Skip to main content

Table 1 RCTs evaluating SGLT2is in patients with HFpEF (with or without T2DM)

From: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibition for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and chronic kidney disease with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus: a narrative review

Trial acronym

DELIVER

EMPEROR-Preserved

PRESERVED-HF

DETERMINE-Preserved

EMPERIAL-Preserved

Trial name

Dapagliflozin evaluation to improve the lives of patients with preserved ejection fraction heart failure

Empagliflozin outcome trial in patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Dapagliflozin in preserved ejection fraction heart failure

Dapagliflozin effect on exercise capacity using a 6-minute walk test in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Effect of empagliflozin on exercise ability and HF symptoms in patients with chronic heart failure

Therapeutic area

HFpEF

HFpEF

HFpEF

HFpEF

HFpEF

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier

NCT03619213

NCT03057951

NCT03030235

NCT03877224

NCT03448406

ClinicalTrials.gov URL

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03619213

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03057951

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03030235

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03877224

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT03448406

Trial completion

Mar 2022

Apr 2021

Aug 2021

Jul 2020

Oct 2019

Publication

Solomon et al., N Engl J Med 2022 [59]

McCausland et al., JAMA Cardiol 2022 [62]

Anker et al., N Engl J Med 2021 [61]

Nassif et al., Nat Med 2021 [72]

Unpublished; details from clinicaltrials.gov

Abraham et al., Eur Heart J 2021 [73]

Intervention (once daily)

Dapagliflozin 10 mg vs. PBO

Empagliflozin 10 mg vs. PBO

Dapagliflozin 10 mg vs. PBO

Dapagliflozin 10 mg vs. PBO

Empagliflozin 10 mg vs. PBO

LVEF eligibility

 > 40%

 > 40%

 ≥ 45%

 > 40%

 > 40%

eGFR exclusion (mL/min/1.73 m2)

 < 25

 < 20 or requiring dialysis

 < 20

 < 25

 < 20 or requiring dialysis

Population

Randomized = 6263 (dapagliflozin, 3131; PBO, 3132)

Randomized = 5988 (empagliflozin, 2997; PBO, 2991)

Randomized = 324 (dapagliflozin, 162; PBO, 162)

Randomized = 504 (dapagliflozin, 253; PBO, 251)

Randomized = 315 (empagliflozin, 157; PBO, 158)

Trial duration

Median 2.3 years

Median 26.2 months

12 weeks

16 weeks

12 weeks

Primary endpoint

Composite of worsening HF (unplanned HHF, or urgent HF visit) or CV death

Composite of CV death or HHF

Change from baseline to week 12 in KCCQ-CSS

Change from baseline to week 16 in KCCQ-TSS, KCCQ-PLS, and 6MWTD

Change from baseline to week 12 in 6MWTD

Primary endpoint achieved?

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Details

18% reduced risk of primary outcome with dapagliflozin (16.4% vs. 19.5% in PBO group; HR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.73–0.92; p < 0.001) Baseline kidney function did not affect primary composite CV outcome (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2: HR: 0.84, 95% CI 0.70–1.00; eGFR 45– < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2: HR: 0.68; 95% CI 0.54–0.87; eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2: HR: 0.93, 95% CI 0.76–1.14; p for interaction = 0.16)

21% reduced risk of primary outcome with empagliflozin (13.8% vs. 17.1% in PBO group; HR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.69–0.90; p < 0.001)

Mean 12-week change in KCCQ-CS was 5.8 points (95% CI 2.3–9.2; p = 0.001) in favor of dapagliflozin

Dapagliflozin had no effect on the primary outcome measures; median difference dapagliflozin vs. PBO 3.16 (95% CI 0.36 to 6.01; p = 0.08) in KCCQ-TSS, 3.12 (95% CI –0.09 to 5.37; p = 0.23) in KCCQ-PLS, and 1.6 m (95% CI –5.9 to 9.0; p = 0.67) in 6MWTD

Empagliflozin had no effect on the primary outcome; median difference at week 12 empagliflozin vs. PBO 4.0 m (95% CI –5.0 to 13.0; p = 0.37) in 6MWTD

Kidney endpoint

Exploratory analysis: effect of treatment on eGFR slope

Post hoc analysis: (1) composite of first sustained ≥ 50% decline in eGFR from baseline; (2) development of ESKD (from AE reporting or sustained decline in eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2); or (3) death due to kidney causes

Secondary endpoint: rate of decline from baseline in eGFR

Other prespecified endpoint: composite of chronic dialysis or renal transplant or sustained reduction from baselines in eGFR of ≥ 40% (< 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 for patients with baseline eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, or < 10 mL/min/1.73 m2 for patients with baseline eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) (defined per clinicaltrials.gov entry)

No kidney endpoints included

No kidney endpoints included

No kidney endpoints included

Kidney endpoint achieved?

Yes (exploratory endpoint only)

Yes (secondary endpoint only)

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Details

Dapagliflozin slowed rate of eGFR decline (from baseline to month 36: difference, + 0.5 [95% CI 0.1–0.9] mL/min/1.73 m2 per year; p = 0.01; and from months 1–36: difference, + 1.4 [95% CI 1.0–1.8] mL/min/1.73 m2 per year; p < 0.001)

Dapagliflozin had no effect on frequency of composite kidney outcome: dapagliflozin 2.5% vs. PBO 2.3% (HR: 1.08, 95% CI 0.79–1.49)

Empagliflozin slowed eGFR rate of decline vs. PBO (–1.25 vs. –2.62 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year [difference, 1.36]; (95% CI 1.06–1.66; p < 0.001)

Empagliflozin had no effect on frequency of composite kidney outcome: empagliflozin 3.6% vs. PBO 3.7% (HR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.73–1.24)

   
  1. 6MWTD 6-min walk test distance
  2. AE adverse event, CI confidence interval, CSS Clinical Summary Score, CV cardiovascular, EF ejection fraction, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, ESKD end-stage kidney disease, HbA1C hemoglobin A1C, HF heart failure, HFpEF heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, HHF hospitalization for heart failure, HR hazard ratio, KCCQ Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, P probability, PBO placebo, PLS Physical Level Score, RCT randomized controlled trial, SGLT2i sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, T2DM type 2 diabetes mellitus, TSS Total Symptom Score