Skip to main content

Table 6 Sensitivity analysis for the forecast of frequency of vascular endpoints and cost-effectiveness using insulin glargine or exenatide per 1,000 patients over 40 years (no discontinuation scenario).

From: Evaluation of the cost effectiveness of exenatide versus insulin glargine in patients with sub-optimally controlled Type 2 diabetes in the United Kingdom

 

Long term scenario

(without hypoglycaemia risk change)

Long term scenario

(with hypoglycaemia risk change)

Exenatide

Glargine

Δ

Exenatide

Glargine

Δ

Macrovascular

Ischaemic Heart Disease

122.1

115.2

-6.95

122.1

115.2

-6.95

Myocardial Infarction

387.2

367.1

-20.12

387.2

367.1

-20.12

Congestive heart Failure

78.2

87.2

9.07

78.2

87.2

9.07

Stroke

97.5

95.7

-1.86

97.5

95.7

-1.86

Microvascular

Retinopathy

55.8

49.2

-6.59

55.8

49.2

-6.59

Nephropathy

14.0

14.0

0.01

14.0

14.0

0.01

Neuropathy

13.1

10.1

-3.04

13.1

10.1

-3.04

Hypoglycaemia

events

Nocturnal

12,749

35,113

22,364

12,742

51,939

39,197

Symptomatic

94,627

57,059

-37,568

94,907

82,663

-12,244

Severe

6,626.5

6,760.3

133.8

6,626.5

6,760.3

133.8

Fatal

Macrovascular

449

428.4

-20.5

449

428.4

-20.5

Microvascular

13.1

11.2

-1.91

13.1

11.2

-1.91

Other

536.8

559.4

22.59

536.8

559.4

22.59

Cost effectiveness

Discounted costs

£14,552,192

£12,505,945

 

£14,552,192

£12,505,945

 

Discounted QALYS

7,688

8,009

 

7,687

7,984

 

ICER (£/QALY)

Dominant (-£6,365)

Dominant (-£6,884)