Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of type 2 diabetic patients included in the study

From: The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor Saxagliptin improves function of circulating pro-angiogenic cells from type 2 diabetic patients

Variable

In vitro study

In vivo study

Saxagliptin

Controls

Number

20

5

5

Age, years

65.2 ± 2.3

67.4 ± 2.6

66.1 ± 1.1

Sex male, %

65.0

80.0

60.0

Risk factors

   

  BMI, kg/m2

30.3 ± 2.1

29.1 ± 1.9

28.7 ± 2.1

  Waist circumference, cm

104.8 ± 3.9

102.8 ± 4.0

103.7 ± 5.1

  Diabetes duration, years

11.3 ± 4.2

9.8 ± 3.6

12.4 ± 5.3

  Fasting glucose, mg/dl (mmol/l)

166.2 ± 8.1

141.2 ± 6.7

138.8 ± 4.5

(9.2 ± 0.5)

(7.8 ± 0.4)

(7.7 ± 0.2)

  HbA1c, % (mmol/mol)

8.4 ± 1.1

7.6 ± 1.6

7.8 ± 1.2

(68.3 ± 9.0)

(59.6 ± 12.5)

(61.7 ± 9.5)

  Hypertension, %

75.0

80.0

100.0

  Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg

138.1 ± 3.2

137.4 ± 4.2

140.1 ± 3.5

  Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg

86.7 ± 2.7

82.4 ± 3.8

84.5 ± 4.6

  Total cholesterol, mg/dl (mmol/l)

188.2 ± 5.1

172.5 ± 4.9

185.4 ± 6.7

(4.9 ± 0.1)

(4.4 ± 0.1)

(4.8 ± 0.1)

  HDL cholesterol, mg/dl (mmol/l)

46.6 ± 2.2

48.2 ± 1.1

46.9 ± 0.8

(1.2 ± 0.1)

(1.2 ± 0.02)

(1.3 ± 0.02)

  LDL cholesterol, mg/dl (mmol/l)

98.1 ± 4.9

81.2 ± 3.2

88.4 ± 2.9

(2.5 ± 0.1)

(2.1 ± 0.1)

(2.7 ± 0.07)

  Triglycerides, mg/dl (mmol/l)

149.3 ± 12.4

162.1 ± 14.8

138.2 ± 16.3

(1.7 ± 0.1)

(1.8 ± 0.2)

(1.6 ± 0.2)

  Smoke, %

15.0

0.0

20.0

Complications

   

  Coronary artery disease, %

25.0

20.0

0.0

  Peripheral vascular disease, %

20.0

40.0

20.0

  Cerebrovascular disease, %

40.0

40.0

20.0

  Retinopathy, %

20.0

0.0

20.0

  Nephropathy, %

25.0

0.0

0.0

  eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 mq

0.0

0.0

0.0

Therapy

   

  Insulin therapy, %

50.0

0.0

20.0

  Oral therapy, %

45.0

100.0

80.0

  Diet alone, %

10.0

0.0

20.0

  ACE inhibitors/ARBs, %

80.0

80.0

80.0

  Statin, %

65.0

60.0

80.0

  1. Data are presented as mean ± standard error, or as percentage, where appropriate. There were no significant differences between the two groups of the in vivo study.