Skip to main content

Table 2 Effect of canagliflozin on HbA1c levels

From: Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in combination with insulin: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

 

Placebo

Canagliflozin 100 mg

Total

 N

70

76

 Mean (SD) baseline (%)

8.85 (0.84)

8.89 (0.81)

 LS mean (SE) change (%)a

0.13 (0.08)

−0.97 (0.08)

 Difference (95 % CI) vs placebo (%)

–

−1.10 (−1.33, −0.87)

 p value

 

<0.001

 N

66

73

 LS mean (SE) change (%)b

0.15 (0.08)

−0.98 (0.08)

 Difference (95 % CI) vs placebo (%)

–

−1.13 (−1.36, −0.89)

 p value

–

<0.001

Each insulin regimen

 Premixed

  N

26

28

  Mean (SD) baseline (%)

8.70 (0.82)

8.73 (0.73)

  LS mean (SE) change (%)a

−0.01 (0.13)

−0.89 (0.12)

  Difference (95 % CI) vs placebo (%)

–

−0.88 (−1.24, −0.52)

  p value

–

<0.001

 Long-acting

  N

24

24

  Mean (SD) baseline (%)

8.89 (0.85)

9.02 (0.87)

  LS mean (SE) change (%)a

0.26 (0.12)

−1.18 (0.12)

  Difference (95 % CI) vs placebo (%)

–

−1.44 (−1.79, −1.09)

  p value

–

<0.001

 Premixed + rapid- or short-acting

  N

1

0

  Mean (SD) baseline (%)

7.50 (−)

–

  LS mean (SE) change (%)a

0.10 (0.00)

–

 Long-acting + rapid- or short-acting

  N

19

24

  Mean (SD) baseline (%)

9.09 (0.80)

8.96 (0.83)

  LS mean (SE) change (%)a

0.17 (0.19)

−0.83 (0.17)

  Difference (95 % CI) vs placebo (%)

–

−1.00 (−1.51, −0.49)

  p value

–

<0.001

  1. N number of patients, LS mean least squares mean, 95 % CI 95 % confidence interval
  2. aLS mean for change from the baseline to week 16, ANCOVA (Factor treatment, covariate HbA1C levels at baseline)
  3. bLS mean for change from the baseline to week 16, MMRM