Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of Included Studies and Patients of the Meta-Analysis

From: Left ventricular remodeling response to SGLT2 inhibitors in heart failure: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

Trial, First Author, year

Active treatment

Imaging Modality

Setting

N° Patients

Age

Males (%)

FU (mo)

LV Remodeling Indices

Beta-blockers, (%)

ACEi/ARBs/ARNI, (%)

SUGAR-DM-HF trial

Lee Matthew MY, 2021

Empagliflozin

CMR

HFrEF

92

69±11

73

9

EDV, EDVi, ESV, ESVi, EF, LVMi,

91

100

EMPA-TROPISM,

Santos-Gallego CG et al., 2021

Empagliflozin

CMR

HFrEF

80

62±12

64

6

EDV, ESV, EF, LVM

88

85

EMPIRE-HF,

Omar Massar et al., 2021

Canagliflozin

Echo

HFrEF

179

64±11

85

3

EDV, EDVi, ESV, ESVi, EF, LVMi,

95

100

The REFORM Trial,

Singh JSS et al., 2020

Dapagliflozin

CMR

HFrEF

56

67±7

66

12

EDV, EDVi, ESV, ESVi, EF, LVMi

82

89

CANA-HF,

Carbone S, 2020

Canagliflozin

Echo

HFrEF

36

56±7

78

3

EDVi, ESVi, EF, NTproBNP

94

86

EMMY Trial

Von Lewinski D et al., 2022

Empagliflozin

Echo

HFrEF

476

58±9

82

6.5

EDV, EDVi ESV, ESVi, EF, NTproBNP

96

98

EXCEED Trial,

Akasaka H et al., 2020

Ipragliflozin

Echo

HFpEF

68

71±8

60

6

EDV, ESV, EF, LVMi

NA

NA

CANDLE Trial,

Tanaka A. et al., 2020

Canagliflozin

Echo

HFrEF, HFpEF

233

69±10

75

6

EF, NTproBNP

70

76

MUSCAT-HF,

Ejiri K. et al., 2020

Luseogliflozin

Echo

HFpEF

165

73±7

62

3

EF, LVMi, NTproBNP

61

59