 4. Cardiovasc Res. 2014;104:423–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  149. León LE, Rani S, Fernandez M, Larico M, Calligaris SD. Subclinical detection of diabetic cardiomyopathy with microRNAs: challenges and perspectives. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:6143129.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  150. Orenes-Piñero E, Montoro-García S, Patel JV, Valdés M, Marín F, Lip GYH. Role of microRNAs in cardiac remodelling: new insights and future perspectives. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167:1651–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  151. Horie T, Ono K, Nishi H, Iwanaga Y, Nagao K, Kinoshita M, et al. MicroRNA-133 regulates the expression of GLUT4 by targeting KLF15 and is involved in metabolic control in cardiac myocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;389:315–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  152. Duisters RF, Tijsen AJ, Schroen B, Leenders JJ, Lentink V, van der Made I, et al. miR-133 and miR-30 regulate connective tissue growth factor: implications for a role of microRNAs in myocardial matrix remodeling. Circ Res. 2009;104:170–178, 6p following 178.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  153. de Gonzalo-Calvo D, Kenneweg F, Bang C, Toro R, van der Meer RW, Rijzewijk LJ, et al. Circulating long-non coding RNAs as biomarkers of left ventricular diastolic function and remodelling in patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37354.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017