Open Access

The receptor for advanced glycation end products and risk of peripheral arterial disease, amputation or death in type 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study

  • Jonas Malmstedt1, 3Email author,
  • Lars Kärvestedt1,
  • Jesper Swedenborg1 and
  • Kerstin Brismar1, 2
Cardiovascular Diabetology201514:93

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-015-0257-5

Received: 16 April 2015

Accepted: 16 July 2015

Published: 28 July 2015

Abstract

Background

Patients with type 2 diabetes have a high risk for early and extensive development of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and this excess risk is not explained by increased burden of traditional atherosclerotic risk factors. Activation of the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) could be one additional mechanism for accelerated PAD and increased risk for amputation and death. We investigated the association between RAGE plasma components and the risk for PAD, amputation and death in patients with type 2 diabetes. We also estimated the rate of amputation-free survival and survival without PAD.

Methods

We investigated if plasma levels of carboxymethyl-lysine, S100A12 and endosecretory RAGE (esRAGE) were associated with two endpoints: survival without development of PAD and survival without amputation in a 12 years prospective population-based cohort of 146 patients with type 2 diabetes, free from PAD at inclusion. Influence of baseline plasma levels of RAGE ligands (individually and combined by a RAGE-score) were evaluated for both endpoints in the Cox-regression analysis.

Results

106 patients survived without amputation and 93 survived without signs of PAD during follow up. Higher levels of S100A12 and RAGE-score were associated with increased risk for amputation or death, hazard ratios (HR) 1.29; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.04, 1.59] and 1.79; 95% CI [1.07, 2.99] and with increased risk for PAD or death, HR 1.22; 95% CI [1.00, 1.49] and 1.56; [1.00, 2.44] after adjustment for age and sex. The effect was decreased after adjustment for Framingham cardiovascular disease score: risk for amputation or death, HR 1.17; 95% CI [0.94, 1.46] and 1.54; [0.95, 2.49], and risk for PAD or death, HR 1.12; 95% CI [0.91, 1.38] and 1.38; [0.91, 2.11] for S100A12 and RAGE-score respectively. The incidence for amputation or death was 2.8 per 100 person-years; 95% CI [2.0, 3.7] and the incidence rate for PAD or death was 3.6 per 100 person-years; 95% CI [2.7, 4.8].

Conclusion

Higher plasma levels of S100A12 and the combined effect (RAGE-score) of esRAGE, carboxymethyl-lysine and S100A12 seem to be associated with shorter PAD- and amputation-free survival in patients with type 2 diabetes. This may indicate a role for S100A12 in PAD by activation of the RAGE system.

Keywords

Peripheral arterial diseaseDiabetes mellitusArteriosclerosisPopulation studies

Background

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a common macrovascular complication in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients with PAD and diabetic complications, such as neuropathy, compromised infectious defence and microcirculatory changes, have a substantially increased risk for disability, amputation and death [1]. Furthermore, patients with diabetes are twice as likely to develop PAD, as compared to patients without, and progression from prediabetes to diabetes doubles the incidence of PAD [2].

Hyperglycaemia, the hallmark of diabetes, is independently associated with an increased risk for development of PAD [36]. Indeed, each 1% increase in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was associated with a 28% excess risk for incident PAD at the end of 18 years follow up in the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) [5]. Despite the strong association with hyperglycaemia, several intervention trials looking at intensive glucose control failed to show reduction of macrovascular disease in patients with diabetes [7]. Furthermore, the increased occurrence of the traditional risk factors for atherosclerosis (smoking, dyslipidaemia and hypertension) cannot explain why patients with diabetes develop PAD early in life [8]. Hence, the increased predisposition to develop PAD in diabetes is multifactorial and new modifiable risk factors are sought for. Inflammation is one key process promoting atherosclerosis [9] and driving diabetic cardiovascular disease [10].

The receptor for advanced glycation end products is involved in chronic inflammation, diabetes and vascular disease. This receptor is expressed in endothelial and smooth muscle cells [11, 12]. The major exogenous ligands to RAGE are advanced glycation end products (AGE), a heterogeneous group of stable compounds involved in most diabetic complications [13]. AGEs are formed non-enzymatically during hyperglycaemia [14] and can also be derived by intestinal uptake from AGE-rich food [15]. Nε-(carboxymethyl)lysine (CML) is the predominant AGE found in tissue proteins [14] and an important ligand to the RAGE receptor [16].

S100-proteins, a family of proinflammatory proteins, are other endogenous ligands to RAGE [17]. A member of this family (S100A12 or calgranulin) shows elevated serum-levels in diabetes and is associated with overall mortality [18, 19]. Activation of RAGE has multiple effects in vascular tissue: it augments inflammation by causing release of cytokines, it stimulates vascular smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation and causes endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress [12, 2022]. There is ample animal evidence that stimulation of the RAGE signalling pathway amplifies atherosclerosis progression and inhibition of RAGE signalling prevents this process [23].

Endosecretory RAGE (esRAGE) is thought to act as a decoy receptor for advanced glycation end products and is consequently a beneficial form of RAGE [24]. esRAGE lacks the transmembrane domain of RAGE, and is produced by alternative splicing of RAGE mRNA [25]. Accordingly diabetic patients with various vascular complications exhibit low levels of esRAGE [18, 2628], but the role in PAD is less clear [29].

Observational studies provide evidence for an association of the AGE-RAGE system plasma levels with mortality, coronary heart disease [19, 30, 31], and hyperglycaemia [28]. These studies are most often cross-sectional in design and mainly focused on type 1 diabetes or patients with end stage renal disease. Moreover, few studies included PAD patients and outcomes related to PAD, and those two who did were focused on patients with end stage renal disease [32, 33].

Objective

Our objective was to investigate the role of AGE-RAGE in the development of macrovascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. The primary aim was to investigate if baseline plasma components of the AGE-RAGE system are associated with the risk of PAD or death and the risk for amputation or death. The second aim was to estimate the incidence of PAD-free survival and amputation-free survival in patients with type 2 diabetes in Sweden.

Hypothesis

We hypothesized that patients with high levels of CML or S100A12 are more prone to develop peripheral vascular complications, compared to those with low levels. We also tested the hypothesis that high plasma levels of esRAGE are protective against the effects of activation of the AGE-RAGE system.

Methods

Study design and patients baseline data

We recruited 156 patients with type 2 diabetes from three primary healthcare centres with defined catchment areas, between July 1998 and May 2001. The study was approved by the regional ethics committee and written informed consent was obtained. Details of recruitment and study design are described elsewhere [34, 35].

We excluded patients with type 1 diabetes or late autoimmune diabetes of the adult (LADA). Diagnosis of LADA required positive glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies and type 1 diabetes was defined as continuous need for insulin therapy before the age of 36. Patients with signs of PAD (loss of foot pulses or previous major amputation or revascularisation) at inclusion were excluded from analysis (n = 6), as detailed in Additional file 1: Table S1.

A single reviewer (LK) recorded baseline characteristics by questionnaire and review of medical records. Baseline examination included physical examination, recording of weight, length, hip- and waist circumference, blood pressure measurements and blood sampling. Patients were then followed for at least 10 years for mortality, major amputations and development of PAD.

Sample collection

We collected venous blood in ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) Vacutainer®tubes, (BD Diagnostics, Franklin Lakes, USA), and then immediately centrifuged them at 1,750g for 15 min to obtain platelet poor plasma which was stored at −70°C until analysis.

Human circulating esRAGE in plasma was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique using B-Bridge™ esRAGE ELISA Kit (Daiichi Fine Chemicals, Takaoka, Japan). Details are presented by Koyama et al. [27].

The endogenous ligand for RAGE, S100A12 was measured in plasma with CircuLex™ S100A12/EN-RAGE ELISA kit (MBL International Corporation, Woburn, USA, #CY-8058). The specific AGE-derivate CML was measured in plasma with CircuLex™ CML/Nε-(carboxymethyl)-lysine ELISA Kit (MBL International Corporation, Woburn, USA, #CY-8066). We followed the manufacturer’s instructions in all analyses.

Follow up and endpoints

The primary endpoint was time from inclusion in study to major amputation (proximal to the fore-foot) or death, i.e. amputation-free survival. Secondary endpoint was death or development of PAD defined as any of: loss of foot pulse, development of ankle-brachial index <0.9, lower limb revascularization or major amputation during follow up. Four patients were lost to follow up due to migration, yielding 146 patients at baseline.

Statistics

Continuous variables are presented as mean and 95% confidence interval (CI). We calculated confidence limits for event rates and proportions according to Bryar’s [36] and Wilson’s methods [37], using a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet file [38]. Cumulative event rates and survival curves were derived by the Kaplan–Meier method, using inclusion date as time zero. We evaluated the influence of individual AGE-RAGE plasma components on primary and secondary outcome by calculating the crude hazard ratio using a Cox proportional hazards model and subsequently adjusted the hazard ratio for age, sex and Framingham 10-year cardiovascular (CV) disease risk score [39]. This score has been validated in patients with type 2 diabetes and gives the individual 10-year sex-specific risk estimate for a CV event dependent on age, smoking, hypertension, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, LDL-cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol. We calculated the Framingham score for each patient at baseline using the Cox survival equation from the original publication [39]. We were thus able to control for all the traditional risk factors by including the CV risk score in our models. The compound effect of the AGE-RAGE-system on primary and secondary outcomes was evaluated by including a RAGE-score in the Cox models. We constructed the RAGE-score by averaging Ζ-standardized values [40] of plasma CML, S100A12 and esRAGE; (RAGEscore = [Ζ-CML+Ζ-S100A12 − Ζ-esRAGE]/3). We used the RAGE-score to avoid fitting models with too many variables in relation to sample size and because a possible interaction between these plasma proteins is not yet defined. A similar score has been used by others [33]. Patient age, plasma measurements, Framingham and RAGE scores were entered as continuous variables and all other variables were entered as categorical variables in the Cox models. Patients who survived without reaching an endpoint event before the end of follow up were considered censored. Forest plots with logarithmic scale for presentation of hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CIs from the Cox models were constructed using Meta Data Viewer software [41].

The proportional hazard assumption was tested by including a time-dependent interaction term in the model (likelihood ratio test) for continuous variables and by inspection of log-minus-log plots for categorical covariates.

All hazard ratios were reported with 95% CI and all tests were two-tailed.

Results

Baseline characteristics

The baseline characteristics of all patients are shown in Table 1. The median follow up time was 12.5 years; 95% CI [11.9, 13.1], equalling 1,540 person-years. The mean duration of diabetes at baseline was 6.9 years; 95% CI [6.2, 8.0] and 27%; [21, 35%] had insulin treatment. The majority was well controlled with respect to HbA1c 56; 95% CI [54, 58] mmol/mol (IFCC). Two thirds (66%) had peripheral neuropathy, 36% had retinopathy and 8.5% nephropathy at baseline. Hypertension and body mass index above normal were common. Thirteen patients had undergone coronary artery bypass surgery and four had had a stroke prior to inclusion.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients initially without PAD and of those who did and did not survive without PAD during 12 years follow up

 

All without PAD at baseline

PAD, amputation or death during 12 years follow up

Alive without PAD or amputation during follow up

N or mean

Proportion in %; [95% CI for proportion] or [95% CI for mean]

N or mean

Proportion in %; [95% CI for proportion] or [95% CI for mean]

N or mean

Proportion in %; [95% CI for proportion] or [95% CI for mean]

n

146

100%

53

36.3%

93

63.7%

Age (years)

61.6

[60.5–62.8]

64.2

[62.4–66.0]

61.2

[59.6–61.7]

Sex (male)

90

62%; [54–69%]

36

68%; [55–79%]

54

58%; [48–68%]

Diabetes duration (years)

7.1

[6.2–8.0]

7.9

[6.1–9.6]

6.7

[5.6–7.7]

Body mass index

29.3

[28.5–30.1]

28.8

[27.3–30.3]

29.7

[28.7–30.6]

Hypertensiona

95

65%; [57–72%]

33

62%; [49–74%]

62

67%; [57–75%]

Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

148

[145–152]

150

[144–157]

147

[142–151]

Present smoker

43

30%; [23–38%]

22

42%; [30–56%]b

21

23%; [15–32%]

Framingham 10-year CV risk score

37%

[33–40%]

46%

[40–52%]

32%

[29–35%]c

Retinopathy

36

30%; [22–38%]

16

36%; [23–50%]

20

26%; [17–37%]

Nephropathyd

12

8%; [5–14%]

5

9%; [4–20%]

7

8%; [4–15%]

Peripheral neuropathy

92

63%; [55–70%]

35

66%; [53–77%]

57

61%; [51–71%]

HbA1c mmol/mol (IFCC)

56

[54–58]

58

[54–63]

55

[52–57]

Cholesterol (mmol/L)

4.96

[4.79–5.13]

4.84

[4.52–5.16]

4.99

[4.79–5.20]

LDL-cholesterol (mmol/L)

3.08

[2.95–3.23]

3.02

[2.76–3.28]

3.09

[2.92–3.26]

HDL-cholesterol (mmol/L)

1.22

[1.16–1.28]

1.13

[1.02–1.23]

1.27

[1.19–1.34]

Triglycerides (mmol/L)

1.72

[1.52–1.92]

1.85

[1.40–2.29]

1.67

[1.47–1.87]

Creatinine (µmol/mL)

78

[75–82]

81

[73–89]

76

[73–80]

esRAGE (ng/mL)

0.32

[0.28–0.36]

0.30

[0.27–0.33]

0.32

[0.27–0.38]

S100A12 (ng/mL)

56

[41–72]

78

[37–119]

44

[33–55]

CML (µg/mL)

2.05

[1.67–2.42]

2.05

[1.25–2.86]

2.03

[1.63–2.43]

Data are N, proportion in%; [95% CI for proportion] or mean; [95% CI for mean].

IFCC International Federation of Clinical Chemistry.

aBlood pressure >130/80 or medication for hypertension.

bP = 0.014 (Pearson χ-square, 6.02).

cP < 0.0001 (T-test).

dAlbuminuria >300 mg/L or S-creatinine above 100 mmol/L in women and 110 mm/L in men.

The mean Framingham 10-year risk for CV disease was 37%; 95% CI [33, 40%].

Events during follow up

At end of follow up, 104 (71%) patients were alive without amputation, 2 (1.4%) alive with amputation, 39 (27%) dead without amputation, and 1 (0.7%) dead after amputation. The corresponding incidence rate for amputation or death was 2.8 per 100 person-years; 95% CI [2.0, 3.7].

Ninety-three (64%) patients were alive without PAD, 13 (9%) alive with PAD, 10 (7%) dead with PAD, and 30 (21%) dead without PAD. The incidence rate for PAD or death was 3.6 per 100 person-years; 95% CI [2.7, 4.8]. The incidence for PAD (censoring for death) was 16 per 1,000 person-years; 95% CI [10, 24].

Patients who survived without PAD or amputation had shorter diabetes duration and were slightly younger, less smokers, had lower Framingham 10 year CV risk score, less microangiopathy, tendency to better metabolic control, lower triglycerides and higher HDL (Table 1).

Risk for amputation or death in relation to the AGE-RAGE system

Forty-two of 146 patients died or lost their leg during follow up. The risk for amputation or death in relation to RAGE components is illustrated in Fig. 1. S100A12 was the AGE-RAGE component with strongest association with amputation or death, HR 1.30; 95% CI [1.06, 1.60] per 100 ng/mL increase in S100A12. The increased risk for amputation or death was essentially unchanged after adjustment for age and sex. Further adjustment for Framingham CV risk score diminished the effect of S100A12, HR 1.17; 95% CI [0.94, 1.46]. The model with RAGE-score showed an increased risk, HR 1.82; 95% CI [1.03, 3.20] (unadjusted) and nearly similar risk when adjusted for age and sex, HR 1.79; 95% CI [1.07, 2.99]. Further adjustment for Framingham CV risk score diminished the effect of the RAGE-score, HR 1.54; 95% CI [0.95, 2.49]. The model with CML showed similar associations although weaker and with smaller effects, HR 1.07; 95% CI [0.93, 1.22] while esRAGE was not associated with amputation or death, HR 0.77; 95% CI [0.22, 2.77].
Fig. 1

Estimated hazard ratios (Cox-regression) for major amputation or death in relation to RAGE system components. Hazard ratio (HR) >1.0 indicate increased risk for amputation or death (i.e. reduced amputation-free survival). HR for S100A12 is per 100 ng/mL increase and for RAGE-score per 1 unit (standard deviation). Framingham Framingham 10-years CV risk score, TG p-triglycerides.

Death and development of PAD in relation to the AGE-RAGE system

Fifty-three of 146 patients developed PAD or died during follow up. The risk for development of PAD or death in relation to RAGE components is illustrated in Fig. 2. Similar associations as were seen in amputation-free survival were seen in relation to PAD-free survival (Fig. 2). Higher plasma levels of S100A12 were associated with higher risk for development of PAD or death in both crude and age-sex adjusted models, HR 1.23; 95% CI [1.01, 1.49] and HR 1.22; 95% CI [1.00, 1.49] per 100 ng/mL increase in S100A12. Adjustment for Framingham CV risk score diminished the effect of S100A12, HR 1.12; 95% CI [0.91, 1.38]. The model with CML did not show any association with the outcome, HR 1.04; 95% CI [0.91, 1.18]. The model with RAGE-score showed an increased risk, HR 1.54; 95% CI [0.98, 2.42] (unadjusted), and nearly no change when adjusted for age and sex, HR 1.56; 95% CI [1.00, 2.44]. Further adjustment for Framingham CV risk score diminished the effect of the RAGE-score, HR 1.38; 95% CI [0.91, 2.11] (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Estimated hazard ratios (Cox-regression) for development of PAD or death in relation to RAGE system components. Hazard ratio (HR) >1.0 indicate increased risk for developing PAD or death (i.e. reduced PAD-free survival). HR for S100A12 is per 100 ng/mL increase and for RAGE-score per 1 unit (standard deviation). Framingham Framingham 10-years CV risk score, TG p-triglycerides.

esRAGE was not associated with PAD-free survival neither in crude, HR 0.74; 95% CI [0.24, 2.25], or in age and sex adjusted models, HR 0.63; 95% CI [0.22, 1.77].

Discussion

Main findings: S100A12 and RAGE-score associated with outcome

We found plasma levels of S100A12 and RAGE-score being associated with amputation-free survival and development of PAD during a mean of 12-year follow up period in patients with type 2 diabetes. Higher levels of S100A12 and RAGE-score were associated with increased risk for amputation or death and higher S100A12 with development of PAD. These findings were not influenced by age or sex. Including Framingham 10-year CV risk score did attenuate the association. Our study is the first to investigate RAGE-score and S100A12 in relation to outcome in a population-based sample of patients with type 2 diabetes.

We used the RAGE-score to evaluate the combined effect of the RAGE-AGE system as the regulation and interactions between the individual components are not established. One previous study has shown S100A12 associated with mortality in patients receiving haemodialysis [42]. Our results are in line with previous evidence of elevated expression of S100A12 in coronary arteries from diabetic patients (compared to non-diabetic) [31], and that elevated plasma S100A12 has been associated with prevalence of cardiovascular disease [43] and PAD [32] in cross-sectional studies. Comparing plasma CML, S100A12 and esRAGE levels between different studies is almost impossible due to methodological problems such as whether levels of CML, esRAGE and S100A12 are measured in plasma or serum, methods used in analysis, and the lack of established reference levels. We consequently used platelet poor plasma, as this probably is the best estimate of physiological conditions, avoiding alterations caused by activated coagulation and platelet aggregation seen in serum samples.

No influence of lipid levels

High triglycerides [44] have been shown to be a risk factor for CV disease especially in diabetes, but there is still some debate about to which extent and if there is a causative relationship or if triglycerides merely serve as a risk marker [45]. Including triglycerides in our regression models did not change the estimated effect of S100A12 and RAGE-score (data not shown).

HDL- and LDL-cholesterol are included in the Framingham risk score. Including Framingham score in our multivariate model may be erroneous as the AGE-RAGE system can be regarded as a very early event in the causal pathway to atherosclerosis [46], preceding some of the elements in the score such as elevated lipids and hypertension.

CML and esRAGE showed no association with outcome

Plasma level of esRAGE is down-regulated in chronic hyperglycaemia; among RAGE ligands, the S100A12 protein, but not CML, appears to be associated with this effect [28].

We could not demonstrate any effect of esRAGE on outcome, probably due to low variation in esRAGE levels among our patients.

Higher levels of CML have been associated with incident fatal and nonfatal CV disease (including limb ischemia and amputations) as well as all-cause mortality in individuals with type 1 diabetes during long-term follow up [33]. The reason why we were unable to confirm this in our cohort with type 2 diabetes may be that our patients were younger with relatively short diabetes duration and a longer follow up may be needed. This is supported by the relatively low incidence of major amputations in our cohort.

Mechanistic aspects

Thrombogenic abnormalities are involved in diabetic vascular complications including graft thrombosis [47].Citrated plasma could induce oxidative and inflammatory reactions in endothelial cells (EC) via the activation of thrombin-PAR-1 system and AGEs could potentiate the plasma-evoked EC damages via up-regulation of PAR-1 [48]. Blockage of the crosstalk between the thrombin-PAR-1 system and the AGE-RAGE axis by rivaroxaban may be a new therapeutic option to reduce thromboembolic events such as infrainguinal graft occlusion in patients with diabetes [48].

Moreover, AGE-RAGE-induced reactive oxygen species generation stimulates soluble dipeptidyl peptidase-4 release from EC, acting via the interaction with mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor II receptor, and thus further potentiating the deleterious effects of AGEs in the vessel wall [49]. There is ample evidence from large studies on human atherosclerosis for a relationship between AGE levels and progression of coronary plaque burden, further emphasising an important role for AGE-RAGE axis in atherosclerosis [50].

Finally, genetic variants may be involved in regulation of the levels of esRAGE as genetic polymorphisms of fructosamine 3-kinase like rs1056534 and rs3848403 significantly correlate with sRAGE concentration in diabetic patients [51].

Population-based incidence of PAD

There are scarce contemporary population-based data on the incidence rate for PAD in diabetic patients as most data come from cohorts derived from hospitals. Furthermore, criteria for PAD diagnosis, length of follow up and diabetes duration influence the estimates. Our estimate for incident PAD (16 per 1,000 person-years) is close to a similar study from Finland reporting new PAD in 21 of 107 patients followed for 11 years (i.e. ≈18 per 1,000 person-years) and the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study with 14 per 1,000 person-years [52, 53]. The UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) estimate for incident PAD during the first 6 years after diabetes diagnosis is 5 per 1,000 person-years. This lower incidence can be explained by younger age and shorter diabetes duration [5].

Limitations

The limitation of this study is the low incidence of events and wide confidence intervals in the measured plasma components, making findings liable to be biased by confounding factors and measurement errors. We used pre-specified adjustment for possible confounders based on subject matter knowledge regarding causal factors for PAD instead of statistical driven covariate selection (i.e. “univariate screen”) [54]. Adjusting for Framingham score, which covers the traditional risk factors for CV disease, diminished the effect of the RAGE system as expected. One can argue that PAD can be defined in a more strict way, but neither ankle or toe pressures provide unequivocal diagnosis of PAD in type 2 diabetes.

Strengths

One of the strengths of this study is a relatively unbiased patient population-based sample of people with diabetes instead of selected groups of patients (e.g. patients with end stage renal disease). Another strength is restriction to patients with type 2 diabetes and not Latent Autoimmune Diabetes of Adulthood (LADA) or type 1 diabetes. We believe that our results are largely valid and conclusions may be justified regarding the associations of S100A12 and RAGE components with amputation- and PAD-free survival, even if adjusted HR fall outside the commonly (miss)used significance limits (i.e. P < 0.05) [5557]. We report point estimates with confidence intervals in order to give a more precise interpretation of the study results regarding both effect size and precision.

Conclusion

The main importance of our results combined with aforementioned mechanistic and clinical studies is that the RAGE-AGE-system could play a role in development of PAD and for survival, but the associations seen may not represent causality.

Our findings suggest that the AGE-RAGE system plays a role in development of PAD in patients with type 2 diabetes. Higher S100A12 protein levels seems to be associated with decreased amputation-free survival but this finding needs to be explored in larger studies.

Abbreviations

RAGE: 

receptor for advanced glycation end products

CML: 

Nε-(carboxymethyl)lysine

esRAGE: 

endosecretory RAGE

CI: 

confidence interval

HR: 

hazard ratio

SD: 

standard deviation

PAD: 

peripheral arterial disease

CV: 

cardiovascular

IFCC: 

International Federation of Clinical Chemistry

EDTA: 

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

ELISA: 

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

HbA1c: 

glycated haemoglobin

HDL: 

high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

LDL: 

low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

UKPDS: 

the UK Prospective Diabetes Study

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

Design of the study: JM, KB, JS, LK. Analysis and interpretation: JM, JS, KB. Data collection: JM, LK. Drafted the manuscript: JM. Critical revision of the article: JM, JS, LK, KB. Statistical analysis: JM. Obtained funding: KB, JS. Overall responsibility: KB. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank S Frebelius, E Sandberg and IL Wivall for expert technical assistance.

Sources of funding

The study was supported by the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, The Swedish Medical Research Council, and family Erling-Persson Foundation and through the regional agreement on medical training and clinical research (ALF) between Stockholm County Council and the Karolinska Institutet. The funding bodies had no influence on any part of the research.

Significance

Our study is the first to investigate S100A12 and the compound effect of the RAGE-AGE system in relation to development of peripheral arterial disease and mortality in a population-based sample of type 2 diabetes patients. Our findings suggest that the AGE-RAGE system plays a role in development of PAD in diabetic patients. The S100A12 protein seems to be associated with decreased amputation-free survival.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet
(2)
Karolinska University Hospital
(3)
Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, South Hospital

References

  1. Leibson CL, Ransom JE, Olson W, Zimmerman BR, O’Fallon WM, Palumbo PJ (2004) Peripheral arterial disease, diabetes, and mortality. Diabetes Care 27(12):2843–2849PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Tapp RJ, Balkau B, Shaw JE, Valensi P, Cailleau M, Eschwege E et al (2007) Association of glucose metabolism, smoking and cardiovascular risk factors with incident peripheral arterial disease: the DESIR study. Atherosclerosis 190(1):84–89PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Selvin E, Wattanakit K, Steffes MW, Coresh J, Sharrett AR (2006) HbA1c and peripheral arterial disease in diabetes: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Diabetes Care 29(4):877–882PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ogren M, Hedblad B, Engstrom G, Janzon L (2005) Prevalence and prognostic significance of asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease in 68-year-old men with diabetes. Results from the population study ‘Men born in 1914’ from Malmo, Sweden. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 29(2):182–189PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Adler AI, Stevens RJ, Neil A, Stratton IM, Boulton AJ, Holman RR (2002) UKPDS 59: hyperglycemia and other potentially modifiable risk factors for peripheral vascular disease in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 25(5):894–899PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Zander E, Heinke P, Reindel J, Kohnert KD, Kairies U, Braun J et al (2002) Peripheral arterial disease in diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2: are there different risk factors? Vasa 31(4):249–254PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Boussageon R, Bejan-Angoulvant T, Saadatian-Elahi M, Lafont S, Bergeonneau C, Kassai B et al (2011) Effect of intensive glucose lowering treatment on all cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and microvascular events in type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 343:d4169PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. MacGregor AS, Price JF, Hau CM, Lee AJ, Carson MN, Fowkes FG (1999) Role of systolic blood pressure and plasma triglycerides in diabetic peripheral arterial disease. The Edinburgh Artery Study. Diabetes Care 22(3):453–458PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Major AS, Harrison DG (2011) What fans the fire: insights into mechanisms of inflammation in atherosclerosis and diabetes mellitus. Circulation 124(25):2809–2811PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Ginsberg HN, Elam MB, Lovato LC, Crouse JR 3rd, Leiter LA, Linz P et al (2010) Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 362(17):1563–1574PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Neeper M, Schmidt A, Brett J, Yan S, Wang F, Pan Y et al (1992) Cloning and expression of a cell surface receptor for advanced glycosylation end products of proteins. J Biol Chem 267(21):14998–15004PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Schmidt AM, Hofmann M, Taguchi A, Yan SD, Stern DM (2000) RAGE: a multiligand receptor contributing to the cellular response in diabetic vasculopathy and inflammation. Semin Thromb Hemost 26(5):485–493PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Brownlee M, Cerami A, Vlassara H (1988) Advanced glycosylation end products in tissue and the biochemical basis of diabetic complications. N Engl J Med 318(20):1315–1321PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Reddy S, Bichler J, Wells-Knecht KJ, Thorpe SR, Baynes JW (1995) N epsilon-(carboxymethyl)lysine is a dominant advanced glycation end product (AGE) antigen in tissue proteins. Biochemistry 34(34):10872–10878PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Uribarri J, Stirban A, Sander D, Cai W, Negrean M, Buenting CE et al (2007) Single oral challenge by advanced glycation end products acutely impairs endothelial function in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. Diabetes Care 30(10):2579–2582PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kislinger T, Fu C, Huber B, Qu W, Taguchi A, Du Yan S et al (1999) N epsilon-(Carboxymethyl)Lysine adducts of proteins are ligands for receptor for advanced glycation end products that activate cell signaling pathways and modulate gene expression. J Biol Chem 274(44):31740–31749PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Hsieh HL, Schafer BW, Weigle B, Heizmann CW (2004) S100 protein translocation in response to extracellular S100 is mediated by receptor for advanced glycation endproducts in human endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 316(3):949–959PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Koyama H, Shoji T, Fukumoto S, Shinohara K, Shoji T, Emoto M et al (2006) Low circulating endogenous secretory receptor for AGEs predicts cardiovascular mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 27:147–153PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Kosaki A, Hasegawa T, Kimura T, Iida K, Hitomi J, Matsubara H et al (2004) Increased plasma S100A12 (EN-RAGE) levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89(11):5423–5428PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Mohamed AK, Bierhaus A, Schiekofer S, Tritschler H, Ziegler R, Nawroth PP (1999) The role of oxidative stress and NF-kappaB activation in late diabetic complications. BioFactors 10(2–3):157–167PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kislinger T, Tanji N, Wendt T, Qu W, Lu Y, Ferran LJ Jr et al (2001) Receptor for advanced glycation end products mediates inflammation and enhanced expression of tissue factor in vasculature of diabetic apolipoprotein E-null mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 21(6):905–910PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Basta G, Lazzerini G, Massaro M, Simoncini T, Tanganelli P, Fu C et al (2002) Advanced glycation end products activate endothelium through signal-transduction receptor RAGE: a mechanism for amplification of inflammatory responses. Circulation 105(7):816–822PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Schmidt AM, Yan SD, Wautier JL, Stern D (1999) Activation of receptor for advanced glycation end products: a mechanism for chronic vascular dysfunction in diabetic vasculopathy and atherosclerosis. Circ Res 84(5):489–497PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Cheng C, Tsuneyama K, Kominami R, Shinohara H, Sakurai S, Yonekura H et al (2005) Expression profiling of endogenous secretory receptor for advanced glycation end products in human organs. Mod Pathol 18(10):1385–1396PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Yonekura H, Yamamoto Y, Sakurai S, Petrova RG, Abedin MJ, Li H et al (2003) Novel splice variants of the receptor for advanced glycation end-products expressed in human vascular endothelial cells and pericytes, and their putative roles in diabetes-induced vascular injury. Biochem J 370(Pt 3):1097–1109PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Katakami N, Matsuhisa M, Kaneto H, Matsuoka TA, Sakamoto K, Nakatani Y et al (2005) Decreased endogenous secretory advanced glycation end product receptor in type 1 diabetic patients: its possible association with diabetic vascular complications. Diabetes Care 28(11):2716–2721PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Koyama H, Shoji T, Yokoyama H, Motoyama K, Mori K, Fukumoto S et al (2005) Plasma level of endogenous secretory RAGE is associated with components of the metabolic syndrome and atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 25(12):2587–2593PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Basta G, Sironi AM, Lazzerini G, Del Turco S, Buzzigoli E, Casolaro A et al (2006) Circulating soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products is inversely associated with glycemic control and S100A12 protein. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91(11):4628–4634PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Catalano M, Cortelazzo A, Santi R, Contino L, Demicheli M, Yilmaz Y et al (2008) The Pro12Ala polymorphism of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma2 gene is associated with plasma levels of soluble RAGE (Receptor for Advanced Glycation Endproducts) and the presence of peripheral arterial disease. Clin Biochem 41(12):981–985PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Mahajan N, Malik N, Bahl A, Dhawan V (2009) Receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) and its inflammatory ligand EN-RAGE in non-diabetic subjects with pre-mature coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis 207(2):597–602PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Burke AP, Kolodgie FD, Zieske A, Fowler DR, Weber DK, Varghese PJ et al (2004) Morphologic findings of coronary atherosclerotic plaques in diabetics: a postmortem study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 24(7):1266–1271PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Shiotsu Y, Mori Y, Hatta T, Maki N, Iida K, Matsuoka E et al (2011) Plasma S100A12 levels and peripheral arterial disease in end-stage renal disease. Nephron Extra 1(1):242–250PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Nin JW, Jorsal A, Ferreira I, Schalkwijk CG, Prins MH, Parving HH et al (2011) Higher plasma levels of advanced glycation end products are associated with incident cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in type 1 diabetes: a 12-year follow-up study. Diabetes Care 34(2):442–447PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Karvestedt L, Martensson E, Grill V, Elofsson S, von Wendt G, Hamsten A et al (2011) The prevalence of peripheral neuropathy in a population-based study of patients with type 2 diabetes in Sweden. J Diabetes Complications 25(2):97–106PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Karvestedt L, Martensson E, Grill V, Elofsson S, von Wendt G, Hamsten A et al (2009) Peripheral sensory neuropathy associates with micro- or macroangiopathy: results from a population-based study of type 2 diabetic patients in Sweden. Diabetes Care 32(2):317–322PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Breslow NE, Day NE (1987) Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume II–the design and analysis of cohort studies. IARC Sci Publ 82:1–406Google Scholar
  37. Newcombe RG (1998) Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med 17(8):857–872PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Analytical Tools for Public Health: Commonly used public health statistics and their confidence intervals. http://www.apho.org.uk/resource/view.aspx?RID=47240
  39. D’Agostino RB Sr, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, Wolf PA, Cobain M, Massaro JM et al (2008) General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 117(6):743–753PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Statistics. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/564172/statistics
  41. Boyles AL, Harris SF, Rooney AA, Thayer KA (2011) Forest plot viewer: a new graphing tool. Epidemiology 22(5):746–747PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Nakashima A, Carrero JJ, Qureshi AR, Miyamoto T, Anderstam B, Barany P et al (2010) Effect of circulating soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) and the proinflammatory RAGE ligand (EN-RAGE, S100A12) on mortality in hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5(12):2213–2219PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Shiotsu Y, Mori Y, Nishimura M, Sakoda C, Tokoro T, Hatta T et al (2011) Plasma S100A12 level is associated with cardiovascular disease in hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 6(4):718–723PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Callaghan BC, Feldman E, Liu J, Kerber K, Pop-Busui R, Moffet H et al (2011) Triglycerides and amputation risk in patients with diabetes: ten-year follow-up in the DISTANCE study. Diabetes Care 34(3):635–640PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Chapman MJ, Ginsberg HN, Amarenco P, Andreotti F, Boren J, Catapano AL et al (2011) Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: evidence and guidance for management. Eur Heart J 32(11):1345–1361PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Vlassara H, Striker GE (2011) AGE restriction in diabetes mellitus: a paradigm shift. Nat Rev Endocrinol 7(9):526–539PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Takenaka K, Yamagishi S, Matsui T, Nakamura K, Imaizumi T (2006) Role of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) in thrombogenic abnormalities in diabetes. Curr Neurovasc Res 3(1):73–77PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Ishibashi Y, Matsui T, Ueda S, Fukami K, Yamagishi S (2014) Advanced glycation end products potentiate citrated plasma-evoked oxidative and inflammatory reactions in endothelial cells by up-regulating protease-activated receptor-1 expression. Cardiovasc Diabetol 13:60PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Ishibashi Y, Matsui T, Maeda S, Higashimoto Y, Yamagishi S (2013) Advanced glycation end products evoke endothelial cell damage by stimulating soluble dipeptidyl peptidase-4 production and its interaction with mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor II receptor. Cardiovasc Diabetol 12:125PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Fukushima Y, Daida H, Morimoto T, Kasai T, Miyauchi K, Yamagishi S et al (2013) Relationship between advanced glycation end products and plaque progression in patients with acute coronary syndrome: the JAPAN-ACS sub-study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 12:5PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Skrha J Jr, Muravska A, Flekac M, Horova E, Novak J, Novotny A et al (2014) Fructosamine 3-kinase and glyoxalase I polymorphisms and their association with soluble RAGE and adhesion molecules in diabetes. Physiol Res 63(Suppl 2):S283–S291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Kallio M, Forsblom C, Groop PH, Groop L, Lepantalo M (2003) Development of new peripheral arterial occlusive disease in patients with type 2 diabetes during a mean follow-up of 11 years. Diabetes Care 26(4):1241–1245PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Wattanakit K, Folsom AR, Selvin E, Weatherley BD, Pankow JS, Brancati FL et al (2005) Risk factors for peripheral arterial disease incidence in persons with diabetes: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Atherosclerosis 180(2):389–397PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Groenwold RH, Klungel OH, Grobbee DE, Hoes AW (2011) Selection of confounding variables should not be based on observed associations with exposure. Eur J Epidemiol 26(8):589–593PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Stang A, Poole C, Kuss O (2010) The ongoing tyranny of statistical significance testing in biomedical research. Eur J Epidemiol 25(4):225–230PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Cumming G, Finch S (2005) Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. Am Psychol 60(2):170–180PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Cumming G (2014) The new statistics: why and how. Psychol Sci 25(1):7–29PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Malmstedt et al. 2015

Advertisement