Skip to main content

Table 5 Effect of ischemic postconditioning in patients with acute myocardial infarction

From: Effects of diabetes on myocardial infarct size and cardioprotection by preconditioning and postconditioning

First author

% of DM

Age

Protocol

Results

    

ST resolution

LV function

Enzyme release

Infarct size

Ischemic PostC

Staat

20 vs. 13

58 vs. 56

4x 60sR/I

Improved

N/A

Reduced (peak, AUC)

N/A

Laskey

N/A

58 vs. 58

2x 90sR/I

Improved

N/A

Nochange (peak)

N/A

Ma

38 vs. 45

64 vs. 64

3x 30sR/I

N/A

Improved WMSI

Reduced (peak)

N/A

Yang

26 vs. 28

59 vs. 63

3x 30sR/I

No change

No change

Reduced (AUC)

Reduced (SPECT, 1w)

Thibault

12 vs. 10

56 vs. 56

4x 60sR/I

N/A

Improved EF, WMSI

Reduced (AUC)

Reduced (SPECT, 6m)

Laskey

38 vs. 42

60 vs. 58

2x 90sR/I

Improved

No change

Reduced (peak)

N/A

Xue

21 vs. 29

54 vs. 62

4x 60sR/I

Improved

Improved EF, WMSI

Reduced (peak, AUC)

Reduced (SPECT, 1w)

Lønborg

7 vs. 7

61 vs. 62

4x 30sR/I

No change

No change

N/A

Reduced (CMR, 3m)

Sörensson

25 vs. 17

63 vs. 62

4x 60sR/I

N/A

No change *1

No change (AUC)

No change (CMR, 1w) *1

Freixa

23 vs. 17

59 vs. 60

4x 60sR/I

N/A

No change

No change (peak)

No change (CMR, 1w & 6m)

Tarantini

18 vs. 3

60 vs. 60

4x 60sR/I

No change

No change

No change (AUC)

No change (CMR, 1m)

  1. DM diabetes mellitus, MBG myocardial blush grade, CF coronary flow, WMSI wall motion score index, EF ejection fraction, AUC area under the curve, MACE major adverse cardiac events, SPECT single photon emission computed tomography, CMR cardiovascular magnetic resonance, w week, m month;
  2. *1 Improved by postconditioning with large area at risk.