Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of left and right volumetric parameters among groups

From: Impact of T2DM on right ventricular systolic dysfunction and interventricular interactions in patients with essential hypertension: evaluation using CMR tissue tracking

 

Controls

HTN(T2DM-)

HTN(T2DM +)

P value

LV geometry and function

   

 LVEF (%)

64.51 ± 6.61

64.66 ± 5.83

62.25 ± 8.30

0.095

 LVEDVI (mL/m2)

77.38 ± 11.49

78.01 ± 16.68

78.71 ± 16.84

0.913

 LVESVI (mL/m2)

27.41 ± 6.95

27.88 ± 8.63

30.49 ± 11.42

0.170

 LVSVI (mL/m2)

50.09 ± 9.37

49.88 ± 10.28

48.53 ± 9.32

0.665

 LV cardiac index (L/min/m2)

3.61 ± 0.90

3.66 ± 0.80

3.57 ± 0.71

0.859

 LVMI (g/m2)

41.91 ± 9.34

54.92 ± 12.59*

54.78 ± 13.76*

 < 0.001

 LV remodeling index (g/mL)

0.55 ± 0.90

0.73 ± 0.17*

0.72 ± 0.17*

 < 0.001

RV geometry and function

   

 RVEF (%)

58.94 ± 6.72

58.44 ± 6.59

58.26 ± 7.47

0.872

 RVEDVI (mL/m2)

69.70 ± 12.91

69.25 ± 15.69

69.69 ± 14.27

0.979

 RVESVI (mL/m2)

28.54 ± 6.93

29.20 ± 9.00

30.03 ± 9.90

0.702

 RVSVI (mL/m2)

40.16 ± 7.96

40.11 ± 8.90

40.08 ± 7.46

0.999

 RV cardiac index (L/min/m2)

2.91 ± 0.68

2.98 ± 0.81

2.89 ± 0.73

0.747

 RVMI (g/m2)

15.06 ± 2.39

17.34 ± 3.06*

17.25 ± 2.81*

 < 0.001

 RV remodeling index(g/mL)

0.22 ± 0.03

0.25 ± 0.03*

0.24 ± 0.04*

 < 0.001

  1. LV left ventricular, RV right ventricular, EF ejection fraction, EDV end diastolic volume, ESV end systolic volume, SV stroke volume, M mass, I indexed to BSA
  2. *p < 0.024 vs. Controls
Back to article page

Cardiovascular Diabetology

ISSN: 1475-2840