Open Access

Palaeolithic diet decreases fasting plasma leptin concentrations more than a diabetes diet in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised cross-over trial

  • Maelán Fontes-Villalba1, 6Email author,
  • Staffan Lindeberg1,
  • Yvonne Granfeldt2,
  • Filip K. Knop3,
  • Ashfaque A. Memon1,
  • Pedro Carrera-Bastos1,
  • Óscar Picazo4,
  • Madhvi Chanrai5,
  • Jan Sunquist1,
  • Kristina Sundquist1 and
  • Tommy Jönsson1
Cardiovascular Diabetology201615:80

DOI: 10.1186/s12933-016-0398-1

Received: 15 March 2016

Accepted: 13 May 2016

Published: 23 May 2016

Abstract

Background

We have previously shown that a Palaeolithic diet consisting of the typical food groups that our ancestors ate during the Palaeolithic era, improves cardiovascular disease risk factors and glucose control compared to the currently recommended diabetes diet in patients with type 2 diabetes. To elucidate the mechanisms behind these effects, we evaluated fasting plasma concentrations of glucagon, insulin, incretins, ghrelin, C-peptide and adipokines from the same study.

Methods

In a randomised, open-label, cross-over study, 13 patients with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to eat a Palaeolithic diet based on lean meat, fish, fruits, vegetables, root vegetables, eggs and nuts, or a diabetes diet designed in accordance with current diabetes dietary guidelines during two consecutive 3-month periods. The patients were recruited from primary health-care units and included three women and 10 men [age (mean ± SD) 64 ± 6 years; BMI 30 ± 7 kg/m2; diabetes duration 8 ± 5 years; glycated haemoglobin 6.6 ± 0.6 % (57.3 ± 6 mmol/mol)] with unaltered diabetes treatment and stable body weight for 3 months prior to the start of the study. Outcome variables included fasting plasma concentrations of leptin, adiponectin, adipsin, visfatin, resistin, glucagon, insulin, C-peptide, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, glucagon-like peptide-1 and ghrelin. Dietary intake was evaluated by use of 4-day weighed food records.

Results

Seven participants started with the Palaeolithic diet and six with the diabetes diet. The Palaeolithic diet resulted in a large effect size (Cohen’s d = −1.26) at lowering fasting plasma leptin levels compared to the diabetes diet [mean difference (95 % CI), −2.3 (−5.1 to 0.4) ng/ml, p = 0.023]. No statistically significant differences between the diets for the other variables, analysed in this study, were observed.

Conclusions

Over a 3-month study period, a Palaeolithic diet resulted in reduced fasting plasma leptin levels, but did not change fasting levels of insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, incretins, ghrelin and adipokines compared to the currently recommended diabetes diet.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00435240

Keywords

Palaeolithic diet Type 2 diabetes Glucagon Leptin Lipotoxicity Adiposopathy Evolution

Background

The metabolic syndrome represents a cluster of symptoms including abdominal obesity, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and high fasting glucose and blood pressure [1]. The condition is associated with a fivefold increased risk of type 2 diabetes, which is characterized by insulin resistance [2] and β-cell failure [3]. Lifestyle plays a prominent role in the pathophysiology of the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes [4, 5]. Specifically, an unhealthy diet with chronic caloric surplus induces hyperinsulinemia leading to ectopic lipid deposition (lipotoxicity) in the heart, liver, pancreas and muscle [68], increasing the risk of the metabolic syndrome, fatty liver, fatty heart and type 2 diabetes [7].

Interestingly, insulin resistance has been suggested to be a consequence and a protective mechanism against lipotoxicity [610]. Leptin resistance is a possible player in the roadmap to the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes [7], and it has been suggested that leptin can protect against lipotoxicity [7]. Lipotoxicity can generate α-cell insulin resistance resulting in hyperglucagonaemia and increased hepatic glucose production [10]. It is increasingly recognized that the recent (in an evolutionary perspective) introduction of staple food groups such as cereal grains, dairy products and refined sugars in the human diet has occurred too recently for the human genome to have completely adapted [11].

In a previous publication from this trial, we reported significant improvements in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), blood lipids, blood pressure, weight and waist circumference [12] along with increased satiety [13] in patients with type 2 diabetes consuming a Palaeolithic diet, as compared to the officially recommended diet for patients with type 2 diabetes (diabetes diet) [14].

The abovementioned pathophysiological changes produce adaptations in other hormones and endocrine axes. Therefore, our aim was to investigate if the beneficial effects from a Palaeolithic diet could be tentatively explained by associated changes in adipokines, glucagon, incretins and ghrelin, and here we present new data on the fasting levels of these hormones from our previous study [12] (Additional file 1).

Methods

Approval of the study was obtained from the regional Medical Ethics Committee and the trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT00435240).

Participants

Patients with type 2 diabetes without insulin treatment were recruited from primary health-care units in the Lund area of Sweden. Details about inclusion and exclusion criteria and patient characteristics (Table 1) have previously been published [12]. All recruited subjects were given oral and written study information prior to signing a consent form to participate in the study and were then further assessed for eligibility.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics

 

All

Diabetes first (6/13)

Palaeolithic first (7/13)

Sex male/female (n)

10/3

4/2

6/1

Age (years)

64 (6)

63 (6)

66 (6)

Height (cm)

171 (5)

170 (6)

172 (4)

Weight (kg)

87 (17)

92 (20)

82 (13)

BMI (kg/m2)

30 (7)

32 (8)

28 (4)

Waist circumference (cm)

103 (14)

109 (17)

97 (9)

Diabetes duration (years)

8 (5)

11 (6)

6 (4)

Diabetic values at OGTT yes/no (n)

12/1

6/0

6/1

Lipid lowering drug (=statin) yes/no (n)

8/5

4/2

4/3

Drugs per day

4.3 (2.3)

3.7 (1.8)

4.9 (2.7)

Antihypertensive drugs per day

1.5 (1.5)

1.2 (1.2)

1.9 (1.7)

 Beta-blocker yes/no (n)


4/9

1/5

3/4

 Thiazide yes/no (n)


4/9

1/5

3/4

 ACE inhibitor yes/no (n)


5/8

2/4

3/4

 Angiotensin-II receptor blocker yes/no (n)

4/9

2/4

2/5

 Calcium channel blocker yes/no (n)

3/10

1/5

2/5

Anti-diabetic drugs per day

1.2 (0.9)

1.5 (0.8)

0.9 (0.9)

 Metformin yes/no (n)

9/4

5/1

4/3

 Dosage, mg/day

1031 (864)

1283 (950)

814 (790)

 Sulphonylurea yes/no (n)

3/10

2/4

1/6

 Thiazolidinedione yes/no (n)

3/10

2/4

1/6

Plasma adiponectin (µg/ml)

4.8 (4.16)

4.8 (2.5)

4.9 (5.4)

Plasma adipsin (ng/ml)

797 (157)

804 (218)

792 (178)

Plasma C-peptide (pg/ml)

487 (275)

437 (276)

531 (289)

Plasma ghrelin (pg/ml)

568 (129)

613 (165)

530 (82)

Plasma GIP (pg/ml)

232 (91.6)

226 (83)

237 (105)

Plasma GLP-1 (pg/ml)

26.8 (3.39)

26.4 (4.5)

27.1 (2.4)

Plasma glucagon (pg/ml)

425 (44.34)

435 (52.4)

417 (38.4)

Plasma leptin (ng/ml)

9.84 (12.18)

12.1 (17)

7.9 (6.8)

Plasma resistin (ng/ml)

2.21 (0.39)

2.3 (0.4)

2.1 (0.4)

Plasma visfatin (ng/ml)

2.52 (0.75)

2.7 (0.5)

2.4 (0.7)

Data is presented as mean values with SD in brackets, unless stated

ACE angiotensin converting enzyme, GIP glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, GLP-1 glucagon-like peptide-1

Design

The study design and generation of random allocation sequence have been reported in detail previously [12]. In short, the study was a randomised, cross-over, dietary intervention study in which all eligible subjects were informed of the intention to compare two healthy diets and that it was not known whether one diet might be superior to the other. After randomisation, there was no blinding of dietary assignment to study participants, nor to those administering the interventions or assessing the outcomes. At study start, all subjects were randomised, by use of opaque envelopes, to start with either a diabetes diet designed in accordance with official recommendations [14] or a Palaeolithic diet [12]. Immediately after randomisation, all subjects received oral and written information about their respective initial diet individually from diabetes nurses. After 3 months, all subjects switched diets and received new oral and written information about the new diet. Advice about regular physical activity was given to all subjects.

Diets

The information on the diabetes diet stated that it aimed to provide evenly distributed meals with an increased intake of vegetables, root vegetables, dietary fibre, whole-grain bread and other whole-grain cereal products, fruits and berries, and a decreased intake of total fat with more unsaturated fat. It was recommended that salt intake should be kept below 6 g per day. The information on the Palaeolithic diet stated that it should be based on lean meat, fish, fruit, leafy and cruciferous vegetables, root vegetables, eggs and nuts, while avoiding—as far as possible—dairy products, cereal grains, beans, refined fats, sugar, candy, soft drinks, beer and added salt. The following items were recommended in limited amounts for the Palaeolithic diet: eggs (≤2 per day), nuts (preferentially walnuts), dried fruit, potatoes (≤1 medium-sized per day), rapeseed or olive oil (≤1 tablespoon per day) and wine (≤1 glass per day). The recommended intake of the other foods was not restricted and no advice was given with regard to the proportions of food categories (e.g. animal vs. plant foods). The evolutionary rationale for a Palaeolithic diet and its potential benefits have been outlined previously [15] and detailed nutritional compositions of the diets can be found in our previous report [12].

Procedures

An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed in the morning after obtaining venous blood samples and measurements of blood pressure, weight and waist circumference using standard methods [12] at the start of the study, after 3 months (when switching to a new diet) and at the end of the study (after 6 months). Samples were collected in EDTA-containing tubes and centrifuged for 10 min at 4 °C. Plasma was then aliquoted and stored at −80 °C until analysis. Outcome variables in the present study included fasting plasma concentrations of leptin, adiponectin, adipsin, visfatin, resistin, glucagon, insulin, C-peptide, GIP, GLP-1 and ghrelin.

Assessment of conditions of frozen blood samples

To assess the condition of the frozen blood samples we compared new analyses of insulin to older ones. The newly analyzed insulin values were on average 27 % lower than older analyses and the standard deviation had increased by 66 %. However, the Pearson correlation of 0.72 (adjusted R2 = 0.51) between new and old insulin values for the same individual and time were highly correlated (p < 0.0001).

Analyses

The Bio-Plex pro™ human diabetes panel (Bio-Rad Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) a Luminex-based magnetic bead assay, was used to quantify insulin, C-peptide, ghrelin, GIP, GLP-1, glucagon, leptin, resistin and visfatin and a separate Bio-Plex assay was used to quantify adiponectin and adipsin (due to different dilution factor) in plasma according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each run included controls of known concentration for each cytokine and a blank.

Statistics

The statistical power calculations were based on initial primary outcomes of this intervention and previously published [12]. Data were analysed for normality (determined by Q–Q plots and the Shapiro–Wilk test in SPSS) and logarithmically transformed when necessary. If data did not show reasonable normal distribution after logarithmic transformation, the Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank sum test was used, otherwise a paired t test was used. To analyse the difference between diets in their effects on outcomes we compared the absolute values at the end of each diet. In order to check for carry-over effects, t tests were used to compare mean values of outcome variables for the group starting with the Palaeolithic diet with those for the group starting with the diabetes diet. In order to check for period effects, t tests were used to compare the effects of the first and second diets. We performed post hoc analysis using bivariate correlations between the outcome variables presented in Table 2 and outcome variables related to glucose homeostasis and satiation. Bivariate correlations were also performed between the outcome variables presented in Table 2 and dietary variables. Outcome variables with significant correlations were entered in Simple Linear Regression. Significance was set at p < 0.05. All t tests were two-sided. Due to multiple outcome measures problem in this post hoc analysis a multiple outcome measures correction was made using QuickCalcs online provided by GraphPad Software (http://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/interpretPValue1/). Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS for Mac Version 20 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Mac, Version 20.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Table 2

Hormone levels, and weight, after the Palaeolithic diet and diabetes diet

Outcome

Palaeolithic diet

Diabetes diet

Delta diets

p a

Adiponectin (µg/ml)

5.2 ± 4.4 (2.5 to 7.9)

5.7 ± 5.4 (2.5 to 9.1)

−0.5 ± 1.2 (−1.3 to 0.2)

0.153

Adipsin (ng/ml)

787 ± 182 (677 to 896)

776 ± 153 (684 to 869)

10 ± 79 (−37 to 58)

0.650

C-peptide (pg/ml)

455 ± 224 (319 to 590)

412 ± 204 (289 to 535)

43 ± 262 (−116 to 201)

0.644

Ghrelin (pg/ml)

540 ± 97 (481 to 598)

566 ± 145 (478 to 654)

−26 ± 74 (−70 to 18)

0.226

GIP (pg/ml)

254 ± 266 (93 to 415)

186 ± 75 (141 to 232)

68 ± 264 (−92 to 227)

0.600b

GLP-1 (pg/ml)

27 ± 9.3 (22 to 33)

27 ± 3.7 (25 to 29)

0.4 ± 7.7 (−4.3 to 5.12)

0.235b

Glucagon (pg/ml)

409 ± 40 (385 to 433)

431 ± 51 (400 to 463)

−22 ± 43 (−48 to 3.9)

0.089

Insulin (pg/ml)

248 ± 138 (165 to 332)

336 ± 327 (138 to 533)

−87 ± 240 (−232 to 58)

0.266

Insulinc (pg/ml)

401 ± 174 (296 to 506)

391 ± 115 (322 to 461)

9.8 ± 172 (−94 to 114)

0.840

Leptin (ng/ml)

5.1 ± 4.9 (2.1 to 8.0)

7.4 ± 8.3 (2.4 to 12)

−2.3 ± 4.6 (−5.1 to 0.4)

0.023 b

Resistin (ng/ml)

2.5 ± 0.9 (1.9 to 3.0)

2.3 ± 0.6 (2.0 to 2.7)

0.2 ± 0.6 (−0.2 to 0.5)

0.356

Visfatin (ng/ml)

2.4 ± 0.7 (2.0 to 2.9)

2.5 ± 0.6 (2.1 to 2.8)

−0.1 ± 0.5 (−0.3 to 0.3)

0.906

Weight (kg)

81 ± 13 (74 to 88)

84 ± 15 (76 to 92)

−3.3 ± 3.8 (−5.7 to −1.0)

0.008

Data are mean ± standard deviation (95 % CI)

Significance tests are paired t test for normally distributed data and Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank sum test for non-normally distributed data

Significant p values are indicated by italics font

GIP glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, GLP-1 glucagon-like peptide-1

a p for difference between diets

bData non-normally distributed (Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank sum test)

cOld insulin values previously published

Results

Participant flow

All reported analyses are per protocol analyses on the 13 participants (3 women, 10 men) who completed the trial (Fig. 1). Four subjects were excluded for the following reasons: one starting with Paleolithic diet was wrongly included with ongoing warfarin treatment, one starting with Paleolithic diet was unwilling to continue due to abdominal pains and bloating, one starting with diabetes diet was excluded after developing leukemia, and one starting with diabetes diet was excluded after developing heart failure. Dates defining the periods of recruitment and follow-up, and side effects have been previously published [12].
Fig. 1

Flow diagram of participant recruitment

Baseline data

Individual characteristics regarding anthropometric measurements, medication and outcome variables have been reported in detail previously [12] and are summarised in Table 1. The participants starting with the Palaeolithic diet compared to those starting with the diabetes diet did not differ at baseline for any of the outcome variables (Table 1). No carry-over or period effect was observed.

Outcomes

The absolute level of plasma leptin after the Palaeolithic diet was lower than after the diabetes diet (large effect size, Cohen’s d = −1.26; p = 0.023) (Table 2; Fig. 2) [16, 17]. When one outlier (more than 3 SDs) was excluded, the mean difference of leptin after the diets was normally distributed and the difference remained significant (p = 0.031). However, due to multiple outcome measures problem the probabilities of having a p value less than 0.023 just by chance in our dataset is 20.8 %.
Fig. 2

Fasting hormone levels after the Palaeolithic diet and diabetes diet for leptin and glucagon. Data show individual differences in a leptin and b glucagon after 3 months in response to the Palaeolithic and diabetes diets. Significance of the difference is indicated by asterisks (p < 0.05). NS non-significant

The absolute level of glucagon at the end of the Palaeolithic diet was lower than at the end of the diabetes diet (moderate effect size, Cohen’s d = −0.51), but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.089) (Table 2; Fig. 2).

As previously reported, weight loss was significantly greater (−3.3 kg) after the Palaeolithic diet than the diabetes diet (p = 0.008).

No statistically significant differences between the diets for the other variables were observed (Table 2).

Correlations and linear regression

In post hoc analysis of within-subject differences (value after the Palaeolithic diet minus value after the diabetes diet) we found that leptin correlated with fasting plasma insulin (Spearman’s correlation 0.55, p = 0.049), grams of dietary fat (Spearman’s correlation −0.66, p = 0.013), percentage of dietary fat (Spearman’s correlation −0.55, p = 0.049), grams of dietary saturated fat (Spearman’s correlation −0.59, p = 0.033), grams of dietary fatty acid C16:0 (Spearman’s correlation −0.57, p = 0.041), and grams of dietary fatty acid C18:0 (Spearman’s correlation −0.55, p = 0.049); glucagon correlated with area under the curve (AUC) for insulin0–120 min (Pearson’s correlation 0.94, p = 0.015), stimulated AUC insulin0–120 min (Pearson’s correlation 0.55, p = 0.047), fasting plasma insulin (Pearson’s correlation 0.63, p = 0.019), satiety quotient for dietary glycaemic index per meal (Pearson’s correlation −0.56, p = 0.045), dietary glycaemic load (Pearson’s correlation 0.63, p = 0.021), dietary glycaemic index (Pearson’s correlation 0.73, p = 0.005), dietary fatty acid C20:5 (EPA) (Pearson’s correlation 0.58, p = 0.037), dietary fatty acid C22:6 (DHA) (Pearson’s correlation 0.57, p = 0.04) and dietary vitamin B12 (Pearson’s correlation 0.57, p = 0.041) (Table 3).
Table 3

Exploratory analysis

 

Pearson’s correlation ra

Spearman’s correlation rb

Adjusted R2

p c

Leptin (ng/ml) versus

 Fasting insulin (ng/ml)

 

0.555

 

0.049

 Fat (g)

 

−0.665

 

0.013

 Fat (%)

 

−0.555

 

0.049

 SAF (g)

 

−0.593

 

0.033

 Fatty acid C16:0 (g)

 

−0.571

 

0.041

 Fatty acid C18:0 (g)

 

−0.555

 

0.049

Glucagon (pg/ml) versus

 AUC insulin0-120 (nmol/l min)

0.946

 

0.383

0.015

 Stimulated AUC insulin0-120 (nmol/l min)

0.558

 

0.249

0.047

 Fasting plasma insulin (pmol/l)

0.637

 

0.352

0.019

 Satiety quotient for glycaemic index per meal (RS)

−0.562

 

0.254

0.045

 Glycaemic load (g)

0.63

 

0.342

0.021

 Glycaemic index

0.731

 

0.491

0.005

 Fatty acid C20:5, n-3, EPA (g)


0.581

 

0.277

0.037

 Fatty acid C22:6, n-3, DHA (g)

0.575

 

0.27

0.04

 Vitamin B-12 (µg)

0.571

 

0.265

0.041

Adipsin (ng/ml) versus

 Satiety quotient for GL per meal (RS/kg)

0.581

 

0.277

0.037

GIP (pg/ml) versus

 Fasting plasma insulin (pmol/l)

 

0.555

 

0.049

GLP-1 (pg/ml) versus

    

 Stimulated AUC insulin (nmol/l min)

 

0.654

 

0.015

 AUC insulin (nmol/l min)

 

0.67

 

0.012

Resistin (ng/ml) versus

 Fasting plasma insulin (pmol/l)

−0.728

 

0.451

0.041

 Satiety quotient for GL per meal (RS/kg)

0.810

 

0.598

0.015

Visfatin (ng/ml) versus

 Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/l)

−0.557

 

0.248

0.048

Exploratory analysis was conducted to check for significant correlations between the outcome variables presented in Table 2 and outcome variables related to glucose homeostasis and satiation. Bivariate correlations were also performed between the outcome variables presented in Table 2 and dietary variables. This analysis consisted in bivariate Pearson or Spearman’s (for non normally distributed variables) correlation between within-subject differences in outcome and dietary variables. Normally distributed outcomes that were significant in Pearson’s correlation were entered into simple linear regression

aPearson’s correlation for normally distributed variables

bSpearman’s correlation for non normally distributed variables

c p value for bivariate correlation and simple linear regression

Discussion

This small trial showed that a Palaeolithic diet decreased fasting plasma leptin, but did not affect fasting levels of insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, incretins, ghrelin and adipokines significantly compared to the currently recommended diabetes diet.

Weight loss interventions have been shown to decrease leptin concentrations [18], and in our trial leptin decreased only with the intervention that induced weight loss, i.e. the Palaeolithic diet. However, post hoc analysis revealed no correlation between difference in weight loss and leptin after the diets (Spearman’s correlation 0.11, p = 0.721).

Interestingly, genetic and in vitro studies indicate insufficient adaptation of the human leptin system to a diet based on cereal grains [19, 20]. Therefore cereal grains could hypothetically lead to leptin resistance and higher leptin values. Our finding of lower leptin following a Palaeolithic diet virtually devoid of cereal grains compared to a diabetes diet with cereal grains supports this notion, and could represent the mechanism behind our previous findings of improved glucose control and blood lipids [12] and greater satiety per calorie from the Palaeolithic diet [13].

In our study there was a non-significant lower fasting glucagon levels after the Palaeolithic diet compared to the diabetes diet, which could be a result of the amelioration of leptin sensitivity in the pancreatic islets. However, this hypothesis should be tested in trials with adequate statistical power.

Due to the small sample size, we were not able to conduct a multivariate analysis adjusting for weight loss to explore the independent effect of the Palaeolithic diet on leptin and glucagon. Therefore, our results might be explained by the weight loss produced only during the Palaeolithic diet, as already mentioned.

Insulin plays a central role in type 2 diabetes, but despite this we found no difference in fasting insulin between the diets. Compared to baseline, there was a significant decrease in insulin (p = 0.004 and 0.023, for old and new insulin analysis, respectively) after the Palaeolithic diet, which may be explained by weight loss.

Adiponectin appears to play an important role in type 2 diabetes due to its anti-inflammation, antiatherogenic, and insulin-sensitizing properties [21], yet we found no difference between the diets. However, there is some controversy regarding the beneficial effects of adiponectin in type 2 diabetes [2225].

In the exploratory analysis there was a positive correlation between change in fasting leptin and insulin, which could be explained by the mechanisms discussed above and recently reviewed by Nolan et al. [8]. This finding is consistent with other studies where a positive correlation between fasting leptin and insulin has also been shown [26, 27]. It has been shown that treatment with recombinant human leptin does not improve insulin sensitivity in obese patients with type 2 diabetes [28], contrary to what happens in patients with severe leptin deficiency [29]. This might support the notion that patients with type 2 diabetes suffer from leptin resistance. Interestingly, within-subject differences in fasting leptin correlated negatively with the intake of total fat (in grams and percent) and C16:0 and C18:0 fatty acids. These results are consistent with a randomised controlled trial where a low-fat diet lowered leptin levels more than a high-fat diet [30]. On the other hand, in a well controlled study leptin levels were higher with a low-fat diet than a low-glycaemic index or very low–carbohydrate diet [31]. Other trials found no effect of fat restriction on leptin levels [32, 33]. This inconsistency in results may be due to differences between individuals in gene variants related to leptin physiology [34].

Comparison with findings from other studies

In a previous trial from our group, leptin decreased significantly during Palaeolithic and Mediterranean diets, respectively, with no differences between diets, but after exclusion of one outlier with a high grain intake in the Palaeolithic diet group there was a significantly greater decrease in leptin in this group [35]. Interestingly, in the same study there was a strong correlation (Pearson’s correlation 0.50, p = 0.008) between change in leptin and intake of cereals [35]. Nevertheless, contrary to our previous finding there was no correlation in the data (Spearman’s correlation 0.22, p = 0471). Additionally, data from the present trial indicated that the Palaeolithic diet is more satiating than the diabetes diet [13], consistent with another trial from our group [35]. Other randomised clinical trials have shown beneficial effects of a Palaeolithic diet compared with other healthy diets on cardiovascular risk factors [36] and body fat [37]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis, where these studies were included [12, 3638], showed that a Palaeolithic diet improves some components of the metabolic syndrome more than the healthy control diets [39].

The Mediterranean diet has been the focus of several publications regarding its role in the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes [4043]. A systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the Mediterranean diet was superior to control diets for all components of the metabolic syndrome [44]. Another systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that the Mediterranean diet decreased HbA1c, but not fasting glucose, more than control diets but not more than the Palaeolithic diet [42]. An important consideration with respect to the characteristics of Mediterranean and Palaeolithic diets concerns their resemblance. Both emphasize a high intake of whole unprocessed foods, specifically: fruits, vegetables, fish, nuts, and olive oil, while the limitation in the intake of wholegrain cereals and legumes in the Paleolithic diet is the main difference. In light of the role that inflammation and oxidative stress might play in glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes [45], potential mechanisms behind the beneficial effects of the Mediterranean and Palaeolithic diets could be attributed to their anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory capacity [41, 46]. Thus, both the Mediterranean diet and the Palaeolithic diet share common features that render them as healthy options in patients with type 2 diabetes, and represent a step forward for an optimal human diet.

Vegetarian diets are regarded as a healthy option for western diseases as well. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the effects of a vegetarian diet on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes [47], resulting in better HbA1c, but not fasting glucose, than control diets. None of the the included trials tested a vegetarian diet against a Palaeolithic or Mediterranean diet.

Importantly, a systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effect of various diets on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes [48]. The results indicate that all the diets, namely low-carbohydrate, low-glycaemic index, Mediterranean and high-protein diets, improved HbA1c compared with their respective control diets. Consequently, the best dietary approach for the management of type 2 diabetes continues to be a matter of debate.

Limitations of the present study

A limitation of this study, as with most other dietary trials, is the lack of blinding after randomisation. To minimise this problem, all study participants were informed of the intention to compare the effect of two healthy diets for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and that it was not known which one would be superior. Also, written information with dietary advice, food recipes and behavioural support were similarly formulated for both diets. The difference in weight loss, macronutrient composition and glycaemic load between the diets precludes a definite conclusion about the specific role of different food choices on the endocrine system.

The results of this study should be interpreted with caution for other reasons as well. First, we have the limitation of multiple outcome measures problem and the probability of type I error for leptin in our study is 20.8 %. Secondly, the outcomes generated from this post hoc analysis represent exploratory investigations; the primary outcomes have been previously published. Lastly, this study has a small sample size which precludes us from performing adjusted multivariate analysis. This is specially relevant for weight loss because it decreased only during the diabetes diet and the difference after the diets was 3.3 kg (p = 0.008). As a result, since weight loss is a principal driver of improved leptin sensitivity we are not certain about the independent effect of the diets on the results.

Conclusion

We show that a Palaeolithic diet results in significantly lower fasting plasma leptin, non-significantly lower fasting plasma glucagon concentrations as well as weight loss, compared to a standard diabetes diet. Human beings are well adapted to food groups similar to those found in the Palaeolithic era during our evolution, and, hypothetically, the lower leptin and glucagon levels could indicate that deviations from this template is not optimal and could explain our previously reported findings on glucose control, blood lipids, blood pressure and satiety. But the small sample size of the present study makes it impossible to perform adjusted multivariate analysis and the observed weight loss after the Palaeolithic diet may also contribute to explain our results. Long-term and adequately powered trials investigating the effects of Palaeolithic diet are warranted.

Abbreviations

AUC: 

area under the curve

GIP: 

glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide

GLP-1: 

glucagon-like peptide-1

HbA1c: 

glycated haemoglobin

OGTT: 

oral glucose tolerance test

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

All the authors fulfil the following conditions: (a) substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data; (b) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and (c) final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Professor Birgitta Hovelius and Dr. Kristina Haara for their participation in designing the study, to Lilian Bengtsson and Lena Kvist for technical assistance, and Anna Hedelius for excellent technical support. We are also very grateful to Amreeta Buxani for helping in the review of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is included within the article (and its additional file). Additional file 1.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval of the study was obtained from the regional Medical Ethics Committee and the trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT00435240). All recruited subjects were given oral and written study information prior to signing a consent form to participate in the study and were then further assessed for eligibility.

Funding

The study was funded by Crafoordska stiftelsen, Region Skåne and Lund University.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Clinical Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University
(2)
Department of Food Technology, Engineering and Nutrition, Lund University
(3)
Center for Diabetes Research, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen
(4)
NutriScience-Education and Consulting, Lda
(5)
Independent researcher
(6)

References

  1. Cornier M-A, Dabelea D, Hernandez TL, Lindstrom RC, Steig AJ, Stob NR, et al. The metabolic syndrome. Endocr Rev. 2008;29:777–822.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Rothman DL, Magnusson I, Cline G, Gerard D, Kahn CR, Shulman RG, et al. Decreased muscle glucose transport/phosphorylation is an early defect in the pathogenesis of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:983–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Porte D, Kahn SE. beta-cell dysfunction and failure in type 2 diabetes: potential mechanisms. Diabetes. 2001;50(Suppl 1):S160–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Takahara M, Shimomura I. Metabolic syndrome and lifestyle modification. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2014;15:317–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lin C-H, Chiang S-L, Tzeng W-C, Chiang L-C. Systematic review of impact of lifestyle-modification programs on metabolic risks and patient-reported outcomes in adults with metabolic syndrome. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2014;11:361–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Unger RH. Lipid overload and overflow: metabolic trauma and the metabolic syndrome. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2003;14:398–403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Unger RH, Scherer PE. Gluttony, sloth and the metabolic syndrome: a roadmap to lipotoxicity. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2010;21:345–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Nolan CJ, Ruderman NB, Kahn SE, Pedersen O, Prentki M. Insulin resistance as a physiological defense against metabolic stress: implications for the management of subsets of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2015;64:673–86.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Unger RH, Clark GO, Scherer PE, Orci L. Lipid homeostasis, lipotoxicity and the metabolic syndrome. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1801:209–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Unger RH, Roth MG. A new biology of diabetes revealed by leptin. Cell Metab. 2015;21:15–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Carrera-Bastos P, Fontes-Villalba M, O’Keefe JH, Lindeberg S, Cordain L. The western diet and lifestyle and diseases of civilization. Res Rep Clin Cardiol. 2011;2:15–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Jönsson T, Granfeldt Y, Ahrén B, Branell U-C, Pålsson G, Hansson A, et al. Beneficial effects of a Paleolithic diet on cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes: a randomized cross-over pilot study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2009;8:35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Jönsson T, Granfeldt Y, Lindeberg S, Hallberg A-C. Subjective satiety and other experiences of a Paleolithic diet compared to a diabetes diet in patients with type 2 diabetes. Nutr J. 2013;12:105.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Mann JI, De Leeuw I, Hermansen K, Karamanos B, Karlström B, Katsilambros N, et al. Evidence-based nutritional approaches to the treatment and prevention of diabetes mellitus. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2004;14:373–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Eaton SB, Strassman BI, Nesse RM, Neel JV, Ewald PW, Williams GC, et al. Evolutionary health promotion. Prev Med. 2002;34:109–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim H-Y. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: effect size. Restor Dent Endod. 2015;40:328–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size-or why the p value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4:279–82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Abbenhardt C, McTiernan A, Alfano CM, Wener MH, Campbell KL, Duggan C, et al. Effects of individual and combined dietary weight loss and exercise interventions in postmenopausal women on adiponectin and leptin levels. J Intern Med. 2013;274:163–75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Jönsson T, Memon AA, Sundquist K, Sundquist J, Olsson S, Nalla A, et al. Digested wheat gluten inhibits binding between leptin and its receptor. BMC Biochem. 2015;16:3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Ségurel L, Austerlitz F, Toupance B, Gautier M, Kelley JL, Pasquet P, et al. Positive selection of protective variants for type 2 diabetes from the Neolithic onward: a case study in Central Asia. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21:1146–51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Ghoshal K, Bhattacharyya M. Adiponectin: probe of the molecular paradigm associating diabetes and obesity. World J Diabetes. 2015;6:151–66.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Wu Z, Cheng Y, Aung LHH, Li B. Association between adiponectin concentrations and cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e78485.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Ortega Moreno L, Copetti M, Fontana A, De Bonis C, Salvemini L, Trischitta V, et al. Evidence of a causal relationship between high serum adiponectin levels and increased cardiovascular mortality rate in patients with type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15:17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. OrtegaMoreno L, Lamacchia O, Salvemini L, De Bonis C, De Cosmo S, Cignarelli M, et al. The paradoxical association of adiponectin with mortality rate in patients with type 2 diabetes: evidence of synergism with kidney function. Atherosclerosis. 2016;245:222–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Singer JR, Palmas W, Teresi J, Weinstock R, Shea S, Luchsinger JA. Adiponectin and all-cause mortality in elderly people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:1858–63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Segal KR, Landt M, Klein S. Relationship between insulin sensitivity and plasma leptin concentration in lean and obese men. Diabetes. 1996;45:988–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Dagogo-Jack S, Fanelli C, Paramore D, Brothers J, Landt M. Plasma leptin and insulin relationships in obese and nonobese humans. Diabetes. 1996;45:695–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mittendorfer B, Horowitz JF, DePaoli AM, McCamish MA, Patterson BW, Klein S. Recombinant human leptin treatment does not improve insulin action in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2011;60:1474–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Petersen KF, Oral EA, Dufour S, Befroy D, Ariyan C, Yu C, et al. Leptin reverses insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis in patients with severe lipodystrophy. J Clin Invest. 2002;109:1345–50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Varady KA, Bhutani S, Klempel MC, Phillips SA. Improvements in vascular health by a low-fat diet, but not a high-fat diet, are mediated by changes in adipocyte biology. Nutr J. 2011;10:8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Ebbeling CB, Swain JF, Feldman HA, Wong WW, Hachey DL, Garcia-Lago E, et al. Effects of dietary composition on energy expenditure during weight-loss maintenance. JAMA. 2012;307:2627–34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Rajaie S, Azadbakht L, Saneei P, Khazaei M, Esmaillzadeh A. Comparative effects of carbohydrate versus fat restriction on serum levels of adipocytokines, markers of inflammation, and endothelial function among women with the metabolic syndrome: a randomized cross-over clinical trial. Ann Nutr Metab. 2013;63:159–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Heggen E, Klemsdal TO, Haugen F, Holme I, Tonstad S. Effect of a low-fat versus a low-gycemic-load diet on inflammatory biomarker and adipokine concentrations. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2012;10:437–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. de Luis DA, Aller R, Izaola O, de la Fuente B, Conde R, Sagrado MG, et al. Evaluation of weight loss and adipocytokines levels after two hypocaloric diets with different macronutrient distribution in obese subjects with rs9939609 gene variant. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012;28:663–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Jönsson T, Granfeldt Y, Erlanson-Albertsson C, Ahrén B, Lindeberg S. A paleolithic diet is more satiating per calorie than a Mediterranean-like diet in individuals with ischemic heart disease. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2010;7:85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Boers I, Muskiet FA, Berkelaar E, Schut E, Penders R, Hoenderdos K, et al. Favourable effects of consuming a Palaeolithic-type diet on characteristics of the metabolic syndrome: a randomized controlled pilot-study. Lipids Health Dis. 2014;13:160.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Mellberg C, Sandberg S, Ryberg M, Eriksson M, Brage S, Larsson C, et al. Long-term effects of a Palaeolithic-type diet in obese postmenopausal women: a 2-year randomized trial. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68:350–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Lindeberg S, Jönsson T, Granfeldt Y, Borgstrand E, Soffman J, Sjöström K, et al. A Palaeolithic diet improves glucose tolerance more than a Mediterranean-like diet in individuals with ischaemic heart disease. Diabetologia. 2007;50:1795–807.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Manheimer EW, van Zuuren EJ, Fedorowicz Z, Pijl H. Paleolithic nutrition for metabolic syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102:922–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Salas-Salvadó J, Guasch-Ferré M, Lee C-H, Estruch R, Clish CB, Ros E. Protective effects of the Mediterranean diet on type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Scand J Nutr. 2016;146:920S.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Ceriello A, Esposito K, La Sala L, Pujadas G, De Nigris V, Testa R, et al. The protective effect of the Mediterranean diet on endothelial resistance to GLP-1 in type 2 diabetes: a preliminary report. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014;13:140.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Carter P, Achana F, Troughton J, Gray LJ, Khunti K, Davies MJ. A Mediterranean diet improves HbA1c but not fasting blood glucose compared to alternative dietary strategies: a network meta-analysis. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014;27:280–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Lasa A, Miranda J, Bulló M, Casas R, Salas-Salvadó J, Larretxi I, et al. Comparative effect of two Mediterranean diets versus a low-fat diet on glycaemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68:767–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Kastorini C-M, Milionis HJ, Esposito K, Giugliano D, Goudevenos JA, Panagiotakos DB. The effect of Mediterranean diet on metabolic syndrome and its components: a meta-analysis of 50 studies and 534,906 individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1299–313.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Vinagre I, Sánchez-Quesada JL, Sánchez-Hernández J, Santos D, Ordoñez-Llanos J, De Leiva A, et al. Inflammatory biomarkers in type 2 diabetic patients: effect of glycemic control and impact of LDL subfraction phenotype. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014;13:34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Whalen KA, McCullough ML, Flanders WD, Hartman TJ, Judd S, Bostick RM. Paleolithic and Mediterranean diet pattern scores are inversely associated with biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative balance in adults. Scand J Nutr. 2016. doi:10.3945/jn.115.224048.
  47. Yokoyama Y, Barnard ND, Levin SM, Watanabe M. Vegetarian diets and glycemic control in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2014;4:373–82.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Ajala O, English P, Pinkney J. Systematic review and meta-analysis of different dietary approaches to the management of type 2 diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97:505–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016