Skip to main content

Table 2 Cost-effectiveness of add-on dapagliflozin to standard care versus standard care alone in the base-case, subgroup, and scenario analyses, from the perspective of healthcare system in Taiwan

From: Cost-effectiveness evaluation of add-on dapagliflozin for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction from perspective of healthcare systems in Asia–Pacific region

 

Cost (US$)

QALYs or LYs

ICER (US$)

Probability of cost-effectiveness, dapagliflozin vs. standard care (%)

 

Add-on dapagliflozin

Standard care

\(\Delta\) Costs

Add-on dapagliflozin

Standard care

\(\Delta\) QALYs or \(\Delta \mathrm{LYs}\)

 

WTP at US$ 25,000

WTP at US$ 75,000

Base-case analysis

         

 QALY gain as effectiveness outcome

87,805

76,501

11,304

11.03

10.09

0.94

12,035

99.3

100

 LY gain as effectiveness outcome

87,805

76,501

11,304

14.71

13.46

1.25

9,080

100

100

Scenario analyses

 

(1) Time horizon

         

 30 years

104,623

87,940

16,682

13.14

11.60

1.54

10,832

100

100

 18 months

16,719

15,732

987

2.10

2.08

0.03

37,386

43.8

61.8

(2) Discounting rate

         

 0%

104,288

90,112

14,176

13.1

11.89

1.21

11,681

100

100

 10%

62,215

55,130

7,085

7.82

7.27

0.54

13,007

97.3

100

(3) Under assumption of equal risk of clinical events between the two treatments

 Cardiovascular death

81,581

76,501

5,081

10.20

10.09

0.11

44,670

33

60.9

 Non-cardiovascular death

86,887

76,501

10,387

10.91

10.9

0.82

12,704

98.9

100

 Hospitalization for HF

87,995

76,501

11,444

11.03

10.09

0.94

12,204

99.6

100

 Emergency visits for HF

87,818

76,501

11,317

11.03

10.09

0.94

12,055

99.9

100

(4) Adverse events of treatments considered in the model

88,074

76,727

11,347

10.95

10.02

0.92

12,288

99.3%

100

  1. QALY quality-adjusted life-year, ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, WTP willingness-to-pay, LY life-year, HF heart failure