From: Abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue: a favorable adipose depot for diabetes?
 | No. of participants | No. of cases | Odds ratios (95% CI)a | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1b | Model 2c | Model 3d | Model 4e | |||
Men | ||||||
 VFA as categories | ||||||
  Quartile 1 | 1349 | 102 | 1.00 (1.00–1.00) | 1.00 (1.00–1.00) | 1.00 (1.00–1.00) | 1.00 (1.00–1.00) |
  Quartile 2 | 1346 | 133 | 1.34 (1.02–1.76) | 1.22 (0.93–1.61) | 1.14 (0.86–1.52) | 1.17 (0.87–1.56) |
  Quartile 3 | 1353 | 229 | 2.54 (1.98–3.25) | 2.26 (1.75–2.90) | 2.04 (1.54–2.70) | 2.10 (1.58–2.80) |
  Quartile 4 | 1353 | 323 | 3.89 (3.07–4.94) | 3.40 (2.66–4.34) | 2.92 (2.15–3.95) | 2.99 (2.20–4.07) |
  P for trend |  |  | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
 VFA as a continuous variable (1 SD increase) |  |  | 1.68 (1.56–1.80) | 1.61 (1.49–1.74) | 1.58 (1.43–1.75) | 1.58 (1.43–1.75) |
Women | ||||||
 VFA as categories | ||||||
  Quartile 1 | 1681 | 110 | 1.00 (1.00–1.00) | 1.00 (1.00–1.00) | 1.00 (1.00–1.00) | 1.00 (1.00–1.00) |
  Quartile 2 | 1681 | 192 | 1.78 (1.39–2.28) | 1.65 (1.29–2.13) | 1.58 (1.22–2.04) | 1.62 (1.25–2.09) |
  Quartile 3 | 1689 | 274 | 2.59 (2.05–3.28) | 2.32 (1.83–2.95) | 2.13 (1.65–2.75) | 2.18 (1.68–2.81) |
  Quartile 4 | 1685 | 426 | 4.29 (3.42–5.38) | 3.66 (2.90–4.61) | 3.19 (2.42–4.19) | 3.17 (2.41–4.17) |
  P for trend |  |  | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
 VFA as a continuous variable (1 SD increase) |  |  | 1.64 (1.53–1.75) | 1.56 (1.45–1.67) | 1.51 (1.38–1.65) | 1.49 (1.37–1.63) |