Skip to main content

Table 4 Effects of tofogliflozin on body mass index, glucose metabolism, lipid metabolism and blood pressure

From: Tofogliflozin does not delay progression of carotid atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes: a prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparative study

Parameters

Tofogliflozin group

Conventional group

P value

Body Mass Index at baseline (kg/m2)

27.0 ± 5.8 (n = 168)

27.0 ± 4.6 (n = 169)

0.93

 Week 26 (change from baseline)

− 0.7 ± 1.0 (n = 163)§

0.0 ± 1.2 (n = 164)

< 0.001

 Week 52 (change from baseline)

− 0.8 ± 1.3 (n = 160)§

− 0.1 ± 1.4 (n = 159)

< 0.001

 Week 78 (change from baseline)

− 0.8 ± 1.5 (n = 154)§

0.0 ± 1.5 (n = 157)

< 0.001

 Week 104 (change from baseline)

− 1.0 ± 1.4 (n = 154)§

− 0.2 ± 1.8 (n = 154)

< 0.001

Waist circumference at baseline (cm)

93.0 ± 12.7 (n = 149)

93.7 ± 11.7 (n = 154)

0.60

 Week 26 (change from baseline)

− 2.0 ± 6.0 (n = 128)§

1.0 ± 4.3 (n = 127)#

< 0.001

 Week 52 (change from baseline)

− 0.9 ± 6.1 (n = 127)

1.4 ± 4.7 (n = 135)#

< 0.001

 Week 78 (change from baseline)

− 1.3 ± 6.5 (n = 117)*

1.4 ± 4.3 (n = 124)§

< 0.001

 Week 104 (change from baseline)

− 1.2 ± 6.0 (n = 124)*

1.5 ± 4.3 (n = 125)§

< 0.001

HbA1c at baseline (%)

7.4 ± 0.7 (n = 169)

7.3 ± 0.7 (n = 170)

0.23

HbA1c at baseline (mmol/mol)

57.5 ± 8.0 (n = 169)

56.5 ± 7.8 (n = 169)

0.23

 Week 26 (change from baseline)

− 0.4 ± 0.6 (n = 165)§

0.0 ± 0.5 (n = 165)

< 0.001

 Week 52 (change from baseline)

− 0.3 ± 0.7 (n = 161)§

0.0 ± 0.6 (n = 162)

< 0.001

 Week 78 (change from baseline)

− 0.3 ± 0.8 (n = 154)§

0.0 ± 0.7 (n = 159)

< 0.001

 Week 104 (change from baseline)

− 0.3 ± 0.8 (n = 156)§

0.1 ± 0.7 (n = 153)

< 0.001

Fasting blood glucose at baseline (mmol/l)

7.8 ± 1.7 (n = 167)

7.8 ± 1.8 (n = 168)

0.91

 Week 26 (change from baseline)

− 0.9 ± 1.6 (n = 155)§

0.2 ± 2.1 (n = 152)

< 0.001

 Week 52 (change from baseline)

− 0.8 ± 1.7 (n = 150)§

− 0.1 ± 1.8 (n = 154)

< 0.001

 Week 78 (change from baseline)

− 0.5 ± 1.7 (n = 145)§

0.1 ± 1.9 (n = 146)

0.007

 Week 104 (change from baseline)

− 0.7 ± 1.9 (n = 148)§

0.1 ± 1.8 (n = 149)

< 0.001

C-peptide at baseline (ng/ml)

1.91 ± 1.16 (n = 166)

2.04 ± 1.24 (n = 168)

0.34

 Week 52 (change from baseline)

− 0.26 ± 0.78 (n = 149)§

− 0.20 ± 1.11 (n = 156)*

0.61

 Week 104 (change from baseline)

− 0.16 ± 0.82 (n = 145)*

− 0.12 ± 1.06 (n = 149)

0.75

Total cholesterol at baseline (mmol/l)

4.96 ± 0.74 (n = 165)

4.93 ± 0.81 (n = 163)

0.72

 Week 26 (change from baseline)

0.09 ± 0.55 (n = 156)*

− 0.03 ± 0.54 (n = 150)

0.07

 Week 52 (change from baseline)

0.07 ± 0.59 (n = 157)

− 0.04 ± 0.57 (n = 156)

0.07

 Week 78 (change from baseline)

0.09 ± 0.57 (n = 146)

− 0.05 ± 0.65 (n = 144)

0.05

 Week 104 (change from baseline)

0.10 ± 0.69 (n = 151)

− 0.05 ± 0.67 (n = 147)

0.06

LDL cholesterol at baseline (mmol/l)

2.88 ± 0.69 (n = 168)

2.89 ± 0.66 (n = 169)

0.87

 Week 26 (change from baseline)

0.03 ± 0.52 (n = 162)

− 0.02 ± 0.51 (n = 162)

0.47

 Week 52 (change from baseline)

0.01 ± 0.50 (n = 159)

− 0.03 ± 0.51 (n = 162)

0.49

 Week 78 (change from baseline)

0.04 ± 0.50 (n = 153)

− 0.05 ± 0.59 (n = 157)

0.14

 Week 104 (change from baseline)

0.01 ± 0.62 (n = 154)

− 0.07 ± 0.57 (n = 153)

0.25

HDL cholesterol at baseline (mmol/l)

1.42 ± 0.36 (n = 169)

1.37 ± 0.31 (n = 170)

0.18

 Week 26 (change from baseline)

0.07 ± 0.18 (n = 163)§

0.00 ± 0.18 (n = 162)

< 0.001

 Week 52 (change from baseline)

0.06 ± 0.16 (n = 161)§

0.01 ± 0.18 (n = 162)

0.009

 Week 78 (change from baseline)

0.08 ± 0.22 (n = 154)§

0.03 ± 0.20 (n = 159)

0.019

 Week 104 (change from baseline)

0.08 ± 0.23 (n = 156)§

0.04 ± 0.20 (n = 154)*

0.08

Triglyceride at baseline (mmol/l)

1.20 [0.93, 1.80] (n = 167)

1.45 [1.01, 1.88] (n = 168)

0.06

 Week 26 (change from baseline)

− 0.04 [− 0.34, 0.24] (n = 152)

0.03 [− 0.26, 0.36] (n = 150)

0.21

 Week 52 (change from baseline)

− 0.03 [− 0.25, 0.23] (n = 149)

− 0.03 [− 0.37, 0.20] (n = 154)*

0.40

 Week 78 (change from baseline)

− 0.01 [− 0.30, 0.23] (n = 145)

− 0.01 [− 0.34, 0.29] (n = 145)

0.82

 Week 104 (change from baseline)

− 0.05 [− 0.36, 0.25] (n = 147)

− 0.03 [− 0.35, 0.30] (n = 148)

0.95

Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

133.0 ± 14.5 (n = 165)

134.5 ± 17.4 (n = 165)

0.41

 Week 26 (change from baseline)

− 4.5 ± 13.9 (n = 160)§

− 0.7 ± 15.3 (n = 159)

0.021

 Week 52 (change from baseline)

− 6.0 ± 13.0 (n = 157)§

− 2.7 ± 17.4 (n = 157)

0.06

 Week 78 (change from baseline)

− 5.6 ± 15.4 (n = 151)§

− 1.6 ± 18.3 (n = 152)

0.040

 Week 104 (change from baseline)

− 5.3 ± 16.3 (n = 150)§

0.5 ± 18.0 (n = 148)

0.004

Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)

77.7 ± 10.0 (n = 165)

79.1 ± 10.9 (n = 165)

0.22

 Week 26 (change from baseline)

− 1.7 ± 8.9 (n = 160)*

0.1 ± 9.0 (n = 159)

0.08

 Week 52 (change from baseline)

− 3.2 ± 9.3 (n = 157)§

− 0.8 ± 10.1 (n = 157)

0.028

 Week 78 (change from baseline)

− 2.7 ± 9.5 (n = 151)§

− 1.1 ± 9.8 (n = 152)

0.15

 Week 104 (change from baseline)

− 3.2 ± 10.1 (n = 150)§

− 1.0 ± 10.0 (n = 148)

0.05

  1. Data are presented as mean ± SD or median (the 25th and 75th percentiles) values. Differences in parameters between groups at baseline were analyzed using Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Differences in parameters from baseline to week 52 and 104 within each group were analyzed by one-sample t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Differences in parameters from baseline to week 52 and 104 between groups were analyzed using Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. *P < 0.05, #P < 0.01, §P < 0.001