Table 2 Relationship of TyG with sICAS and ICASB
|  | TyG quantiles* | OR/β (95% CI) (TyG as quantiles) | P value | OR/β (95% CI) (TyG as continuous) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
sICASa | |||||
 Unadjusted OR (95%CI) | Q1 (< 8.4) | 1 (Ref.) |  | 1.19 (1–1.41) | 0.048 |
Q2 (8.4–8.9) | 1.16 (0.81–1.66) | 0.412 | |||
Q3 (8.9–9.4) | 1.02 (0.71–1.46) | 0.926 | |||
Q4 (≥ 9.4) | 1.45 (1.02–2.06) | 0.036 | |||
P for trend | 0.074 | ||||
 Adjusted model I OR (95%CI) | Q1 (< 8.4) | 1 (Ref.) |  | 1.23 (1.03–1.46) | 0.022 |
Q2 (8.4–8.9) | 1.16 (0.81–1.67) | 0.411 | |||
Q3 (8.9–9.4) | 1.05 (0.73–1.52) | 0.799 | |||
Q4 (≥ 9.4) | 1.54 (1.08–2.2) | 0.018 | |||
P for trend | 0.036 | ||||
 Adjusted model II OR (95%CI) | Q1 (< 8.4) | 1 (Ref.) |  | 1.25 (1.01–1.55) | 0.037 |
Q2 (8.4–8.9) | 1.16 (0.79–1.71) | 0.445 | |||
Q3 (8.9–9.4) | 1.02 (0.68–1.53) | 0.917 | |||
Q4 (≥ 9.4) | 1.59 (1.04–2.43) | 0.033 | |||
P for trend | 0.074 | ||||
ICASBb | |||||
 Unadjusted β (95%CI) | Q1 (< 8.4) | 0 (Ref.) |  | 0.29 (0.03, 0.55) | 0.03 |
Q2 (8.4–8.9) | 0.63 (0.1, 1.16) | 0.02 | |||
Q3 (8.9–9.4) | 0.52 (− 0.01, 1.05) | 0.055 | |||
Q4 (≥ 9.4) | 0.81 (0.27, 1.34) | 0.003 | |||
P for trend | 0.007 | ||||
 Adjusted model I β (95%CI) | Q1 (< 8.4) | 0 (Ref.) |  | 0.46 (0.2–0.72) | 0.001 |
Q2 (8.4–8.9) | 0.72 (0.2–1.25) | 0.007 | |||
Q3 (8.9–9.4) | 0.76 (0.23–1.28) | 0.005 | |||
Q4 (≥ 9.4) | 1.15 (0.62–1.68) |  < 0.001 | |||
P for trend |  < 0.001 | ||||
 Adjusted model II β (95%CI) | Q1 (< 8.4) | 0 (Ref.) |  | 0.43 (0.13–0.74) | 0.006 |
Q2 (8.4–8.9) | 0.74 (0.19–1.28) | 0.008 | |||
Q3 (8.9–9.4) | 0.63 (0.07–1.19) | 0.028 | |||
Q4 (≥ 9.4) | 1.08 (0.47–1.69) | 0.001 | |||
P for trend | 0.002 | ||||