Efficacy and safety of linagliptin in type 2 diabetes subjects at high risk for renal and cardiovascular disease: a pooled analysis of six phase III clinical trials
© von Eynatten et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 27 December 2012
Accepted: 27 March 2013
Published: 9 April 2013
In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertension and microalbuminuria are predictive markers for increased renal and cardiovascular risk. This post hoc analysis of data from a global development program aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of linagliptin in a population with joint prevalence of these two vascular risk factors.
Data for patients with baseline microalbuminuria (urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio 30–300 mg/g) and hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg and/or a history of hypertension; and/or an antihypertensive treatment at baseline) who participated in any of six randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trials were analyzed. Participants received linagliptin 5 mg daily (alone or in combination with other oral antidiabetic drugs) or placebo for 18 to 24 weeks.
Of 3,119 patients, 512 had both microalbuminuria and hypertension (linagliptin, 366; placebo, 146). Baseline mean (SD) HbA1c was 8.3 (0.9)% and 8.4 (0.9)%; median (range) urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio was 60 (30–292) mg/g and 64 (30–298) mg/g; mean (SD) systolic blood pressure was 138 (15) mm Hg and 135 (16) mm Hg; and mean (SD) diastolic blood pressure was 81 (10) mm Hg and 81 (10) mm Hg, for linagliptin and placebo, respectively. Placebo-corrected mean change in HbA1c from baseline to week 18 and week 24 was -0.57% (95% CI: -0.75, -0.39; P < 0.0001) and -0.59% (95% CI: -0.80, -0.39; P < 0.0001), respectively. Placebo-corrected mean change in FPG from baseline to week 24 was -21.3 mg/dl (95% CI: -31.0, -11.6; P < 0.0001). The incidence of drug-related adverse events was similar for linagliptin and placebo (10.4% and 8.2%, respectively). Changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, cholesterol and triglyceride levels were similar between linagliptin and placebo.
In T2DM patients with the two common vascular risk factors of hypertension and microalbuminuria, linagliptin achieved significant improvements in glycemic control. In this vulnerable patient population at high risk for micro- and macrovascular complications, linagliptin was well tolerated.
Linagliptin is an oral, once-daily dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitor that prevents the inactivation of incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, which stimulate glucose-dependent secretion of insulin. In large clinical trials undertaken in patients with T2DM, linagliptin as monotherapy or in combination with other oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) has shown clinically meaningful efficacy with a low risk of hypoglycemia and no weight gain [7–9]. A meta-analysis of linagliptin phase III studies showed no increased cardiovascular risk with linagliptin . A pooled analysis of data from eight phase III studies with linagliptin provided additional confirmation that linagliptin is well tolerated in patients with or without renal dysfunction . Although renal dysfunction can increase risk for hypoglycemia, incidence of hypoglycemic events in patients receiving linagliptin without concomitant sulfonylurea was < 1.0% in this high-risk population .
Many OADs are primarily eliminated via the kidney, and require dosage adjustment based on renal function monitoring or become contraindicated when renal function declines further. Linagliptin has a primarily non-renal route of excretion. It can, therefore, be used without dosage adjustment irrespective of renal function , suggesting it is worthy of investigation in patients with, or at high risk of developing, renal as well as cardiovascular disease.
To further explore the effects of linagliptin in this high-risk population, data from patients with hypertension and microalbuminuria from six phase III clinical trials were pooled and analyzed.
All protocols were approved by relevant local independent ethical review or institutional review committees. Trials were carried out according to either the Declaration of Helsinki or International Conference on Harmonization Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. All patients provided written informed consent before participation.
Patients were included in this analysis if they had prevalent microalbuminuria (urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio [UACR] 30–300 mg/g, determined after randomization and prior to first drug intake by spot urine-quantitative measurement) and hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] ≥ 140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] ≥ 90 mm Hg and/or a history of hypertension; and/or antihypertensive treatment at baseline). The inclusion criteria for age and body mass index (BMI) were similar in the six trials: age of ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years and BMI of ≤ 40 kg/m2. The inclusion criteria for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels at the start of placebo run-in ranged between ≥ 7% and ≤ 11%. In the majority of studies, OAD regimens, if any, needed to have remained constant for ≥ 10 weeks prior to enrolment [7–9, 14].
Efficacy was assessed by the change from baseline in HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at 18 and 24 weeks of treatment. The analysis at week 18 was based on data from all six clinical trials, whereas the analysis at week 24 was based on data from four clinical trials [7–9, 15].
This was also true for the UACR and blood pressure analyses of change from baseline. Lipid and blood pressure analyses were based on the last value on treatment (LVOT) data. Safety endpoints included the frequency and intensity of adverse events (AEs) and the frequency of hypoglycemic events.
Efficacy endpoints were evaluated with an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The general model contained the following factors: treatment, washout of prior OAD and study, as well as the linear covariate continuous baseline HbA1c. For the FPG analysis, continuous baseline FPG was also included in the general model. The efficacy endpoints were assessed on the full analysis set (FAS), comprising all randomized subjects who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug and had both baseline and ≥ 1 on-treatment HbA1c measurement. A last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach was used to handle missing values for the calculation of the placebo-corrected mean change in HbA1c at week 18 and week 24 and the placebo-corrected mean change in FPG at week 24. The placebo-corrected mean change in FPG at week 18 was presented as observed cases (OC) because LOCF data were not available from all included trials for that time point. Efficacy measurements after start of rescue were replaced by missing values. Pooled safety data were recorded from the treated set (all randomized subjects who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug) and were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Baseline patient demographics and clinical characteristics (treated set)
Values are mean (±SD) or % of subjects
Linagliptin 5 mg (n = 366)
Placebo (n = 146)
American Indian/Alaska Native
≥ 90 ml/min
60 to < 90 ml/min
30 to < 60 ml/min
Urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, mg/g, median (range)†
SBP, mm Hg
DBP, mm Hg
Metabolic syndrome, %
Time since diagnosis of diabetes, %
Up to 1 year
> 1 to 5 years
> 5 years
Number of prior antidiabetes drugs, %
Antihypertensive therapy, %
Antihypertensive therapy was taken by 86.3% and 84.9% of patients in the linagliptin and placebo groups, respectively. The most commonly reported antihypertensive drugs were angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (linagliptin, 40.4% and placebo, 41.1%).
Linagliptin was also better than placebo in lowering FPG levels in this population. Adjusted mean change from baseline (SE) in FPG at week 18 was -12.3 (2.3) mg/dl for linagliptin and -1.6 (3.5) mg/dl for placebo, resulting in a placebo-corrected mean change from baseline of -10.6 mg/dl (95% CI: -18.4, -2.9; P = 0.0074). At week 24, the adjusted mean change from baseline in FPG was -13.4 (2.9) mg/dl and 7.9 (4.4) mg/dl in the linagliptin and placebo groups, respectively. The placebo-corrected mean change from baseline in these patients was -21.3 mg/dl (95% CI: -31.0, -11.6; P < 0.0001).
Safety and tolerability
Adjusted mean change* from baseline to last value on treatment in total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides
Linagliptin 5 mg (n = 366†)
Placebo (n = 146†)
Total cholesterol, mg/dl
Change from baseline
Change from baseline
Change from baseline
Change from baseline
SBP, mm Hg
Change from baseline
DBP, mm Hg
Change from baseline
AEs leading to discontinuation of trial medication were reported by 1.4% and 3.4% of patients in the linagliptin and placebo groups, respectively. Less than 1% of subjects experienced hypoglycemia when linagliptin was administered as monotherapy or in addition to metformin or pioglitazone. However, when linagliptin was administered with a sulfonylurea, the number of patients experiencing hypoglycemia was greater than with placebo (linagliptin, 19.8% and placebo, 5.9%).
The median (range) change in UACR from baseline at week 24 was -13.7 (-240.4 to 695.7) mg/g for linagliptin and -4.9 (-234.3 to 2,263.9) mg/g for placebo. The placebo-corrected median change from baseline in UACR at week 24 was -8.8 mg/g.
Mean (SD) SBP decreased by -2.9 (0.9) mm Hg and -2.4 (1.2) mm Hg in the linagliptin and placebo groups, respectively, at LVOT (Table 2). Mean (SD) DBP decreased by -1.2 (0.6) mm Hg and -1.0 (0.8) mm Hg in the linagliptin and placebo groups, respectively, at LVOT.
Minor changes were observed in lipid parameters in the linagliptin group as compared to the placebo group (Table 2). Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein showed small but non-significant differences between the groups. Triglyceride levels decreased in both treatment groups, with a numerically greater decrease seen with linagliptin (-18.5 mg/dl vs. -13.5 mg/dl).
Summary of clinical AEs and hypoglycemia (treated set)
Linagliptin 5 mg (n = 366)
Placebo (n = 146)
Investigator-defined drug-related AE
Any AEs classified by system organ class*
Infections and infestations
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Nervous system disorders
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
AEs leading to study drug discontinuation
Subjects with hypoglycemia
Subjects with hypoglycemia by study
Studies without sulfonylurea‡
Studies with sulfonylurea§
Vascular complications are the main challenge in the management of T2DM. In patients with T2DM, hypertension and prevalent microalbuminuria are common clinical features that guide treating physicians in assessing risk of cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Clinical evidence has shown a clear transitional path from microalbuminuria to chronic kidney disease  and a continuous relationship between albuminuria of any degree and increased cardiovascular mortality [17, 18].
In the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study, one quarter of patients developed microalbuminuria within 10 years of being diagnosed with T2DM . Manifestations of urinary albumin progressed from normoalbuminuria to microalbuminuria at an annual rate of 2.0%, from microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria at 2.8% annually, and from macroalbuminuria to diabetic nephropathy at 2.3% annually. Among patients with microalbuminuria, the study found an annual cardiovascular mortality rate of 2.0% compared with 3.5% in those with macroalbuminuria.
International guidelines for the treatment of T2DM recommend reducing the risk or slowing the progression of kidney disease through optimization of glycemic control . A variety of pharmaceutical options for reduction of hyperglycemia are available, including metformin, sulfonylureas and incretin-based therapies (GLP-1 analogs and DPP-4 inhibitors). For patients with T2DM, however, renal impairment can be a limiting factor in the selection of appropriate antihyperglycemic therapies. Metformin and some sulfonylureas have contraindications or recommended dose adjustments related to renal impairment. Dose adjustment is also recommended for all DPP-4 inhibitors except linagliptin when used in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment [12, 20]. Linagliptin, due to its predominantly non-renal route of elimination, requires no dose adjustment.
In this post hoc analysis of 512 patients with T2DM at high renal and vascular risk (defined as prevalent hypertension and microalbuminuria with T2DM), linagliptin showed significant and clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c and FPG in comparison with placebo. These findings were comparable to the efficacy results found in the individual six phase III trials [7–9, 13–15].
Along with these efficacy results, this analysis showed that linagliptin was well tolerated. At baseline, patients in the two treatment groups had well-matched clinical characteristics and similar backgrounds of antihypertensive therapies, with approximately 85% of each group receiving at least one drug in that class and 13% of each group receiving combination antihypertensive therapy. The incidence of hypoglycemia was markedly greater in the linagliptin group only when linagliptin was administered with sulfonylurea, which is consistent with clinical findings for other DPP-4 inhibitors [8, 21, 22]. This tendency may be attributable to the proposed uncoupling effect that sulfonylureas have on the glucose-dependent effects of incretin therapies . The percentage of patients receiving linagliptin who experienced serious AEs or AEs related to study drug was similar to those receiving placebo. Gastrointestinal AEs and infections, which are of concern in the DPP-4 class, occurred in similar proportions of patients in the linagliptin and placebo groups. No deaths occurred in either group.
Research suggests that GLP-1 may have beneficial effects on dyslipidemia, and recent small studies with DPP-4 inhibitors have shown favorable effects [24, 25] or a neutral effect  on postprandial dyslipidemia in patients with T2DM. The present analysis showed a reduction in mean triglyceride levels with linagliptin at LVOT, which was numerically greater than that seen with placebo.
Linagliptin had a modest effect on blood pressure, comparable to studies with other DPP-4 inhibitors, which have shown small to neutral effects on blood pressure [24, 26–28]. Minor changes were also observed in UACR with linagliptin treatment. In a recent post-hoc analysis of pooled Phase III data, linagliptin significantly reduced UACR after 24 weeks compared with placebo . The change in mean UACR versus baseline was -32% (95% CI: -42, -21; P < 0.05) with linagliptin. Patients in this earlier analysis were defined as having albuminuria ranging from micro- (UACR, >30 to ≤300 mg/g) to macroalbuminuria (UACR >300 to ≤3000 mg/g) and were on stable ACE inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker background therapy. Hence, differences in baseline UACR levels along with more frequent concomitant treatment with renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors may have contributed to the larger reduction in UACR in that analysis. In order to specifically evaluate the albumin-lowering potential of linagliptin a randomized, controlled trial has recently been initiated (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01792518, MARLINA). So far, however, research on the use of DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with renal dysfunction or albuminuria has been limited. The present analysis did not evaluate the efficacy or safety of linagliptin by subgroups of renal function, but baseline eGFR data were included to provide a full description of the clinical characteristics of the population with both microalbuminuria and hypertension. DPP-4 inhibitors have previously been shown to be efficacious and well tolerated at reduced doses in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment [30, 31]. In clinical trial populations that included patients with mild and moderate renal impairment, linagliptin has been shown to be an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment without dose adjustment [7, 9, 15]. A phase I clinical trial with linagliptin showed that renal impairment ranging from mild to end-stage renal disease had no clinically meaningful effects on its pharmacokinetics . Additionally, a recently published phase III trial of patients with severe renal impairment, demonstrated that treatment with linagliptin 5 mg daily provided clinically meaningful reductions in HbA1c over 1 year (-0.7%, 95% CI: -21.0 to -20.4; P < 0.0001) with similar tolerability to placebo .
In patients treated with linagliptin in the present analysis, incidence of severe hypoglycemia was very low, body weight and renal function remained stable, and no cases of drug-related renal failure were reported, suggesting that linagliptin can be used safely in all patients and even in this highly susceptible patient population with severe renal impairment.
The findings of this study are limited by the post hoc pooled nature of the analysis. Patients who participated in any of six randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trials, had different background antidiabetic therapies. The analysis was also based on a relatively short duration of 24 weeks or less, which does not allow for long-term safety assessments. However, taken together with previous reports of up to 2 years in patients with T2DM [7–9, 13–15, 34], these results provide further evidence of beneficial glycemic effects and tolerability in this population. The ongoing CAROLINA trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01243424) is investigating long-term cardiovascular outcomes with linagliptin. This trial will include patients with vascular-related end-organ damage (such as moderate renal dysfunction or microalbuminuria) as well as patients with prevalent cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypercholesterolemia or hypertension, and will allow for long-term safety assessments. It is the first long-term, clinical evaluation of a DPP-4 with an active comparator.
In conclusion, in patients with T2DM complicated by hypertension and microalbuminuria, linagliptin 5 mg once daily is well tolerated and improves glycemic control. Linagliptin may support long-term metabolic therapeutic strategies to treat patients at high risk of renal and cardiovascular disease.
The authors were fully responsible for all content and editorial decisions, were involved at all stages of manuscript development, and have approved the final version. Medical writing assistance, supported financially by Boehringer Ingelheim, was provided by Claire Stevens, MSc, and Mark Poirier of Envision Scientific Solutions during the preparation of this manuscript.
- IDF Diabetes Atlas.http://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas/.
- Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, Diamant M, Ferrannini E, Nauck M, Peters AL, Tsapas A, Wender R, Matthews DR: Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach. Position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. 2012, 55 (6): 1577-1596. 10.1007/s00125-012-2534-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Basi S, Fesler P, Mimran A, Lewis JB: Microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes and hypertension: a marker, treatment target, or innocent bystander?. Diabetes Care. 2008, 31 (Suppl 2): S194-S201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chade AR, Lerman A, Lerman LO: Kidney in early atherosclerosis. Hypertension. 2005, 45 (6): 1042-1049. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000167121.14254.a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- American Diabetes Association: Standards of medical care in diabetes—2012. Diabetes Care. 2012, 35 (Suppl 1): 11-63.Google Scholar
- KDOQI: KDOQI clinical practice guideline for diabetes and CKD: 2012 update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012, 60 (5): 850-886.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Del Prato S, Barnett AH, Huisman H, Neubacher D, Woerle HJ, Dugi KA: Effect of linagliptin monotherapy on glycaemic control and markers of beta-cell function in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011, 13 (3): 258-267. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01350.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Owens DR, Swallow R, Dugi KA, Woerle HJ: Efficacy and safety of linagliptin in persons with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by a combination of metformin and sulphonylurea: a 24-week randomized study. Diabet Med. 2011, 28 (11): 1352-1361. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03387.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taskinen MR, Rosenstock J, Tamminen I, Kubiak R, Patel S, Dugi KA, Woerle HJ: Safety and efficacy of linagliptin as add-on therapy to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011, 13 (1): 65-74. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01326.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johansen OE, Neubacher D, von Eynatten M, Patel S, Woerle HJ: Cardiovascular safety with linagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pre-specified, prospective, and adjudicated meta-analysis of a phase 3 programme. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012, 11: 3-10.1186/1475-2840-11-3.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schernthaner G, Barnett AH, Emser A, Patel S, Troost J, Woerle HJ, von Eynatten M: Safety and tolerability of linagliptin: a pooled analysis of data from randomized controlled trials in 3572 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012, 14 (5): 470-478. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01565.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH: TradjentaTM (linagliptin) tablets. US prescribing information, 2011. . , : .Google Scholar
- Barnett AH, Patel S, Harper R, Toorawa R, Thiemann S, von Eynatten M, Woerle HJ: Linagliptin monotherapy in type 2 diabetes patients for whom metformin is inappropriate: an 18-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial with a 34-week active-controlled extension. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012, 14 (12): 1145-1154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lewin AJ, Arvay L, Liu D, Patel S, von Eynatten M, Woerle HJ: Efficacy and tolerability of linagliptin added to a sulfonylurea regimen in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: an 18-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Clin Ther. 2012, 1909–1919: e1915.Google Scholar
- Gomis R, Espadero RM, Jones R, Woerle HJ, Dugi KA: Efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with linagliptin and pioglitazone in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011, 13 (7): 653-661. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01391.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adler AI, Stevens RJ, Manley SE, Bilous RW, Cull CA, Holman RR: Development and progression of nephropathy in type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 64). Kidney Int. 2003, 63 (1): 225-232. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00712.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Zeeuw D: Albuminuria: a target for treatment of type 2 diabetic nephropathy. Semin Nephrol. 2007, 27 (2): 172-181. 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2007.01.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ritz E, Schmieder RE, Pollock CA: Renal protection in diabetes: lessons from ONTARGET. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2010, 9: 60-10.1186/1475-2840-9-60.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- International Diabetes Federation: Global guideline for type 2 diabetes.http://www.idf.org/global-guideline-type-2-diabetes-2012.
- Bakris GL: Recognition, pathogenesis, and treatment of different stages of nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011, 86 (5): 444-456. 10.4065/mcp.2010.0713.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chacra AR, Tan GH, Apanovitch A, Ravichandran S, List J, Chen R: Saxagliptin added to a submaximal dose of sulphonylurea improves glycaemic control compared with uptitration of sulphonylurea in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Clin Pract. 2009, 63 (9): 1395-1406. 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02143.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hermansen K, Kipnes M, Luo E, Fanurik D, Khatami H, Stein P: Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on glimepiride alone or on glimepiride and metformin. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2007, 9 (5): 733-745. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2007.00744.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meloni AR, Deyoung MB, Lowe C, Parkes DG: GLP-1 receptor activated insulin secretion from pancreatic beta-cells: mechanism and glucose dependence. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013, 15 (1): 15-17. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01663.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tremblay AJ, Lamarche B, Deacon CF, Weisnagel SJ, Couture P: Effect of sitagliptin therapy on postprandial lipoprotein levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011, 13 (4): 366-373. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01362.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matikainen N, Manttari S, Schweizer A, Ulvestad A, Mills D, Dunning BE, Foley JE, Taskinen MR: Vildagliptin therapy reduces postprandial intestinal triglyceride-rich lipoprotein particles in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2006, 49 (9): 2049-2057. 10.1007/s00125-006-0340-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cobble ME, Frederich R: Saxagliptin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: assessing cardiovascular data. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012, 11: 6-10.1186/1475-2840-11-6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ogawa S, Ishiki M, Nako K, Okamura M, Senda M, Mori T, Ito S: Sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, decreases systolic blood pressure in Japanese hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2011, 223 (2): 133-135. 10.1620/tjem.223.133.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Russell-Jones D, Cuddihy RM, Hanefeld M, Kumar A, Gonzalez JG, Chan M, Wolka AM, Boardman MK: Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus metformin, pioglitazone, and sitagliptin used as monotherapy in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-4): a 26-week double-blind study. Diabetes Care. 2012, 35 (2): 252-258. 10.2337/dc11-1107.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Groop P-H, Cooper M, Perkovic V, Emser A, Seck T, von Eynatten M, Woerle H-J: Effects of the DPP-4 inhibitor linagliptin on albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic nephropathy. Diabetologia. 2012, Oct, 55 (Suppl 1): S20.Google Scholar
- Chan JC, Scott R, Arjona Ferreira JC, Sheng D, Gonzalez E, Davies MJ, Stein PP, Kaufman KD, Amatruda JM, Williams-Herman D: Safety and efficacy of sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic renal insufficiency. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008, 10 (7): 545-555. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00914.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nowicki M, Rychlik I, Haller H, Warren ML, Suchower L, Gause-Nilsson I: Saxagliptin improves glycaemic control and is well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and renal impairment. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011, 13 (6): 523-532. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01382.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Graefe-Mody U, Friedrich C, Port A, Ring A, Retlich S, Heise T, Halabi A, Woerle HJ: Effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor linagliptin(*). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011, 13 (10): 939-946. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01458.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McGill JB, Sloan L, Newman J, Patel S, Sauce C, von Eynatten M, Woerle HJ: Long-term efficacy and safety of linagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe renal impairment: a 1-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Diabetes Care. 2013, 36 (2): 237-244. 10.2337/dc12-0706.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gallwitz B, Rosenstock J, Rauch T, Bhattacharya S, Patel S, von Eynatten M, Dugi KA, Woerle HJ: 2-year efficacy and safety of linagliptin compared with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin: a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2012, 380 (9840): 475-483. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60691-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.