Estimation of plasma apolipoprotein B concentration using routinely measured lipid biochemical tests in apparently healthy Asian adults
- Dong-Sik Cho†1,
- Sookyoung Woo†2,
- Seonwoo Kim2,
- Christopher D Byrne3,
- Joon-Hyuk Kong4 and
- Ki-Chul Sung1Email author
© Cho et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 6 February 2012
Accepted: 7 May 2012
Published: 18 May 2012
Increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) concentration is associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) but a substantial risk of cardiovascular disease often remains after LDL concentrations have been treated to target. Apolipoprotein B (apo B) is the major apolipoprotein contained within atherogenic lipoproteins such as LDL, and apo B is a more reliable indicator of cardiovascular risk than LDL concentration.
Aim and methods
Our aim was to develop a formula for calculating apo B using lipid biochemistry measurements that are commonly available in clinical practice. We examined the clinical and laboratory data from 73,047 Koreans who underwent a medical health check that included apolipoprotein B concentration. The study sample was randomly divided into a training set for prediction model building and a validation set of equal size. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to develop a prediction model equation for estimating apo B and to validate the developed model.
The best results for estimating apo B were derived from an equation utilising LDL and triglyceride (TG) concentrations [ApoB = −33.12 + 0.675*LDL + 11.95*ln(tg)]. This equation predicted the apo B result with a concordance correlation coefficient (CCC and 95%CIs) = 0.936 (0.935,0.937)).
Our equation for predicting apo B concentrations from routine analytical lipid biochemistry provides a simple method for obtaining precise information about an important cardiovascular risk marker.
The association between increased concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) and increased rates of premature coronary heart disease has been clearly demonstrated [1–8]. Current recommendations for the management of dyslipidemia are largely based on treatments to decrease LDL concentration [5, 9–14]. However, a significant residual risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) often remains after low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels have been treated to target [15–20].
Apolipoprotein B100 (apoB) is the structural protein for atherogenic lipoproteins and facilitates the transporting of lipid from the liver to peripheral tissues [15, 21–23]. A single apo B100 molecule is present in all major atherogenic particles derived from the liver (very low density lipoprotein (VLDL), intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL) and LDL). Consequently, measurement of apoB100 provides direct information as to the number of circulating atherogenic particles . Apo B100 concentration is a better measure of LDL particle number concentration and is a more reliable indicator of risk than LDL concentration [22, 24, 25]. Thus, addition of apo B100 concentration to the routine lipid profile could improve identification of patients at risk of CVD and could improve management of those patients who are receiving lipid lowering therapy [24–31]. Apo B100 measurement also improves CHD risk prediction in people with diabetes or metabolic syndrome [24, 32] and Apo B100 may provide a better assessment of on-treatment residual risk (than LDL) providing support for the notion that addition of apo B100 measurement to the routine lipid panel would improve patient management [26, 31].
Apo B100 can be measured by commercial immunoassay  but assays are time-consuming and costly . Although an algorithm for estimating apo B100 has previously been developed by Hermans et al. , this algorithm was developed in 45 people with diabetes from a Western population. Thus, the aim of our study was to develop an algorithm for estimating the apo B100 concentration from easily measured parameters; e.g. age, body mass index (BMI), low desntiy lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc), triglyceride (TG) and total cholesterol (TC) concentrations.
A total of 73,047 apparently healthy subjects were recruited for the study. The mean age was 41.73 ± 8.4 years, [n = 44,118 men (41.9 ± 8.1-years) and n = 28,929 women (41.4 ± 8.7-years)]. Subjects participated in a routine health check-up program that was held at the Health Promotion Center of Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea in 2008. The medical health checkup program was developed to improve the health of employees. Most subjects were employees, or family members, from various industrial companies across the country. The cost of medical examinations was predominantly paid for by the employers, and most subjects underwent a health check annually or biannually. The study protocol conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki as reflected by a priori approval from our institution’s Human Research Committee.
The health check consisted of a full medical history and comprehensive blood test evaluation. Participants’ height and weight were measured barefoot and in light clothing. BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. Laboratory examinations were obtained after an overnight fast. An enzymatic calorimetric test was used to measure TC and TG concentrations. The selective inhibition method was used to measure HDLc, and a homogeneous enzymatic calorimetric method was used to measure the concentration of LDLc (Advia 1650 Autoanalyzer, Bayer Diagnostics, Leverkusen, Germany). Apo B100 and apoA1 concentrations were determined by rate nephelometry (IMMAGE system; Beckman Coulter).
Descriptive statistics for continuous variables are presented as means, standard deviations (SDs), medians and inter-quartile ranges (Q1, Q3). Categorical variable are presented as proportions (percentages).
The study sample was randomly divided into a training set for prediction model building and a validation set of equal size. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to develop a prediction model equation and to validate the developed model. Natural log transformation was used to normalize the distribution of HDLc, TG, age and BMI. Analysis of residuals was used to check assumptions for multivariable linear regression modeling. The accuracy of the prediction model equation was evaluated using concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) analysis (Lin (1989)) that allowed comparison between prediction modeling results and the direct biochemical measurement of apo B100. In all tests, p-values < 0.05 were considered significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.1.3 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC) and R 2.13.2 (Vienna, Austria).
We conducted subgroup analyses by sex, glucose (7.0 mmol/l or 126 mg/dl), BMI (25kg/m2) and apoB quartile, in order to examine whether the derived equation was appropriate for specific subpopulation.
Characteristics of the whole cohort, and the model building and validation subsets
(n = 73047)
(n = 36523)
(n = 36524)
41.73 ± 8.38
41.7 ± 8.4
41.7 ± 8.4
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)
195.17 ± 33.79
195.12 ± 33.89
195.22 ± 33.70
127.55 ± 86.80
127.40 ± 86.25
127.70 ± 87.34
55.20 ± 12.73
55.19 ± 12.73
55.20 ± 12.74
110.63 ± 29.43
110.62 ± 29.48
110.64 ± 29.37
97.52 ± 23.97
97.53 ± 24.04
97.50 ± 23.0
23.63 ± 3.12
23.64 ± 3.12
23.63 ± 3.11
Models for predicting apoB100 concentration
ApoB100 = 16.177816 + 0.735235*LDLc
2. LDLc, age
ApoB100 = −24.77 + 0.72*LDLc + 11.43*ln(age)
3. LDLc, BMI
ApoB100 = −49.13 + 0.70*LDLc + 21.81*ln(BMI)
4. LDLc, BMI, age
ApoB100 = −78.91 + 0.696*LDLc + 9.81*ln(나이) + 19.98*ln(BMI)
5. LDLc, TG
ApoB100 = −33.12 + 0.675*LDLc + 11.95*ln(tg)
6. LDLc, TG, age
ApoB100 = −59.40 + 0.67*LDLc + 11.63*ln(tg) + 7.68*ln(age)
7. LDLc, TG, BMI
ApoB100 = −35.99 + 0.67*LDLc + 11.84*ln(tg) + 1.11*ln(BMI)
8. LDLc, TG, age, BMI
ApoB100 = −59.53 + 0.67*LDLc + 11.62*ln(tg) + 7.68*ln(age) + 0.05*ln(BMI)
CCC values for the developed equation* and published equations
Equation1: ApoB100 = −33.12 + 0.675*LDLc + 11.95*ln(tg)
Equation 2: ApoB100 = 20.67944 + 0.551614*non HDLc, where non HDLc = total C-HDLc
Equation 3: ApoB100 = 6.3 + 0.65*non HDLc, where non HDLc = total C-HDLc
Comparative CCC results for the developed equation and two published equations, stratified by sex, glucose and BMI thresholds and apo B quartile
Apolipoprotein B Quartile
Q2(80.24< Q2< 90.95)
The CCC for obese individuals with a BMI > 28kg/m2 was 0.914(95% CI(0.908-0.920)). We also tested the formula also in subjects with an atherogenic lipid profile, namely in those with a TG > 150 mg/dl + HDLc < 40/<50 mg/dl. In individuals with TG > 150 & HDLc < 50 (female), the CCC was 0.923(95% CI(0.917-0.929)). In individuals with TG > 150 & HDcL < 40 (male), the CCC was 0.932(95% CI(0.924-0.939)). We also calculated the performance of the proposed equation using estimated LDLc from Friedewald’s equation. The CCCs are 0.920(95% CI(0.919-0.922)) in the training data-set and 0.922(95% CI(0.920-0.924)) in the validation data-set.
Measurement of apo B100 concentrations helps cardiovascular risk prediction but unfortunately to date apo B100 assays are often not available because they are considered expensive and time consuming. Consequently, apo B100 measurements are not readily available to clinicians. From a very large cohort of subjects that are representative of a general Asian population, we have developed a very simple algorithm for estimating apo B100 concentration that utilizes only LDLc and fasting triglyceride concentrations. Although more complex equations fitted the data slightly better for predicting apo B100; the very simple algorithm did not compromise precision, compared with the more complex equations. We have also shown that the simple algorithm is valid in important sub groups of people that included obese subjects, subjects with increased plasma glucose concentrations and subjects with an atherogenic lipid profile. The derived formula is also appropriate if LDLc is estimated from Friedewald’s equation.
The CCCs for apoB100 in Q2 and Q3 were lower than for the other two quartiles. To evaluate the reason for the lower CCC results in Q2 and Q3, we compared the characteristics of the relationship between apoB100 and LDLc in each quartile. In the total data set, the relationship between apoB100 and LDLc showed a clear positive linear relationship, whereas in Q2 and Q3, the relationship was not linear In Q2 and Q3 the data points were concentrated around the middle of the distribution, rather than being spread evenly along the regression line. Consequently, the scatter of data in these middle two quartiles did not fit the regression line as well as in Q1 and Q4. Thus, this finding may limit the usefulness of our formula in these middle two quartiles. However, our equation was developed for the whole population and not just for the subjects in the 2nd and 3rd quartile. We reason that it is more important to fit the formula to the whole population and not to a specific subgroup within that population.
In conclusion, we have developed an algorithm in a large Asian population to derive an estimate of apoB100 concetnrations that utilizes only measurement of LDLc and triglyceride concentrations from a fasting plasma sample. We are unable to comment as to whether the algorithm is valid in a Western population.
We acknowledge the efforts of the health screening group at Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, republic of Korea. CDB is supported in part by the Southampton National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre.
This study was partially supported by Samsung Biomedical Research Institute Grant SBRI C-B1-114-1.
- Bairaktari E, Hatzidimou K, Tzallas C, Vini M, Katsaraki A, Tselepis A, Elisaf M, Tsolas O: Estimation of LDL cholesterol based on the Friedewald formula and on apo B levels. Clin Biochem. 2000, 33: 549-555. 10.1016/S0009-9120(00)00162-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kannel WB, Castelli WP, Gordon T: Cholesterol in the prediction of atherosclerotic disease. New perspectives based on the Framingham study. Ann Intern Med. 1979, 90: 85-91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gordon T, Kannel WB, Castelli WP, Dawber TR: Lipoproteins cardiovascular disease and death. The Framingham study. Archives Internal Med. 1981, 141: 1128-1131. 10.1001/archinte.1981.00340090024008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Assmann G, Schulte H: Relation of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides to incidence of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (the PROCAM experience). Prospective Cardiovascular Munster study. The Am J Cardiology. 1992, 70: 733-737. 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90550-I.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Expert Panel on Detection Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults: Summary of the second report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II). JAMA : J Am Med Assoc. 1993, 269: 3015-3023.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ko M, Kim MT, Nam JJ: Assessing risk factors of coronary heart disease and its risk prediction among Korean adults: the 2001 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Int J Cardiol. 2006, 110: 184-190. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.07.030.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hobbs FD: Reducing cardiovascular risk in diabetes: beyond glycemic and blood pressure control. Int J Cardiol. 2006, 110: 137-145. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.09.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keech A, Colquhoun D, Best J, Kirby A, Simes RJ, Hunt D, Hague W, Beller E, Arulchelvam M, Baker J, et al: Secondary prevention of cardiovascular events with long-term pravastatin in patients with diabetes or impaired fasting glucose: results from the LIPID trial. Diabetes Care. 2003, 26: 2713-2721. 10.2337/diacare.26.10.2713.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bairaktari E, Elisaf M, Tzallas C, Karabina SA, Tselepis AD, Siamopoulos KC, Tsolas O: Evaluation of five methods for determining low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in hemodialysis patients(1). Clin Biochem. 2001, 34: 593-602. 10.1016/S0009-9120(01)00274-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raza JA, Babb JD, Movahed A: Optimal management of hyperlipidemia in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Int J Cardiol. 2004, 97: 355-366. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.07.039.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- International Taskforce for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease: Prevention of coronary heart disease: scientific background and clinical guidelines. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 1992, 2: 113-156.Google Scholar
- Haffner SM: Dyslipidemia management in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004, 27 (Suppl 1): S68-S71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cho YK, Hur SH, Han CD, Park HS, Yoon HJ, Kim H, Nam CW, Kim YN, Kim KB, Park NH, Park HJ: Comparison of Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mg Versus Atorvastatin 20 mg in Achieving a Target Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol Goal for Patients With Very High Risk. Korean Circ J. 2011, 41 (3): 149-153. 10.4070/kcj.2011.41.3.149.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Choi SJ, Park SH, Lee KS, HY Park: The prevalence, awareness and treatment of high low density lipoprotein-cholesterol in korean adults without coronary heart diseases - the third Korea national health and nutrition examination survey, 2005 -.Korean. Circ J. 2012, 42 (2): 86-94.Google Scholar
- Davidson MH: Apolipoprotein measurements: is more widespread use clinically indicated?. Clin Cardiol. 2009, 32: 482-486. 10.1002/clc.20559.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III): Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation. 2002, 106: 3143-3421.Google Scholar
- Rizzo M, Berneis K: Should we measure routinely the LDL peak particle size?. Int J Cardiol. 2006, 107: 166-170. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.02.035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosenson RS, Otvos JD, Hsia J: Effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on LDL and HDL particle concentrations in patients with metabolic syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Diabetes Care. 2009, 32: 1087-1091. 10.2337/dc08-1681.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li, et al: Serum Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration and risk of death from cardiovascular diseases among U.S. adults with diagnosed diabetes: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey linked mortality study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2011, 10: 46-10.1186/1475-2840-10-46.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hermans, et al: log(TG)/HDL-C is related to both residual cardiometabolic risk and b-cell function loss in type 2 diabetes males. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2010, 9: 88-10.1186/1475-2840-9-88.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marcovina S, Packard CJ: Measurement and meaning of apolipoprotein AI and apolipoprotein B plasma levels. J Internal Med. 2006, 259: 437-446. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01648.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walldius G, Jungner I: The apoB/apoA-I ratio: a strong, new risk factor for cardiovascular disease and a target for lipid-lowering therapy–a review of the evidence. J Internal Med. 2006, 259: 493-519. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01643.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hermans MP, Sacks FM, Ahn SA, Rousseau MF: Non-HDL-cholesterol as valid surrogate to apolipoprotein B100 measurement in diabetes: Discriminant Ratio and unbiased equivalence. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2011, 10: 20-10.1186/1475-2840-10-20.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jiang R, Schulze MB, Li T, Rifai N, Stampfer MJ, Rimm EB, Hu FB: Non-HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B predict cardiovascular disease events among men with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004, 27: 1991-1997. 10.2337/diacare.27.8.1991.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Contois JH, McConnell JP, Sethi AA, Csako G, Devaraj S, Hoefner DM, Warnick GR: Apolipoprotein B and cardiovascular disease risk: position statement from the AACC Lipoproteins and Vascular Diseases Division Working Group on Best Practices. Clin Chem. 2009, 55: 407-419. 10.1373/clinchem.2008.118356.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barter PJ, Ballantyne CM, Carmena R, Castro Cabezas M, Chapman MJ, Couture P, de Graaf J, Durrington PN, Faergeman O, Frohlich J, et al: Apo B versus cholesterol in estimating cardiovascular risk and in guiding therapy: report of the thirty-person/ten-country panel. J Internal Med. 2006, 259: 247-258. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01616.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brunzell JD, Davidson M, Furberg CD, Goldberg RB, Howard BV, Stein JH, Witztum JL: Lipoprotein management in patients with cardiometabolic risk: consensus conference report from the American Diabetes Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008, 51: 1512-1524. 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.02.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim BJ, Hwang ST, Sung KC, Kim BS, Kang JH, Lee MH, Park JR: Comparison of the relationships between serum apolipoprotein B and serum lipid distributions. Clin Chem. 2005, 51: 2257-2263. 10.1373/clinchem.2005.052738.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Charlton-Menys V, Betteridge DJ, Colhoun H, Fuller J, France M, Hitman GA, Livingstone SJ, Neil HA, Newman CB, Szarek M, et al: Targets of statin therapy: LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS). Clin Chem. 2009, 55: 473-480. 10.1373/clinchem.2008.111401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim HK, Chang SA, Choi EK, Kim YJ, Kim HS, Sohn DW, Oh BH, Lee MM, Park YB, Choi YS: Association between plasma lipids, and apolipoproteins and coronary artery disease: a cross-sectional study in a low-risk Korean population. Int J Cardiol. 2005, 101: 435-440. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.03.057.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Genest J, Frohlich J, Fodor G, McPherson R: Recommendations for the management of dyslipidemia and the prevention of cardiovascular disease: summary of the 2003 update. CMAJ : Canadian Med Assoc J = Journal de l'Association Medicale canadienne. 2003, 169: 921-924.Google Scholar
- Williams K, Sniderman AD, Sattar N, D'Agostino R, Wagenknecht LE, Haffner SM: Comparison of the associations of apolipoprotein B and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with other cardiovascular risk factors in the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS). Circulation. 2003, 108: 2312-2316. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000097113.11419.9E.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kulkarni K: Apo B measurement system and method. 2008,http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20080261313, . Agents: DLA PIPER US LLP; IPC8 Class: AG01N3392FI; USPC Class: 436 52.Google Scholar
- Chen Z, Strack AM, Stefanni AC, Chen Y, Wu W, Pan Y, Urosevic-Price O, Wang L, McLaughlin T, Geoghagen N, Lassman ME, Roddy TP, Wong KK, Hubbard BK, Flattery AM: Validation of human ApoB and ApoAI immunoturbidity assays for non-human primate dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis research. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2011, 4: 373-383. 10.1007/s12265-011-9264-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.