Skip to main content

Table 6 Associations between MR-based Abdominal and Cardiac Measures by Multivariable Regression in Healthy Controls

From: Association of abdominal adiposity, hepatic shear stiffness with subclinical left-ventricular remodeling evaluated by magnetic resonance in adults free of overt cardiovascular diseases: a prospective study

  

H-PDFF (β [95%CI], p)

SAT (β [95%CI], p)

VAT (β [95%CI], p)

LVMT

Model 1

–

0.001 (− 0.01, 0.01), 0.86

–

 

Model 2

–

0.001 (− 0.01, 0.01), 0.89

–

|C-PS|

Model 1

− 1.30 (− 2.58, -0.01), 0.048a

–

− 0.03 (− 0.08, − -0.02), 0.18

 

Model 2

− 1.31 (− 2.76, 0.14), 0.08

–

− 0.04 (− 0.10, 0.02), 0.17

|R-PDSR|

Model 1

− 0.50 (− 0.98, -0.02), 0.04a

–

–

 

Model 2

− 0.61 (− 1.14, -0.08), 0.03a

–

–

L-PDSR

Model 1

− 0.21 (− 0.36, − 0.07), 0.01a

–

–

 

Model 2

− 0.23 (− 0.40, − 0.06), 0.01a

–

–

  1. CI confidence interval, C-PS circumferential peak strain, H-PDFF hepatic proton density fat fraction, L-PDSR longitudinal peak diastolic strain rate, LV left ventricular, LVMT left ventricular myocardial thickness, R-PDSR radial peak diastolic strain rate, SAT subcutaneous adipose tissue, VAT visceral adipose tissue
  2. Significant results are in bold
  3. aThe results were significant at a significance level of 0.05