Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics and co-morbidities

From: Impact of diabetes on outcome in critical limb ischemia with tissue loss: a large-scaled routine data analysis

 

Rutherford grade 5

Rutherford grade 6

DM+

DM−

All

P

DM+

DM−

All

P

Patients, n (%)

3061 (44.3)

3855 (55.7)

6916 (100.0)

 

4108 (48.8)

4308 (51.2)

8416 (100.0)

 

Male sex (%)

1795 (58.6)

1708 (44.3)

3503 (50.7)

<0.001

2551 (62.1)

2148 (49.9)

4699 (55.8)

<0.001

Age, mean ± SD

73.8 ± 10.8

77.0 ± 11.2

75.6 ± 11.1

<0.001

73.3 ± 11.2

76.5 ± 12.1

74.9 ± 11.8

<0.001

Hypertension (%)

2172 (71.0)

2514 (65.2)

4686 (67.8)

<0.001

2860 (69.9)

2577 (59.8)

5437 (64.6)

<0.001

Obesity (%)

361 (11.8)

186 (4.8)

547 (7.9)

<0.001

427 (10.4)

178 (4.1)

605 (7.2)

<0.001

Dyslipidemia (%)

834 (27.2)

836 (21.7)

1670 (24.1)

<0.001

922 (22.4)

752 (17.5)

1674 (19.9)

<0.001

Smoking (%)

140 (4.6)

293 (7.6)

433 (6.3)

<0.001

180 (4.4)

328 (7.6)

508 (6.0)

<0.001

CKD (%)

1179 (38.5)

960 (24.9)

2139 (30.9)

<0.001

1637 (39.8)

1160 (26.9)

2797 (33.2)

<0.001

CAD (%)

884 (28.9)

851 (22.1)

1735 (25.1)

<0.001

1218 (29.6)

974 (22.6)

2192 (26.0)

<0.001

CHF (%)

512 (16.7)

551 (14.3)

1063 (15.4)

0.005

766 (18.6)

704 (16.3)

1470 (17.5)

0.005

Malignancies (%)

55 (1.8)

87 (2.3)

142 (2.1)

0.180

103 (2.5)

137 (3.2)

240 (2.9)

0.064

  1. Characteristics and co-diagnoses of Rutherford grade 5 and Rutherford grade 6 patients with and without diabetes (DM+/DM−). Data are given as patient numbers and percentages related to the respective subgroup. Statistical significance was tested via contingency table, p values <0.05 are considered significant
  2. Italic values are statistically significant
  3. DM diabetes mellitus; CKD chronic kidney disease; CAD coronary artery disease; CHF chronic heart failure