Skip to main content

Table 6 Risk of progression of Coronary Calcium Score according to pulse pressure and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity odds ratioa (95 % CI) of CAC change >0 by PWV50 % and pulse pressure 50 %

From: Association between brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and progression of coronary artery calcium: a prospective cohort study

 

Number

Cases

Age and sex-adjusted ORa (95 % CI)

Multivariate-adjusted ORa (95 % CI)

Model 1

Model 2

Pulse pressure

 Pulse pressure <50 %

574

159

1.00 (reference)

1.00 (reference)

1.00 (reference)

 Pulse pressure ≥50 %

550

159

1.01 (0.77–1.32)

0.91 (0.68–1.21)

0.90 (0.63–1.28)

Pulse Pressure and Pulse Wave Velocity

 PWV <50 % and pulse pressure <50 %

322

66

1.00 (reference)

1.00 (reference)

1.00 (reference)

 PWV <50 % and pulse pressure ≥50 %

240

44

0.90 (0.58–1.39)

0.85 (0.54–1.33)

0.90 (0.55–1.46)

 PWV ≥50 % and pulse pressure <50 %

252

93

2.01 (1.37–2.95)

1.82 (1.22–2.72)

1.88 (1.26–2.82)

 PWV ≥50 % and pulse pressure ≥50 %

310

115

1.88 (1.30–2.72)

1.57 (1.06–2.32)

1.75 (1.09–2.80)

 P for trend

  

<0.001

0.002

<0.001

  1. OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
  2. aEstimated from logistic regression. Multivariable model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, center, year of screening exam, smoking status, alcohol intake, educational level, BMI, diabetes, hypertension, HDL, LDL and glucose; model 2: model 1 plus adjustment for sbp and heart rate