From: Residual macrovascular risk in 2013: what have we learned?
Treatment/Trial [reference] | Daily dose (mg) | Patient criteria | Duration of follow-up | Key findings |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fenofibrate | Â | Â | Â | Â |
ACCORD Lipid (n = 5,518) [46] | 1601 | Type 2 diabetes; Mean LDL-C ~2.07 mmol/L [80 mg/dL] on simvastatin (mean dose 22.4 mg/day) | 4.7 years | • No significant benefit on any CV outcomes for the total study population |
• For patients with marked atherogenic dyslipidaemia,2 there was ~30% reduction in the primary CV outcome versus simvastatin alone (12.4% versus 17.3%, p = 0.06 for interaction versus all other patients) | ||||
Niacin | Â | Â | Â | Â |
ER niacin titrating to 1500-2000 | Patients with CVD with persistent atherogenic dyslipidaemia3 | Prematurely terminated; mean 3 years | • No significant outcomes benefit with ER niacin | |
• Methodological issues; inadequately powered, placebo contained a low-dose of niacin (50 mg/capsule), imbalance in concomitant LDL-C lowering therapy between groups | ||||
Median LDL-C on statin 1.91Â mmol/L [74Â mg/dL] | ||||
 |  |  |  | • For patients with marked atherogenic dyslipidaemia,4 there was a 36% relative reduction in the primary CV outcome (25.0% versus 16.7%, p = 0.032) |
HPS2-THRIVE (n = 25,673) [63] | ER niacin/laropiprant 2000 | Patients with history of CVD | Median 3.9 years | • No significant outcomes benefit with ER niacin/laropiprant |
Mean lipid values at end of pre-randomisation phase (simvastatin 40 mg/day ± ezetimibe): | ||||
• Significant increases in diabetic complications, new-onset diabetes, infection, gastrointestinal effects (p < 0.0001), musculoskeletal, bleeding effects (p < 0.001) and skin adverse events (p = 0.026) with ER niacin/laropiprant | ||||
LDL-C 1.64Â mmol/L [63Â mg/dL] | ||||
HDL-C 1.14Â mmol/L [44Â mg/dL] | ||||
TG 1.43Â mmol/L [125Â mg/dL] | ||||
Omega-3 fatty acids | Â | Â | Â | Â |
1800, EPA | High-risk patients with hypercholesterolaemia (total cholesterol ≥6.5 mmol/L [250 mg/dL]) | Mean 4.6 years | • 19% reduction in major coronary events (2.8% versus 3.5%, p = 0.011) with EPA + statin versus statin alone | |
Baseline mean LDL-C 4.6 mmol/L [180 mg/dL] on pravastatin 10 mg/day or simvastatin 5 mg/day | • A post hoc analysis showed a 53% relative reduction (p = 0.043) in patients with TG ≥1.7 mmol/L (150 mg/dL) and HDL-C <1.0 mmol/L (40 mg/dL) versus those without this dyslipidaemia | |||
ALPHA-OMEGA (n = 4,837) [67] | 400, EPA + DHA; | MI survivors, 85% on lipid-lowering therapy (mainly statins) | 40 months | • No significant effect on CV outcomes with any treatment versus placebo (best evidence-based treatment) |
2Â g ALA; or both | ||||
Mean baseline lipids were | ||||
LDL-C 2.6Â mmol/L [100Â mg/dL] | ||||
HDL-C 1.28Â mmol/L [49.5Â mg/dL] | ||||
Median TG 1.69Â mmol/L [150Â mg/dL] | ||||
ORIGIN | 900 (465 EPA and 375 DHA) | Patients with or at risk of diabetes and at high CV risk | Median 6.2 years | • No significant effect on primary outcome (CV death) or secondary or other clinical outcomes |
(n = 12,536) [68] | ||||
Mean baseline lipids were | ||||
TC 4.9Â mmol/L (190Â mg/dL) | ||||
LDL-C 2.89Â mmol/L (112Â mg/dL) | ||||
HDL-C 1.19Â mmol/L (46Â mg/dL) | ||||
Median TG 1.58Â mmol/L (140Â mg/dL) |