Open Access

Luseogliflozin reduces epicardial fat accumulation in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pilot study

  • Ryotaro Bouchi1Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • Masahiro Terashima2,
  • Yuriko Sasahara1,
  • Masahiro Asakawa1,
  • Tatsuya Fukuda1,
  • Takato Takeuchi1,
  • Yujiro Nakano1,
  • Masanori Murakami1,
  • Isao Minami1,
  • Hajime Izumiyama1, 3,
  • Koshi Hashimoto1, 4,
  • Takanobu Yoshimoto1 and
  • Yoshihiro Ogawa1, 5
Cardiovascular Diabetology201716:32

DOI: 10.1186/s12933-017-0516-8

Received: 26 January 2017

Accepted: 27 February 2017

Published: 3 March 2017

Abstract

Background

Accumulation of epicardial fat (EF) is associated with increased cardio-metabolic risks and coronary events, independently of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Therefore, the reduction of EF volume (EFV) may be associated with reduced cardio-metabolic risks and future cardiovascular events. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce body fat including visceral fat and cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, it has still been unknown whether SGLT2 inhibitors can reduce EFV.

Methods

Type 2 diabetic patients with HbA1c 6.5–9.0% and body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) ≥25.0 were enrolled in this single arm pilot study. Participants were administered luseogliflozin 2.5 mg daily and the dosage was tolerated to be increased up to 5.0 mg daily. EFV [median (interquartile range), cm3] was measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Primary endpoint was the decrease in EFV at 12 weeks. Visceral fat area (VFA, cm2) and liver attenuation index (LAI) measured by the abdominal computed tomography, and skeletal muscle index (SMI) and body fat (%) measured by the whole body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were also determined at baseline and at 12 weeks.

Results

Nineteen patients (mean age: 55 ± 12 years; 26% female) completed this study. Luseogliflozin treatment significantly reduced EFV at 12 weeks [117 (96–136) to 111 (88–134), p = 0.048]. The body weight, BMI, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, insulin, homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), triglycerides, SMI, and body fat were significantly reduced by luseogliflozin at 12 weeks. The reduction of EFV was significantly correlated with the reduction of C-reactive protein (r = 0.493, p = 0.019). Neither VFA nor LAI were significantly reduced by the luseogliflozin treatment. No severe adverse events were observed.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that luseogliflozin could reduce the EFV in parallel with the improvement of systemic micro-inflammation and the reduction of body weight in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. The reduction of muscle mass after the administration of SGLT2 inhibitors may require a particular attention.

Trial registration umin.ac.jp, UMIN000019072

Keywords

Luseogiflozin Epicardial fat Type 2 diabetes

Background

Epicardial fat (EF), the local adipose tissue surrounding the heart, located between the myocardium and the visceral pericardium, has been recognized as one of the phenotypes of ectopic fat accumulation [1, 2]. EF accumulation is thought to be involved in the progression of coronary atherosclerosis, through the secretion of bioactive inflammatory cytokines and adipokines [36]. It has recently been reported that EF volume (EFV) is associated with non-calcified coronary plaque [79]. In addition, EFV is associated with cardio-metabolic risks including insulin resistance [10, 11] and type 2 diabetes [12] and both fatal and nonfatal coronary events, independently of traditional cardiovascular risk factors [9]. It is therefore conceivable that the reduction of EFV could be associated with reduced cardio-metabolic risks and future cardiovascular events.

EFV was reported to be correlated with obesity [13]. In addition to obesity, diabetes was also associated with EFV [14]. Therefore, obese patients with type 2 diabetes have an extremely high risk for developing ectopic adiposity [15]. In diabetic patients, EFV was associated with dyslipidemia [16] and endothelial dysfunction [17], compared to non-diabetic subjects. Furthermore, a recent study demonstrated that diabetes, even in the absence of obesity, is associated with an increased myocardial triglyceride content, increased hepatic triglyceride content, and impaired myocardial energetics [18]. The authors also demonstrate that the degree of both hepatic and epicardial fat accumulations are associated with a cardiac contractile dysfunction in the patients with diabetes. Give these findings, the evaluation of EFV may be important to predict future coronary events, especially in obese patients with diabetes.

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors lower the blood glucose level in patients with type 2 diabetes by decreasing the renal glucose reabsorption [19] and its improvement of glycemic control is parallel with the reduction of body weight and visceral fat [20, 21]. Recently, it has been revealed from the EMPA-REG outcome study that empagliflozin significantly reduces the composite outcome of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke (3-point MACE) in patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risks [22]. Although it has still been elusive which mechanisms are involved in the favorable effects of empagliflozin on cardiovascular events, it is expected that the reduction of EFV in addition to the reduction of body weight, may be associated with the improvement of CV outcomes. Therefore, we hypothesized that the administration of SGLT2 inhibitors could reduce the EFV in patients with type 2 diabetes, and its reduction could be correlated with the changes in insulin sensitivity, body fat, and secretion of adipokines or cytokines, all of which are associated with cardiovascular events. A pooled analysis of four 52-week Phase III trials of luseogliflozin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes has recently showed that luseogliflozin is especially beneficial in patients with a higher body mass index (BMI) in terms of metabolic abnormalities, including obesity, hyperinsulinemia, and hypertension [23]. It is also reported that luseogliflozin can reduce a waist circumference, a surrogate marker for visceral adiposity, with a significant reduction of HbA1c among Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes [24]. Given these findings, we have focused on the potential of luseogliflozin to improve the abnormal regional fat distribution, especially an excessive accumulation of EFV and we conducted this small-scale pilot study to investigate whether luseogliflozin could reduce the EFV in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

Study design

This was a 12-week single-arm pilot study to assess the effects of luseogliflozin on EFV in patients with type 2 diabetes. This study was undertaken in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by the ethical committee of Tokyo Medical and Dental University (No. 2102). This study was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000019072). All patients provided written informed consent before participation.

Subjects

We screened patients with type 2 diabetes aged older than 20 years who regularly visited the Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital. The inclusion criteria were as the followings: (1) type 2 diabetes diagnosed according to the criteria of the Japan Diabetes Society (JDS) [25], (2) a BMI equal to or greater than 25 kg/m2, (3) HbA1c levels between 6.5 and 9.0%. Exclusion criteria were: (1) type 1 diabetes, (2) any history of taking SGLT2 inhibitors, (3) insulin treatment, (4) severe renal or liver disease, (5) malignant neoplasm, (6) pregnant women, (7) any history of acute coronary syndrome or stroke within 3 months prior to the enrollment, (8) patients whose treatment for diabetes were changed 3 months prior to baseline evaluation, (9) those who had contraindications for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Intervention

Luseogliflozin was administered from 2.5 mg once daily after breakfast and the dosage was allowed to be increased up to 5.0 mg if HbA1c kept more than 7.0% by 2.5 mg of luseogliflozin. During the 12 weeks, anti-hyperglycemic agents other than luseogliflozin were unchanged, except when unacceptable hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, or adverse events (AEs) occurred. The diet/exercise therapy and the combination anti-hyperglycemic agents were to be continued unchanged from the baseline until the end of the study.

Clinical and biochemical analysis

Blood samples were collected at an overnight fasting state. HbA1c was measured using the latex agglutination method. HbA1c levels were expressed in accordance with the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Programs recommended by the Japanese Diabetes Society [25]. The insulin sensitivity was assessed by a homeostasis model assessment as an index of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) in patients whose fasting plasma glucose levels were less than 7.8 mmol/l. The systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP) were measured in a sitting position after at least 5 min rest, using an electronic sphygmomanometer (ES-H55, Terumo Inc., Tokyo, Japan). The BMI was calculated as the weight divided by the square of the height (kg/m2). Routine tests included alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GTP), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, uric acid, C-reactive protein, hemoglobin, and hematocrit. All tests were determined using standard laboratory procedures. Urinary albumin and creatinine excretion were measured in a spot urine collection by a turbidimetric immunoassay and enzymatic method. The ratio (ACR, mg/g) was used for the assessment of albuminuria. The GFR was calculated using the following equation for the Japanese [26]; GFR = 194 × SCr−1.094 × age−0.287 [(if female) × 0.739], where SCr (mg⁄dl) is measured by an enzymatic method. Adiponectin, leptin and interleukin 6 (IL-6) were measured using latex turbidimetric immunoassay, double-antibody radioimmunoassay, and chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay, respectively.

Quantification of abdominal adiposity, hepatic fat accumulation by CT

Both visceral fat area (VFA) and subcutaneous fat area (SFA) were measured at the level of umbilicus by the abdominal computed tomography (CT) examination (Aquilion PRIME, Toshiba Medical Systems, Tochigi, Japan) as described previously [27]. The hepatic fat accumulation was also determined by the liver attenuation index (LAI) in the CT examination as described previously [28]. The LAI was calculated as follows: the average attenuation value of the liver (eight points) divided by the average attenuation value of the spleen (three points).

Body composition measured by DXA

The regional fat and fat-free mass were measured using the whole body DXA (Lunar iDXA, GE Healthcare, Madison, WI, USA) as described previously [27]. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) was calculated as the appendicular non-fat mass divided by the square of the height (kg/m2). The body fat (%) was calculated as the whole body fat mass divided by the body weight.

Quantification of epicardial fat volume by MRI

The EFV was measured using 1.5T-MRI system (Achieva Dual, Philips Healthcare, Netherland or Titan, Toshiba Medical Systems, Japan) with a 32-channel commercially available cardiac coil and was assessed using a modified fat excitation based on the whole-heart coronary MR angiography sequence [29]. A patient-specific acquisition window was set during either systole or diastole, depending on the phase of minimal motion of the right coronary artery. Typical parameters of the sequence included repetition time, 3.2 ms; echo time, 1.6 ms; flip angle, 15°; sensitivity-encoding factor, 2.5; field of view, 330 × 330 × 128 mm; acquisition matrix, 248 × 238; acquired spatial resolution, 1.3 × 1.4 × 1.6 mm, and reconstructed voxel size, 0.64 × 0.64 × 0.8 mm. All MR mages were transferred to a workstation (Ziostation 2, Japan). Semiautomatic analyses of EFV were performed by an experienced operator blinded to the clinical information.

Study endpoints

The primary endpoint of this study was the decrease in EFV at 12 weeks. The secondary endpoints were the losses in the following variables at 12 weeks: VFA, SFA, SMI, LAI, HbA1c, HOMA-IR, blood pressure, lipid profile, albuminuria, C-reactive protein (CRP), adiponectin, leptin, and IL-6. We further determined the impact of luseogliflozin on the EFV and VFA levels normalized by the body surface area (BSA) using the ratios of the EFV and VFA divided by the BSA (EFV/BSA ratio and VFA/BSA ratio).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using a IBM SPSS version 21.0 statistical package (IBM Corp. Released 2012. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or standard error of mean (SE), median with interquartile range (IQR), or percent as appropriate according to the data distribution. Pearson product-moment correlation analysis was used to investigate the correlation of EFV with the markers for body composition and cardio-metabolic risks. The primary endpoint was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The secondary endpoints were also analyzed by paired t test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test. p values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Demographics

Twenty patients were recruited and inform consent was obtained from all subjects. At baseline, one patient was not eligible for the study because the HbA1c level was less than 6.5% and finally 19 patients (95.0%) completed the study. Table 1 presents the baseline demographic data and Table 2 shows the medications at baseline. Regarding the anti-diabetic medications, the patients were treated primarily with metformin and/or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors. Approximately one-third of the participants were receiving calcium channel blockers, angiotensin receptor blockers, and anti-platelet agents and statins were prescribed to more than 50% of the patients.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics at baseline and at 12 weeks after the administration of luseogliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes

 

Baseline

12 weeks

p values

Age (years)

55 ± 12

  

Gender (% female)

26

  

SBP (mmHg)

137 ± 14

128 ± 15

0.035

DBP (mmHg)

83 ± 7

80 ± 7

0.023

Body weight (kg)

82.2 ± 11.4

79.5 ± 11.5

< 0.001

Body mass index (kg/m2)

28.7 ± 2.7

27.8 ± 2.9

< 0.001

Waist circumference (cm)

101 ± 8

99 ± 8

0.067

HbA1c (mmol/mol)

57.9 ± 5.4

50.9 ± 4.5

<0.001

HbA1c (%)

7.5 ± 0.7

6.8 ± 0.6

<0.001

Plasma glucose (mmol/l)

7.6 ± 2.2

6.8 ± 1.6

0.026

Insulin (μU/ml)

8.9 (5.3–13.6)

8.1 (4.7–11.7)

0.030

HOMA-IR (N = 15)

3.6 (1.5–4.8)

2.6 (1.3–3.8)

0.006

Triglycerides (mmol/l)

1.67 (1.15–2.85)

1.10 (0.93–2.39)

0.044

HDL cholesterol (mmol/l)

1.38 ± 0.36

1.36 ± 0.33

0.605

LDL cholesterol(mmol/l)

2.89 ± 0.51

3.02 ± 0.66

0.267

AST (U/l)

24 (18–40)

23 (17–28)

0.075

ALT (U/l)

19 (17–43)

23 (18–30)

0.407

γ-GTP (U/l)

35 (23–80)

28 (19–59)

0.088

Estimated GFR (ml/min/1.73 m2)

69.7 ± 13.8

68.1 ± 13.3

0.407

Log urinary ACR (mg/g)

1.62 ± 0.55

1.56 ± 0.48

0.232

Uric acid (μmol/l)

351 ± 64

326 ± 91

0.107

Log CRP (mg/l)

−0.01 ± 0.45

−0.10 ± 0.33

0.392

Hemoglobin (g/dl)

14.1 ± 3.3

15.3 ± 1.3

0.105

Hematocrit (%)

43.4 ± 3.1

45.7 ± 3.7

<0.001

Adiponectin (μg/ml)

8.8 ± 3.3

8.5 ± 3.4

0.233

Leptin (ng/ml)

13.9 ± 6.1

13.1 ± 6.8

0.377

Log Interleukin 6 (pg/ml)

0.30 ± 0.23

0.24 ± 0.26

0.278

EFV (cm3)

117 (96–136)

111 (88–134)

0.048

VFA (cm2)

167 (134–201)

151 (124–209)

0.811

SFA (cm2)

226 (184–273)

218 (178–240)

0.184

Liver attenuation index

1.03 ± 0.21

1.04 ± 0.22

0.670

Body fat (%)

36.9 ± 5.6

36.2 ± 6.0

0.027

Non-fat mass in upper extremities (kg)

5.7 ± 1.3

5.5 ± 1.3

0.012

Non-fat mass in lower extremities (kg)

16.8 ± 3.3

16.3 ± 3.4

0.012

Android (kg)

3.4 ± 1.4

2.9 ± 0.8

0.126

Gynoid (kg)

4.6 ± 1.8

3.8 ± 1.0

0.186

Total fat mass (kg)

29.3 ± 5.9

27.9 ± 6.3

<0.001

Total non-fat mass (kg)

50.4 ± 8.4

49.3 ± 8.4

0.003

Skeletal muscle index

7.81 ± 1.09

7.58 ± 1.11

0.004

ACR albumin-to-creatinine ratio, ALT alanine transaminase, AST aspartate transaminase, CRP C-reactive protein, DBP diastolic blood pressure, EFV epicardial fat volume, GFR glomerular filtration ratio, GTP glutamyl transpeptidase, HDL high-density lipoprotein, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment as an index of insulin resistance, LDL low-density lipoprotein, SBP systolic blood pressure, SFA subcutaneous fat area, VFA, visceral fat area

Table 2

Medications at baseline

Sulfonylureas (%)

21

Biguanides (%)

63

Alpha-GIs (%)

10

Glinides (%)

0

TZDs (%)

16

DPP4 inhibitors (%)

63

GLP1 receptor agonists (%)

5

ACEIs (%)

5

ARBs (%)

37

Calcium channel blockers (%)

32

Beta-blockers (%)

5

Alpha-blockers (%)

5

Diuretics (%)

0

Statins (%)

53

Fibrates (%)

5

Anti-platelet agents (%)

32

ACEIs angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, ARBs angiotensin receptor blockers, DPP4 dipeptidyl peptidase 4, GIs glycosidase inhibitors, GLP1 glucagon-like peptide 1, TZDs thiazolidinediones

Correlation of EFV with markers for body composition and cardio-metabolic risks

As shown in Table 3, the EFV was significantly correlated with the BMI, VFA, total fat mass, and HOMA-IR and tended to be correlated with the SFA. In contrast, no significant association was observed between the EFV and the markers for cardio-metabolic risks, hepatic steatosis, adipokines, and SMI.
Table 3

Correlation of epicardial fat with markers for body composition and cardio-metabolic risks in patients with type 2 diabetes

 

r

p values

Body composition markers

 Body weight (kg)

0.310

0.196

 Body mass index (kg/m2)

0.485

0.044

 Waist circumference (cm)

0.364

0.126

 Visceral fat area (cm2)

0.467

0.044

 Subcutaneous fat area (cm2)

0.452

0.052

 Liver attenuation index

−0.210

0.388

 Body fat (%)

0.249

0.304

 Total fat mass (kg)

0.484

0.036

 Total non-fat mass (kg)

0.103

0.675

 Skeletal muscle index

0.233

0.337

Cardio-metabolic markers

 HbA1c (%)

−0.312

0.193

 HOMA-IR

0.502

0.046

 Triglycerides (mmol/l)

−0.100

0.684

 HDL cholesterol (mmol/l)

−0.041

0.869

 SBP (mmHg)

0.073

0.765

 DBP (mmHg)

0.309

0.198

 ALT (U/l)

0.175

0.475

 Log CRP (mg/l)

0.130

0.608

 Log ACR (mg/g)

−0.143

0.561

 Adiponectin (μg/ml)

0.159

0.608

 Leptin (ng/ml)

−0.143

0.561

 Log interleukin 6 (pg/ml)

0.174

0.490

ACR albumin-to-creatinine ratio, ALT alanine transaminase, DBP diastolic blood pressure, HDL high-density lipoprotein, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment as an index of insulin resistance, SBP systolic blood pressure

Efficacy and safety

As shown in Table 1, luseogliflozin treatment significantly reduced the EFV at 12 weeks; whereas, the hepatic fat accumulation (LAI) kept unchanged by luseogliflozin. Among markers for body composition, body fat (%), total fat and non-fat mass, non-fat mass in the upper and the lower extremities, and the appendicular SMI, all of which were measured using the whole body DXA, were significantly decreased by luseogliflozin. In contrast, neither VFA nor SFA, measured by abdominal CT were unchanged by luseogliflozin at 12 weeks. When EFV and VFA were normalized by the BSA (EFV/BSA ratio and VFA/BSA ratio), the significant impact of luseogliflozin on the decline of EFV was slightly attenuated [58.4 (50.7–70.0) cm3/m2 at baseline to 57.2 (46.5–68.5) cm3/m2 at 12 weeks, p = 0.064] and luseogliflozin did not reduce the VFA/BSA ratio [89.1 (61.4–106.2) cm2/m2 at baseline to 86.7 (70.1–103.5) cm2/m2 at 12 weeks, p = 0.619]. Among the cardio-metabolic risk factors, fasting plasma glucose, insulin, and HbA1c levels were significantly reduced by luseogliflozin. The insulin sensitivity, assessed by HOMA-IR, was significantly improved in patients whose fasting plasma glucose level was less than 7.8 mmol/l (N = 15). Significant reductions of both the systolic and diastolic blood pressures were observed by luseogliflozin. The triglycerides level was significantly reduced by luseogliflozin, whereas the HDL cholesterol level was unchanged. The adiponectin, leptin, and IL-6 levels were unchanged by luseogliflozin. No severe AEs including severe hypoglycemic episodes were observed during the study period.

Correlation of changes in EFV, LAI, VFA, SFA with those in markers for body composition and cardio-metabolic risks by luseogliflozin

Table 4 shows the correlation of the changes in EFV, LAI, VFA, and SFA with those in the markers for body composition, cardio-metabolic risks, and adipokines. The loss of EFV was significantly correlated with the reductions in both BMI and log CRP (Table 4). In contrast, the increase in LAI was significantly correlated with the decreases in VFA, body fat (%), and log CRP. Among adipokines, the decrease in leptin was significantly correlated with the decrease in VFA as was the increase in adiponectin with the reduction in SFA. However, neither the decrease in EFV nor the increase in LAI showed no significant association with the changes in adipokines.
Table 4

Correlations of the changes between markers for body composition and the markers for cardio-metabolic risks in patients with type 2 diabetes

 

Delta EFV

Delta LAI

Delta VFA

Delta SFA

r

p values

r

p values

r

p values

r

p values

Changes in body composition markers

 Body weight (kg)

0.301

0.113

−0.616

0.003

0.686

0.001

0.250

0.159

 Body mass index (kg/m2)

0.387

0.046

−0.531

0.012

0.719

<0.001

0.292

0.120

 EFV

NA

 

0.154

0.264

−0.237

0.164

−0.075

0.379

 LAI

0.154

0.264

NA

 

−0.391

0.049

−0.168

0.245

 VFA (cm2)

−0.237

0.164

−0.391

0.049

NA

 

0.272

0.130

 SFA (cm2)

−0.075

0.379

−0.168

0.245

0.023

0.463

NA

 

 Body fat (%)

0.103

0.342

−0.468

0.025

0.296

0.117

−0.149

0.277

 Total fat mass (kg)

0.166

0.255

−0.723

<0.001

0.284

0.127

0.082

0.374

 Total non-fat mass (kg)

−0.063

0.402

0.224

0.186

−0.255

0.154

−0.082

0.374

 Skeletal muscle index

0.187

0.229

−0.154

0.271

0.143

0.285

0.350

0.047

Changes in cardio-metabolic markers

 HbA1c (%)

0.256

0.152

−0.150

0.277

0.073

0.387

0.282

0.128

 HOMA-IR

−0.271

0.155

0.315

0.118

0.306

0.117

0.094

0.364

 ALT (U/l)

−0.044

0.490

−0.170

0.251

0.249

0.159

−0.203

0.210

 Log CRP (mg/l)

0.493

0.019

−0.453

0.029

−0.039

0.438

0.302

0.112

 Log ACR (mg/g)

−0.069

0.393

0.042

0.434

0.333

0.048

−0.069

0.393

 Adiponectin (μg/ml)

−0.228

0.189

0.154

0.264

−0.167

0.261

−0.571

0.008

 Leptin (ng/ml)

0.146

0.295

0.115

0.330

0.378

0.044

−0.138

0.305

 Log interleukin 6 (pg/ml)

−0.411

0.064

−0.318

0.115

0.296

0.142

0.007

0.490

ACR albumin-to-creatinine ratio, ALT alanine transaminase, CRP C-reactive protein, DBP diastolic blood pressure, EFV epicardial fat volume, HDL high-density lipoprotein, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment as an index of insulin resistance, LAI liver attenuation index, SBP systolic blood pressure, SFA subcutaneous fat area, VFA visceral fat area

Discussion

This single-arm pilot study demonstrates that luseogliflozin treatment significantly reduces EFV in patients with type 2 diabetes and the reduction of EFV is associated with the improvement of micro-inflammation and the reduction of body weight. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on EFV in patients with type 2 diabetes and the finding suggests the possibility that SGLT2 inhibitors may reduce cardiovascular, especially coronary artery events partly by reducing the EFV in patients with type 2 diabetes.

EF accumulation has recently been reported to be associated with a non-calcified coronary plaque [79], cardio-metabolic risks including insulin resistance [10, 11] and type 2 diabetes [12] and fatal and nonfatal coronary events, independently of traditional cardiovascular risk factors [9]. These observations imply the presence of mechanisms that can account for the increased risks of coronary artery disease by an increase in EFV. Adipokines and inflammatory cytokines secreted from EF are thought to physiologically regulate heart vessels, via paracrine and vasocrine mechanisms [30] and EF is recognized as an energy reservoir for resident cardiomyocytes [31]. It is therefore conceivable that the reduction of EFV could be associated with reduced cardio-metabolic risks, presumably leading to the prevention of future cardiovascular events, via the reduction of proinflammatory adipokines. In this study we were unable to see the significant changes in the levels of adipokines by luseogliflozin treatment. It may be due to the relatively small reduction of body fat including EFV by luseogliflozin. Finally, luseogliflozin may have less of an impact on the circulatory levels of adipokines.

When considering the correlation between cardio-metabolic risks and EFV at baseline, the EFV was significantly correlated with the BMI, VFA, and HOMA-IR in this study. EF embryologically derives from the splanchnopleuric mesoderm [32], sharing an embryologic origin with the intra-abdominal visceral adipose tissue [33, 34]. Therefore, it may be acceptable that patients with a high EFV are at a high risk for the increased visceral adiposity, leading to the peripheral insulin resistance. Indeed, EFV was reported to be strongly correlated with VFA [35]. Given these findings, we believe that the statistical significance of EFV with other markers for adiposity or insulin resistance in this study can be considered as moderate (Pearson’s correlation coefficient were approximately 0.5), although the sample size of this study was small. In contrast, luseogliflozin treatment significantly reduced EFV but not VFA in the present study even though some previous studies demonstrated that SGLT2 inhibitors can reduce visceral adiposity [36, 37]. This unexpected result might be partially explained by the small sample size of this study. Additionally, it has been reported that the reduction of EFV was not correlated with that of VFA in severely obese patients with a rapid weight loss by bariatric surgery [38]. Therefore, further large-scale clinical studies are needed to elucidate the association between the reduction of EFV and that of VFA in case obese patients with diabetes lose weight. We also revealed that the reduction of EFV is associated with the reduction of CRP. Systemic micro-inflammation causes insulin resistance and is located in the central of the initiation and the propagation of atherosclerosis [39]. It is therefore possible that luseogliflozin could reduce the risks for future cardiovascular events partially by the attenuation of systemic micro-inflammation.

There is growing evidence that diabetic treatment can reduce the EFV in patients with diabetes. Sack et al. firstly showed that pioglitazone decreases a genetic expression of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines in EF in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease [40]. More recently, Lima-Martínez et al. reported that the addition of sitagliptin produced a significant and rapid reduction of EFV in overweight/obese patients with type 2 diabetes who were inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy [41]. Iacobellis et al. also has demonstrated that liraglutide, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, has a similar effect of reducing the cardiac fat independently of the loss of body weight [42]. Therefore, we believe that the findings in the present study expand evidence of therapeutic approach to preventing coronary artery disease by diabetic treatment aimed at the reduction of EFV.

In contrast to the favorable effects of luseogliflozin on the reduction of EFV and the improvement of glycemic control, we need to address the significant reduction of non-fat mass and SMI by luseogliflozin in this study. It is reasonable that SGLT2 inhibitors can be administered in patients who are expected to show the decrease in both visceral and ectopic fat including EFV and no loss of the muscle mass by these drugs. Unfortunately, luseogliflozin reduced SMI in all patients in this study. Therefore we were unable to clarify the clinical features of patients who can be safely administered luseogliflozin from the perspective of muscle mass. A decrease in skeletal muscle mass is a component of sarcopenia which is defined as the progressive loss of muscle mass and function with aging [43, 44]. Diabetes is a strong risk factor for both the decrease in muscle mass and the loss of muscle function [45, 46]. Therefore, to avoid the unfavorable decrease in muscle mass, the administration of SGLT2 inhibitors should be carefully considered in patients with diabetes who are at a high risk for sarcopenia, especially in elderly patients with diabetes. Resistance training is reported to be associated with the attenuation of a rapid decline of muscle mass in elderly patients with diabetes [47]. It is therefore expected in the future studies that the combination of SGLT2 inhibitors and resistance training could be feasible and effective to preserve the muscle mass and function in patients with diabetes.

Potential limitations of our study are as follows: (1) this study is a single-arm pilot study and the sample size is small. Therefore, larger randomized control trials are needed; (2) no information is available regarding the diet and exercise which could influence not only the glycemic control but also the changes in body composition including EFV; (3) it is to be elucidated whether the findings in this study could be observed in non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes; (4) it is important to investigate whether the reduction of EFV could be associated with the improvement of cardiovascular function; however, we were unable to examine the change of parameters related to cardiovascular function, such as diastolic function or pulse wave velocity in this study; (5) we need to mention the absolute reduction of EFV by luseogliflozin. Luseogliflozin reduced EFV by 6 cm3 (5.1% reduction relative to the baseline value) in this study. EFV has been reported to be robustly reduced from 137 ± 37 cm3 to 98 ± 25 cm3 with decreases in BMI (43.1 ± 4.5 kg/m2 to 32.3 ± 4.0 kg/m2) or VFA (190 ± 83 cm2 to 107 ± 44 cm2) by bariatric surgery in severely obese patients [38]. Therefore, in order to avoid an exaggerated expectation about the clinical use of luseogliflozin, we would like to emphasize that luseogliflozin may have a significant but relatively weak impact on the reduction of EFV as well as that of VFA or body weight compared to bariatric surgery.

In summary, our data suggest that luseogliflozin could reduce EFV in parallel with the improvement of systemic micro-inflammation and the reduction of body weight in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. It may be necessary to pay close attention to the potential of SGLT2 inhibitors to decrease the skeletal muscle mass.

Abbreviations

ACEIs: 

angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors

ACR: 

albumin-to-creatinine ratio

ALT: 

alanine aminotransferase

ARBs: 

angiotensin receptor blockers

AST: 

aspartate aminotransferase

BMI: 

body mass index

CCB: 

calcium channel blocker

CI: 

confidence interval

CRP: 

C-reactive protein

CT: 

computed tomography

CVD: 

cardiovascular disease

DBP: 

diastolic blood pressure

DPP4: 

dipeptidyl peptidase 4

EF: 

epicardial fat

EFV: 

epicardial fat volume

eGFR: 

estimated glomerular filtration rate

γ-GTP: 

glutamyl transpeptidase

GIs: 

glycosidase inhibitors

GLP1: 

glucagon-like peptide 1

HDL: 

high-density lipoprotein

HOMA-IR: 

homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance

IL-6: 

interleukin 6

IRB: 

institutional review board

LAI: 

liver-spleen-attenuation index

LDL: 

low-density lipoprotein

MRI: 

magnetic resonance imaging

NAFLD: 

non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

SFA: 

subcutaneous fat area

SGLT2: 

sodium-glucose cotransporter 2

SBP: 

systolic blood pressure

SMI: 

skeletal muscle index

TG: 

triglyceride

TZDs: 

thiazolidinediones

VFA: 

visceral fat area

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

RB designed the study, researched data, and wrote and edited the manuscript. RB, MT, IM, TY and YO contributed to intellectual discussion and reviewed and edited the manuscript. YS, MA, TF, TT, YN, MM, HI and KH researched data. As the corresponding author and guarantor of this manuscript, RB is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan and Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical Co. The authors thank all the staff of Department of Molecular Endocrinology and Metabolism, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Cardiovascular Imaging Clinic, and Ochanomizu Surugadai Clinic for their contributions.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable. The conclusions of the manuscript are based on relevant data sets available in the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate, consent for publication

The Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Tokyo Medical and Dental University approved the study (No. 2102), and all patients provided written informed consent before participation.

Funding

This study was supported by grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan and Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical Co.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Molecular Endocrinology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
(2)
Cardiovascular Imaging Clinic
(3)
Center for Medical Welfare and Liaison Services, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
(4)
Department of Preemptive Medicine and Metabolism, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
(5)
CREST, Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development

References

  1. Sacks HS, Fain JN. Human epicardial adipose tissue: a review. Am Heart J. 2007;153:907–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lim S, Meigs JB. Ectopic fat and cardiometabolic and vascular risk. Int J Cardiol. 2013;169:166–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Henrichot E, Juge-Aubry CE, Pernin A, Pache JC, Velebit V, Dayer JM, Meda P, Chizzolini C, Meier CA. Production of chemokines by perivascular adipose tissue: a role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:2594–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker AR, Silva NF, Quinn DW, Harte AL, Pagano D, Bonser RS, Kumar S, McTernan PG. Human epicardial adipose tissue expresses a pathogenic profile of adipocytokines in patients with cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2006;5:1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Shimabukuro M, Hirata Y, Tabata M, Dagvasumberel M, Sato H, Kurobe H, Fukuda D, Soeki T, Kitagawa T, Takanashi S, et al. Epicardial adipose tissue volume and adipocytokine imbalance are strongly linked to human coronary atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33:1077–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Greif M, Becker A, von Ziegler F, Lebherz C, Lehrke M, Broedl UC, Tittus J, Parhofer K, Becker C, Reiser M, et al. Pericardial adipose tissue determined by dual source CT is a risk factor for coronary atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29:781–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Alexopoulos N, McLean DS, Janik M, Arepalli CD, Stillman AE, Raggi P. Epicardial adipose tissue and coronary artery plaque characteristics. Atherosclerosis. 2010;210:150–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Oka T, Yamamoto H, Ohashi N, Kitagawa T, Kunita E, Utsunomiya H, Yamazato R, Urabe Y, Horiguchi J, Awai K, et al. Association between epicardial adipose tissue volume and characteristics of non-calcified plaques assessed by coronary computed tomographic angiography. Int J Cardiol. 2012;161:45–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mahabadi AA, Berg MH, Lehmann N, Kälsch H, Bauer M, Kara K, Dragano N, Moebus S, Jöckel KH, Erbel R, et al. Association of epicardial fat with cardiovascular risk factors and incident myocardial infarction in the general population: the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1388–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Iacobellis G, Leonetti F. Epicardial adipose tissue and insulin resistance in obese subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:6300–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rijzewijk LJ, Jonker JT, van der Meer RW, Lubberink M, de Jong HW, Romijn JA, Bax JJ, de Roos A, Heine RJ, Twisk JW, et al. Effects of hepatic triglyceride content on myocardial metabolism in type 2 diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:225–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chun H, Suh E, Byun AR, Park HR, Shim KW. Epicardial fat thickness is associated to type 2 diabetes mellitus in Korean men: a cross-sectional study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015;14:46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Willens HJ, Byers P, Chirinos JA, Labrador E, Hare JM, de Marchena E. Effects of weight loss after bariatric surgery on epicardial fat measured using echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:1242–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Song DK, Hong YS, Lee H, Oh JY, Sung YA, Kim Y. Increased epicardial adipose tissue thickness in type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity. Diabetes Metab J. 2015;39:405–13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Dubois SG, Heilbronn LK, Smith SR, Albu JB, Kelley DE, Ravussin E, Look AHEAD Adipose Research Group. Decreased expression of adipogenic genes in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes. Obesity. 2006;14:1543–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Nasarre L, Juan-Babot O, Gastelurrutia P, Llucia-Valldeperas A, Badimon L, Bayes-Genis A, Llorente-Cortés V. Low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 is upregulated in epicardial fat from type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and correlates with glucose and triglyceride plasma levels. Acta Diabetol. 2014;51:23–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Aslan AN, Keleş T, Ayhan H, Kasapkara HA, Akçay M, Durmaz T, Sarı C, Baştuğ S, Çakır B, Bozkurt E. The relationship between epicardial fat thickness and endothelial dysfunction in type I diabetes mellitus. Echocardiography. 2015;32:1745–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Levelt E, Pavlides M, Banerjee R, Mahmod M, Kelly C, Sellwood J, Ariga R, Thomas S, Francis J, Rodgers C, et al. Ectopic and visceral fat deposition in lean and obese patients with type 2 diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:53–63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Gallo LA, Wright EM, Vallon V. Probing SGLT2 as a therapeutic target for diabetes: basic physiology and consequences. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2015;12:78–89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Bolinder J, Ljunggren Ö, Kullberg J, Johansson L, Wilding J, Langkilde AM, Sugg J, Parikh S. Effects of dapagliflozin on body weight, total fat mass, and regional adipose tissue distribution in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequate glycemic control on metformin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:1020–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ridderstråle M, Andersen KR, Zeller C, Kim G, Woerle HJ, Broedl UC. Comparison of empagliflozin and glimepiride as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 104-week randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2:691–700.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S, Mattheus M, Devins T, Johansen OE, Woerle HJ, EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Eng J Med. 2015;373:2117–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Sakai S, Kaku K, Seino Y, Inagaki N, Haneda M, Sasaki T, Fukatsu A, Kakiuchi H, Samukawa Y. Efficacy and safety of the SGLT2 inhibitor luseogliflozin in Japanese patients with type 2 Diabetes mellitus stratified according to baseline body mass index: pooled analysis of data from 52-week phase III trials. Clin Ther. 2016;38(843–862):e9.Google Scholar
  24. Seino Y, Sasaki T, Fukatsu A, Ubukata M, Sakai S, Samukawa Y. Efficacy and safety of luseogliflozin as monotherapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014;30:1245–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Committee of the Japan Diabetes Society on the Diagnostic Criteria of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the committee on the classification and diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Investig. 2010;1:212–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, Yasuda Y, Tomita K, Nitta K, Yamagata K, Tomino Y, Yokoyama H, Hishida A. Collaborators developing the Japanese equation for estimated GFR. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53:982–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Bouchi R, Nakano Y, Ohara N, Takeuchi T, Murakami M, Asakawa M, Sasahara Y, Numasawa M, Minami I, Izumiyama H, et al. Clinical relevance of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a simultaneous evaluation of fatty liver disease and atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15:64.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Bouchi R, Takeuchi T, Akihisa M, Ohara N, Nakano Y, Nishitani R, Murakami M, Fukuda T, Fujita M, Minami I, et al. Increased visceral adiposity with normal weight is associated with prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Investig. 2016;7:607–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Nagata M, Kato S, Kitagawa K, Ishida N, Nakajima H, Nakamori S, Ishida M, Miyahara M, Ito M, Sakuma H. Diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T unenhanced whole-heart coronary MR angiography performed with 32-channel cardiac coils: initial single-center experience. Radiology. 2011;259:384–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Salazar J, Luzardo E, Mejías JC, Rojas J, Ferreira A, Rivas-Ríos JR, Bermúdez V. Epicardial fat: physiological, pathological, and therapeutic implications. Cardiol Res Pract. 2016;2016:1291537.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Iacobellis G, Barbaro G. The double role of epicardial adipose tissue as pro- and anti-inflammatory organ. Horm Metab Res. 2008;40:442–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Iacobellis G. Epicardial adipose tissue in endocrine and metabolic diseases. Endocrine. 2014;46:8–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ngo DT, Gokce N. Epicardial adipose tissue: a benign consequence of obesity? Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:e003156.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Iacobellis G, Malavazos AE, Corsi MM. Epicardial fat: from the biomolecular aspects to the clinical practice. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2011;43:1651–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Iacobellis G, Assael F, Ribaudo MC, Zappaterreno A, Alessi G, Di Mario U, Leonetti F. Epicardial fat from echocardiography: a new method for visceral adipose tissue prediction. Obes Res. 2003;11:304–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Cefalu WT, Leiter LA, Yoon KH, Arias P, Niskanen L, Xie J, Balis DA, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin versus glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (CANTATA-SU): 52 week results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2013;382:941–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Bolinder J, Ljunggren Ö, Johansson L, Wilding J, Langkilde AM, Sjöström CD, Sugg J, Parikh S. Dapagliflozin maintains glycaemic control while reducing weight and body fat mass over 2 years in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin. Diab Obes Metab. 2014;16:159–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Gaborit B, Jacquier A, Kober F, Abdesselam I, Cuisset T, Boullu-Ciocca S, Emungania O, Alessi MC, Clément K, Bernard M, Dutour A. Effects of bariatric surgery on cardiac ectopic fat: lesser decrease in epicardial fat compared to visceral fat loss and no change in myocardial triglyceride content. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1381–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Abel ED, O’Shea KM, Ramasamy R. Insulin resistance: metabolic mechanisms and consequences in the heart. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32:2068–76.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Sacks HS, Fain JN, Cheema P, Bahouth SW, Garrett E, Wolf RY, Wolford D, Samaha J. Inflammatory genes in epicardial fat contiguous with coronary atherosclerosis in the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: changes associated with pioglitazone. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:730–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Lima-Martínez MM, Paoli M, Rodney M, Balladares N, Contreras M, D’Marco L, Iacobellis G. Effect of sitagliptin on epicardial fat thickness in subjects with type 2 diabetes and obesity: a pilot study. Endocrine. 2016;51:448–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Iacobellis G, Mohseni M, Bianco S. Liraglutide causes massive and rapid reduction of cardiac fat independent of weight loss in type 2 diabetes. The 75th American Diabetes Association, Scientific Sessions, LBA-5785, Boston, USA, 2015.
  43. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, Martin FC, Michel JP, Rolland Y, Schneider SM, European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European Working Group on sarcopenia in older people. age. Aging. 2010;39:412–23.Google Scholar
  44. Chen LK, Liu LK, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung TW, Bahyah KS, Chou MY, Chen LY, Hsu PS, Krairit O, et al. Sarcopenia in Asia: consensus report of the Asian Working Group for sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir. 2014;15:95–101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Park SW, Goodpaster BH, Lee JS, Kuller LH, Boudreau R, de Rekeneire N, Harris TB, Kritchevsky S, Tylavsky FA, Nevitt M, et al. Health, aging, and body composition study. Excessive loss of skeletal muscle mass in older adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1993–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Mavros Y, Kay S, Anderberg KA, Baker MK, Wang Y, Zhao R, Meiklejohn J, Climstein M, O’Sullivan A, deVos N, et al. Changes in insulin resistance and HbA1c are related to exercise-mediated changes in body composition in older adults with type 2 diabetes: interim outcomes from the GRE, AT2DO trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:2372–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Castaneda C, Layne JE, Munoz-Orians L, Gordon PL, Walsmith J, Foldvari M, Roubenoff R, Tucker KL, Nelson ME. A randomized controlled trial of resistance exercise training to improve glycemic control in older adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:2335–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement