Enrique Fisman, Cardiovascular Diabetology Research Foundation
17 December 2009
TO THE READERS: After the publication of this manuscript, the authors discovered a mistake in the figure legends. In both legends the correct reference number should be 52 instead of 45.
Correction
17 December 2009
TO THE READERS:
After the publication of this manuscript, the authors discovered a mistake in the figure legends. In both legends the correct reference number should be 52 instead of 45.
Competing interests
None declared