Skip to main content

Table 2 Effect sizes (95% confidence limits) for the difference in CIMT between categories of post prandial glucose levels.

From: Relationship between blood glucose and carotid intima media thickness: A meta-analysis

  Glucose categories being compared
  Diabetic-Normal Impaired-Normal
Faeh[1] 0.331 (0.170, 0.493) 0.187 (0.012, 0.362)
Henry[2] 0.293 (0.129, 0.457) 0.300 (0.107, 0.492)
Hunt[3] 0.401 (0.273-0.528) 0.326 (0.078-0.575)
Ishizaka[4] 0.239 (0.071, 0.408) 0.122 (-0.006, 0.252)
Mohan[5] 0.304 (0.233, 0.375) 0 (-0.118, 0.118)
O'Leary[6] 0.279 (0.210, 0.349) 0.125 (0.060, 0.189)
Niskanen[7] 0.379 (0.085, 0.673) 0.081 (-0.390, 0.552)
Rajala[8] 0.288 (-0.085, 0.662) 0.072 (-0.254, 0.399)
Temelkova[9] 0.477 (0.233, 0.721) 0.374 (0.125, 0.623)
Tuomilehto[10] -0.082 (-0.437, 0.271) -0.030 (-0.469, 0.407)
Wagenknecht[11] 0.192 (0.070, 0.313) 0.058 (-0.076, 0.194)
Overall 0.294 (0.245, 0.343) 0.137 (0.072, 0.202)