Correction of p-value for HbA1c in abstract from 0.01 to 0.02
Tommy Jönsson, Swedish Health Care
16 July 2014
I am the principal author of "Beneficial effects of a Paleolithic diet on cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes: a randomized cross-over pilot study" in Cardiovascular Diabetology, and I have just been made aware of an error in the article which I want to correct. The p-value for HbA1c after the Paleolithic diet, when compared in a t-test to after the diabetes diet, was 0.0164807189350042. So the p-value 0.02 for HbA1c presented in Table 3 is correct, and it is incorrectly rounded down and presented as 0.01 in the abstract. The error has no effect on the scientific content and conclusions in the article.
Cardiovascular Diabetology
Correction of p-value for HbA1c in abstract from 0.01 to 0.02
16 July 2014
I am the principal author of "Beneficial effects of a Paleolithic diet on cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes: a randomized cross-over pilot study" in Cardiovascular Diabetology, and I have just been made aware of an error in the article which I want to correct. The p-value for HbA1c after the Paleolithic diet, when compared in a t-test to after the diabetes diet, was 0.0164807189350042. So the p-value 0.02 for HbA1c presented in Table 3 is correct, and it is incorrectly rounded down and presented as 0.01 in the abstract. The error has no effect on the scientific content and conclusions in the article.Competing interests
I have no competing interests.