Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of global strain of both ventricles and regional strain of right ventricle

From: Impact of T2DM on right ventricular systolic dysfunction and interventricular interactions in patients with essential hypertension: evaluation using CMR tissue tracking

 

Controls

HTN(T2DM-)

HTN(T2DM +)

P value

Global myocardial peak strain of LV

    

 GRS (%)

37.60 ± 8.21

34.65 ± 9.61

30.59 ± 8.64*§

 < 0.001

 GCS (%)

− 21.12 ± 2.50

− 20.59 ± 3.54

− 18.81 ± 3.35*§

 < 0.002

 GLS (%)

− 14.74 ± 2.09

− 13.09 ± 2.75*

− 11.68 ± 2.74*§

 < 0.001

Global and regional myocardial peak strain of RV

    

 Radial peak strain (%)

    

  GRS

32.22 ± 9.57

36.03 ± 15.13

31.89 ± 10.04

0.083

  Basal cavity

45.63 ± 16.80

48.43 ± 23.16

40.57 ± 17.46

0.076

  Mid cavity

33.99 ± 15.11

38.04 ± 19.42

36.05 ± 17.81

0.448

 Apical cavity

26.90 ± 12.64

30.41 ± 22.96

30.46 ± 20.49

0.569

 Circumferential peak strain (%)

    

  GCS

− 13.94 ± 3.49

− 12.27 ± 4.03

− 12.23 ± 3.88

0.052

  Basal cavity

− 3.50 ± 7.29

− 2.56 ± 7.76

− 2.46 ± 7.12

0.730

  Mid cavity

− 17.10 ± 3.84

− 15.13 ± 4.64

− 14.92 ± 4.93*

0.025

  Apical cavity

− 19.52 ± 4.22

− 18.30 ± 4.59

− 17.81 ± 6.68

0.227

 Longitudinal Peak stain (%)

  GLS

− 16.07 ± 2.16

− 13.91 ± 2.68*

− 12.38 ± 2.69*§

 < 0.001

  Basal cavity

− 13.37 ± 4.54

− 12.62 ± 4.43

− 10.29 ± 4.96*§

0.02

  Mid cavity

− 16.90 ± 3.42

− 14.48 ± 4.16*

− 13.31 ± 4.22*

 < 0.001

  Apical cavity

− 18.75 ± 2.85

− 17.10 ± 2.86*

− 15.67 ± 3.07*§

 < 0.001

  1. GRS global radial strain, GCS global circumferential strain, GLS global longitudinal strain
  2. *p < 0.05 vs. controls
  3. §p < 0.05 vs. HTN(T2DM-)