Skip to main content

Table 3 Outcomes after matching for differences in exercise energy expenditure

From: High-intensity interval training improves metabolic syndrome and body composition in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation patients with myocardial infarction

 

MICT (n = 14)

HIIT (n = 14)

ANCOVA

Baseline

Change

Baseline

Change

P-value

Rate-Your-Plate

56 ± 7

5 ± 5

55 ± 7

5 ± 7

P = .95

Average statin

2.4 ± 0.7

0.1 ± 0.3

2.6 ± 0.7

− 0.1 ± 0.3

P = .23

MetS variables

 MetS z-score

5.7 ± 3.6

− 0.8 ± 3.8

5.6 ± 3.2

− 5.3 ± 3.0

P < .001

 ATP III MetS score

4 ± 1

− 1 ± 1

4 ± 0

− 2 ± 1

P = .005

 Waist circumference, cm

110 ± 11

1 ± 5

103 ± 9

− 0.4 ± 2.2

P = .31

 FBG, mg/dl

130.4 ± 38.7

− 3.9 ± 25.8

138.9 ± 46.6

− 40.1 ± 46.6

P = .002

 TG, mg/dl

222.5 ± 80.1

− 10.4 ± 105.3

232.0 ± 111.1

− 97.2 ± 105.7

P = .008

 HDL-c, mg/dl

38.9 ± 10.8

6.4 ± 8.3

37.6 ± 7.3

3.7 ± 4.8

P = .26

 SBP, mmHg

122 ± 18

0 ± 25

122 ± 15

− 13 ± 12

P = .13

 DBP, mmHg

71 ± 12

0 ± 13

70 ± 7

− 12 ± 8

P < .001

Body composition

 Body weight, kg

91.2 ± 14.4

0.6 ± 4.8

80.3 ± 13.2

1.4 ± 7.0

P = .72

 BMI, kg/m2

31.5 ± 4.2

− 0.1 ± 1.5

28.6 ± 4.5

0.7 ± 2.4

P = .92

 Fat mass, kg

35.4 ± 6.6

0 ± 2.2

30.9 ± 7.6

− 1.7 ± 1.8

P = .02

 Body fat, %

40.2 ± 4.9

− 0.2 ± 1.4

38.8 ± 7.5

− 1.8 ± 1.7

P = .01

 Lean mass, kg

53.5 ± 9.3

− 0.9 ± 3.2

48.5 ± 8.5

1.2 ± 1.4

P = .03

 Abdominal fat, %

47.5 ± 5.2

0.1 ± 2.4

48.1 ± 7.4

− 2.4 ± 2.4

P = .01

  1. BMI body mass index, CR cardiac rehabilitation, DBP diastolic blood pressure, FBG fasting blood glucose, HDL-c high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HIIT high-intensity interval training, MetS metabolic syndrome, MICT moderate-intensity continuous training, SBP systolic blood pressure, TG triglycerides