Skip to main content

Table 4 Associations between MR-based Abdominal and Cardiac Measures by Multivariable Regression in Over-all Cohort

From: Association of abdominal adiposity, hepatic shear stiffness with subclinical left-ventricular remodeling evaluated by magnetic resonance in adults free of overt cardiovascular diseases: a prospective study

  

H-PDFF (β [95%CI], p)

P-PDFF (β [95%CI], p)

SAT (β [95%CI], p)

VAT (β [95%CI], p)

Hepatic shear stiffness (β [95%CI], p)

EAT

Model 1

1.71 (0.93, 2.48), < 0.001a

3.34 (2.21, 4.47), < 0.001a

0.12 (0.09, 0.16), < 0.001a

0.23 (0.15, 0.31), < 0.001a

–

 

Model 2

0.95 (0.07, 1.83), 0.04a

2.71 (1.66, 3.75), < 0.00a

0.10 (0.07, 0.13), < 0.001a

0.14 (0.04, 0.24), 0.01a

–

LVM

Model 1

0.51 (− 0.24, 1.26), 0.18

1.50 (0.35, 2.64), 0.01a

0.05 (0.02, 0.09), 0.003a

0.12 (0.04, 0.20), 0.003a

–

 

Model 2

0.45 (− 0.44, 1.34), 0.32

1.15 (− 0.02, 2.32), 0.05

0.04 (− 0.002, 0.08), 0.07

0.10 (− 0.001, 0.21), 0.05

–

LVMT

Model 1

–

–

–

0.002 (− 0.001, 0.01), 0.21

–

 

Model 2

–

–

–

0.001 (− 0.003, 0.01), 0.68

–

LVEF

Model 1

–

–

0.01 (− 0.001, 0.02), 0.08

–

–

 

Model 2

–

–

0.01 (0.000, 0.03), 0.05

–

–

LVEDV

Model 1

0.79 (− 0.45, 2.02), 0.21

3.08 (1.25, 4.91), 0.001a

0.13 (0.08, 0.18), < 0.001a

0.18 (0.06, 0.31), 0.01a

–

 

Model 2

0.77 (− 0.68, 2.22), 0.29

2.49 (0.63, 4.36), 0.01a

0.12 (0.06, 0.18), < 0.001a

0.15 (− 0.02, 0.32), 0.08

–

LVESV

Model 1

–

1.05 (0.17, 1.94), 0.02a

–

0.05 (− 0.02, 0.11), 0.14

–

 

Model 2

–

0.83 (− 0.09, 1.74), 0.08

–

0.00 (− 0.08, 0.08), 0.99

–

SV

Model 1

0.48 (− 0.40, 1.36), 0.28

2.03 (0.71, 3.34), 0.003a

0.09 (0.06, 0.13), < 0.001a

0.14 (0.05, 0.23), 0.003a

–

 

Model 2

0.62 (− 0.44, 1.68), 0.25

1.66 (0.29, 3.04), 0.02a

0.09 (0.05, 0.13), < 0.001a

0.15 (0.03, 0.27), 0.02a

–

R-PS

Model 1

− 0.41 (− 0.67, − 0.15), 0.002a

-0.51 (-0.92, -0.09), 0.02a

− 0.01 (− 0.03, -0.001), 0.03a

–

–

 

Model 2

− 0.40 (− 0.73, − 0.07), 0.02a

− 0.44 (− 0.89, − 0.001), 0.05

− 0.01 (− 0.02, 0.01), 0.23

–

–

|C-PS|

Model 1

− 0.11 (− 0.21, -0.01), 0.03a

− 0.19 (− 0.34, -0.04), 0.01a

–

− 0.01 (− 0.02, 0.002), 0.13

–

 

Model 2

− 0.12 (− 0.24, 0.01), 0.06

− 0.19 (− 0.35, − 0.03), 0.02a

–

− 0.01 (− 0.02, 0.01), 0.23

–

|L-PS|

Model 1

− 0.18 (− 0.30, -0.06), 0.01a

− 0.34 (− 0.53, − 0.15), 0.001a

− 0.01 (− 0.02, − 0.006), < 0.001a

− 0.03 (− 0.04, − 0.02), < 0.001a

− 1.48 (− 2.98, 0.01), 0.05

 

Model 2

− 0.17 (− 0.32, − 0.02), 0.03a

− 0.29 (− 0.49, − 0.10), 0.004a

− 0.01 (− 0.02, − 0.003), 0.01a

− 0.03 − 0.05, − 0.01), < 0.001a

− 1.39 (− 2.83, 0.05), 0.06

|L-PSSR|

Model 1

− 0.01 (− 0.19, 0.00), 0.04a

–

− 0.001 (− 0.001, 0.00), 0.01a

–

–

 

Model 2

− 0.01 (− 0.02, 0.001), 0.06

–

− 0.001 (− 0.001, 0.00), 0.04a

–

–

|R-PDSR|

Model 1

− 0.04 (− 0.07, -0.01), 0.02a

–

–

–

–

 

Model 2

-0.03 (-0.07, 0.01), 0.18

–

–

–

–

C-PDSR

Model 1

− 0.02 (− 0.03, − 0.002), 0.02a

− 0.02 (− 0.04, 0.002), 0.08

–

− 0.001 (− 0.003, 0.00), 0.049a

–

 

Model 2

− 0.01 (− 0.02, 0.01), 0.32

− 0.01 (− 0.04, 0.01), 0.19

–

− 0.001 (− 0.003, 0.001), 0.50

–

L-PDSR

Model 1

− 0.02 (− 0.03, − 0.01), 0.01a

− 0.02 (− 0.04, − 0.001), 0.04a

− 0.001 (− 0.002, 0.00), 0.001a

− 0.002 (− 0.003, − 0.001), 0.002a

–

 

Model 2

− 0.01 (− 0.03, 0.003), 0.13

− 0.02 (− 0.04, 0.004), 0.11

− 0.001 (− 0.001, 0.00), 0.01a

− 0.001 (− 0.003, 0.00), 0.10

–

  1. CI confidence interval, C-PDSR circumferential peak diastolic strain rate, C-PS circumferential peak strain, H-PDFF hepatic proton density fat fraction, L-PDSR longitudinal peak diastolic strain rate, L-PS longitudinal peak strain, LV left ventricular; LVM left ventricular mass, LVMT left ventricular myocardial thickness, P-PDFF pancreatic proton density fat fraction, R-PDSR radial peak diastolic strain rate, SV stroke volume, VAT visceral adipose tissue
  2. Significant results are in bold
  3. aThe results were significant at a significance level of 0.05