Skip to main content

Table 2 Effect of different exercise training programs on MetS

From: The effect of exercise training on clinical outcomes in patients with the metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Outcome

Aerobic exercise versus control

Combined aerobic and resistance exercise versus control

No. studies

N

MD (95% CI), p value

I2 (%)

No. studies

N

MD (95% CI), p value

I2

BMI (kg m−2)

14

385

−0.29 (−0.44, −0.15) p < 0.0001

79

3

652

−0.40 (−0.88, 0.07) p = 0.10

100%

Body weight (kg)

11

217

−1.16 (−1.83, −0.48) p = 0.0008

43

2

46

−0.03 (−0.51, 0.46) p = 0.92

24%

Waist (cm)

13

261

−1.37 (−2.02, −0.71) p < 0.0001

61

3

652

−3.80 (−5.65, −1.95) p < 0.0001

59%

Total fat mass (kg)

5

176

−1.19 kg (−1.79,−0.59) = 0.0001

0

0

0

N/A

N/A

Peak VO2 (mL kg−1 min−1)

13

294

3.00 (1.92, 4.08) p < 0.000001

60

3

652

4.64 (2.42, 6.87) p < 0.0001

48%

SBP (mmHg)

15

364

−2.54 (−4.34, −0.75) p = 0.006

78

3

652

−3.79 (−6.18, −1.40, p = 0.002)

0%

DBP (mmHg)

14

337

−2.27 (−3.47, −1.06) p = 0.0002

61

3

652

−0.23 (−3.53, 1.55) p = 0.85

68%

FBG (mmol L−1)

15

378

−0.16 (−0.32, −0.01) p = 0.04

81

2

623

−0.18 (−0.47, 0.25) p = 0.21

0%

HDL (mmol L−1)

15

265

0.03 (−0.01, 0.08) p = 0.19

71

2

623

0.14 (0.04, 0.25) p = 0.009

61%

TG (mmol L−1)

13

308

−0.21 (−0.29, −0.13) p < 0.00001

57

1

606

−0.01 (−0.04, 0.02) p = 0.50

0%

LDL (mmol L−1)

2

44

−0.03 (−0.05, −0.00) p = 0.02

0

1

722

−0.30 (−0.61, 0.01) p = 0.06

0%

  1. N number of people included in analysis, BMI body mass index, peak VO 2 peak oxygen consumption, FBG fasting blood glucose, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, FBG fasting blood glucose, HDL high density lipoproteins, TG triglycerides, LDL low density lipoproteins