Skip to main content

Table 4 Calculated CV risks and investigators’ CV risk assessments

From: Suboptimal control of lipid levels: results from the non-interventional Centralized Pan-Russian Survey of the Undertreatment of Hypercholesterolemia II (CEPHEUS II)

CV risk category Primary calculation using central laboratory data (n = 2703) Investigators’ assessments (n = 2703)
Low 2 (0.1) 34 (1.3)
Moderate 86 (3.2) 283 (10.5)
High 151 (5.6) 295 (10.9)
Very high 2464 (91.2) 1954 (72.3)
Missing 0 (0.0) 137 (5.1)
Difference between calculated CV risks and investigators’ CV risk assessments (n = 2566)*
 Underestimation by investigators 497 (19.4)
 Same estimation 2020 (78.7)
 Overestimation by investigators 49 (1.9)
  1. Numbers are n (%) and are for the full analysis set
  2. CV cardiovascular
  3. * p < 0.001 for the differences between assessed CV risks (McNemar’s test)