Skip to main content

Table 5 Associations between MR-based Abdominal and Cardiac Measures by Multivariable Regression in Obesity Subgroup

From: Association of abdominal adiposity, hepatic shear stiffness with subclinical left-ventricular remodeling evaluated by magnetic resonance in adults free of overt cardiovascular diseases: a prospective study

  

H-PDFF (β [95%CI], P)

P-PDFF (β [95%CI], P)

VAT (β [95%CI], P)

Hepatic Shear Stiffness (β [95%CI], P)

LVM

Model 1

–

–

 

5.43 (− 7.51, 18.36), 0.40

 

Model 2

–

–

 

6.19 (− 7.72, 19.61), 0.36

LVMT

Model 1

–

–

0.002 (− 0.003, 0.01), 0.49

0.07 (− 0.42, 0.56), 0.78

 

Model 2

–

–

0.001 (− 0.004, 0.01), 0.60

0.17 (− 0.35, 0.69), 0.51

SV

Model 1

–

–

 

7.73 (− 2.62, 18.08), 0.14

 

Model 2

–

–

 

7.30 (− 6.95, 21.54), 0.31

|C-PS|

Model 1

–

− 0.25 (− 0.44, − 0.07), 0.01a

 

–

 

Model 2

–

− 0.29 (− 0.48, − 0.09), 0.01a

 

–

|L-PS|

Model 1

–

–

− 0.04 (− 0.06, -0.01), 0.002a

–

 

Model 2

–

–

− 0.05 (− 0.07, -0.02), < 0.001a

–

|R-PDSR|

Model 1

− 0.03 (− 0.06, − 0.001), 0.046a

–

 

–

 

Model 2

− 0.02 (− 0.06, 0.02), 0.27

–

 

–

C-PDSR

Model 1

− 0.01 (− 0.03, − 0.001), 0.04a

–

− 0.002 (− 0.004, 0.00), 0.03a

–

 

Model 2

− 0.01 (− 0.02, 0.01), 0.36

–

− 0.001 (− 0.003, 0.001), 0.26

–

L-PDSR

Model 1

–

–

− 0.002 (− 0.004, 0.00), 0.05

–

 

Model 2

–

–

− 0.002 (− 0.004, 0.001), 0.15

–

  1. CI confidence interval, C-PDSR circumferential peak diastolic strain rate, C-PS circumferential peak strain, H-PDFF hepatic proton density fat fraction, L-PDSR longitudinal peak diastolic strain rate, L-PS longitudinal peak strain, LV left ventricular, LVM left ventricular mass, LVMT left ventricular myocardial thickness, P-PDFF pancreatic proton density fat fraction, R-PDSR radial peak diastolic strain rate; SV stroke volume, VAT visceral adipose tissue
  2. Significant results are in bold
  3. aThe results were significant at a significance level of 0.05