Relationship between stress hyperglycaemic ratio and incidence of in-hospital cardiac arrest in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a retrospective cohort study

Table 7 Incremental predictive value and predictive power of various models with NRI, IDI, and C-statistics

Model	C-statistic (95% Cl)	p	NRI (95% Cl)	p	IDI (95% Cl)	p
Baseline risk model	0.8123 (0.7677–0.8568)	Ref.	Ref.		Ref.
+ HbA1c	0.8125 (0.7680–0.8570)	0.4489	0.0000 (-0.0021–0.0021)	1.0000	0.0001 (-0.0003–0.0001)	0.4018
+ ABG	0.8237 (0.7793–0.8680)	0.1419	0.0353 (-0.0191–0.0898)	0.2032	0.0115 (-0.0011–0.0241)	0.0731
+ SHR	0.8242 (0.7786–0.8698)	0.1941	0.0734 (0.0058–0.1409)	0.0332	0.0218 (0.0063–0.0374)	0.0060

Baseline risk model includes age, smoking, SBP, DBP, number of diseased vessels, CTO disease, thrombolytic therapy, eGFR, hs-CRP, LVEF, and LDL-C.
Admission Blood Glucose, ABG; Confidence Interval, CI; Integrated Discrimination Improvement, IDI; Net Reclassification Improvement, NRI; References, ref; Stress Hyperglycaemic Ratio, SHR

ISSN: 1475-2840