Table 4 Reclassification and discrimination statistics for predicting CKD by adding baseline TyG index, TyG index variability and cumulative TyG index

Men

Clinical risk model ^a

0.610 (0.590, 0.629)

+baseline TyG index

0.610 (0.590, 0.630)

0.690 ^b

-0.130 (-0.236, -0.025)

0.015 ^b

-0.17% (-0.36%, 0.01%)

0.060 ^b

+baseline TyG index and TyG index variability

0.633 (0.614, 0.653)

0.008 ^c

0.240 (0.135, 0.345)

< 0.001 ^c

0.85% (0.36%, 1.35%)

< 0.001 ^c

+baseline TyG index and cumulative TyG index

0.629 (0.609, 0.648)

0.006 ^c

0.097 (-0.009, 0.202)

0.072 ^c

0.42% (0.02%, 0.81%)

0.039 ^c

+baseline TyG index, TyG index variability and cumulative TyG index

0.649 (0.629, 0.668)

< 0.001 ^c

0.309 (0.204, 0.414)

< 0.001 ^c

1.50% (0.88%, 2.12%)

< 0.001 ^c

0.007 ^d

0.088 (-0.017, 0.194)

0.101 ^d

0.42% (0.00%, 0.83%)

0.048 ^d

0.010 ^e

0.243 (0.138, 0.348)

< 0.001 ^e

0.95% (0.45%, 1.45%)

< 0.001 ^e

Women

Clinical risk model ^a

0.612 (0.593, 0.630)

+baseline TyG index

0.615 (0.597, 0.633)

0.318 ^b

0.143 (0.039, 0.246)

0.007 ^b

0.17% (0.02%, 0.32%)

0.027 ^b

+baseline TyG index and TyG index variability

0.629 (0.611, 0.647)

0.019 ^c

0.189 (0.084, 0.294)

< 0.001 ^c

0.38% (0.12%, 0.64%)

0.004 ^c

+baseline TyG index and cumulative TyG index

0.623 (0.605, 0.641)

0.107 ^c

0.156 (0.051, 0.261)

0.004 ^c

0.22% (0.02%, 0.42%)

0.035 ^c

+baseline TyG index, TyG index variability and cumulative TyG index

0.636 (0.617, 0.653)

0.004 ^c

0.233 (0.129, 0.338)

< 0.001 ^c

0.64% (0.29%, 0.99%)

< 0.001 ^c

0.152 ^d

0.178 (0.073, 0.283)

< 0.001 ^d

0.26% (0.04%, 0.48%)

0.023 ^d

0.026 ^e

0.192 (0.087, 0.297)

< 0.001 ^e

0.42% (0.14%, 0.70%)

0.003 ^e