Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline clinical characteristics

From: Comparison of effects of sitagliptin and voglibose on left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of the 3D trial

Variable

Sitagliptin n = 40

Voglibose n = 40

P value

Age, y

67.8 ± 10.5

66.7 ± 9.8

0.654

Women, n (%)

20(50)

14(35)

0.258

Diabetes duration, months (95 % CI)

48(6-240)

38.5(3-218)

0.145

Body mass index, kg/m2

27.7 ± 4.1

25.7 ± 4.3

0.038

Abdominal girth, cm

88.7 ± 14.3

85.9 ± 15.6

0.469

Current smoking

6(15)

4(10)

0.762

Regular alcohol drinkers

13(33)

17(43)

0.489

NYHA functional class

   

Class I, n (%)

17(43)

17(43)

1.000

Class II, n (%)

23(58)

22(55)

 

Class III, n (%)

0(0)

1(3)

 

Grades of Diastolic Dysfunction

   

0

1 (2.6)

3 (7.5)

0.0987

1

31 (79.5)

34 (85.0)

 

2

7 (17.9)

3 (7.5)

 

Diabetes complication+

7(18)

3(8)

0.311

Diabetic retinopathy

4(10)

2(5)

0.675

Diabetic nephropathy

3(8)

0(0)

0.241

Diabetic neuropathy

2(5)

0(0)

0.494

Hypertension

37(93)

32(80)

0.193

Hyperuricemia

31(78)

31(78)

1.000

Hyperlipidemia

5(13)

4(10)

1.000

Renal disturbance

7(18)

1(3)

0.057

Mean eGFR

74.8 ± 21.7

70.5 ± 15.3

0.304

Cerebrovascular disease

3(8)

1(3)

0.615

Myocardial infarction

5(13)

2(5)

0.432

Peripheral artery disease

3(8)

1(3)

0.615

Anti-diabetic drugs

   

Pioglitazone

14(35)

18(45)

0.494

Sulfonylurea

6(15)

3(8)

0.481

Metformin

7(18)

1(3)

0.057

α-GI

1(3)

0(0)

1.000

Antihypertensive drugs

   

ARB

28(70)

27(68)

1.000

Calcium channel blocker

26(65)

22(55)

0.494

Diuretics

15(38)

10(25)

0.335

Others

11(28)

10(25)

1.000

ACE-I

2(5)

3(8)

 

α-blocker

4(10)

1(3)

 

β-blocker

6(15)

4(10)

 

αβ-blocker

1(3)

1(3)

 

Aldosterone antagonist

2(5)

1(3)

 

Antihyperlipidemic drugs

   

Statins

24(60)

22(55)

0.821

Fibrate

2(5)

2(5)

1.000

Ezetimibe

5(13)

6(15)

1.000

Eicosapentaenoic acid

5(13)

2(5)

0.432

Antiplatelet agent

10(25)

12(30)

0.803

Nitrates

1(3)

1(3)

1.000

Allopurinol

1(3)

4(10)

0.359

Uricosuric agents

0(0)

1(3)

1.000

  1. Values are means ± SD, number of patients (%), or median (95 % confidencel Interval). The continuous variables were compared using Student’s t-test, the categorical variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test, grades of diastolic dysfunction was compared using Cochran-Armitage trend test, and the duration of diabetes was compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test