Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of CMR findings among T2DM patients with/without AR and normal controls

From: Additive effect of aortic regurgitation degree on left ventricular strain in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus evaluated via cardiac magnetic resonance tissue tracking

 

Controls (n = 83)

T2DM (AR −) (n = 149)

T2DM (AR +) (n = 66)

LVEDV, mL

142.6 (115.6, 187.1)

135.5 (109.2, 161.0)

191.0 (136.2, 251.0)*†

LVESV, mL

58.7 (42.8, 95.1)

49.12 (38.0, 69.8)

102.6 (56.4, 195.6)*†

LVSV, mL

73.7 (59.9, 95.8)

78.3 (63.5, 96.6)

66.0 (48.2, 82.0)*†

LVEF, %

62.0 (41.5, 64.1)

61.4 (54.3, 66.7)

43.2 ± 2.6*†

LV mass index, (g/m2)

60.7 ± 11.4

59.4 ± 12.1

71.9 ± 29.3*†

PS (%)

 Radial

36.6 ± 9.5

29.9 (23.8, 37.4)*

15.3 (9.5, 27.6)*†

 Circumferential

− 20.0 ± 3.0

− 19.0 ± 4.5

− 13.0 ± 5.9*†

 Longitudinal

− 14.0 ± 3.4

− 12.2 ± 4.0*

− 7.9 ± 4.2*†

PSSR (1/s)

 Radial

1.54 (1.1, 2.0)

1.8 (1.3, 2.1)*

1.0 (0.7, 1.5)*†

 Circumferential

− 0.9 (− 1.1, − 0.7)

− 1.0 ± 0.4

− 0.7 ± 0.3*†

 Longitudinal

− 0.7 (− 0.8, − 0.5)

− 0.7 (− 0.9, − 0.5)*

− 0.5 (− 0.7, − 0.3)*†

PDSR (1/s)

 Radial

− 2.7 ± 0.9

− 1.8 (− 2.3, − 1.2)*

− 1.0 (− 1.6, − 0.6)*†

 Circumferential

1.2 ± 0.3

1.1(0.9, 1.3)*

0.7 ± 0.3*†

 Longitudinal

0.9 ± 0.3

0.7(0.5, 0.9)*

0.5(0.4, 0.6)*†

  1. *P < 0.05, T2DM vs. Normal; P < 0.05, T2DM patients with AR vs. T2DM patients without AR. T2DM type 2 diabetes mellitus, AR aortic regurgitation, LV left ventricular, EDV end diastolic volume, ESV end systolic volume, SV stroke volume, EF ejection fraction, PS peak strain, PSSR peak systolic strain rate, PDSR peak diastolic strain rate