Skip to main content

Table 4 Multivariate analysis for prediction of outcomes

From: Global trans-lesional computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve gradient is associated with clinical outcomes in diabetic patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease

Characteristic

MACE

MACCE

Multivariate HR (95% CI)

Wald x²

P value

Multivariate HR (95% CI)

Wald x²

P value

Age (year)

1.00 (0.98–1.02)

0.005

0.94

1.00 (0.99–1.02)

0.288

0.59

Male

0.98 (0.67–1.45)

0.007

0.93

1.10 (0.78–1.56)

0.293

0.59

Hyperlipidemia

1.93 (1.34–2.77)

12.413

< 0.001

1.61 (1.18–2.21)

8.800

0.003

Current smoking

1.19 (0.80–1.77)

0.739

0.39

1.06 (0.74–1.52)

0.111

0.74

High-risk plaque

2.67 (1.68–4.24)

17.083

< 0.001

2.35 (1.52–3.64)

14.686

< 0.001

Leiden score

1.43 (0.98–2.08)

3.508

0.06

1.50 (1.07–2.08)

5.676

0.02

CT-FFR ≤ 0.75

1.40 (0.90–2.16)

2.229

0.14

1.43 (0.96–2.13)

3.012

0.08

GΔCT-FFR ≥ 0.20

2.88 (1.76–4.70)

17.734

< 0.001

2.37 (1.53–3.66)

15.041

< 0.001

  1. CI confidence interval, CT-FFR coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve, GΔCT-FFR global ΔCT-FFR (sum of the trans-lesional CT-FFR gradient in all epicardial vessels), HR hazard ratio, MACE major adverse cardiovascular events, MACCE major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events
Back to article page

Cardiovascular Diabetology

ISSN: 1475-2840