Insulin resistance phenotype is associated with vascular risk phenotype at the end of the second decade of life: a population-based study

Table 3 Factor loading, standard error and p-values of the latent variables indicators: family socioeconomic status, insulin resistance phenotype and vascular risk phenotype. São Luís, Brazil (2022)

Latent variable	Male			Female
Latent variable	Standardized coefficient	Standard error	P-value	Standardized coefficient	Standard error	P-value
*Family socioeconomic status
Household head’s education	0.646	0.023	< 0.001	0.641	0.022	< 0.001
Socioeconomic class	0.853	0.025	< 0.001	0.894	0.022	< 0.001
Adolescent’s education	0.534	0.027	< 0.001	0.566	0.027	< 0.001
Monthly income	0.499	0.023	< 0.001	0.533	0.022	< 0.001
^†Insulin resistance phenotype
TG-HDL ratio	0.860	0.007	< 0.001	0.774	0.003	< 0.001
VLDL	0.990	0.006	< 0.001	0.969	0.003	< 0.001
TyG	0.940	0.011	< 0.001	0.800	0.005	< 0.001
^‡Vascular risk phenotype
SBP	0.737	0.016	< 0.001	0.825	0.015	< 0.001
DBP	0.672	0.015	< 0.001	0.723	0.012	< 0.001
PWV	0.530	0.015	< 0.001	0.618	0.016	< 0.001

^*Family socioeconomic status: latent variable defined by the household head´s education, socioeconomic class according to CEB criteria, adolescent´s education, and monthly household income; ^†Insulin Resistance Phenotype: defined by the Triglyceride to HDL ratio (TG-HDL), VLDL and Triglyceride Glycemic Index (TyG) ratio. ^‡Vascular Risk Phenotype: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP); Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), and Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV)

ISSN: 1475-2840