Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of results from secondary analyses | Medicaid and Optum

From: The risk of sudden cardiac arrest and ventricular arrhythmia with rosiglitazone versus pioglitazone: real-world evidence on thiazolidinedione safety

Analysis,a prespecified and conducted in Medicaid unless otherwise noted

Results

N

aHR for rosiglitazoneb and sudden cardiac arrest/ventricular arrhythmia

aHR for rosiglitazoneb and sudden cardiac death/fatal ventricular arrhythmia

Limiting maximum follow-up time to 30 days

379,598

0.91 (0.67–1.23)

1.09 (0.73–1.64)

Limiting maximum follow-up time to 6 years (post hoc)

379,598

0.90 (0.74–1.09)

1.08 (0.83–1.40)

Limiting study period to time before January 1, 2007 (post hoc)

315,196

0.90 (0.74–1.11)

1.00 (0.76–1.30)

Decreasing permissible grace period between contiguous thiazolidinedione dispensings from 15 to 7 days

379,598

0.95 (0.77–1.18)

1.17 (0.88–1.56)

Increasing permissible grace period between contiguous thiazolidinedione dispensings from 15 to 30 days

379,598

0.97 (0.81–1.15)

1.08 (0.83–1.40)

Excluding, as a censoring criterion, the occurrence of a VA diagnosis not meeting the outcome definition

379,598

0.91 (0.75–1.10)

1.08 (0.84–1.41)

Exclusion of persons with an any-claim type, any-position diagnosis of SCA or VA ever prior to cohort entry

374,694

0.89 (0.73–1.08)

1.05 (0.80–1.37)

Exclusion of empiric covariates from the PS thought to be strong correlates of exposure but not associated with the outcome

384,976

0.90 (0.75–1.10)

1.08 (0.83–1.41)

Limiting outcomes to fatal events

379,598

1.09 (0.84–1.41)

Examining thiazolidinedione dose–response relationships and limiting maximum follow-up time to 90 days

See Additional file 1: Figure S4

Examining the same estimands in an independent, commercial health insurance dataset (Optum Clinformatics Data Mart, 2000–2016), also see □ in Fig. 2

195,742

0.88 (0.61–1.28)

Not applicable, as our Optum dataset does not record death in any setting

Examining effect modification by

N

p-value for interaction term

aHR for rosiglitazone† and sudden cardiac arrest/ventricular arrhythmia

Concomitant use of drugs that inhibit hepatic CYP450-based metabolism of thiazolidinediones

   

 CYP2C8 inhibitors

379,598

0.10

Since the interaction term p-values did not meet the prespecified threshold for statistical significance, stratified results are not presented

 CYP2C9 inhibitors

379,598

0.95

 CYP3A4 inhibitors

379,598

0.69

Concomitant use of drugs with a “known risk of TdP”

379,598

0.44

Concomitant use of drugs with a “known”, “possible”, or “conditional risk of TdP”

379,598

0.18

Other high-risk subgroups

  

 Age group

379,598

0.86

 Sex

379,598

0.01

Among women: 1.16 (0.89–1.52)

Among men: 0.71 (0.54–0.93)

 Race

379,598

0.56

Since the interaction term p-values did not meet the prespecified threshold for statistical significance, stratified results are not presented

 Nursing home residence

379,598

0.72

 Ischemic heart disease

379,598

0.58

 Conduction disorders

379,598

0.36

 HF/cardiomyopathy

379,598

0.92

 Kidney disease

379,598

0.38

 Liver disease

379,598

0.86

  1. aHR adjusted hazard ratio, CYP cytochrome P450, HF heart failure, N number of thiazolidinedione users under study, PS propensity score, SCA sudden cardiac arrest, SCD sudden cardiac death, TdP torsade de pointes, VA ventricular arrhythmia
  2. aRationales for these secondary analyses are detailed in Additional file 1: Table S4
  3. bVersus pioglitazone as prespecified referent