Plasma NT-proBNP and white matter hyperintensities in type 2 diabetic patients

  • Henrik Reinhard1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Ellen Garde2,

      Affiliated with

      • Arnold Skimminge2,

        Affiliated with

        • Per Åkeson2,

          Affiliated with

          • Thomas Zoëga Ramsøy2, 7,

            Affiliated with

            • Kaj Winther3,

              Affiliated with

              • Hans-Henrik Parving4, 5,

                Affiliated with

                • Peter Rossing1 and

                  Affiliated with

                  • Peter K Jacobsen1, 6

                    Affiliated with

                    Cardiovascular Diabetology201211:119

                    DOI: 10.1186/1475-2840-11-119

                    Received: 18 August 2012

                    Accepted: 20 September 2012

                    Published: 3 October 2012

                    Abstract

                    Elevated plasma N-terminal (NT)-proBNP from the heart as well as white matter hyperintensities (WMH) in the brain predict cardiovascular (CV) mortality in the general population. The cause of poor prognosis associated with elevated P-NT-proBNP is not known but WMH precede strokes in high risk populations. We assessed the association between P-NT-proBNP and WMH or brain atrophy measured with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in type 2 diabetic patients, and age-matched controls.

                    Methods and results

                    We measured P-NT-proBNP(ng/l) in 20 diabetic patients without prior stroke but with(n = 10) or without(n = 10) asymptomatic coronary artery disease(CAD) in order to include patients with a wide-ranging CV risk profile. All patients and 26 controls had a 3D MRI and brain volumes(ml) with WMH and brain parenchymal fraction(BPF), an indicator of brain atrophy, were determined.

                    P-NT-proBNP was associated with WMH in linear regression analysis adjusted for CV risk factors(r = 0.94, p = 0.001) and with BPF in univariate analysis(r = 0.57, p = 0.009). Patients divided into groups of increased P-NT-proBNP levels were paralleled with increased WMH volumes(geometric mean[SD];(2.86[5.11] ml and 0.76[2.49] ml compared to patients with low P-NT-proBNP 0.20[2.28] ml, p = 0.003)) and also when adjusted for age, sex and presence of CAD(p = 0.017). The association was strengthened by CV risk factors and we did not find a common heart or brain specific driver of both P-NT-proBNP and WMH. Patients and particular patients with CAD had higher WMH, however no longer after adjustment for age and sex.

                    Conclusion

                    P-NT-proBNP was associated with WMH in type 2 diabetic patients, suggesting a linkage between heart and brain disease.

                    Keywords

                    Type 2 diabetes Plasma NT-proBNP 3-D magnetic resonance imaging White matter hyperintensities Brain parenchymal fraction

                    Introduction

                    Manifest atherosclerosis that includes strokes is the most important determinant of the excessive morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes, especially in patients with microalbuminuria [1]. Although medical treatment aimed at reduction of established conventional risk factors is effective in reducing the increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes, there is still excess morbidity and mortality compared to the background population [2]. Detection of subclinical atherosclerotic manifestations in patients with diabetes in order to be able to identify patients at risk and start appropriate intervention at an early stage therefore seems evident.

                    Elevated plasma N-terminal-proBNP (P-NT-proBNP) levels released from the heart as well as white matter hyperintensities (WMH) in the brain are risk factors for cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality in the general population [3, 4]. We have previously identified P-NT-proBNP as a powerful predictor of CV mortality that included strokes in patients with type 2 diabetes [5]. The cause of poor prognosis seen in patients with elevated P-NT-proBNP is not known, but P-NT-proBNP is associated with the diagnosis of stroke in patients with suspected acute cerebrovascular disease [6]. Furthermore, a recent study (25% had diabetes) showed that P-NT-proBNP is highly elevated in patients with acute and cardioemboli strokes compared to patients with other types of strokes [7]. WMH, defined as white matter areas with high signal intensities on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) are regarded as expressions of chronic hypoperfusion [8]. Presence of WMH portends a three-fold increased risk of stroke and two-fold increased risk of dementia or mortality in the general population [4]. WMH are together with brain atrophy regarded as surrogate markers for cerebral small vessel disease. Cerebral small vessel disease is the most prevalent asymptomatic neurological disease, its incidence reported to be 6- to 10-fold that of symptomatic stroke [9, 10]. Whether P-NT-proBNP is associated with WMH and/or brain atrophy in patients with type 2 diabetes, is not known. In this study, we assessed the association between P-NT-proBNP and WMH and/or brain atrophy measured with MRI in type 2 diabetic without prior history of stroke but with or without asymptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD), and age and sex matched controls.

                    Methods

                    Patient cohort and investigations

                    We have previously investigated the extent of asymptomatic coronary artery disease as defined by myocardial imaging (MPI) and/or coronary angiography (CAG) in a study of 200 patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. The design and a selection of clinical measurements of the study have previously been described [11]. In the present study, we randomly selected 20 patients without previous clinical strokes but with or without previously screen detected asymptomatic CAD based on our previous study and in order to include patients with a wide-ranging CV risk profile. We also included 26 age and sex matched controls without known diabetes or CAD. P-NT-proBNP was analysed by an established immunoassay [5]. Tests for autonomic neuropathy, heart rate variability assessed by the expiration-inspiration variation of the heart rate and somatic nerve function (vibratory perception threshold) evaluated by biothesiometry, were performed.

                    The cardiovascular examinations have previously been described [1113]. In brief, carotid artery intima media thickness (CIMT) was measured at the posterior wall approximately 20 mm proximal to the bifurcation bilaterally and calculated as the mean of CIMT on both sides. Agaston coronary calcium score (CCS) was measured during a single breath hold using a 16 multidetector-row CT scanner with 3 mm slice thickness. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed using a Philips IE 33 machine. Significant CAD was defined as the presence of significant myocardial perfusion defects on MPI, and/or >70% coronary artery stenosis at CAG. The correlations between P-NT-proBNP, CCS, MPI and CAG have previously been reported [11]. All subjects underwent brain MRI (see below) and patients were assessed with the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE), a screening tool widely used for impaired cognitive skills [14]. It is often used to identify individuals in the early phase of dementia.

                    Brain magnetic resonance imaging

                    All subjects were scanned using a Siemens Magnetom Trio 3 T MRI scanner(Erlangen, Germany) with an eight channel head coil (Invivo, FL, USA) High-resolution three-dimensional(192 sagittal slices; 256 x 256 acquisition matrix) structural MRI scans of the brain were acquired including T1-weighted magnetisation prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MPRAGE) images (repetition time (TR) = 1550 ms, echo time (TE) = 3.04, inversion time(TI) = 800 ms; flip-angle = 9°; 1x1x1mm3), T2-weighted turbo spin echo images (TR = 3000 ms, TE = 354 ms; FOV = 282 mm;1.1x1.1x1.1 mm3), and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images (TR = 6000 ms, TE = 353 ms, TI = 2200; FOV = 282 mm;1.1x1.1x1.1 mm3).

                    Image pre-processing

                    Images were pre-processed using pipelines implemented in Matlab, mainly SPM8 (Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, University College London, UK) routines to obtain anatomical point correspondence between images. MPRAGE images were initially coregistered to the Monteal Neurological Institute (MNI) template image using a 6 parameter rigid transformation. Subsequently, T2-weighted and FLAIR images were coregistered to the corresponding MPRAGE image using a 6 parameter rigid transformation. All images were corrected for spatial distortions due to non-linearity in the gradient system of the scanner, and resliced to 1x1x1 mm3 resolution in MNI standard orientation.

                    Global tissue volumes

                    Brain tissue volumes, that included cortex, grey and white matter were estimated from the MPRAGE image with SIENAX, part of FSL, and were normalised for subject head size [15]. Intracranial volume was calculated by multiplying the volumetric scaling factor with the intracranial volume of the standard MNI template. Brain parenchymal fraction (BPF), a surrogate for brain atrophy was determined as total brain volume/ICV.

                    White matter hyperintensities

                    WMH were defined as clearly hyperintense areas relative to surrounding white matter on both FLAIR and T2-weighted images and identified by simultaneous inspection of both images. Infarcts (areas that were hyperintense on T2-weighted imaging but with low signal intensity on FLAIR and T1-weighted images and located in a vascular distribution area) were noted but not included. Local threshold was applied and WMH volumes for the whole brain quantified automatically using JIM (http://​www.​xinapse.​com). Visual identification was carried out by a single trained rater blinded to clinical information.

                    The study was approved by the local ethics committee and all patients gave written informed consent.

                    Statistical analysis

                    We investigated the association between P-NT-proBNP and WMH and/or BPF in univariate linear regression analyses in the 20 cases and also assessed the WMH levels in patients divided according to P-NT-proBNP tertiles. Furthermore, multivariate linear regression analyses were also performed with adjustment for age, sex and CV risk factors. Importantly, due to our low number of samples, we only included 2–3 risk factors in addition to age and sex for every analysis. However, we did test to see if various different combinations of various different 2–3 CV risk factors changed associations between P-NT-proBNP and WMH and/or BPF. Included CV risk factors were known diabetes duration, BMI, total cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, HbA1c, presence of retinopathy, urinary albumin excretion rate, vibration threshold, heart rate variation, CIMT, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), CCS and subclinical CAD. Particular the concomitant analyses with measures of subclinical atherosclerosis (CIMT, LVEF, CCS and subclinical CAD) were performed in order to test for a possible common driver of both P-NT-proBNP and WMH. Secondly, patients in groups with or without CAD and age-matched controls were compared in relation to brain measurements. Comparisons between groups were performed by an unpaired Student's t-test or the Pearson Chi-test2 when appropriate. Data were expressed as means and standard deviation (SD), except for non-normally distributed variables, which were given as medians and interquartile range. WMH volumes were skewly distributed and we used log WMH, in addition to medians (range), also given as geometric mean (SD) in order to compare with other studies. Several controls had no WMH, therefore we used log WMH (0 + 0.0001) for all controls. All data were analyzed by using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 14 for windows, and a P value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

                    Results

                    Patient characteristics and brain structure

                    Clinical characteristics of all patients and cerebral MRI measurements in all patients, in patients with or without CAD and age and sex matched controls, respectively, are summarized in Table 1. Of note, WMH were higher and BPF was lower in our patients, and in particular patients with CAD, compared to age and sex matched controls, however not when adjusting for conventional risk factors.
                    Table 1

                    The clinical characteristics and cerebral measurements of all patients and patients with or without asymptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) defined as abnormal myocardial perfusion imaging and/or stenosis on coronary angiography, and age and sex matched controls

                     

                    All patients

                    Controls

                    p-values1

                    Patients without CAD

                    Patients with. CAD

                    p-values2

                     

                    (n = 20)

                    (n = 26)

                     

                    (n = 10))

                    (n = 10))

                     

                    Sex no. (male%)

                    17 (76)

                    21 (81)

                    0.70

                    8 (80)

                    9 (90)

                    0.53

                    Age, years

                    57 (10)

                    52 (15)

                    0.28

                    51 (9)

                    63 (7)

                    0.005

                    Duration of diabetes, years

                    12 (6)

                      

                    9 (6)

                    15 (7)

                    0.036

                    BMI, kg/m2

                    31.9 (4.3)

                      

                    31.5 (4.3)

                    32.2 (4.6)

                    0.69

                    HbA1c , mmol/mol , (%)

                    63 (7.9)

                      

                    53 (7.8)

                    64 (8.1)

                    0.66

                    Urinary albumin excretion rate, mg/24ha

                    103 (3 – 1263)

                      

                    118 (42–618)

                    95 (3 – 1263)

                    0.37

                    P-creatinine, μmol/l

                    78 (20)

                      

                    69 (17)

                    88 (18)

                    0.025

                    Systolic blood pressure, mmHg

                    133 (17)

                      

                    127 ± 15

                    138 (18)

                    0.20

                    Total cholesterol, mmol/l

                    3.7 (0.9)

                      

                    3.8 ± 1.1

                    3.5 (0.7)

                    0.43

                    Vibratory perception threshold mV – mean of both sides

                    31 (15)

                      

                    22 (12)

                    40 (13)

                    0.004

                    Heart rate variation during deep breathing, bpma

                    8 (2–29)

                      

                    11 (5–29)

                    5 (2–11)

                    0.004

                    Retinopathy no. (%)

                    11 (55)

                      

                    4 (40)

                    7 (70)

                    0.18

                    Oral antidiabetic medication no. (%)

                    18 (90)

                      

                    9 (90)

                    90 (90)

                    1.0

                    Insulin treatment no. (%)

                    14 (70)

                      

                    6 (60)

                    8 (80)

                    0.33

                    RAAS blockade no. (%)

                    20 (100)

                      

                    10 (100)

                    10 (100)

                    1.0

                    Statin therapy no. (%)

                    20 (100)

                      

                    10 (100)

                    10 (100)

                    1.0

                    Aspirin therapy no. (%)

                    20 (100)

                      

                    10 (100)

                    10 (100)

                    1.0

                    Beta-blocker therapy no. (%)

                    2 (10)

                      

                    0 (0)

                    2 (20)

                    0.14

                    Calcium channel blockers no. (%)

                    7 (35)

                      

                    1 (10)

                    6 (60)

                    0.015

                    Use of diuretics no. (%)

                    11 (55)

                      

                    5 (50)

                    6 (60)

                    0.65

                    Current smoker no. (%)

                    5 (25)

                      

                    3 (30)

                    2 (20)

                    0.60

                    Carotid intima-media thickness, mm

                    0.73 (0.14)

                      

                    0.70 (0.13)

                    0.77 (0.14)

                    0.34

                    NT-proBNP, ng/la

                    23.9 (5.1-357,6)

                      

                    7.6 (5.1-29.1)

                    125.4 (15.8-357.6)

                    nr

                    MMSEa

                    30 (25–30)

                      

                    30 (28–30)

                    28 (25–30)

                    0.035

                    Cerebral MRI measurements

                          

                    White matter hyperintensities, mlb

                    0.79 (4.89)

                    0.002 (139)

                    0.0001

                    0.34 (2.75)

                    1.85 (5.17)

                    0.012

                    White matter hyperintensities, mla,b

                    0.48 (0.29-2.92)

                    0 (0–1.40)

                    0.0001

                    0.42 (0.13-0.78)

                    2.46 (0.36-2.92)

                    0.012

                    Brain parenchymal fraction

                    0.77 (0.04)

                    0.82 (0.05)

                    0.001

                    0.79 (0.04)

                    0.74 (0.02)

                    0.002

                    Intracranial volume (ICV), ml

                    1443.4 (123.9)

                    1441.5 (285.7)

                    0.98

                    1451.0 (104.7)

                    1435.8 (146.0)

                    0.79

                    Grey matter volume per ICV,%

                    38.9 (2.7)

                    42.6 (3.2)

                    0.0001

                    40.2

                    37.6

                    0.029

                    White matter volume per ICV,%

                    37.6 (2.3)

                    39.1 (2.1)

                    0.027

                    39.0

                    36.3

                    0.006

                    Cortex volume per ICV,%

                    29.9 (2.3)

                    33.0 (2.7)

                    0.0001

                    31.0

                    28.8

                    0.033

                    Ventricular volume per ICV,%

                    3.4 (1.3)

                    2.5 (0.8)

                    0.002

                    2.9

                    4.2

                    0.024

                    Data are expressed as means (standard deviation [SD]) or medians (interquartile range) a. Not relevant (nr).

                    WMH volumes b are both expressed as geometric mean (SD) values or medians (interquartile range) a in order to compare with other studies. Several controls had no WMH and therefore we used log WMH (0 + 0.0001) for all controls. The majority of controls had no signs of WMH (69%) but in contrast all patients had WMH.

                    P-values reflect comparison between patients and controls1, and patients with or without CAD2.

                    These comparisons were all non-significant when adjustment for age and sex.

                    Mini mental state examination (MMSE).

                    P-NT-proBNP, WMH volume and BPF

                    P-NT-proBNP was measured in all cases and distribution is shown in Table 1. A correlation in univariate linear regression analysis was found between P-NT-proBNP and WMH volumes (r = 0.68, p = 0.001, Figure 1). In an adjusted model that included age, sex, total cholesterol and systolic blood pressure, P-NT-proBNP remained predictive of WMH (r = 0.82, p = 0.05). Importantly, when all the other previously defined CV risk factors (known diabetes duration, total cholesterol, BMI, systolic blood pressure, HbA1c, presence of retinopathy, urinary albumin excretion rate, vibration threshold, heart rate variation, CIMT, LVEF, CCS or the presence of asymptomatic CAD) were included in the latter analysis instead of total cholesterol and systolic blood pressure in various combinations as previously defined, the association remained significant (all p < 0.05). Interestingly, when CIMT was included in addition to age, sex, cholesterol and systolic blood pressure, the significance and association between P-NT-proBNP and WMH increased (r = 0.94, p = 0.001). P-NT-proBNP was also associated with BPF in univariate linear regression analysis (r = 0.57, p = 0.009) but not after adjustment for sex and age (p = 0.23).
                    http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2840-11-119/MediaObjects/12933_2012_Article_550_Fig1_HTML.jpg
                    Figure 1

                    Univariate linear regression analysis with the logarithm of plasma NT-proBNP (ng/l) in relation to the logarithm of white matter hyperintensities in 20 patients with type 2 diabetes.

                    Patients were also divided into NT-proBNP tertiles (<14.7, 14.7-57.4, and >57.4 ng/l, respectively), and patients with high and intermediate P-NT-proBNP levels had higher WMH volume (geometric mean[SD]; (2.86[5.11] and 0.76[2.49], compared to patients with low P-NT-proBNP(0.20[2.28] , p = 0.003, Figure 2), and this was also significant when adjusting for age, sex and presence of CAD (p = 0.017).
                    http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2840-11-119/MediaObjects/12933_2012_Article_550_Fig2_HTML.jpg
                    Figure 2

                    A scatter plot correlation, showing white matter hyperintensities in 20 patients with type 2 diabetes and with low, intermediate and high plasma NT-proBNP levels (tertile values), respectively, (horizontal bar is geometric mean among the groups, p = 0.003).

                    Discussion

                    Principal findings

                    In twenty patients with type 2 diabetes with no history of stroke, P-NT-proBNP was strongly associated with volumes of white matter hyperintensities. Furthermore, white matter hyperintensities were higher and brain parenchyma fraction was lower in our patients, and in particular patients with CAD, compared to age and sex matched controls, however not when adjusting for conventional risk factors.

                    Plasma NT-proBNP and white matter hypertensities

                    Our main finding that elevated P-NT-proBNP levels were associated with presence and severity of WMH has to our best knowledge not been described before. The association was independent of all tested CV risk factors and particular age and systolic blood pressure, which are considered the main predictors of WMH. Noteworthy, the association between P-NT-proBNP and WMH was strengthened and not attenuated by the addition of CV risk factors and in particular CIMT, and this may suggest that the cause is not related to an age systemic atherosclerosis but indeed organ heart and brain specific, therefore linking the heart with the brain. In humans the left ventricle is the main source of P-NT-proBNP with increased myocyte stretch or myocardial ischemia. It therefore seemed unlikely, based on physiology that elevated P-NT-proBNP from the heart per se directly promoted WMH or cerebrovascular disease in the present study. In contrast, heart disease such as heart failure or presence of atrial fibrillation that are known determinants of higher P-NT-proBNP levels and associated with increased risk of strokes, could be a common driver of both elevated P-NT-proBNP and WMH [7]. Our patients, however, were without acute illness and had normal ejection fraction without atrial fibrillation or valvular disease, and patients also had lower levels of P-NT-proBNP than seen in congestive heart failure [11]. Furthermore, we performed concomitant analyses with measures of subclinical heart disease, and the association between P-NT-proBNP and WMH remained significant after adjustment for LVEF, CCS and asymptomatic CAD. Along that line when patients with CAD were excluded, the association between P-NT-proBNP and WMH actually persisted. This is particular important, since the differences in P-NT-proBNP levels between patients with and without CAD were large and this could drive a false association between P-NT-proBNP and WMH. Of note, we only included patients with or without previously screen detected asymptomatic CAD in order to include patients with a wide risk profile. Accordingly, our present study suggests that the cause of the association between P-NT-proBNP and WMH is not explained by a common typical CV or heart disease driver, therefore possibly directly linking P-NT-proBNP and WMH. Along that line, recent studies have documented that plasma brain natiurectic peptide (BNP) itself increases the risk of stroke [16]. WMH are commonly found on MRI of elderly individuals with frequencies ranging from 11-21% at age 60 to 94% at age 82 [4]. Although often referred to as 'incidental', WMH have been associated with decline in cognitive function in independently living elderly populations and with a two-fold increased risk of dementia or stroke [4]. Furthermore, WMH are regarded as expressions of chronic hypoperfusion and small vessel cerebral disease. Small vessel cerebral disease is the most prevalent asymptomatic neurological disease, its incidence reported to be 6- to 10-fold that of symptomatic stroke [9, 10]. Presence of WMH has been reported to predict a three-fold increased risk of stroke and two-fold increased risk of mortality in the general population [4]. In the recent Framingham Offspring Stroke Study, the presence of WMH predicted CV mortality and this was independent of risk factors and strokes or dementia [17]. Following the discussion of the mechanism underlying the relationship between P-NT-proBNP and WMH, the reverse could also be true; WMH induced elevated P-NT-proBNP levels through abnormal neuroendocrine signals to the cardiac ventricles and thereby functional asymptomatic heart failure [7]. Accordingly, the chronic cerebral hypoperfusion seen in patients with WMH could indirectly promote NT-proBNP realise from the heart. Our measurement of cardiac autonomic neuropathy (heart rate variability), however, did not change the association between P-NT-proBNP and WMH in the present study. Increased P-NT-proBNP levels could, however, also reflect other counter actions to the damages associated with WMH and accordingly mediated through other pathways. Along that line, other studies have suggested that BNP include several actions in addition to vasodilation and promotion of natriuresis and diuresis such as inhibition of the sympathetic nervous system and inhibition of several hormone systems, including the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS), endothelins, cytokines, and vasopressin [18, 19].

                    Finally, the correlation between P-NT-proBNP and WMH could also be brain to brain instead of heart to brain. Along that line, damage or hypoperfusion of the brain (WMH) might directly induce realise of NT-proBNP from the brain [20]. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) was actually first described in the porcine brain and accordingly later localized in the hypothalamus, thalamus, cerebellum, pons and cortex of the human brain [20]. Few studies have investigated BNP and NT-proBNP from the brain in disease. Specifically, in rats status epilepticus induced increase in plasma ANP (8), and occlusion of the middle cerebral artery stimulates BNP mRNA expression in rat brain tissues [21]. In humans, the BNP gene promoter region contains a hypoxia-inducible factor-1 binding site, which activates BNP expression [22], and in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage plasma BNP concentrations were higher than controls. Some studies have also shown that P-NT-proBNP is increased in patients with acute ischemic stroke [6, 7, 2325] but these studies may not have convincingly demonstrated that this association is independent from heart disease. In contrast, Tomati et al. examined all included patients with acute stroke with echocardiography in order to exclude the presence of heart disease and hereby investigate if BNP levels were elevated in patients with acute stroke, independently of heart disease. The study demonstrated that plasma BNP levels were indeed associated with the severity of cerebrovascular disease and particular volume of brain infarct size. One human CT study also recently suggested that the ischemic brain tissue per se release NT-proBNP into the circulation [26]. Importantly, all our patients were without acute illnesses; since acute disease such as stroke might be a condition that per se with sympathetic and catecholamines activity, cause stress of the heart and therefore BNP secretion. In contrast, our patients with CAD had higher WMH and lower BPF, however no longer after adjustment for age and sex (Table 1). Our study also demonstrated that WMH is higher and BPF lower in our patients compared to age-matched controls, where 69% had no signs of WMH.

                    Clinical implications

                    All our patients had microalbuminuria and several studies have demonstrated that microalbuminuria identifies a subgroup of patients with increased morbidity and mortality from CV disease but recent studies also suggest that P-NT-proBNP can further stratify the group into patients with high or low risk for CV events [1, 3, 5]. Specifically, we have previously identified P-NT-proBNP as a powerful predictor of all cause and cardiovascular mortality that included strokes in patients with type 2 diabetes [5]. In that study, 80% of patients in the upper P-NT-proBNP tertile died, compared to 30% of patients in the lower tertile during 15 years of follow-up. The cause of poor prognosis in patients with elevated P-NT-proBNP is not known. We therefore performed the above described cross-sectional study of 200 patients with microalbuminuria and in this study, which examined patients for subclinical CAD and CV disease, we demonstrated no independent correlations between P-NT-proBNP and measurements of peripheral systolic blood pressure, CIMT, CCS, MPI, CAG or echo abnormalities [1113]. P-NT-proBNP levels, however, have been shown by others to correlate with CIMT [27], CCS [28], MPI [29], CAG [30] and echo abnormalities [31] in other populations. Along that line, all our patients received intensive multifactorial intervention at Steno Diabetes Center for years before entering the study and this intervention aimed at CV prevention includes improved glycemic, lipid, and blood pressure control, as well as antithrombotic therapy and lifestyle modification according to international guidelines [32]. Intensive multifactorial treatment according to the Steno-2 trail reduces CV disease and mortality with 50% [2]. Of note, the medical treatment in our large cohort included statins (95% of patients), aspirin (92%), and RAAS-blocking agents (98%) and yielded mean total cholesterol levels of 3.7 mM, arterial blood pressures of 133/75 mmHg, and haemoglobinA1c levels of 53 mmol/mol (7.9%), respectively. We have therefore speculated that the intensive multifactorial medical treatment may be responsible for a weakening of the associations currently found between P-NT-proBNP levels and the previously described measurements of subclinical CAD and CV disease [1113]. The Steno-2 trial showed that P-NT-proBNP levels might still hold prognostic capability despite multifactorial treatment [33]. Along that line, the association between P-NT-proBNP and WMH in the present study could suggest that the residual risk seen in these patients could be cerebrovascular and that this risk is revealed with increased levels of P-NT-proBNP. If P-NT-proBNP in general can be used as an independent biomarker in the detection of subclinical WMH or cerebrovascular disease is, however, not known. Along that line, our present study is small and included a relative selected population of type 2 diabetic patients. For an example, the intensive medical therapy prescribed in our patients but also the selection of high risk CV patients with microalbuminuria and/or asymptomatic CAD. Along that line, the confounders on P-NT-proBNP levels could be even more pronounced in complicated CV patients, and therefore more than we were able to adjust for.

                    Today, it is generally accepted that the P-NT-proBNP assay may be useful in the screening, diagnosis and perhaps monitoring of patients with heart failure. In the general population, BNP inversely correlates with hyperinsulinemia but in diabetic patients P-NT-proBNP levels are increased compared to controls, and in addition BNP levels are altered by several factors in stroke patients [3436]. P-NT-proBNP is a prognostic marker of CV disease in several populations including diabetic patients, and perhaps also a diagnostic tool for LV dysfunction in diabetic patients [5, 31]. As described above, recent studies have demonstrated that BNP might also be important in patients with stroke. Specifically, Saritas et al., showed that plasma BNP levels could serve as a measurement of the severity and clinical progression in stroke patients [37]. Furthermore, the Framingham Offspring Study demonstrated that BNP offered improvement in the accuracy of stroke risk [16]. This could also be true in diabetic patients but is not formally proven [5]. Finally, it is important to note that few studies have investigated if WMH or other cerebrovascular disease in these patients on intensive medical therapy could serve a CV preventive treatment target. In one study, more aggressive antihypertensive treatment was associated with reduced progression in WMH but if this reduction is associated with reduced risk is not known [38]. Accordingly, the clinical impact of the presence of WMH and the true meaning of NT-proBNP and WMH associations need to be investigated in larger and longitudinal studies.

                    Strengths and limitations

                    Our detection of brain structure in the present study was performed with 3D MRI scan, which is a well established, recognized and accurate strong non-invasive modality for these measurements. The MRI is sensitive with a three-dimensional quantification and low covariability [39]. Most studies that include MRI measurements in patients with diabetes are from subpopulations [40] and fewer studies report volumetric measurements as in the present study [41, 42]. Although our study only included twenty patients with diabetes, we demonstrated a broad variation of WMH and brain volumes among our patients that were selected among 200 patients with or without asymptomatic CAD in order to include patients with a wide-ranging CV risk profile. The several multivariate analyses we performed as described in various combination of 2–3 CV risk factors in addition to age and sex, due to the relative low sample size, should obviously be interpreted with caution and we did not test for the multiple testing in these analyses.

                    Conclusion

                    We demonstrated for the first time that plasma NT-proBNP was independently associated with white matter hyperintensities in asymptomatic type 2 diabetec patients with no history if stroke. The association was strengthened and not attenuated with the addition of CV risk factors and particular carotid artery intima media thickness, suggesting a linkage between heart and brain disease. We were however, not able to demonstrate a common driver of both P-NT-proBNP and white matter hypertensities. Finally, white matter hyperintensities were higher and brain parenchyma fraction was lower in our patients, and in particular patients with CAD, compared to age and sex matched controls, however not when adjusting for conventional risk factors.

                    Abbreviations

                    CCS: 

                    Agaston coronary calcium score

                    BPF: 

                    Brain parenchymal fraction

                    CV: 

                    Cardiovascular

                    CIMT: 

                    Carotid artery intima media thickness

                    CAG: 

                    Coronary angiography

                    CAD: 

                    Coronary artery disease

                    LVEF: 

                    Left ventricular ejection fraction

                    MRI: 

                    Magnetic resonance imaging

                    MMSE: 

                    Mini Mental Status Examination

                    MPI: 

                    Myocardial imaging

                    P-NT-proBNP: 

                    N-terminal-proBNP

                    WMH: 

                    White matter hyperintensities.

                    Declarations

                    Acknowledgements

                    Authors want to acknowledge the work of lab technicians Ulla M. Smidt, Berit R. Jensen, Tina R. Juhl and Anne G. Lundgaard, employees at Steno Diabetes Center A/S.

                    Authors’ Affiliations

                    (1)
                    Steno Diabetes Center
                    (2)
                    Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital
                    (3)
                    Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Frederiksberg University Hospital
                    (4)
                    Department of Medical Endocrinology, University Hospital of Copenhagen
                    (5)
                    Faculty of Health Science, Aarhus University
                    (6)
                    The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet & University of Copenhagen
                    (7)
                    Decision Neuroscience Research Group, Dept. of Marketing, Copenhagen Business School

                    References

                    1. Gerstein HC, Mann JF, Yi Q, et al: Albuminuria and risk of cardiovascular events, death, and heart failure in diabetic and nondiabetic individuals. JAMA. 2001, 286 (4): 421-426. 10.1001/jama.286.4.421.View ArticlePubMed
                    2. Gaede P, Lund-Andersen H, Parving H-H, et al: Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008, 358 (6): 580-591. 10.1056/NEJMoa0706245.View ArticlePubMed
                    3. Wang TJ, Larson MG, Levy D, et al: Plasma natriuretic peptide levels and the risk of cardiovascular events and death. N Engl J Med. 2004, 350 (7): 655-663. 10.1056/NEJMoa031994.View ArticlePubMed
                    4. Debette S, Markus HS: The clinical importance of white matter hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br Med J. 2010, 341: c3666-10.1136/bmj.c3666.View Article
                    5. Tarnow L, Gall M-A, Hansen BV, et al: Plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and mortality in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2006, 49: 2256-2262. 10.1007/s00125-006-0359-4.View ArticlePubMed
                    6. Whiteley W, Wardlaw J, Dennis M, et al: Blood biomarkers for the diagnosis of acute cerebrovascular diseases: a prospective cohort study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011, 32 (2): 141-147. 10.1159/000328517.View ArticlePubMed
                    7. Shibazaki K, Kimura K, Iguchi Y, et al: Plasma brain natriuretic peptide can be a biological marker to distinguish cardioembolic stroke from other stroke types in acute ischemic stroke. Intern Med. 2009, 48 (5): 259-264. 10.2169/internalmedicine.48.1475.View ArticlePubMed
                    8. Pantoni L, Garcia JH: Pathogenesis of leukoaraiosis: a review. Stroke. 1997, 28 (3): 652-659. 10.1161/01.STR.28.3.652.View ArticlePubMed
                    9. Hachinski V: World Stroke Day 2008: "little strokes, big trouble". Stroke. 2008, 39 (9): 2407-2420. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.531681.View ArticlePubMed
                    10. Leary MC, Saver JL: Annual incidence of first silent stroke in the United States: a preliminary estimate. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003, 16 (3): 280-285. 10.1159/000071128.View ArticlePubMed
                    11. Reinhard H, Hansen PR, Persson F, et al: Elevated NT-proBNP and coronary calcium score in relation to coronary artery disease in asymptomatic type 2 diabetic patients with elevated urinary albumin excretion rate. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011, 26 (10): 3242-3249. 10.1093/ndt/gfr009.View ArticlePubMed
                    12. Reinhard H, Wiinberg N, Hansen PR, et al: NT-proBNP levels, atherosclerosis and vascular function in asymptomatic type 2 diabetic patients with microalbuminuria: peripheral reactive hyperaemia index but not NT-proBNP is an independent predictor of coronary atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2011, 10: 71-10.1186/1475-2840-10-71.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                    13. Reinhard H, Hansen PR, Wiinberg N, et al: NT-proBNP, echocardiographic abnormalities and subclinical coronary artery disease in high risk type 2 diabetic patients. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012, 11: 19-10.1186/1475-2840-11-19.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                    14. Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ: The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992, 40 (9): 922-935.View ArticlePubMed
                    15. Smith SM, Zhang Y, Jenkinson M, et al: Accurate, robust, and automated longitudinal and cross-sectional brain change analysis. Neuroimage. 2002, 17 (1): 479-489. 10.1006/nimg.2002.1040.View ArticlePubMed
                    16. Pikula A, Beiser AS, DeCarli C, et al: Multiple biomarkers and risk of clinical and subclinical vascular brain injury: the Framingham Offspring Study. Circulation. 2012, 125 (17): 2100-2107. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.989145.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                    17. Debette S, Beiser A, DeCarli C, et al: Association of MRI markers of vascular brain injury with incident stroke, mild cognitive impairment, dementia, and mortality: the Framingham Offspring Study. Stroke. 2010, 41 (4): 600-606. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.570044.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                    18. Wada A, Tsutamoto T, Matsuda Y, et al: Cardiorenal and neurohumoral effects of endogenous atrial natriuretic peptide in dogs with severe congestive heart failure using a specific antagonist for guanylate cyclase-coupled receptors. Circulation. 1994, 89 (5): 2232-2240. 10.1161/01.CIR.89.5.2232.View ArticlePubMed
                    19. Schultz HD, Gardner DG, Deschepper CF, et al: Vagal C-fiber blockade abolishes sympathetic inhibition by atrial natriuretic factor. Am J Physiol. 1988, 255 (1 Pt 2): R6-R13.PubMed
                    20. Takahashi K, Totsune K, Sone M, et al: Human brain natriuretic peptide-like immunoreactivity in human brain. Peptides. 1992, 13 (1): 121-123. 10.1016/0196-9781(92)90149-W.View ArticlePubMed
                    21. Brosnan MJ, Clark JS, Jeffs B, et al: Genes encoding atrial and brain natriuretic peptides as candidates for sensitivity to brain ischemia in stroke-prone hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1999, 33 (1 Pt 2): 290-297.View ArticlePubMed
                    22. Jiang C, Lu H, Vincent KA, et al: Gene expression profiles in human cardiac cells subjected to hypoxia or expressing a hybrid form of HIF-1 alpha. Physiol Genomics. 2002, 8 (1): 23-32.View ArticlePubMed
                    23. Nakagawa K, Yamaguchi T, Seida M, et al: Plasma concentrations of brain natriuretic peptide in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005, 19 (3): 157-164. 10.1159/000083249.View ArticlePubMed
                    24. Sharma JC, Ananda K, Ross I, et al: N-terminal proBrain natriuretic peptide levels predict short-term poststroke survival. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006, 15 (3): 121-127. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2006.03.003.View ArticlePubMed
                    25. Iltumur K, Yavavli A, Apak I, et al: Elevated plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels in acute ischemic stroke. Am Heart J. 2006, 151 (5): 1115-1122. 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.05.022.View ArticlePubMed
                    26. Modrego PJ, Boned B, Berlanga JJ, et al: Plasmatic B-type natriuretic peptide and C-reactive protein in hyperacute stroke as markers of CT-evidence of brain edema. Int J Med Sci. 2008, 5 (1): 18-23.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                    27. Peng XL, Lin ZP, Zhang RK, et al: [B-type natriuretic peptides and subclinical target organ damage in essential hypertensive patients]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2010, 30 (10): 2347-2350.PubMed
                    28. Abdullah SM, Khera A, Das SR, et al: Relation of coronary atherosclerosis determined by electron beam computed tomography and plasma levels of n-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in a multiethnic population-based sample (the Dallas Heart Study). Am J Cardiol. 2005, 96 (9): 1284-1289. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.06.073.View ArticlePubMed
                    29. Wiersma JJ, van der Zee PM, van Straalen JP, Fischer JC, van Eck-Smit BL, Tijssen JG, Trip MD, Piek JJ, Verberne HJ: NT-pro-BNP is associated with inducible myocardial ischemia in mildly symptomatic type 2 diabetic patients. Int J Cardiol. 2010, 145 (2): 295-6. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.10.035. November 19View ArticlePubMed
                    30. Sakai H, Tsutamoto T, Ishikawa C, et al: Direct comparison of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP secretion and extent of coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Circ J. 2007, 71 (4): 499-505. 10.1253/circj.71.499.View ArticlePubMed
                    31. Magnusson M, Jovinge S, Shahgaldi K, et al: Brain natriuretic peptide is related to diastolic dysfunction whereas urinary albumin excretion rate is related to left ventricular mass in asymptomatic type 2 diabetes patients. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2010, 9: 2-10.1186/1475-2840-9-2.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                    32. Christensen LL, Anker-Nielsen A, Almdal TP: Development in Quality of Treatment in Complicated Type 2 Diabetes Assessed by the Proportion of Patients Reaching ADA Goals. Diab. 2010, 59: A180-A181.
                    33. Gaede P, Hildebrandt P, Hess G, et al: Plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide as a major risk marker for cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Diabetologia. 2005, 48 (1): 156-163. 10.1007/s00125-004-1607-0.View ArticlePubMed
                    34. Nakatsuji H, Kishida K, Funahashi T, et al: Hyperinsulinemia correlates with low levels of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide in Japanese men irrespective of fat distribution. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012, 11: 22-10.1186/1475-2840-11-22.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                    35. Magnusson M, Melander O, Israelsson B, et al: Elevated plasma levels of Nt-proBNP in patients with type 2 diabetes without overt cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Care. 2004, 27 (8): 1929-1935. 10.2337/diacare.27.8.1929.View ArticlePubMed
                    36. Cakir Z, Saritas A, Emet M, et al: A prospective study of brain natriuretic peptide levels in three subgroups: Stroke with hypertension, stroke without hypertension, and hypertension alone. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2010, 13 (1): 47-51. 10.4103/0972-2327.61277.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                    37. Saritas A, Cakir Z, Emet M, et al: Factors affecting the B-type natriuretic peptide levels in stroke patients. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2010, 39 (5): 385-389.PubMed
                    38. Fukuda H, Kitani M: Differences between treated and untreated hypertensive subjects in the extent of periventricular hyperintensities observed on brain MRI. Stroke. 1995, 26 (9): 1593-1597. 10.1161/01.STR.26.9.1593.View ArticlePubMed
                    39. Mantyla R, Erkinjuntti T, Salonen O, et al: Variable agreement between visual rating scales for white matter hyperintensities on MRI. Comparison of 13 rating scales in a poststroke cohort. Stroke. 1997, 28 (8): 1614-1623. 10.1161/01.STR.28.8.1614.View ArticlePubMed
                    40. van HB, de Leeuw FE, Weinstein HC, et al: Brain imaging in patients with diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2006, 29 (11): 2539-2548. 10.2337/dc06-1637.View Article
                    41. Jongen C, van der Grond J, Kappelle LJ, et al: Automated measurement of brain and white matter lesion volume in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2007, 50 (7): 1509-1516. 10.1007/s00125-007-0688-y.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                    42. De BJ, Tiehuis AM, van den Berg E, et al: Progression of cerebral atrophy and white matter hyperintensities in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010, 33 (6): 1309-1314. 10.2337/dc09-1923.View Article

                    Copyright

                    © Reinhard et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

                    This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                    Advertisement