Skip to main content

Table 5 Relationship between AIP and prediabetes in different sensitivity analyses

From: Nonlinear relationship between atherogenic index of plasma and the risk of prediabetes: a retrospective study based on Chinese adults

Exposure

Model I (HR,95%CI, P)

Model II (HR,95%CI, P)

AIP

1.51 (1.37, 1.66) < 0.0001

1.44 (1.32, 1.56) < 0.0001

AIP (Quintile)

  

Q1

ref

ref

Q2

1.15 (1.07, 1.23) < 0.0001

1.21 (1.13, 1.30) < 0.0001

Q3

1.23 (1.14, 1.32) < 0.0001

1.28 (1.20, 1.38) < 0.0001

Q4

1.32 (1.23, 1.43) < 0.0001

1.36 (1.27, 1.46) < 0.0001

P for trend

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

  1. Model I was sensitivity analysis in participants with BMI < 25 kg/m2. We adjusted gender, age, SBP, DBP, family history of diabetes, drinking status, smoking status, TC, LDL-C, AST, ALT, Scr, BUN and FPG
  2. Model II was sensitivity analysis in participants aged < 60 years. We adjusted gender, SBP, DBP, family history of diabetes, drinking status, smoking status, BMI, TC, LDL-C, AST, ALT, Scr, BUN and FPG
  3. HR, hazard ratios; CI, confidence, Ref: reference; AIP: atherogenic index of plasma
Back to article page

Cardiovascular Diabetology

ISSN: 1475-2840